[Bug bootstrap/52007] configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52007 --- Comment #11 from chilaka 2012-01-28 07:18:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > You need to have follow the directorions for building a cross sysroot or have > a > sysroot already built. ../gcc-4.3.0/configure --target=ia64-redhat-linux

[Bug c++/38543] [C++0x] Cannot specialize variadic template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/41561] [C++0x] warning on a large hex literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41561 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/47791] finish function is using literal value instead of a #defined one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47791 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50261] [C++0x] ICE on brace-initialize an array member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50261 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/50370] [C++0x] Multiple declarations with default template arguments accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50370 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50080] [DR 468] error: 'template' (as a disambiguator) is only allowed within templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50080 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50080] [C++0x] error: 'template' (as a disambiguator) is only allowed within templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50080 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-28 05:46:23 UTC --- Note typename was PR 22154.

[Bug c++/43453] Initialization of char array with string literal fails in mem-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43453 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target|i686-pc-

[Bug bootstrap/50245] Compile of cross compiler for M68HC11 fails in libgcc, "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50245 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||m68hc11 Severity|blocker

[Bug pch/39618] trunk revision 145459 - The configure of libstdc++-v3 hangs while checking for PCH support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39618 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|i386-unknown-ope

[Bug bootstrap/43046] gcc fails to build libgcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43046 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/48556] Gcc 4.6.0 bootstrap fails with in-tree GMP/MPFR/MPC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48556 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/45573] --enable-build-with-cxx failures with ld: crtbegin.o: No such file: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45573 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/42474] SIGSEGV in linemap_lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42474 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/40650] gcc-4.5-20090702 won't build on OS X 10.5 with GMP/MPFR in-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40650 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/44079] Bootstrap error about elf_getshdrstrndx when configure script does not detect elf_getshdrstrndx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44079 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/36481] gcc fails to build on Solaris x86 - it forgets the locations of libmpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36481 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/42666] xgcc: Internal error: segmentation violation (program cc1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42666 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/42028] Bootstrap fails for mpfr/gmp not in LD_LIBRARY_PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42028 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.kirkby at onetel dot

[Bug bootstrap/42028] Bootstrap fails for mpfr/gmp not in LD_LIBRARY_PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42028 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/32272] make exit because build/genmodes.exe doesn't exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/39572] x86_64-*-openbsd* is not supported yet

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39572 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc > gcc-4.2.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37739 --- Comment #39 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-28 04:54:28 UTC --- *** Bug 39173 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/39173] PR37739 (bootstrap failure) applies to 4.3.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39173 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/37606] builtins.c: 6 * set but not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37606 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/37308] bootstrap hangs in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37308 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52026] [c++0x] g++: Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/36687] g++ can not compile dbcheck.cpp of MythTV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36687 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/36272] Please add support for google-breakpad or build own system.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/52007] configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52007 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/52007] configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52007 chilaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/35380] ICE with attribute 'aligned' in template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35380 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/34434] internal compiler error: in insert_save, at caller-save.c:725

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34434 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug go/47656] libgo.so has writable executable stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47656 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Hill 2012-01-28 03:44:37 UTC --- Thanks. I'm guessing this builtin is new for 4.7?

[Bug c++/52026] New: [c++0x] g++: Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 Bug #: 52026 Summary: [c++0x] g++: Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/34434] internal compiler error: in insert_save, at caller-save.c:725

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34434 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Severity|majo

[Bug target/33517] bit field cause an internal compiler error: in schedule_region

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33517 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/33966] Revision 129625 caused 11% slowdown on 200.sixtrack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33966 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/33070] Bootstrap comparison failure between stage2/3 but no objdump differences

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33070 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/32080] Can goto a function try-block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32080 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCONF

[Bug tree-optimization/32825] Reduction with nonzero start (arbitrary also) causes an extra add to happen

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32825 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/32657] libjava/classpath/external/jsr166/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicLong.java fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32657 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Stat

[Bug middle-end/32003] Undocumened -fdump-tree options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/31986] conversion-type-id should match in both contexts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, wrong-code S

[Bug bootstrap/31963] The configure option "--enable-stage1-checking" is undocumented (and incorrectly named)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31963 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/30497] compiling binutils 2.17 on aix fails with gcc 4.1.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30497 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-28 02:25:34 UTC --- stwu r3, -8(r29) is what that instruction supposed to be ...

[Bug target/48634] Missed optimization for use of __builtin_ctzll() and __builtin_clzll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48634 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-28 02:20:52 UTC --- I think this is a dup of bug 29776.

[Bug target/29775] redundant movzbl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29775 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-28 02:20:32 UTC --- I think this is a dup of bug 29776.

[Bug other/31778] genattrtab.c doesn't record filename

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/31889] compiler misses opportunity to combine multiple identical function return paths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31889 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/52006] [4.7 Regression] ARM ICE with incorrectly peepholed tls_load_dot_plus_eight

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52006 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52006] [4.7 Regression] ARM ICE with incorrectly peepholed tls_load_dot_plus_eight

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52006 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-28 00:29:15 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jan 28 00:29:11 2012 New Revision: 183661 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183661 Log: PR target/52006 * config/arm/arm.md (pic_ad

[Bug go/47656] libgo.so has writable executable stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47656 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|4.6.0

[Bug c++/51936] template function not instantiated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51936 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #26 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 23:30:41 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Jan 27 23:30:28 2012 New Revision: 183655 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183655 Log: 2012-01-27 Paolo Carlini PR lib

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||52025 --- Comment #17 from Georg-Johan

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-01-27 23:26:39 UTC --- I should add: as a matter of ABI compatibility with programs doing what stddef.h does for max_align_t (double fields using __attribute__((__aligned__(__alignof__(dou

