[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179 --- Comment #11 from Mike Stump 2012-02-23 04:56:55 UTC --- Ah, the better way to do that would be to have: AC_CHECK_FUNCS([pthread_get_stackaddr_np]) in configure.ac, and then just have #ifdef HAVE_PTHREAD_GET_STACKADDR_NP #define STACKBOTTOM

[Bug tree-optimization/52346] Two abs in a row is being optimized to just one on the tree level

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/52346] New: Two abs in a row is being optimized to just one on the tree level

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52346 Bug #: 52346 Summary: Two abs in a row is being optimized to just one on the tree level Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179 --- Comment #10 from Mike Stump 2012-02-23 04:34:30 UTC --- The proposed patch is wrong, the code is in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h, so the patch should change the ifdef DARWIN block there. I don't know why they have NO_PTHREAD_GET_STACK

[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

-4.7-20120222/boehm-gc/testsuite/boehm-gc.lib/lib.exp ... === boehm-gc Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes11 # of unexpected failures1 # of unsupported tests1 Are there any other darwin related changes upstream?

[Bug target/51835] ARM EABI violation when passing arguments to helper floating functions like __aeabi_d2iz

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51835 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52187] armeb-unknown-eabi not recognized as big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/52258] __builtin_isgreaterequal is sometimes signaling on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52258 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/52334] The user of "zero" register is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52334 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-23 01:10:57 UTC --- This is all speculation. We need a complete compilable testcase.

[Bug middle-end/52334] The user of "zero" register is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52334 --- Comment #5 from haichang417 2012-02-23 01:01:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #0) > > if( _find_port( g_pstv->member.pstid, index, > > (void*)&pstid) > > This bit looks like a strict-

[Bug libstdc++/43813] [DR1234] vector(3, NULL) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43813 Jeffrey Yasskin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW CC|

[Bug c/52290] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected function_decl, have var_decl in start_function, at c-decl.c:7712

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-22 23:24:07 UTC --- How about: Index: c-decl.c === --- c-decl.c(revision 184492) +++ c-decl.c(working copy) @@ -7702,7 +7702,8 @@ sta

[Bug c++/52343] [C++11] alias-definition dont work in `template` params type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrick.marlier at gmail

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 --- Comment #45 from Jing Yu 2012-02-22 22:26:45 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Wed Feb 22 22:26:40 2012 New Revision: 184494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184494 Log: 2012-02-21 Jing Yu Bakcport r175181, r177963,

[Bug other/49325] Incorrect target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325 --- Comment #5 from Jing Yu 2012-02-22 22:26:46 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Wed Feb 22 22:26:40 2012 New Revision: 184494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184494 Log: 2012-02-21 Jing Yu Bakcport r175181, r177963, r

[Bug target/50166] .init_array/.fini_array support doesn't work on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50166 --- Comment #8 from Jing Yu 2012-02-22 22:26:46 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Wed Feb 22 22:26:40 2012 New Revision: 184494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184494 Log: 2012-02-21 Jing Yu Bakcport r175181, r177963, r

[Bug other/46770] Replace .ctors/.dtors with .init_array/.fini_array on targets supporting them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770 --- Comment #73 from Jing Yu 2012-02-22 22:04:44 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Wed Feb 22 22:04:39 2012 New Revision: 184493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184493 Log: 2012-02-21 Jing Yu Google Ref 47894 Backpo

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 --- Comment #44 from Jing Yu 2012-02-22 22:04:45 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Wed Feb 22 22:04:39 2012 New Revision: 184493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184493 Log: 2012-02-21 Jing Yu Google Ref 47894 Backpo

[Bug other/49325] Incorrect target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325 --- Comment #4 from Jing Yu 2012-02-22 22:04:44 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Wed Feb 22 22:04:39 2012 New Revision: 184493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184493 Log: 2012-02-21 Jing Yu Google Ref 47894 Backpor

[Bug target/50166] .init_array/.fini_array support doesn't work on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50166 --- Comment #7 from Jing Yu 2012-02-22 22:04:44 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Wed Feb 22 22:04:39 2012 New Revision: 184493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184493 Log: 2012-02-21 Jing Yu Google Ref 47894 Backpor

[Bug tree-optimization/52345] Missed optimization dealing with bools

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52345 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52345] New: Missed optimization dealing with bools

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52345 Bug #: 52345 Summary: Missed optimization dealing with bools Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priori

