http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcaz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-12
06:54:04 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jan 12 06:53:59 2012
New Revision: 183121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183121
Log:
2012-01-12 Dominique d'Humieres
Tob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51057
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-12
06:54:03 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jan 12 06:53:59 2012
New Revision: 183121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183121
Log:
2012-01-12 Dominique d'Humieres
To
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51834
Bug #: 51834
Summary: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions
with multiple side effects are used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23856
--- Comment #2 from Ranjit Mathew 2012-01-12
06:25:13 UTC ---
Sorry, I haven't worked on GCC/GCJ/Classpath in a long
time, so I wouldn't know if this bug still exists or
even makes sense. :-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51833
Richard Eames changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Eames
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51833
--- Comment #1 from Richard Eames 2012-01-12
05:31:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 26304
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26304
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51833
Bug #: 51833
Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11333
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51565
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|AS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51565
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-12
02:30:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 12 02:30:47 2012
New Revision: 183120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183120
Log:
PR c++/51565
* call.c (standard_conversion)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832
Bug #: 51832
Summary: [4.7 regression] Rev.182970 causes LTO link errors
(multiple definitions of allocator_traits)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28685
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-04-30 15:12:57 |2012-01-11
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51831
Bug #: 51831
Summary: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:5375
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829
--- Comment #2 from Seth Heeren 2012-01-12 00:30:36 UTC
---
To clarify, the valid code that was rejected looks like:
auto expr = boost::spirit::qi::eps(false) | '1';
this might explain the 'strange' breaking up into e1 and e2 for the minim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #18 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-11
23:31:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I think the proper solution is to remove the trans-stmt.c manual scalarization
> and handle somewhere in trans-{array,expr}.c the array bounds.
>
Some of i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51796
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-11
22:59:16 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 11 22:59:12 2012
New Revision: 183111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183111
Log:
PR bootstrap/51796
* combine.c (distribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-01-11 22:54:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It looks like target issue after all. I'm preparing a patch with following
OTOH, if the pattern says that it outputs to DImode pair (i.e. %eax/%edx, then
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642
--- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2012-01-11
22:37:33 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Jan 11 22:37:26 2012
New Revision: 183110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183110
Log:
gcc:
2012-01-11 Bill Schmidt
PR tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-11
22:32:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> libgfortran/intrinsics/unpack_generic.c: In function 'unpack_internal':
The warnings are bogus - assuming that "dim > 0" - as:
if (ret->data == NULL)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51124
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-11 21:45:35 UTC ---
> --- Comment #15 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-10
> 17:53:25 UTC ---
> Folks, I am going to close this PR since it is a potpourri of failures across
> different architectures,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51830
Bug #: 51830
Summary: FAIL: libitm.c/mem(cpy|set)-1.c execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829
--- Comment #1 from Seth Heeren 2012-01-11 21:32:11 UTC
---
Created attachment 26302
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26302
(gz) preprocessed source for the minimal testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe 2012-01-11 21:31:19
UTC ---
we have the source - it looks like inherited stdlib from FreeBSD.
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-498.1.7/stdlib/getenv-fbsd.c
however, more debugging is going to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829
Bug #: 51829
Summary: decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |x86_64-apple-darwin*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-11
21:05:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I also see
> ../../../work/libgfortran/caf/libcaf.h:80:6: warning: no previous prototype
> for
> '_gfortran_caf_critical' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> ../../../
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51565
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828
Bug #: 51828
Summary: libgfortran build warnings
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51818
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51613
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51818
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-11
20:26:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 11 20:26:44 2012
New Revision: 183107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183107
Log:
PR c++/51818
* mangle.c (find_substitution)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20696
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827
Bug #: 51827
Summary: Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration,
with PCH/LTO/C++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51826
Bug #: 51826
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_nontype_argument,
at cp/pt.c:5408
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-11 18:15:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Note, can't be reproduced on the trunk, the strcmp isn't DCEd there, but guess
> the problem is just latent there.