[Bug c++/51910] [4.7 Regression] -frepo linking failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 --- Comment #15 from Sandra Loosemore 2012-01-27 23:22:45 UTC --- I've just dug around in the code a bit and I think we can fix this. I don't have a build tree to use for this set up at the moment, but roughly: the loop to attempt relinking aft

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-27 23:20:03 UTC --- Created attachment 26486 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26486 main-loop.c (maybe related from PR52025) This is a small test case from PR52025 generates strang

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 --- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-01-27 23:12:38 UTC --- I don't think the test programs here are strictly conforming - the offset could be bigger than the alignment, and alignments are values "representing the number of b

[Bug rtl-optimization/52025] caller-saves triggers a frame without need

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52025 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-27 23:08:34 UTC --- Created attachment 26485 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26485 main-loop.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/52025] caller-saves triggers a frame without need

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52025 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52025] New: caller-saves triggers a frame without need

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52025 Bug #: 52025 Summary: caller-saves triggers a frame without need Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, ra

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 --- Comment #9 from bruno at clisp dot org 2012-01-27 22:39:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > What happens if you have the attribute packed on the structure? Attribute 'packed' is outside the scope of ISO C11. We're discussing ISO C11 complian

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #25 from Marc Glisse 2012-01-27 22:32:17 UTC --- On the other hand, you can test the boost implementation without looking at the code and notice the assertion failure if you ask for uint32_t (with uint64_t, there is enough space to do

[Bug go/47656] libgo.so has writable executable stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47656 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 22:25:06 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Jan 27 22:25:02 2012 New Revision: 183650 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183650 Log: compiler: Use new __builtin_init_heap_trampo

[Bug fortran/51754] [OOP] ICE on valid with class arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-27 22:15:48 UTC --- Trunk r183622 now gives pr51754.f90:19.15: BGet => self%componentB(1) 1 Error: Pointer assignment target is neither TARGET nor POINTER at (1) (r183618 g

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 eggert at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUP

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #24 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-27 22:01:14 UTC --- There aren't if afterwards you don't submit a patch to GCC ;) Seriously, I'm pretty sure that there are many implementations around and Boost would be by and large ok, but normally it

[Bug fortran/52024] [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 --- Comment #1 from Fran Martinez Fadrique 2012-01-27 21:56:34 UTC --- Created attachment 26484 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26484 Test case driver

[Bug fortran/52024] New: [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52024 Bug #: 52024 Summary: [OOP] GENERIC operator cannot be resolved Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug testsuite/52011] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-*.o assemble, -flto -fgnu-tm in 32 bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52011 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/52011] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-*.o assemble, -flto -fgnu-tm in 32 bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52011 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-27 21:53:47 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Fri Jan 27 21:53:40 2012 New Revision: 183648 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183648 Log: PR testsuite/52011 * gcc.dg/lto/tra

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #23 from spoon.reloaded at gmail dot com 2012-01-27 21:52:48 UTC --- By the way, the Boost library also has an implementation of this. Are there any problems with the license to look at it?

[Bug c/10360] __alignof__(double) answer 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10360 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-27 21:49:59 UTC --- *** Bug 52023 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 eggert at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUP

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-27 21:43:50 UTC --- Thanks for the link!

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-27 21:42:53 UTC --- Paolo, not Paulo, by the way. Sure, you are right, I didn't personally write these bits of random and for years I simply trusted the documentation which doesn't point to any restricti

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #20 from spoon.reloaded at gmail dot com 2012-01-27 21:39:11 UTC --- Someone posted a thread here: http://objectmix.com/java/312426-extending-schrage-multiplication.html about ways to overcome the preconditions of Shrage's algorithm. Ma

[Bug libstdc++/51795] linear_congruential_engine doesn't work correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795 --- Comment #19 from spoon.reloaded at gmail dot com 2012-01-27 21:21:40 UTC --- Paulo, in response to your suggestion to simply do multiplication and modulo in #7 and #8, I don't think that would work in general. The example I gave happened to hav

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-27 21:13:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) It gets even worse with the following two structures: struct { double d; char i; double d1; int i1; }; struct { char i; double d; char i1; dou

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-27 21:09:53 UTC --- One more comment about _Alignof and structures. Take the following two structures on powerpc-aix (and on powerpc-darwin): struct { double d; int i; }; struct { int i; double d

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pins

[Bug c/10360] __alignof__(double) answer 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10360 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eggert at gnu dot org --- Comment #7 from

[Bug c/10360] __alignof__(double) answer 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10360 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 bruno at clisp dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruno at clisp dot org --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52022] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong-code with procedures passed as actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52022 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-27 20:26:12 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 27 20:26:03 2012 New Revision: 183644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183644 Log: PR libstdc++/51798 * config/cpu/generic/at

[Bug c++/51910] [4.7 Regression] -frepo linking failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-27 20:24:14 UTC --- As can be seen from Jason's example, -frepo option is unfortunately not mandatory on the link line when some objects have been compiled with -frepo. And collect2 seems to work by runn

[Bug c++/51910] [4.7 Regression] -frepo linking failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 --- Comment #13 from Sandra Loosemore 2012-01-27 20:14:22 UTC --- Sigh. I think it would be OK to make -frepo imply --no-demangle, and document that this is the case. If my previous patch is reverted, that'll still leave -frepo broken on Window

[Bug fortran/52022] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong-code with procedures passed as actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52022 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-27 20:12:00 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 27 20:11:51 2012 New Revision: 183643 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183643 Log: 2012-01-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/52

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #21 from Nathan Ridge 2012-01-27 19:44:54 UTC --- The testcase and my original program now compile successfully. Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #23

[Bug target/52023] _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug c/52023] New: _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023 Bug #: 52023 Summary: _Alignof (double) yields wrong value on x86 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priorit

  1   2   >