http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-04
07:52:24 UTC ---
> Attached is updated change for hpux10. Test results are here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02575.html
Does it change anything if you put a pragma Volatile in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52475
Bug #: 52475
Summary: option -imacros for fortran code is not supported
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #1 from wwieser at gmx dot de 2012-03-04 02:00:07 UTC ---
Maybe I should add, the arguments to GCC were:
avr-gcc -W -Wall -O2/-O0 -s -mmcu=atxmega192a3 ...
The target device in question is an ATXmega192A3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30521
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-04
01:44:32 UTC ---
We could do this at the tree level. First do add a late PHIOPT which does the
conversion to a COND_EXPR and then simplify a?b+1:b into a+b. Likewise for
a?b+2:b+1 to a+b+1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|RE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36797
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-04
00:55:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Mar 4 00:55:31 2012
New Revision: 184874
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184874
Log:
PR c++/36797
* mangle.c (write_expression)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32120
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-04
00:45:50 UTC ---
I might even have a patch for my tree combine branch later today. I still have
to connect up ssa_combine to SCCVN but that should not be hard.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35306
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-04
00:11:40 UTC ---
I have a patch which handles:
int bla(int a, int x, int y)
{
return (a & x)!=0 | (a & y)!=0;
}
But it does not handle the original case though. That is mostly because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16157
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-04
00:06:13 UTC ---
If we rewrite the code to be:
extern int a0, a1, a2, a3, a4;
extern int b0, b1, b2, b3, b4;
void f ()
{
/* this can be optimized to four additions... */
b4 = a4 + (a3 +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22586
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-09-17 08:00:30 |2012-03-03
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
Bug #: 52474
Summary: Regression: AVR-GCC: arithmetics produce completely
wrong result
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||32120
--- Comment #48 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52313
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52313
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2012-03-03 21:00:03 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Mar 3 20:59:58 2012
New Revision: 184864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184864
Log:
PR fortran/52313
* module.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473
Bug #: 52473
Summary: CSHIFT slow - inline it?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-03
19:38:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 26820
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26820
ice-memx.c: C source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52468
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
Bug #: 52472
Summary: ICE: in convert_debug_memory_address, at
cfgexpand.c:2491
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52471
Bug #: 52471
Summary: ICE bootstrapping GCC 4.7.0-20120302 on x86_64 OpenBSD
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-03
18:56:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Mar 3 18:55:57 2012
New Revision: 184863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184863
Log:
2012-03-03 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52470
--- Comment #1 from dcb 2012-03-03 18:01:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 26818
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26818
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52470
Bug #: 52470
Summary: ice in copy_binfo
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52469
--- Comment #1 from palott at gmail dot com 2012-03-03 16:35:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26817
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26817
simple example defining a function pointer interface and calling function
Defining func inte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20296
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52469
Bug #: 52469
Summary: Defining function pointer interface
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52383
--- Comment #3 from Thorsten Glaser 2012-03-03 15:50:06
UTC ---
Hrm. Building 4.6.3 now, to see whether it goes away.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-03 15:35:44 UTC ---
Attached is updated change for hpux10. Test results are here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02575.html
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36160
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52468
Bug #: 52468
Summary: Build failure for *-*-mingw32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29671
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28662
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||franke.daniel at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18989
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20296
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42146
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||darkdragon2000 at hotmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-03
14:11:34 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Mar 3 14:11:24 2012
New Revision: 184856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184856
Log:
2012-03-03 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44940
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26882
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr-unknown-none|avr-*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52467
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52467
Bug #: 52467
Summary: ICE: canonical types differ for int [0] and int [0]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-03
13:44:59 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Mar 3 13:44:52 2012
New Revision: 184855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184855
Log:
PR target/52425
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30677
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-03
12:32:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created attachment 26812 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> I've tested this patch again against rev 184764 (GCC 4.7) with
>
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.1[01], |i386-pc-solaris2.1[01],
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
Bug #: 52466
Summary: gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for
--target=lm32-rtems4.11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52313
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
Bug #: 52465
Summary: g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-03
08:40:36 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Mar 3 08:40:24 2012
New Revision: 184852
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184852
Log:
2012-03-03 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52387
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-03
08:10:14 UTC ---
See also new thread by Bob ("Fortran I/O (long)"):
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/003shg-vXis
55 matches
Mail list logo
