http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52682
Bug #: 52682
Summary: [patch] gcc-4.7.0/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c doesn't compile
with old C compilers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52672
Meador Inge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.4 |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from Meador Inge 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
--- Comment #12 from michaelh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-23 02:19:51 UTC ---
Author: michaelh
Date: Fri Mar 23 02:19:46 2012
New Revision: 185724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185724
Log:
2012-03-16 Michael Hope
Bac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52601
--- Comment #5 from birender.singh at hotmail dot com 2012-03-23 02:08:08 UTC
---
Thanks, Eric Botcazou. I have compiled gcc-4.4.4 and installed successfully.
God bless you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52681
Bug #: 52681
Summary: [C++11] Using std::thread without -pthread crashes
without warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
Bug #: 52680
Summary: std::this_thread::sleep_for #ifdef'd out by
_GLIBCXX_USE_NANOSLEEP
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-23
01:07:00 UTC ---
Of course I meant "if you have something better to do ;)"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-23
01:05:26 UTC ---
Jason, I'm glad to work on this (if you don't have anything better to do ;) Any
tips for me? Shouldn't be so hard but I'm still a bit lost...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52487
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52487
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-23 00:58:15 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Mar 23 00:58:10 2012
New Revision: 185723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185723
Log:
/cp
2012-03-22 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11701
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52487
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-23 00:35:38 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Mar 23 00:35:33 2012
New Revision: 185722
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185722
Log:
/cp
2012-03-22 Paolo Carlini
PR
Dos dias COMPLETOS, 6 Expertos compartiendo con ud Informacion CLAVE
Congreso de Administración de Almacenes y Control de Inventarios
Mexico, D.F. 21 y 22 de Junio de 2012
Para poder descargar el folleto responda este correo con los siguientes
datos:
Nombre:
Empresa:
Telefono (Lada): (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-23
00:02:58 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Mar 23 00:02:47 2012
New Revision: 185717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185717
Log:
PR libstdc++/52433
* include/debug/safe_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn 2012-03-22
23:53:14 UTC ---
I recognize that a lot of FLOSS packages are developed on x86/Linux, but
POWER/AIX is not x86/Linux. Upon further consideration, I am concerned that
your proposal forces all applica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52663
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51907
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora 2012-03-22 22:32:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed. It happens for 32-bit and 64-bit targets
any progress?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #16 from Jim Michaels 2012-03-22
22:23:18 UTC ---
I realize it's going to be more complicated than this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52679
Bug #: 52679
Summary: ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11701
--- Comment #2 from Eelis 2012-03-22
21:56:17 UTC ---
For what it's worth: as the original reporter, I no longer care about this bug
(or typeof in general), because we now have C++11 with decltype. :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #15 from Jim Michaels 2012-03-22
21:54:16 UTC ---
oops, made amistake there.
if (-1==sign && 9223372036854775808==mantissa) {
datum=mantissa*sign;
} else if (1==sign && 9223372036854775808==mantissa) {
datum=mantissa;
} else
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #14 from Jim Michaels 2012-03-22
21:45:33 UTC ---
OK, given your argument, let's look at -32768 for a short.
it's just too big because 32768 is larger than the size of an int, so it's
considered unsigned, right? wrong. no warning me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678
Bug #: 52678
Summary: internal compiler error: in
vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at
tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
V
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596
--- Comment #9 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-22
21:39:51 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Mar 22 21:39:45 2012
New Revision: 185714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185714
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-03-02 Ka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48806
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-22
21:39:51 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Mar 22 21:39:45 2012
New Revision: 185714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185714
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-03-02 Ka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn 2012-03-22 21:23:46
UTC ---
Yes, one can re-engineer the GCC and libtool shared library build process on
AIX to try to make AIX look more like SVR4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-22
21:13:07 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 22 21:13:00 2012
New Revision: 185713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185713
Log:
2012-03-22 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-22
20:54:17 UTC ---
First off take:
9223372036854775808LL
It is too large to fit into a signed long long so it is assumed as unsigned.
That is what the warning is about.
What you have is:
- 922337
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52677
Bug #: 52677
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in build_vector_from_val, at
tree.c:1386 with -O -ftree-vectorize
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
Jim Michaels changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26949|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #8 from Michael Haubenwallner 2012-03-22 20:33:01 UTC ---
I'm still grafting some RFC for gcc-ml with more background info for the
not-so-experienced ones, however I don't mind to discuss that here - eventually
resulting in a better RF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52671
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
20:29:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 20:29:01 2012
New Revision: 185711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185711
Log:
PR c++/52671
* decl.c (check_tag_decl): Onl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52671
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
20:27:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 20:27:38 2012
New Revision: 185710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185710
Log:
PR c++/52671
* decl.c (check_tag_decl): Onl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52671
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
20:25:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 20:25:02 2012
New Revision: 185709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185709
Log:
PR c++/52671
* decl.c (check_tag_decl): Onl
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ppluzhni...@google.com
Using current SVN trunk "g++ (GCC) 4.8.0 20120322 (experimental)"
g++ -c -Wreturn-type t.cc
t.cc: In function ‘int fn1()’:
t.cc:27:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #11 from Jim Michaels 2012-03-22
20:10:33 UTC ---
OK... then why do these warnings only show up on constants which have an or LL
suffix?