[Bug libgcj/52344] New: [4.x regression] _Jv_platform_nanotime of win32.cc is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52344 Bug #: 52344 Summary: [4.x regression] _Jv_platform_nanotime of win32.cc is wrong Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-22 20:20:34 UTC --- On 02/22/12 14:08, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297 > > --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-22 > 20:08:46 UTC --- > (In repl

[Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-22 20:08:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > That's (essentially) independent of the target, as it's a pure testsuite > > issue. > > Tests that require linking with -litm s

[Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-22 20:00:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > That's (essentially) independent of the target, as it's a pure testsuite > issue. > Tests that require linking with -litm should go in libitm/testsuite ins

[Bug target/52330] pr50305.c: valgrind problem on invalid asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52316] Loops with floating-point iteration variables not optimized away, though result is not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52316 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/52330] pr50305.c: valgrind problem on invalid asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330 --- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 19:47:52 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Feb 22 19:47:42 2012 New Revision: 184492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184492 Log: PR target/52330 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/52330] pr50305.c: valgrind problem on invalid asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 19:42:23 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Feb 22 19:42:17 2012 New Revision: 184491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184491 Log: PR target/52330 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin 2012-02-22 19:25:45 UTC --- Bugzilla 4.2 has been released today. But overseers told me that bzr (Bazaar) cannot be installed on the server because it has a too old version of Python. As Bugzilla 4.0.x is the l

[Bug target/52330] pr50305.c: valgrind problem on invalid asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 19:17:47 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Feb 22 19:17:42 2012 New Revision: 184489 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184489 Log: PR target/52330 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/52330] pr50305.c: valgrind problem on invalid asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 19:12:14 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Feb 22 19:12:09 2012 New Revision: 184488 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184488 Log: PR target/52330 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/52250] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in sel_remove_bb, at sel-sched-ir.c:5213 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops -fselective-scheduling2 and other flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250 --- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-22 18:49:15 UTC --- I'll take a look on Friday, tomorrow I am off work. Indeed I do not remember seeing these notes at the assert time.

[Bug c++/52343] New: [C++11] alias-definition dont work in `template` params type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343 Bug #: 52343 Summary: [C++11] alias-definition dont work in `template` params type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52051] [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #14 from gee 2012-02-22 18:13:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Yes, this looks better IMHO. Btw any differences about libjava testsuite run > about this altered libffi patch? WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. Test

[Bug go/52342] New: 64-bit go.test/test/chan/doubleselect.go times out on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52342 Bug #: 52342 Summary: 64-bit go.test/test/chan/doubleselect.go times out on Solaris/SPARC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/52341] New: crypto/rand FAILs before Solaris 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52341 Bug #: 52341 Summary: crypto/rand FAILs before Solaris 11 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/52287] [4.7 regression] ICE in ready_remove_first, at haifa-sched.c:1927

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52335] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] I/O: -std=f95 rejects valid DELIM= in OPEN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-22 17:25:21 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Feb 22 17:25:11 2012 New Revision: 184485 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184485 Log: 2012-02-22 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/52

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -fdump-tree-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/52250] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in sel_remove_bb, at sel-sched-ir.c:5213 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops -fselective-scheduling2 and other flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug target/52238] -mms-bitfields: __attribute__ ((aligned (n))) ignored for struct members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52238 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jojelino at gmail dot com --- Comment #12 fro

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz 2012

[Bug target/52330] pr50305.c: valgrind problem on invalid asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Target|

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52321] poor diagnostic of invalid cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52321 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/52137] bdver2 scheduler needs to be added to bdver1 insn reservations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52137 Quentin Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/52287] [4.7 regression] ICE in ready_remove_first, at haifa-sched.c:1927

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug tree-optimization/52340] New: autopar (at least) corrupts dominance info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52340 Bug #: 52340 Summary: autopar (at least) corrupts dominance info Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Sev

[Bug target/49564] [cppcheck][patch] fixed resource and memory leaks in /gcc/gcc/config/alpha/host-osf.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22 14:20:29 UTC --- I think you can ignore it, that user has been posting comments on dozens of bugs that refer to the word "memory" anywhere in the title or comments: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/201

[Bug target/18145] Do not emit __do_copy_data or __do_clear_bss if .data or .bss is empty.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-22 14:14:03 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 22 14:13:48 2012 New Revision: 184481 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184481 Log: PR target/18145 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_as

[Bug target/49564] [cppcheck][patch] fixed resource and memory leaks in /gcc/gcc/config/alpha/host-osf.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564 --- Comment #2 from Martin Ettl 2012-02-22 14:16:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > so leack memory that it is disk Sorry, but what does this comment mean?

