http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51035
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44776
--- Comment #16 from Gary Funck 2012-02-08 07:23:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> We're seeing a similar failure under openSUSE 12.1 running as a VM, which may
> have a somewhat constrained memory environment.
We built with trunk version 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44776
--- Comment #15 from Gary Funck 2012-02-08 07:14:29
UTC ---
We're seeing a similar failure under openSUSE 12.1 running as a VM, which may
have a somewhat constrained memory environment.
*** glibc detected ***
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/[...]/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51035
Alexander Basov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coopht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Marlier
2012-02-08 03:38:24 UTC ---
Proposed fix here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00321.html
All comments (and tests) are welcome!
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
Bug #: 52166
Summary: c++0x required to import standard c++ headers?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Bug #: 52165
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in add_var_loc_to_decl, at
dwarf2out.c:5430 building libgo on s390/s390x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2012-02-07
23:03:15 UTC ---
running a rebuild to get a backtrace ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Bug #: 52164
Summary: [4.7 Regression] libjava build failure on
arm-linux-gnuabi, configured for softfp float ABI
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Bug #: 52163
Summary: [4.7 regression] 64bit powerpc libgcc is missing
exported symbols
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-07 22:39:48 UTC ---
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:52:39PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
>
> --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
> 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29846
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162
Bug #: 52162
Summary: Bogus -fcheck=bounds with realloc on assignment to
unallocated LHS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2012-02-07 22:00:12 UTC
---
Created attachment 26606
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26606
tarball of ltrans temporaries that reproduce this bug, from Ubuntu source
package for qemu-linaro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-07 21:52:39 UTC ---
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:26:01PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> > Yes, this is problem.
>
> So confirmed.
>
Yes, and I'm currently regression testing a patch (should
be c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52161
Bug #: 52161
Summary: Internal compiler errors with -fcheck=bounds in
coarray tests
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52160
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-07
21:44:42 UTC ---
Here is what GCC produces:
.loc 1 7 0
leaq-4(%rbp), %rax
movq%rax, %rsi
movl$.LC1, %edi
movl$0, %eax
call__isoc99_scanf
jmp.L2
.L5:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|operator new[] can return |[DR 624] operator new[] can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437
--- Comment #20 from Thorsten Glaser 2012-02-07 21:24:33
UTC ---
Just a reminder that the bug (which Mikael kindly begun to analyse) still
happens on the 4.6 branch and, as he said it, is most likely only masked on
4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52160
Bug #: 52160
Summary: gdb ignores line "bar: if(foo)goto bar;"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-07
21:15:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
While I haven't done a full bootstrap, applying the patch from comment 6 and
remaking the current build reduces the libitm failures to just...
FAIL: libitm.c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24001
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33158
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||10050
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21462
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||10050
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-07
21:05:24 UTC ---
Note this optimized I think is invalid with the C11/C++11 memory model.
returned exit code 2
matt@matt-desktop:~/src/qemu-linaro-1.0.50-2012.01$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120207 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158
Bug #: 52158
Summary: Regression on character function with gfortran 4.7
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52157
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, TREE
Blo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52157
Bug #: 52157
Summary: Missing FRE because of sign change
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-15 04:47:37 |2012-02-07 0:00
--- Comment #2 from Andre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43673
Ryan S. Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52156
Bug #: 52156
Summary: add warning for allocated array being converted to
pointer to base
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52155
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-07 19:23:40 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Feb 7 19:23:35 2012
New Revision: 183979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183979
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/52155
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-07 19:18:33 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Feb 7 19:18:27 2012
New Revision: 183978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183978
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/52152
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24306
--- Comment #19 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-07 19:15:15 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Feb 7 19:15:10 2012
New Revision: 183977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183977
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/24306
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-07 19:15:15 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Feb 7 19:15:10 2012
New Revision: 183977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183977
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/24306
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52155
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips*-*-elf*
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52155
Bug #: 52155
Summary: loongson.h requires -flax-vector-conversions with
newlib targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mipsisa*-*-elf*
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154
Bug #: 52154
Summary: va_arg with empty aligned structure fails for MIPS
EABI32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
Bug #: 52153
Summary: REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips*-*-elf*
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152
Bug #: 52152
Summary: MIPS ELF targets should use dbxelf.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
18:17:33 UTC ---
Yes, love to see a patch. I think the argument is important to get right, as
otherwise the next bug to track down will be much harder to find (I call this
bug pushing). If y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-07 18:09:45 UTC ---
> Please look at gcc.log files in your testsuite directory. There are extensive
> single-instruction traces to analyse what went wrong. Comparing your traces to
> l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-07
17:54:18 UTC ---
> You know perfectly well that such a proof is practically impossible:
> that would mean updating a machine through every single Solaris 8/9/10
> kernel/libc/libthread patch ever relea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2012-02-07
17:53:14 UTC ---
We were *supposed* to already be disallowing inlining of tm_pure
into non-tm_pure functions. At least that's what I remember...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-07
17:42:41 UTC ---
The profiling code forgot to remove the * from the assembly name it looks like.
