[Bug tree-optimization/52091] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2012-02-04 Thread irar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091 --- Comment #8 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-05 05:58:22 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Feb 5 05:58:18 2012 New Revision: 183902 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183902 Log: PR tree-optimization/52091

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

2012-02-04 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #23 from gee 2012-02-05 02:43:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > Breakpoint 9, _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) > at ../.././libgcc/unwind.inc:88 > 88uw_init_context (&this_context); > (gdb) bt > #0 _Unwind_RaiseE

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

2012-02-04 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #22 from gee 2012-02-05 02:11:12 UTC --- Breakpoint 9, _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) at ../.././libgcc/unwind.inc:88 88uw_init_context (&this_context); (gdb) bt #0 _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) at ../.././l

[Bug libstdc++/52119] numeric_limits::min() is not a constant expression

2012-02-04 Thread jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2012-02-05 02:04:00 UTC --- I hadn't tested #define __glibcxx_min(T) \ (__glibcxx_signed (T) ? -__glibcxx_max(T) - 1 : (T)0) but now I have, and it works with clang.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

2012-02-04 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #21 from gee 2012-02-05 01:22:36 UTC --- Created attachment 26574 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26574 proposed patch for workaround TestEarlyGC failure it deals raw closure stub with thiscall calling convention.

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-04 22:58:06 UTC --- Jon, interesting

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-04 22:54:51 UTC --- But using decltype((o<

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-04 22:53:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Yesterday I was wondering: is there something in C++11 saying explicitly > > that > > these tricks are allowed, > In N3242, 1

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-04 22:49:17 UTC --- Thanks Daniel. Ben, I know SFINAE ;) what I was looking for is something *in the library* chapters saying somehow explicitly that for overload resolution purposes or other QoI purpose

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 --- Comment #5 from Ben Longbons 2012-02-04 22:36:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yesterday I was wondering: is there something in C++11 saying explicitly that > these tricks are allowed, In N3242, 14.8.2/{7,8}

[Bug fortran/48847] Wrong "unused parameter" warning with interface block

2012-02-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48847 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler 2012-02-04 21:44:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (PS: Daniel tweaked tuple_cat the same way) There is a difference here: For tuple_cat we have a user constraint that says that the template argument shall

[Bug bootstrap/38035] GCC 4.3.2 Make fails on ubuntu - configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files

2012-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38035 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49246] bootstrap comparison failure with 174455 on OpenBSD

2012-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49246 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug pch/39618] trunk revision 145459 - The configure of libstdc++-v3 hangs while checking for PCH support

2012-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39618 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsg at openbsd dot org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug bootstrap/49209] unresolved references to fatal() while linking xgcc and cpp

2012-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49209 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/37888] make install fails attempting to build gcc/intl.c

2012-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/42735] Error: symbol `pread64' is already defined

2012-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42735 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-04 20:39:58 UTC --- (PS: Daniel tweaked tuple_cat the same way)

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug tree-optimization/51528] [4.6 Regression] SRA should not create BOOLEAN_TYPE replacements

2012-02-04 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

2012-02-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52116] pragma GCC diagnostic only acts on some lines

2012-02-04 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52116 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-04 18:41:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > ah, got home where I have a bunch of versions ... Since this is not a regression and GCC 4.7 is close to release, I don't think this will be fixed bef

[Bug c/52116] pragma GCC diagnostic only acts on some lines

2012-02-04 Thread b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52116 --- Comment #2 from Ben Longbons 2012-02-04 18:30:46 UTC --- ah, got home where I have a bunch of versions ... GCC < 4.6 fail with error: #pragma GCC diagnostic not allowed inside functions GCC 4.6.{0,1,2}, branch-4.6 r183147, and trunk r182496

[Bug rtl-optimization/52095] [4.7 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/sms-7.c: SEGV in fprintf

2012-02-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52095 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52095] [4.7 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/sms-7.c: SEGV in fprintf

2012-02-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52095 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-04 16:51:37 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 4 16:51:31 2012 New Revision: 183895 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183895 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52095 * modulo-sched.c

[Bug target/52124] New: config/cr16/cr16.c: possibly redundant code

2012-02-04 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52124 Bug #: 52124 Summary: config/cr16/cr16.c: possibly redundant code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug libstdc++/51365] cannot use final empty class in std::tuple

2012-02-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug ada/52123] New: [4.7] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

2012-02-04 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 Bug #: 52123 Summary: [4.7] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

2012-02-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #53 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-04 13:38:57 UTC --- I did think about fixincludes, but that would undef PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER for everyone, whereas we only really need to undef the gthr equivalent to stop libstdc++ usin

[Bug target/52122] New: [4.6.x/4.7] incorrect ln -s replacement for mingw like targets in configure files

2012-02-04 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122 Bug #: 52122 Summary: [4.6.x/4.7] incorrect ln -s replacement for mingw like targets in configure files Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Statu

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-02-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-04 12:47:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 4 12:47:55 2012 New Revision: 183894 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183894 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52113 * lower-subreg.c

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

2012-02-04 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #20 from gee 2012-02-04 11:32:07 UTC --- Created attachment 26573 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26573 proposed patch for workaround Throw_2 failure it was call %ebx for sig_pat. and Throw_2 test passed with this

[Bug libstdc++/51649] pretty printers don't handle std::__7:: namespace

2012-02-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649 --- Comment #10 from Pawel Sikora 2012-02-04 11:26:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Author: tromey > Date: Mon Jan 30 16:25:11 2012 > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183732 could you backport this for 4.6 ?

[Bug c/52116] pragma GCC diagnostic only acts on some lines

2012-02-04 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52116 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52116] pragma GCC diagnostic only acts on some lines

2012-02-04 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52116 --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-04 11:09:44 UTC --- Created attachment 26572 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26572 patch to fix (2) I am not surprised. Location information in GCC is not very precise. Have you

[Bug fortran/52111] [OOP] procedure pointer with polymorphic passed dummy argument

2012-02-04 Thread nagl46 at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52111 --- Comment #4 from alexander tismer 2012-02-04 11:02:55 UTC --- I think you are right. Thanks again for your helpful annotations. But I'm not sure if I understand everything correctly. >> Thus, the compiler is not required to diagnose it - and

[Bug libstdc++/52119] numeric_limits::min() is not a constant expression

2012-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug bootstrap/41709] Failing bootstrap in stage 2 while building Ada + C

2012-02-04 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41709 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/52119] numeric_limits::min() is not a constant expression

2012-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52103] need a finer control over -Woverloaded-virtual

2012-02-04 Thread mlg7 at yandex dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52103 --- Comment #3 from mlg 2012-02-04 09:50:39 UTC --- > You can use C++11 explicit override control Since it is a lot of existing code, I'm afraid I'd have to have _them_ used override 5 or 10 or so years ago.