[Bug gcov-profile/51113] [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-11-15 07:58:50 UTC --- Full error message: c++ -o js.i_o -c -I../../../dist/system_wrappers_js -include /var/tmp/mozilla-central/js/src/config/gcc_hidden.h -DEXPORT_JS_API -DOSTYPE=\"Linux3.2\" -DOSA

[Bug c++/51138] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] Uninitialized list elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51138 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/51138] New: [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] Uninitialized list elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51138 Bug #: 51138 Summary: [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] Uninitialized list elements Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51137] [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with -std=c++0x and virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51137 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug c++/51137] New: [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51137 Bug #: 51137 Summary: [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with -std=c++0x Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/51136] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in unlink_virtual_phi (tree-flow-inline.h:427) with -O2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts (-ftree-tail-merge)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51136 Bug #: 51136 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in unlink_virtual_phi (tree-flow-inline.h:427) with -O2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts (-ftree-tail-merge) Classification: Unclassifie

[Bug libstdc++/51133] Incorrect implementation of std::tr1::hermite()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133 --- Comment #4 from Jason Dick 2011-11-15 05:59:27 UTC --- I have attached a tiny program which I used to test these polynomials. I believe the test is entirely robust provided the first two Hermite polynomials are correct. On my machine, this

[Bug libstdc++/51133] Incorrect implementation of std::tr1::hermite()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133 --- Comment #3 from Jason Dick 2011-11-15 05:48:37 UTC --- Created attachment 25823 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25823 Test case for hermite(), requires GSL This test verifies the Hermite polynomials using numerical integr

[Bug libstdc++/51133] Incorrect implementation of std::tr1::hermite()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133 --- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-15 05:17:45 UTC --- Jason, You are right! Thank you. We'll want some test cases. I was testing against GSL but they didn't have orthogonal polynomials at the time and thi

[Bug c++/986] g++ misses warning for reference on temporary that invokes undefined behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=986 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/51135] New: SIGSEGV during exception cleanup on win32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135 Bug #: 51135 Summary: SIGSEGV during exception cleanup on win32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority:

[Bug target/51134] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-15 04:05:06 UTC --- gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90 is miscompiled.

[Bug target/51134] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-15 04:03:41 UTC --- It is caused by revision 181357.

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #8 from Anh Vo 2011-11-15 01:09:00 UTC --- with snapshot gcc-4.7-2005, there are syntax errors in adainit.c, initialize.c, seh_init.c and tracebak.c. These files are located at /gcc/ada directory which is part of Ada compiler. I

[Bug tree-optimization/51005] -ftree-tail-merge slows down compilation of 20001226-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50744] [4.7 Regression] ice in good_cloning_opportunity_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-11-15 00:25:12 UTC --- Created attachment 25822 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25822 Testcase suitable for the testsuite Testcase suitable for the test suite - it is not that difficult

[Bug tree-optimization/51005] -ftree-tail-merge slows down compilation of 20001226-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-15 00:12:51 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Tue Nov 15 00:12:45 2011 New Revision: 181372 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181372 Log: 2011-11-15 Tom de Vries PR tree-op

[Bug libstdc++/51133] Incorrect implementation of std::tr1::hermite()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||3dw4rd at verizon dot net --- Comment #1

[Bug bootstrap/51098] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failed on avx i686, svn revision 181259 to 181267

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2011-11-14 23:50:59 UTC --- ... which will not be declared if AVX support is disavowed. ... except that the configure was --with-arch=corei7-avx. If true, the problem is user error. How can you expect to co

[Bug c/51129] 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files - cannot find find libcloog, though in path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug target/51134] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134 Bug #: 51134 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-14 23:31:17 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Mon Nov 14 23:31:13 2011 New Revision: 181371 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181371 Log: PR rtl-optimization/51051 * cfgrtl.c (cfg

[Bug tree-optimization/51118] [4.7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘typed’ structure, have ‘block’ in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:14160

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |tree-optimization Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/51118] ICE when bootstrapping on Ubuntu 11.10/amd64 with stage1 checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/51118] ICE when bootstrapping on Ubuntu 11.10/amd64 with stage1 checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 23:18:29 UTC --- Created attachment 25821 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25821 Preprocessed source. Confirmed with attached source on x86_64 [uros@localhost libgcc]$ ~/gcc-build-fa

[Bug bootstrap/51098] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failed on avx i686, svn revision 181259 to 181267

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86-avx CC|

[Bug regression/51097] [4.7 Regression] a lot of "FAIL: gcc.dg/vect" on i686 avx build 181167 to 181177

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 22:39:57 UTC --- These are not failures. These "FAIL"s mean that somebody has to go through vectorizer testsuite and update scan patterns for AVX.

