[Bug middle-end/52048] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fcompare-debug -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-30 07:52:12 UTC --- Probably tail-merge bug, looking into it.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2012-01-30 07:29:28 UTC --- Hmm, not sure if you already noticed it, but ffi_call supports by recent patch thiscall/fastcall convention. So parts of you patch won't apply mainline.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26499|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug libgcj/51901] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-30 07:15:28 UTC --- Comment on attachment 26512 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 invalid attachment. please ignore it.

[Bug libgcj/51901] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #3 from gee 2012-01-30 07:14:42 UTC --- Created attachment 26512 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 FAIL: TestClosureGC output FAIL: libjava.jar/TestClosureGC.jar executio

[Bug rtl-optimization/52051] [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 --- Comment #1 from gee 2012-01-30 04:17:43 UTC --- in dump.zip, filename with prefix 0 : without -O flag with prefix 1 : with -O flag.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52051] New: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 Bug #: 52051 Summary: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/52050] Want an option to warn about a declaration inside a for/while/if statements.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050 --- Comment #4 from Mans Rullgard 2012-01-30 00:45:05 UTC --- I'm not here to argue semantics. I use -Wdeclaration-after-statement to avoid accidentally introducing code that will fail with compilers that do not support this. Having an equivale

[Bug c/52050] Want an option to warn about a declaration inside a for/while/if statements.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Summary|-Wdeclarati

[Bug target/52049] SH Target: Inefficient constant address access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52049 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-01-30 00:15:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I'm not sure whether this is actually a problem of the SH back-end or of some > middle-end passes. It happens for all sub-targets and regardless of the >

[Bug c++/51910] [4.7 Regression] -frepo linking failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 --- Comment #17 from Sandra Loosemore 2012-01-30 00:12:53 UTC --- Cleaned up version of patch, with Jason's test case. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01591.html

[Bug middle-end/52045] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1748 with -O3 -ftracer -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce and stpcpy_chk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52045 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/51875] FAIL: gfortran.dg/guality/pr41558.f90 -O0 line 7 s == 'foo'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-01-29 23:56:44 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Jan 29 23:56:38 2012 New Revision: 183688 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183688 Log: PR testsuite/51875 * gfortran.dg/gual

[Bug middle-end/52048] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fcompare-debug -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/52048] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fcompare-debug -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46057] Most stackalign tests fail on hppa-hpux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 23:43:48 UTC --- On 29-Jan-12, at 6:16 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > So, fixed? Or suspended? Not fixed. The stack alignment would need adjustment in main. The HP-UX runtime on

[Bug c/52050] -Wdeclaration-after-statement does not warn on declaration in for loop initialiser

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050 --- Comment #2 from Mans Rullgard 2012-01-29 23:34:12 UTC --- I tested and found it failing with 3.4.6, 4.1.2, 4.2.4, 4.3.6, 4.4.6, 4.5.3, and 4.6.2.

[Bug c/52050] -Wdeclaration-after-statement does not warn on declaration in for loop initialiser

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 23:23:56 UTC --- On 29-Jan-12, at 6:05 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799 > > Steven Bosscher changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug target/51920] 64-bit gcc.target/sparc/vec-init-1-vis1.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/52046] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid operands in ternary operation with -O -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46057] Most stackalign tests fail on hppa-hpux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/44581] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44581 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/38384] shared link/execute fails for cross gcc from linux to target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/29421] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-2.c scan-tree-dump-not \n candidates .*,.*,.*\n[^\n]*\nFinal cost fails

||steven at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-01-29 23:09:08 UTC --- Does not FAIL in "Results for 4.6.3 20120129 (prerelease) [gcc-4_6-branch revision 183674] (GCC) testsuite on hppa64-hp-hpux

[Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/16150] libstdc++ testsuite failures on pa64 (GNU linker)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16150 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/8026] -fstack-check dumps when throw out of scope with

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8026 --- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher 2012-01-29 22:50:28 UTC --- The GCC 4.1.1 install comes from a depot that contains "GNU_C_C++_64". Unfortunately I can't see if this is a stock FSF build or something changed by the HP porting centre.

[Bug c/52050] New: -Wdeclaration-after-statement does not warn on declaration in for loop initialiser

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050 Bug #: 52050 Summary: -Wdeclaration-after-statement does not warn on declaration in for loop initialiser Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Stat

[Bug target/8026] -fstack-check dumps when throw out of scope with

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8026 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2012-01-29 CC|

[Bug target/7625] gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-29 22:36:34 UTC --- That gdb session in comment 18 makes no sense, owns_lock can't call trylock. Your sources don't match your lib. I thought this was a problem with WARNING: program timed out. I didn

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-29 22:25:02 UTC --- At least we should change "has not external linkage" to proper English, that's annoyed me for some time ;)

[Bug libstdc++/52040] TR1 is not accessible using compiler flags alone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-29 22:22:07 UTC --- We discussed this years ago, GCC's interpretation is valid, WONTFIX.