I will show you a replacement test file shortly afterwards which has a 32-bit
number that does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52547
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52547
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
19:28:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 19:27:52 2012
New Revision: 185708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185708
Log:
PR middle-end/52547
* tree-nested.c (conver
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52547
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
19:25:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 19:25:36 2012
New Revision: 185707
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185707
Log:
PR middle-end/52547
* tree-nested.c (conver
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn 2012-03-22 19:02:23
UTC ---
Can you be a little more specific about how you want to use import files? You
seem to be associating them with -brtl, but that is a separate issue.
GCC -shared and AIX support share
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52674
Bug #: 52674
Summary: [4.7 regression] profiledbootstrap-lean failues on
Debian/SPARC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52673
Bug #: 52673
Summary: implement -fheap-arrays in gfortran
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-22
18:47:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I will refer you to this since you don't believe me.
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2ayc1sk0.aspx
I understand that but you are understanding wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-22
18:34:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 22 18:34:24 2012
New Revision: 185705
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185705
Log:
PR c++/52582
* method.c (implicitly_declar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #41 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-22
18:17:59 UTC ---
> Any plans w.r.t the fix to this problem?
Yes, I have plans, but less time unfortunately. But I'll definitely tackle it
during this stage #1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46539
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka 2012-03-22
17:12:28 UTC ---
I started to look into why the testcase does not fire on mainline. It seems to
be effect of change in early inliner. We used to inline intrusive_ptr_release
in early inlining ignoring
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #40 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-22 16:59:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Do we need to optimize for partial register stall?
xchg is enabled only for Pentium4, and this is not partial reg stall target.
BTW: According to the docs,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52666
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-22 17:04:12
UTC ---
FYI, this patch also fixed:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-2.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects
on alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52671
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
16:49:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 26958
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26958
gcc48-pr52671.patch
Untested fix.
unsigned long * ul_ptr;
void
foo (unsigned long ul)
{
((func_t)((ul_ptr)(((ul_ptr)0x0110)[14]))[0])(ul);
}
$ ./install/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc --version
arm-none-eabi-gcc (GCC) 4.6.4 20120322 (prerelease)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46539
Arnaud Desitter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnaud02 at users dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52671
Bug #: 52671
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with misplaced attribute on
enum
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52619
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-22
16:30:02 UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52626
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52669
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-03-22 16:24:41
UTC ---
Do we need to optimize for partial register stall?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52668
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52626
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2012-03-22 16:07:53 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Mar 22 16:07:47 2012
New Revision: 185699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185699
Log:
Fix pthread.h failure (PR other/52626)
PR other/526
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FIXME
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52670
Bug #: 52670
Summary: -mabi=ms generates bad code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52669
Bug #: 52669
Summary: No warning in unused private variable in modules
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52619
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Schuele 2012-03-22
15:36:42 UTC ---
Here is a testcase not including anything:
template
struct foo {
operator T() {
return T();
}
};
template
struct test {
foo x;
void bar() {
auto f = [this] {return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52508
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52488
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52484
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52496
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52499
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52505
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52506
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52507
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52506
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:32 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52507
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:12 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52668
Bug #: 52668
Summary: Incorrect warning emitted by gfortran 4.7.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52484
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:38 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52508
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:19 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:33 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52499
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:33 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52505
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:13 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:21 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52488
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:31 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:29 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52496
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
15:07:17 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 15:06:57 2012
New Revision: 185697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185697
Log:
libgcc/
Backport from 2012-03-07 mainline r185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52547
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #19 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
14:49:13 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 14:48:55 2012
New Revision: 185696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185696
Log:
Backport from 2012-03-20 mainline r185583.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka 2012-03-22
14:33:37 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Mar 22 14:33:27 2012
New Revision: 185694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185694
Log:
PR middle-end/51737
* cgraph.c (cgraph_rem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-22
14:27:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> But that is not correct: '&' might be overloaded for the type in question...]
If the diagnostics were improved for all types except for those with over
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #18 from Ralph Loader 2012-03-22
14:21:33 UTC ---
Flaws from the pretty-printing not listed in this bug (from 25362):
It takes the address of integer constants.
The pretty printing confuses '.' and '->' [this has changed slightly si
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52666
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52666
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-22
13:52:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 22 13:52:19 2012
New Revision: 185693
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185693
Log:
2012-03-22 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
