http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51751
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-01-06
02:14:13 UTC ---
The problem appears to be in the test routine zdrvgb, at line
639 (and following) of zdrvgb.f, where the contents of the array
s contain zero for powerpc64 and very low values for x86_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51504
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-06
01:26:12 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 6 01:26:06 2012
New Revision: 182943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182943
Log:
PR libstdc++/51504
* doc/xml/manual/debug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51067
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||silver24k at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47549
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51772
Bug #: 51772
Summary: --enable-clocale=generic makes unsafe assumptions
about ctype_base::mask
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47304
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47302
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47294
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #1 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 23:48:36 UTC ---
Author: torvald
Date: Thu Jan 5 23:48:30 2012
New Revision: 182937
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182937
Log:
Mark transaction begin as returns-twic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Last reconfirmed|20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Bug #: 51771
Summary: trans-mem: abnormal edges get lost or corrupted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14842
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15457
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682
--- Comment #2 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-01-05 23:09:22 UTC ---
A candidate fix has been submitted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00276.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-21 03:49:53 |2012-01-04
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:52:22 |2012-01-04
CC|gcc-bugs at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-01-05
23:00:25 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Jan 5 23:00:14 2012
New Revision: 182935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182935
Log:
PR c++/51541 - ICE with invalid identifier in alia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21991
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51018
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
* tree-sra.c (tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p): New predicate.
(build_accesses_from_assign): Use it instead of tree_non_aligned_mem_p.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120105-1.c
- copied unchanged from r182932,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture
* tree-sra.c (tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p): New predicate.
(build_accesses_from_assign): Use it instead of tree_non_aligned_mem_p.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120105-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-sra.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51681
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51681
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 21:50:25 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jan 5 21:50:20 2012
New Revision: 182931
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182931
Log:
PR target/51681
* config/ia64/ia64.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51742
--- Comment #4 from Steven Schweda 2012-01-05
21:18:21 UTC ---
> The back story on this [...]
A somewhat condensed test case (1.6MB) should now be available here:
http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/unzip610c08_sx.tgz
The READ_ME file ther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51763
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-aix5.3
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51762
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51762
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
20:47:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 20:47:16 2012
New Revision: 182924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182924
Log:
PR debug/51762
* calls.c (emit_call_1): For
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
20:21:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 20:20:57 2012
New Revision: 182922
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182922
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51767
* cfgrtl.c (force
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
20:18:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 20:18:15 2012
New Revision: 182921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182921
Log:
PR middle-end/51768
* stmt.c (check_unique_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7|[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51770
Bug #: 51770
Summary: dump gimple lineno when dumping bb
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
19:54:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 19:54:16 2012
New Revision: 182920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182920
Log:
PR middle-end/44777
* profile.c (branch_pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-05
19:34:08 UTC ---
OK, so the problem is separating the actual two builtins, not that profiling
would choke on the multiple returns now?
In that case I think the patch is OK (otherwise I would be concerned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-05
19:25:19 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Jan 5 19:25:14 2012
New Revision: 182919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182919
Log:
PR middle-end/49710
* cfgloopmanip.c (remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
--- Comment #22 from davidxl 2012-01-05 18:54:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> But can't a valid code also compare the result from realloc with the old
> pointer, and if they are equal, do something, otherwise do something else?
> I think i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
--- Comment #20 from davidxl 2012-01-05 18:11:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
> >
> > --- Comment #18 from davidxl 2012-01-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
17:48:11 UTC ---
Ramana (or some other ARM maintainer), could you please try to implement this?
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
17:41:47 UTC ---
Ian, ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936
--- Comment #10 from Sandra Loosemore
2012-01-05 17:31:39 UTC ---
My notes are that the unnecessary register moves in the loop have been present
since at least GCC 4.3, so it is not a 4.6->4.7 regression, at least.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-05 17:16:21 UTC ---
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
> 09:41:13 UTC ---
> Can't reproduce on x86_64-linux, nor with cross from that to
> i686-sun-solaris2.11 with -m64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-05
17:13:02 UTC ---
private inheritance doesn't mean the destructor can't be called with the wrong
static type
class Foo {
public:
~Foo() {}
virtual void f() { }
};
class Bar : private Foo {
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-06-28 01:34:16 |2012-01-05
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541
--- Comment #1 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-01-05 16:58:29 UTC ---
A candidate fix has been posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00256.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2012-01-05
16:16:29 UTC ---
I can reproduce the segfault when compiling both the testcase from
comment #8 and the original unreduced test case on the 4.6 branch but
not on my trunk checkout (revision 182785). I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51769
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2012-01-05 16:03:06 UTC
---
Created attachment 26255
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26255
pre-processed source of the file that triggers the ICE
commandline to trigger the ICE with the attach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51769
Bug #: 51769
Summary: bootstrap fails when using -O2 -funswitch-loops
-floop-flatten
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168
--- Comment #4 from Frederick Roth 2012-01-05
15:55:30 UTC ---
this still happens with version 4.6.2. Can someone reconfirm this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768
Bug #: 51768
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid asm goto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50490
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-05
15:44:01 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 5 15:43:54 2012
New Revision: 182917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182917
Log:
2012-01-05 Richard Guenther
PR lto/504
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42283
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51294
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james.kanze at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767
Bug #: 51767
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with degenerated asm goto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
15:10:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 15:10:26 2012
New Revision: 182914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182914
Log:
PR middle-end/51761
* gimple.h (struct gimp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-05
15:08:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 5 15:08:42 2012
New Revision: 182913
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182913
Log:
2012-01-05 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51766
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51766
Bug #: 51766
Summary: [4.7 regression] sync_fetch_and_xxx atomicity
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50490
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765
Bug #: 51765
Summary: Testsuite ICEs with -flto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-05
14:51:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 26252
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26252
Another failing variant, with pointers
This is not fixed by the patch above.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-05
14:50:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 26250
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26250
Another failing variant, with allocatables
This is not fixed by the patch above.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-05
14:30:15 UTC ---
Ok, I'm a complete neophyte on this, but that seems very restrictive. Does
that mean that basically we can't hoist any loads inside a transaction...ever?
__transaction_atomic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51638
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-05
14:26:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > Fortran code is invalid.
> This code is like it is since its first commit on 11-Jun-93
This does not mean that was and/or is valid. Newer compilers tend t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51171
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51171
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-05
14:14:34 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu Jan 5 14:14:29 2012
New Revision: 182911
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182911
Log:
PR other/51171
* testsuite/libitm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-05
14:11:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> At the moment I'm confused, however, because I don't understand if the
> patch linked by Manuel in PR51294 (maybe we can consolidate these two issues)
> was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-05 14:03:22
UTC ---
OK.
Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29615
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764
Bug #: 51764
Summary: mudflap does not work with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51685
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-05
13:41:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 5 13:41:34 2012
New Revision: 182909
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182909
Log:
2012-01-05 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