[Bug target/52049] New: SH Target: Inefficient constant address access

h-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20120129 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/51327] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51327] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 21:43:00 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Jan 29 21:42:56 2012 New Revision: 183685 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183685 Log: /cp 2012-01-29 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51327] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 21:41:58 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Jan 29 21:41:54 2012 New Revision: 183684 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183684 Log: /cp 2012-01-29 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug middle-end/52048] New: [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fcompare-debug -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048 Bug #: 52048 Summary: [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fcompare-debug -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-dominator-opts Classification: Unclassified Produ

[Bug target/51920] 64-bit gcc.target/sparc/vec-init-1-vis1.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/41600] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Arrays not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 20:54:38 UTC --- Status: Comment 1 is fixed by the just committed patch of comment 8. TODO: The test case of comment 0: Once as is, once with "CLASS IS" instead of "TYPE IS" - and also with empty "SEL

[Bug fortran/41600] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Arrays not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 20:51:22 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Jan 29 20:51:19 2012 New Revision: 183682 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183682 Log: 2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/41

[Bug fortran/51972] [OOP] Wrong code as _copy does not honor CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51972] [OOP] Wrong code as _copy does not honor CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 20:02:25 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Jan 29 20:02:19 2012 New Revision: 183680 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183680 Log: 2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/51

[Bug tree-optimization/52037] [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-29 19:41:40 UTC --- Actually, I've used a slightly different testcase (a random shuffle of the contents of the @testcase input file) for the bisection and unfortunately the original testcase still f

[Bug middle-end/52047] New: [trans-mem] ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2270) with -O -fgnu-tm -fprefetch-loop-arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52047 Bug #: 52047 Summary: [trans-mem] ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2270) with -O -fgnu-tm -fprefetch-loop-arrays Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/51808] Improve handling of ISO_C_BINDING binding names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-01-29 19:01:14 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sun Jan 29 19:01:09 2012 New Revision: 183679 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183679 Log: PR 51808 Constify binding_label. 2012-01-29 Janne

[Bug middle-end/52046] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid operands in ternary operation with -O -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046 Bug #: 52046 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid operands in ternary operation with -O -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -ftree-vectorize Classification:

[Bug fortran/52044] [OOP] Invalid memory access with ALLOCATE, default initializer and polymorphic array components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52044 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/51754] [OOP] ICE on valid with class arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 18:49:10 UTC --- When fixed, correctness check should be added to test3() of the test case submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00252.html

[Bug middle-end/52045] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1748 with -O3 -ftracer -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce and stpcpy_chk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52045 Bug #: 52045 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1748 with -O3 -ftracer -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce and stpcpy_chk() Classification: Unc

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51812] [4.7 regression] Virtual public inheritance and thunks leads to "undefined reference" in header files.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812 --- Comment #9 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2012-01-29 18:30:43 UTC --- Thanks :-)

[Bug libstdc++/52040] TR1 is not accessible using compiler flags alone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52037] [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/52044] New: [OOP] Invalid memory access with ALLOCATE, default initializer and polymorphic array components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52044 Bug #: 52044 Summary: [OOP] Invalid memory access with ALLOCATE, default initializer and polymorphic array components Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/49857] Put constant switch-tables into flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2

[Bug c++/52043] New: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in tsubst_copy (pt.c:12081) with -Wreturn-type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52043 Bug #: 52043 Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in tsubst_copy (pt.c:12081) with -Wreturn-type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

[Bug fortran/51808] Improve handling of ISO_C_BINDING binding names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-01-29 17:41:54 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sun Jan 29 17:41:49 2012 New Revision: 183678 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183678 Log: PR 51808 Fix ChangeLog entry Modified: trunk/gc

[Bug fortran/51947] [OOP]Polymorphic coarrays: Bogus errors for dummy arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51947 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler 2012-01-29 17:28:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > However compilation still fails if pi is given internal linkage by declaring > it > static, i.e. > > int main() > { > static constexpr float pi = 3.14;

[Bug libstdc++/51967] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 17:27:24 UTC --- On 23-Jan-12, at 10:39 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > do the printers ever work, outside the testsuite? No. Need to study the gdb build for this target. It looks

[Bug fortran/51808] Improve handling of ISO_C_BINDING binding names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49857] Put constant switch-tables into flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug fortran/51808] Improve handling of ISO_C_BINDING binding names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-01-29 17:19:38 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sun Jan 29 17:19:32 2012 New Revision: 183677 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183677 Log: PR 51808 Support arbitrarily long bind(C) binding la

[Bug libitm/52042] New: libitm.c/clone-1.c and libitm.c/stackundo.c execution tests are not pie compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 Bug #: 52042 Summary: libitm.c/clone-1.c and libitm.c/stackundo.c execution tests are not pie compatible Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Stat

