http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.5, 4.6.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
Target Mileston
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
ure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r184082-install
--program-prefix=r184082- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20120210 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
Bug #: 52208
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Useless store
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-11
01:10:48 UTC ---
Interestingly, aslr randomizes the gdb crash log. For instance...
# gdb ./gctest
(gdb) break mark.c:361
Breakpoint 1 at 0x20c49ba5e20a81: file
../../../gcc-4.7-20120209/boehm-gc/mark.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-11 00:10:13
UTC ---
Note that the C++ example must be compiled -fnon-call-exceptions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||52205
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-02-10 23:41:50
UTC ---
I think it is used to avoid '$" in operand.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207
Bug #: 52207
Summary: License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up
the licenses of many other documents.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206
Bug #: 52206
Summary: Strange %P in stack_tls_protect_set_ and movabs
patterns
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-10
23:35:15 UTC ---
Here is a C++ example (which comes from PR 52205 which I marked as a dup of
this bug):
#include
#include
#include
#include
void
die(const char* msg)
{
perror(msg);
exit(EXIT_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #9 from A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Bug #: 52205
Summary: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails
with -fnon-call-exceptions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-10 22:44:17 UTC ---
On 2/10/2012 5:41 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> There is only only one atomic instruction (ldcw).
Actually, loads and stores are also atomic and strongly ordered. But
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52204
Bug #: 52204
Summary: libiberty/at-file.texi has no copyright or license
statement whatsoever
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-10 22:41:42 UTC ---
On 2/10/2012 5:26 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
>
> Andrew Macleod changed:
>
> What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Bug #: 52203
Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at
sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining
-fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags
Classification: Uncl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200
--- Comment #3 from Boris Baldassari
2012-02-10 21:44:13 UTC ---
Confirmed, has twice download problems. Third was right.
Thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52202
Bug #: 52202
Summary: [C++11][DR 1376] Should not extend lifetime of
temporary wrapped in static_cast to reference type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
Bug #: 52201
Summary: FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for
excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200
--- Comment #1 from Boris Baldassari
2012-02-10 21:18:59 UTC ---
Well.. Actually I was NOT able to get them right with bzip2recover.
The gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz2 is corrupted as well. (other not-mentioned releases were
ok).
More information:
* Downl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200
Bug #: 52200
Summary: Archives of some old versions of gcc are corrupted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #15 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10
20:03:11 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Feb 10 20:03:08 2012
New Revision: 184113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184113
Log:
Add the testcase for PR 52146
Added:
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117
--- Comment #9 from steven hirshman 2012-02-10
20:00:47 UTC ---
Tobias
We have a problem in v4.6.2 with the following (using the std=f95 flag):
There seems to have been a limitation in past versions of gfortran with
allocatable components insid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-10 19:19:56
UTC ---
Hmm, I assume issue is related to using of -mms-bitfields for 4.7 for
windows-targets.
Does the following patch fix the issue?
Index: exception.cc
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux
AssignedTo|unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199
Bug #: 52199
Summary: V2DI vec_duplicate ICE on valid code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod 2012-02-10
18:37:22 UTC ---
Author: amacleod
Date: Fri Feb 10 18:37:18 2012
New Revision: 184112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184112
Log:
2012-02-10 Andrew MacLeod
PR c/52190
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
Janis Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10
18:23:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Feb 10 18:23:12 2012
New Revision: 184111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184111
Log:
Disallow negative constant address for x32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
--- Comment #30 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-10
18:20:50 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Fri Feb 10 18:20:43 2012
New Revision: 184110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184110
Log:
2012-02-10 Benjamin Kosnik
Jonatha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #39 from Rainer Orth 2012-02-10 18:10:19
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Feb 10 18:10:12 2012
New Revision: 184108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184108
Log:
Use __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION on Tru64 UNIX (PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-10 18:01:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> What if the CONST_INT is from DImode expansion instead of SImode?
> val_signbit_known_set_p would handle that, INTVAL () < 0 not.
I have tested this case, a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-10
17:51:19 UTC ---
> I don't understand this sentence completely - if the types have been merged
> then the COMPONENT_REFs should have been updated, too (do they only have
> "weak" matched types at the p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-10
17:48:42 UTC ---
What if the CONST_INT is from DImode expansion instead of SImode?
