[Bug c++/51320] gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 --- Comment #7 from Andris Pavenis 2011-11-27 07:36:29 UTC --- Tested with native compiler for DJGPP both versions 2.03r2 and 2.04 pre. Compiles OK for both with and without optimization enabled (tried without, with -O2 and with -O3). I tested in

[Bug c/51321] __builtin_types_compatible_p (any_type_t[1][], any_other_type_t) crashes GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51321 --- Comment #1 from Herman Narkaytis 2011-11-27 07:27:23 UTC --- gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.

[Bug c/51321] New: __builtin_types_compatible_p (any_type_t[1][], any_other_type_t) crashes GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51321 Bug #: 51321 Summary: __builtin_types_compatible_p (any_type_t[1][], any_other_type_t) crashes GCC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UN

[Bug c++/51320] gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 Andris Pavenis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andris.pavenis at iki dot

[Bug c++/51320] gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 --- Comment #5 from Jim Michaels 2011-11-27 06:14:52 UTC --- additional interesting stuff: the file initializer_list is not anywhere in the compiler. so why should I not simply get a simple error line instead of a compiler internal error?

[Bug c++/51320] gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 --- Comment #4 from Jim Michaels 2011-11-27 06:09:12 UTC --- djgpp has a problem with the new 4.6.2 compiler where it is unable to generate any temp files with -save-temps. sorry.

[Bug c++/51320] gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 --- Comment #3 from Jim Michaels 2011-11-27 05:39:06 UTC --- Created attachment 25918 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25918 test.cpp error output from gxx

[Bug c++/51320] gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 --- Comment #2 from Jim Michaels 2011-11-27 05:27:54 UTC --- Created attachment 25917 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25917 test.cpp small discrete test case small discrete test case which seems to do the same thing. assigns

[Bug c++/51320] gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 --- Comment #1 from Jim Michaels 2011-11-27 03:04:44 UTC --- Created attachment 25916 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25916 .cpp file self-contained program source code. uses c++11 (c++0x) features such as initializer lists.

[Bug c++/51320] New: gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51320 Bug #: 51320 Summary: gcc internal compiler error (program cc1plus) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug ada/51307] [4.7 Regression] s-taprop.adb:676:25: "CLOCK_RT_Ada" not declared in "OS_Constants"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51316] alignof doesn't work with arrays of unknown bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-11-26 23:11:11 UTC --- Note that this usage is not valid in C1X.

[Bug gcov-profile/51297] [4.7 regression] Many gcov tests FAIL on Tru64, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51297 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned a

[Bug c/51256] ICE with invalid parameter for __atomic builtin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51256 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gcov-profile/51297] [4.7 regression] Many gcov tests FAIL on Tru64, Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51297 --- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell 2011-11-26 21:44:26 UTC --- Author: nathan Date: Sat Nov 26 21:44:24 2011 New Revision: 181745 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181745 Log: PR gcov-profile/51297 * gcov.c (main): A

[Bug c++/51319] New: [4.7 Regression] Eigen3 enums not accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51319 Bug #: 51319 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Eigen3 enums not accepted Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/51002] SP_H register is used even on targets that do not have it (eg attiny26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51002 --- Comment #2 from Wim Lewis 2011-11-26 21:02:55 UTC --- I think that would produce correct code, at least. It seems like it would be more efficient for gcc to treat the stack pointer as mode QI on these parts, and promote it to HI when it needs

[Bug rtl-optimization/49912] [4.7 Regression] ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49912] [4.7 Regression] ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-26 20:50:32 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Nov 26 20:50:28 2011 New Revision: 181743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181743 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49912 * cfgrtl.c (rtl_v

[Bug c++/51318] New: [4.7 Regression] segfault on Eigen3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51318 Bug #: 51318 Summary: [4.7 Regression] segfault on Eigen3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/51002] SP_H register is used even on targets that do not have it (eg attiny26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51002 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/51308] PARAMETER attribute conflicts with SAVE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51308 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51317] New: Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification (see DR 587)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51317 Bug #: 51317 Summary: Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification (see DR 587) Classification: Unclassified Prod

[Bug c++/51316] New: alignof doesn't work with arrays of unknown bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316 Bug #: 51316 Summary: alignof doesn't work with arrays of unknown bound Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/51315] New: gcc 4.6.2 miscompilation with -ftree-sra (included in -O2) on Debian/sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315 Bug #: 51315 Summary: gcc 4.6.2 miscompilation with -ftree-sra (included in -O2) on Debian/sparc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/51314] sizeof... and parentheses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51314 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug c++/51312] Wrong interpretation of converted constant expressions (for template arguments and enumerator initializers)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312 --- Comment #2 from Nikolka 2011-11-26 15:33:36 UTC --- > For the first one, you should write X{} instead of X() which looks too much like a function type. I agree, that was my mistake.

[Bug c++/51314] New: sizeof... and parentheses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51314 Bug #: 51314 Summary: sizeof... and parentheses Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-26 15:18:40 UTC --- Does this reduced test work with -std=gnu++11 -pthread ? #include #include #include struct M { pthread_mutex_t m = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; constexpr M() noexcept = defau

[Bug c++/51312] Wrong interpretation of converted constant expressions (for template arguments and enumerator initializers)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-26 15:15:26 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Nov 26 15:15:22 2011 New Revision: 181740 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181740 Log: PR libstdc++/51296 * testsuite/30_threads

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-26 14:32:45 UTC --- This comment is (just) for cross reference. The patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00217.html fixes some MOVE_ALLOC issues, including the following one. Most of the

[Bug c++/51313] New: [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected class 'constant', have 'unary' (nop_expr) in null_ptr_cst_p, at cp/call.c:556

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51313 Bug #: 51313 Summary: [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected class 'constant', have 'unary' (nop_expr) in null_ptr_cst_p, at cp/call.c:556 Classification: Unclassified Produc

[Bug c++/51312] New: Wrong interpretation of converted constant expressions (for template arguments and enumerator initializers)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312 Bug #: 51312 Summary: Wrong interpretation of converted constant expressions (for template arguments and enumerator initializers) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versio

[Bug fortran/46321] [OOP] Polymorphic deallocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-26 12:38:01 UTC --- For MOVE_ALLOC one also needs to do a polymorphic deallocation.

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #128 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-26 12:30:25 UTC --- Your test script runs blah twice, but you probably meant to run blah2

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #127 from Bruce Adams 2011-11-26 12:10:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #126) > "201103" of course. Perhaps it is my misunderstanding. I assume __cpluscplus is defined by the compiler. Could it come from a system header or system libra

[Bug c++/51311] New: bogus array bounds warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51311 Bug #: 51311 Summary: bogus array bounds warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug fortran/51310] New: -finit-bla doesn't initialize *all* items of type bla to the requested constant.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310 Bug #: 51310 Summary: -finit-bla doesn't initialize *all* items of type bla to the requested constant. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug due to implicit_pure?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #26 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2011-11-26 09:22:15 UTC --- Am 25.11.2011 18:44, schrieb burnus at gcc dot gnu.org: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 > > --- Comment #25 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-25 > 17:44:2

[Bug middle-end/50074] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c execution test on x86_64 with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074 --- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-11-26 09:21:51 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Sat Nov 26 09:21:47 2011 New Revision: 181738 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181738 Log: PR middle-end/50074 * c