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kay 2012-01-29 16:24:29 UTC --- Oops! You're quite right, pi is automatic in my test case. However compilation still fails if pi is given internal linkage by declaring it static, i.e. int main() { static constexpr

[Bug target/51106] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:2314

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106 Ryan Hill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth 2012-01-29 15:54:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > could you also let me know what the value of > HAVE_AS_TLS > is in gcc/auto-host.h Both the darwin10 build (without this problem) and the darwin11 build (

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe 2012-01-29 15:37:45 UTC --- could you also let me know what the value of HAVE_AS_TLS is in gcc/auto-host.h

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth 2012-01-29 15:30:12 UTC --- Here is a single stepping through 30_threads/try_lock/3.cc at -m64... (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x10cd0: file /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-20120126/libstdc++-v

[Bug tree-optimization/49857] Put constant switch-tables into flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |tree-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/51754] [OOP] ICE on valid with class arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-29 14:53:50 UTC --- Created attachment 26505 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26505 This fixes the class_41 failure with the previous patch This fixes the failure describe above but reg

[Bug fortran/51754] [OOP] ICE on valid with class arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-29 14:51:48 UTC --- Created attachment 26504 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26504 This fixes the ice-on-valid of comment #0 This patch (extracted from PR50981 comment #28) fixes the I

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-29 14:44:55 UTC --- Created attachment 26503 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26503 bzipped preprocessed file for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3 AFAICT the only differences be

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-29 14:42:13 UTC --- Created attachment 26502 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26502 bzipped assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3 Assembler generated by /opt/gcc/p_bui

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-29 14:36:29 UTC --- Created attachment 26501 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26501 Assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 2 Assembler generated by /opt/gcc/p_build/stage

[Bug bootstrap/52041] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

apper Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 Configured with: ../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java,ada,lto --with-gmp=/opt/mp --with-system-zlib --with-cloog=/opt/mp --enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-lto Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20

[Bug libstdc++/52040] New: TR1 is not accessible using compiler flags alone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040 Bug #: 52040 Summary: TR1 is not accessible using compiler flags alone Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug bootstrap/52039] New: gcc/gimplify.o differs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039 Bug #: 52039 Summary: gcc/gimplify.o differs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46321] [OOP] Polymorphic deallocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 14:06:41 UTC --- Remember also to update the component handling, cf. PR 51972 comment 3.

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug tree-optimization/52037] [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-29 13:56:10 UTC --- Created attachment 26500 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26500 lto testcase % /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto1 -quiet -O1 -fltrans test.o In

[Bug tree-optimization/52037] [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-29 13:17:12 UTC --- -O2 -finline-functions -fipa-cp-clone -flto=4 or -O1 -findirect-inlining -fipa-cp -finline-small-functions -finline-functions -fipa-cp-clone -flto=4 also fails.

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-29 12:20:56 UTC --- > As written in comment 27, if it is only used in resolve.c, not a prototype but > "static" should be used. AFAICT it could also be used in gcc/fortran/expr.c (as changed in r

[Bug c++/51930] [4.7 regression] Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 Philipp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #33 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 12:17:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > Using 'symbol_as' without prototypes, as in comment #28, breaks bootstrap when > configured with '--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx' (see pr52038). As w

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-29 12:09:57 UTC --- Using 'symbol_as' without prototypes, as in comment #28, breaks bootstrap when configured with '--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx' (see pr52038).

[Bug fortran/52038] [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no previous prototype for 'symbol_as'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/52038] [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no previous prototype for 'symbol_as'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 11:59:59 UTC --- FIXED on the trunk (4.7). Thanks for the report! (In reply to comment #1) > Added (accidentally) with Rev. 183620 of 2012-01-27 (That's for PR 52016.)

[Bug fortran/52038] [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no previous prototype for 'symbol_as'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52038] [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no previous prototype for 'symbol_as'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-29 11:56:23 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Jan 29 11:56:18 2012 New Revision: 183675 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183675 Log: 2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/52

[Bug fortran/52038] [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no previous prototype for 'symbol_as'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52037] [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-29 11:32:59 UTC --- I've uploaded the slim-lto files here: http://trippelsdorf.de/testcase.tar.bz2 To reproduce just run: % g++ @testcase -flto=4 -O3

[Bug tree-optimization/52037] [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-29 11:14:19 UTC --- -flto-partition=none is fine and every optimization level !=-O3, too.

[Bug fortran/52038] New: [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no previous prototype for 'symbol_as'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038 Bug #: 52038 Summary: [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no previous prototype for 'symbol_as' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Statu

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26338|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-29 10:38:59 UTC --- This one is evidently due to the reference-counted nature of our string class, and is also very, very old. It will go away automagically when we'll move to no-reference-counting for C

[Bug tree-optimization/52037] New: [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037 Bug #: 52037 Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

  1   2   >