val_signbit_known_set_p would handle that, INTVAL () < 0 not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-10 17:42:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> HJ, Steffen, can you please test following patch instead:
val_signbit_known_set_p is a bit overkill, following patch works as well:
--cut here--
Index: i386
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-02-10 17:28:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> HJ, Steffen, can you please test following patch instead:
>
> --cut here--
> Index: i386/i386.c
> ===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-10 17:05:47
UTC ---
HJ, Steffen, can you please test following patch instead:
--cut here--
Index: i386/i386.c
===
--- i386/i386.c (revision 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #38 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 17:01:39 UTC ---
> --- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-07
> 09:22:29 UTC ---
> Rainer, you should now be able to define _GTHREAD_USE_MUTEX_INIT_FUNC and
> _GTHREAD_USE_C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
--- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-10
16:38:44 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Feb 10 16:38:37 2012
New Revision: 184102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184102
Log:
2012-02-10 Bill Schmidt
Ira Rose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-10 16:32:44
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Feb 10 16:32:36 2012
New Revision: 184101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184101
Log:
PR boehm-gc/48514
* include/gc_config_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-10 16:30:59
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Feb 10 16:30:47 2012
New Revision: 184100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184100
Log:
PR boehm-gc/48514
* include/gc_config_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-10
15:31:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 10 15:31:18 2012
New Revision: 184096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184096
Log:
PR middle-end/52177
* builtins.c (fold_buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 15:28:17 UTC ---
> With this fixed, all but the
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-load-int128.c -O0 -g thread simulation
> test
>
> failures (at all optimization levels) wer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52104
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 15:22:41 UTC ---
> --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-06
> 21:37:09 UTC ---
> please let me know what issues remain on Solaris after r183920
Solaris 8/9 works again, b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33919
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-10
15:10:54 UTC ---
So, can you from your build log paste the command to compile var-tracking.c
with the stage2 gcc and rerun it in the gcc subdir with additional
-fcompare-debug option? It might be a -f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52186
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52198
Bug #: 52198
Summary: SLP vectorization does not consider swapped operands
consistently
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #5 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-02-10
14:35:12 UTC ---
Same for gcc-4.7-20120204.
Is this snapshot after r183751?
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc47/work/build'
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o dif
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52192
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 13:59:12 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-09
> 20:01:41 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #0)
>> needs to link with -lthread for __tls_get_addr. -pthread knows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52197
Bug #: 52197
Summary: library cannot be rebuilt by make all-target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536
--- Comment #8 from Duncan Sands 2012-02-10
12:34:21 UTC ---
Author: baldrick
Date: Fri Feb 10 12:34:17 2012
New Revision: 184090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184090
Log:
Backport the fix for PR tree-optimization/49536 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-10
12:31:24 UTC ---
Yes, it looks OK to me. Thanks!
Perhaps we will eventually need to give up on this sanity check as the
transformations we do to callgraph gets more general...
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE|[4.7 Regression] ICE when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #8 from Steffen Schmidt
2012-02-10 12:23:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 26636 [details]
> A patch
I've tried the patch, it applied cleanly, but unfortunately it had no effect on
the generated code.
The gcc b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-10
12:21:24 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Feb 10 12:21:16 2012
New Revision: 184089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184089
Log:
PR middle-end/48600
* predict.c (predict_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-10
11:31:22 UTC ---
i.e #undef _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-10
11:29:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> * Default to --disable-threads on Solaris 8/9 to avoid breaking symbol
> versioning. That's my current preference, but certainly requires
> documentatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-10
11:27:39 UTC ---
What happens is that cgraph_materialize_clone on the _ZN1BIcEC2E1Ai.constprop.1
clone performs:
2451 if (!node->clone_of->analyzed && !node->clone_of->clones)
2452{
2453 cgra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-10
11:25:35 UTC ---
This change:
--- baseline_symbols.txt2012-01-23 19:01:03.590486000 +0100
+++ baseline_symbols.txt.s8g2012-01-23 19:03:38.063402000 +0100
@@ -2176,0 +2177 @@
+FUNC:_ZSt16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-10
11:23:49 UTC ---
Then simply don't export it? It's a template instantiation after all.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52193
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52193
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-10
11:10:12 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 10 11:10:04 2012
New Revision: 184086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184086
Log:
2012-02-10 Richard Guenther
PR transla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-10
10:33:33 UTC ---
This is related to same body aliases. The verification fails because IPA-CP
decides to cgraph_redirect_edge_callee a call_stmt that calls a same_body_alias
of B::B(A, int) (__comp_cto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 10:24:36 UTC ---
> caused libstdc++.so symbol versioning to be broken on Solaris. Before the
> patch,
> when compiling locale-const.cc only contains references and definitions of
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-10 10:14:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 26636 [details]
> A patch
This should be implemented in constant_address_p.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52196
Bug #: 52196
Summary: Add -Wrealloc-lhs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52195
--- Comment #3 from nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 08:21:40
UTC ---
Oh, because simply doing:
namespace std
{
using ::stdout;
using ::stderr;
using ::stdin;
}
seemed to work fine for me on both linux and windows so I t
95 matches
Mail list logo