>
> It looks like a target bug t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-11
17:48:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I've just tried it with the vendor cxx (first disabling noexcept for C++
> < 2011), and it also fails with EINVAL.
Well that's something vaguely positiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-11 17:37:59 UTC ---
> --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-11
> 16:50:09 UTC ---
> Regarding the remaining failures, it appears to be a front-end issue. Fixing
> it
> in th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
--- Comment #28 from davidxl 2012-01-11 17:26:46
UTC ---
See comment 24 for shorter test case.
Summary:
1) the regression reported by Oleg in gcc4_6 and earlier versions is due to FE
code generation difference which lead to the backend to gener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-11
17:23:54 UTC ---
On closer inspection, no I can't reproduce this.
The outer transaction has correct PHI nodes with values dependent on whether
the transaction got aborted/restarted or whether we fell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-01-11
16:52:13 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:52:03 2012
New Revision: 183101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183101
Log:
gcc:
2012-01-11 Bill Schmidt
PR tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-11
16:50:09 UTC ---
Regarding the remaining failures, it appears to be a front-end issue. Fixing it
in the library could be done with an autoconf macro to detect that the testcase
in comment 13 works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51613
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-11
16:47:05 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:46:57 2012
New Revision: 183099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183099
Log:
PR c++/51613
* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_uni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-11 16:30:03 UTC ---
Great, thanks.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24943
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-11 16:29:48 UTC ---
On 1/11/2012 9:54 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is this still an issue?
>
Yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-11
16:27:58 UTC ---
I have some ideas for PR 51772 which would also be relevant to this bug, and
wouldn't affect other platforms.
I'll see what I can do over the next few days
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Tobler 2012-01-11
16:23:57 UTC ---
Author: andreast
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:23:48 2012
New Revision: 183096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183096
Log:
2012-01-11 Bruce Korb
Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #48 from Steve Kargl
2012-01-11 16:23:14 UTC ---
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:49:41AM +, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> This is the CL I prepared:
>
> 2012-01-11 Bruce Korb
> Steven G. Kargl
> Andreas T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51800
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-11
16:06:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> There is an additional issue for initialization of characters:
> subroutine sub(n)
> character(len=n) :: str
That was simpler that I had hoped for:
s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-11
15:59:43 UTC ---
I can work on it for GCC 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8081
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |accepts-invalid,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8081
--- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-11
15:53:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 21374 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21374
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse 2012-01-11
15:46:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> We could specialize reverse_iterator on a trait that says the extra member
> isn't needed, and then make that trait true for all iterator types defined in
> th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18649
--- Comment #8 from bucreev_1 at mail dot ru 2012-01-11 15:26:45 UTC ---
There are no questions. Just to inform you that in version of gcc 4.5.2. this
example does not work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|reverse iterator|[DR 198] reverse iterator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse 2012-01-11
15:16:58 UTC ---
Paolo started a discussion on this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-11/msg00089.html
but apparently the code wasn't changed. It is really sad that in most cases the
size of reverse_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825
Bug #: 51825
Summary: Fortran runtime error: Cannot match namelist object
name
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-01-11 15:13:39 UTC ---
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
>
> Aldy Hernandez changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25295
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51800
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-11
15:03:42 UTC ---
Draft patch.
There is an additional issue for initialization of characters:
subroutine sub(n)
character(len=n) :: str
except that no initializer seems to be applied if the str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25160
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25126
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|libstdc++ not s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24944
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24943
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-11 14:53:57 UTC ---
On 1/11/2012 9:09 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is this still an issue?
I'll have to check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24842
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24801
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24698
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24573
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24332
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24201
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24194
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24128
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24085
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24000
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23901
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-11
14:37:27 UTC ---
That change was present as early as the Feb 2004 draft, n1577
Also related: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#1052
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23856
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23810
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #47 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-11 14:31:15 UTC ---
To eliminate any possible ambiguity, the patch is "approved"
On 01/10/12 23:49, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
>
> Andrea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23800
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23756
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i486-linux-gnu |i?86-linux-gnu
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23750
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23686
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