[Bug tree-optimization/19831] Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #12 f

[Bug ada/35372] Memory corruption at unchecked deallocation of the interface classwide type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35372 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/48840] [4.4/4.5 regression] assertion failure in reload1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug libgcj/16997] WeakHashMap leaks memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16997 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug other/27541] Support Cluster OpenMP (distributed-memory OpenMP)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27541 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug middle-end/12083] have builtin function comparing memory backwards

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12083 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug target/47754] [missed optimization] AVX allows unaligned memory operands but GCC uses unaligned load and register operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47754 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/32199] jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of 805021000 bytes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32199 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #14 f

[Bug target/40735] memory hog compiling big functions with -fPIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40735 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #16 f

[Bug tree-optimization/42587] bswap not recognized for memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42587 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug target/49564] [cppcheck][patch] fixed resource and memory leaks in /gcc/gcc/config/alpha/host-osf.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug middle-end/47344] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug fortran/49241] memory leak with lhs realloc of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug target/45937] unnecessary add/sub sp to reserve stack memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45937 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/49936] IRA handles CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS poorly, + spills to memory on 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #12 f

[Bug target/17306] function_vector attribute in H8300H/H8S

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17306 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/26388] Variable sized storage allocation should be promoted to stack allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26388 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug target/39222] out of memory bootstrapping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39222 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug fortran/38319] Memory leaks in allocatable component expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug c/28233] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:752

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28233 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug libgcj/24154] Make requires too much memory building libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24154 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug target/44141] Redundant loads and stores generated for AMD bdver1 target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug target/31667] Integer extensions vectorization could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31667 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug target/44490] X86 memory mismatch stall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44490 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug fortran/51175] Memory Leak with Transfer intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51175 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug libstdc++/24025] libstdc++ crashes when out of memory exception thrown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24025 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #10 f

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug c++/52339] using delete ptr1->ptr2 where ptr2 destructor deletes a const ptr1 fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52339 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22 12:48:04 UTC --- b = b.0; a = b->a; D.2361 = a->b; if (D.2361 != 0B) goto ; else goto ; : D.2364 = a->b; B::~B (D.2364); D.2365 = a->b; operator delete (D.2365);

[Bug c++/2316] g++ fails to overload on language linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #46 fr

[Bug target/36370] Is the sse2 psrlq insn accessible ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36370 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/21046] move memory allocation out of a loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21046 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug inline-asm/33451] Collapsing of offsetable memory operands.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33451 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug target/43988] unnecessary memory store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43988 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2012-0

[Bug middle-end/41043] [4.4 Regression] virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #16 f

[Bug libgcj/27031] native Eclipse uses too much memory on startup, sometimes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27031 xiaoyuanbo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug driver/30640] Memory leak in lang_specific_driver

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30640 --- Comment #1 from xiaoyuanbo 2012-02-22 12:27:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > in function lang_specific_driver, if shared gcclib is wanted, a new larger > memory block is allocated for the extra argument "-shared-libgcc". However, > the

[Bug c++/52337] memory hole

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337 --- Comment #7 from xiaoyuanbo 2012-02-22 12:24:54 UTC --- i tell you of cause context certainly vm is your keyword outside you consider but regular pascal refer the abiblity you can surppose a memory like gcc use or g++ it is that selector so yo

[Bug target/52338] shorter abs thumb2 code sequences

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52338 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Severity|normal

[Bug target/52338] shorter abs thumb2 code sequences

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52338 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/52329] Invalid MEM_REF encountered in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52329 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52337] memory hole

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22 11:22:14 UTC --- C++ is not memory safe, but I guess you know that (and that code probably shouldn't be run outside a VM)

[Bug middle-end/52329] Invalid MEM_REF encountered in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52329 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-22 11:21:53 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 22 11:21:48 2012 New Revision: 184466 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184466 Log: 2012-02-22 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug c++/52339] using delete ptr1->ptr2 where ptr2 destructor deletes a const ptr1 fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52339 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

  1   2   >