The * means it is defined.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Bug #: 52151
Summary: Segfault with realloc on assignment and RESHAPE to
unallocated LHS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-07 17:29:37 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-07
> 17:12:26 UTC ---
>> I'm quite upset about this because the only reason for that reversion
>> he's given so far is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
Bug #: 52150
Summary: [4.7 regression] junk at end of line in Firefox PGO
build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
* expr.c (get_inner_reference): If there is an offset, add a negative
bit position to it (if any).
Added:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120207-1.c
- copied unchanged from r183974,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120207-1.c
Modified:
branches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-07
17:23:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Further investigation shows that the issue appears only when inheritance from
> the template class (class B : private A) is provided explicitly. According
* expr.c (get_inner_reference): If there is an offset, add a negative
bit position to it (if any).
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120207-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/expr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52141
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2012-02-07
17:15:41 UTC ---
It is a compiler error, because we're supposed to have handled
a transaction involving asms differently, earlier in compilation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-07 16:59:32 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-07
> 15:37:54 UTC ---
> Only sparc-sun-solaris2.10 is a primary target at the moment. Rainer, you
> say "regressio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117
--- Comment #8 from steven hirshman 2012-02-07
16:18:33 UTC ---
Thank you. I didn't catch the PAUSE problem. It now runs correctly with the
-std=f95 flag, which is what we'll use.
Thanks for your helpful responses.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #9 from Quentin Neill 2012-02-07
16:17:35 UTC ---
Author: qneill
Date: Tue Feb 7 16:17:26 2012
New Revision: 183973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183973
Log:
2012-02-07 Quentin Neill
Backport from mai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-07
15:48:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 7 15:48:52 2012
New Revision: 183972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183972
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52060
* combine.c (try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-07
15:48:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> The problem appears to be due to the exception region on a cc0 setter, which
> separates it from the cc0 consumer:
>
> (insn 4013 4012 8164 949 (set (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52132
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51950
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149
--- Comment #2 from Greta Yorsh 2012-02-07
14:40:17 UTC ---
This patch fixes the problem. Thank you!
-- Greta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-07
14:36:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> It compiles/links with the -std:f95 flag, but gives the same wrong results
> [qsh@swim SIESTA]$ gfortran -std=f95 reshape.f90
> reshape.f90:37.11:
> PA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26603|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149
Bug #: 52149
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52147
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-07
12:29:24 UTC ---
largest regression:
trunk -O2:
TOTAL : 29.47 3.0632.61
678947 kB
4.6.3-pre -O2:
TOTAL : 23.56 3.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26602|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
--- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-07 11:48:41
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Feb 7 11:48:34 2012
New Revision: 183965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183965
Log:
2012-02-07 Kai Tietz
Dave Korn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117
--- Comment #6 from hirshmansp at ornl dot gov 2012-02-07 11:43:29 UTC ---
Tobias
Here are the answers to your questions:
[qsh@swim SIESTA]$ gfortran -v|&grep -E 'gcc version|Target'
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
gcc version 4.6.2 20111027 (Red
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-07
11:42:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 26602
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26602
gcc47-pr52139.patch
Ugh, this is ugly. The main problem is that delete_insn/remove_insn refuse to
r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148
--- Comment #1 from Michal Hlavinka 2012-02-07
10:58:56 UTC ---
note: looks similar to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52025
but compared to both bugs above, adding -fno-caller-save
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