[Bug c/51129] 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files - cannot find find libcloog, though in path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129 Toshiro K. Ohsumi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51133] New: Incorrect implementation of std::tr1::hermite()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133 Bug #: 51133 Summary: Incorrect implementation of std::tr1::hermite() Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|amodra at gcc do

[Bug bootstrap/51086] [4.7 regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:3437

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51086 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/51097] [4.7 Regression] a lot of "FAIL: gcc.dg/vect" on i686 avx build 181167 to 181177

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097 --- Comment #1 from Stupachenko Evgeny 2011-11-14 21:59:45 UTC --- Tests fails caused by revision 181170: r181170 | jakub | 2011-11-08 19:29:51 +0300 (Tue, 08 Nov 2011) | 7 lines * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_preferred_simd_mode): Even fo

[Bug target/51126] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 URL|

[Bug target/51126] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51129] 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files - cannot find find libcloog, though in path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-14 21:31:27 UTC --- is /usr/local/lib/libcloog.so.0.0.0 a 64-bit library? what does 'ldconfig -p | fgrep cloog' show?

[Bug c++/51107] [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libgomp/51132] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-[678].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51132 Bug #: 51132 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-[678].c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/51129] 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files - cannot find find libcloog, though in path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129 --- Comment #2 from Toshiro K. Ohsumi 2011-11-14 21:20:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > did you export LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Oh yes, I tried that too. :-) Thank you for the clarifying question. In fact, /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf to

[Bug c/51129] 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files - cannot find find libcloog, though in path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/51126] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug target/51126] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Compone

[Bug bootstrap/51131] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51131 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/51131] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51131 Bug #: 51131 Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/50852] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11030

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/51130] New: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:468 with -fgnu-tm and __transaction_atomic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51130 Bug #: 51130 Summary: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:468 with -fgnu-tm and __transaction_atomic Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status

[Bug bootstrap/51036] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036 --- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-14 20:15:18 UTC --- I am closing this then, as it appears fixed in trunk now.

[Bug c++/51107] [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 20:05:19 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 14 20:05:12 2011 New Revision: 181363 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181363 Log: PR c++/51107 * typeck.c (check_literal_oper

[Bug c/51129] New: 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files - cannot find find libcloog, though in path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129 Bug #: 51129 Summary: 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files - cannot find find libcloog, though in path Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/35167] problem with function address constant non-type template parameter in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35167 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-14 19:52:02 UTC --- Ok, thanks.

[Bug other/51125] FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 19:41:12 UTC --- (gdb) bt #0 fancy_abort (file=0x103d0c0 "/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/gimplify.c", line=468, function=0x103dfc3 "create_tmp_var") at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:8

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/51128] New: [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128 Bug #: 51128 Summary: [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/51125] FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 18:58:33 UTC --- A gdb backtrace would certainly help.

[Bug bootstrap/51036] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 18:55:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Hmm, it looks like I can't reproduce this anymore with r181280 on trunk. > > > > Are you still seeing it? > > No, due to [1]. Bu

[Bug bootstrap/51126] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

-fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector -fno-common -fexceptions -o unwind-dw2.s Reading symbols for shared libraries + done GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.0 2014 (experimental) (x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0) compiled by GNU C version 4.2.1 Compatible Apple Clang

[Bug c++/35167] problem with function address constant non-type template parameter in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35167 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 18:45:30 UTC --- We shouldn't close it, it's still broken in C++98 mode.

[Bug lto/50601] [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 18:36:39 UTC --- *** Bug 51127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug lto/51127] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51127 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/51127] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51127 Bug #: 51127 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Statu

[Bug lto/51105] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-1.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/51123] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/51105] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-1.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 18:25:23 UTC --- *** Bug 51123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/51126] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126 Bug #: 51126 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/51123] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 18:18:22 UTC --- I also see [hjl@gnu-33 gcc]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc -B/export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture

[Bug other/51125] New: FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125 Bug #: 51125 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/51124] New: libitm failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51124 Bug #: 51124 Summary: libitm failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: o

[Bug target/51122] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51122] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 17:56:01 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011 New Revision: 181359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359 Log: PR c++/6936 PR c++/25994 PR c++/26256

[Bug c++/25994] Using declarations and base function overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25994 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 17:56:02 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011 New Revision: 181359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359 Log: PR c++/6936 PR c++/25994 PR c++/26256

[Bug c++/26256] ignores using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 17:56:02 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011 New Revision: 181359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359 Log: PR c++/6936 PR c++/25994 PR c++/26256

[Bug c++/30195] Using declaration doesn't work in template.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 17:56:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011 New Revision: 181359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359 Log: PR c++/6936 PR c++/25994 PR c++/26256

[Bug middle-end/51123] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 17:35:19 UTC --- It also happens on Linux/x86-64: g++ -c -o XalanNamespacesStack.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DAPP_NO_THREADS -DXALAN_INMEM_MSG_LOADER -I. -Ixercesc -Ixercesc/dom -Ixercesc/dom/impl -Ixercesc/sax

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka 2011-11-14 17:32:52 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Nov 14 17:32:47 2011 New Revision: 181358 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181358 Log: PR middle-end/50598 * cgraph.h (varpool_e

[Bug middle-end/51123] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 Regression] 445.gobmk |[4.7 Regression] |in SPEC CPU

[Bug middle-end/51123] New: [4.7 Regression] 445.gobmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123 Bug #: 51123 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 445.gobmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/35167] problem with function address constant non-type template parameter in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35167 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-11-14 17:09:04 UTC --- I'm not going to be able to look at it anytime soon, but just some general thoughts: 1. Disabling caller-saves probably isn't appropriate. Just looking at codesize isn't the way t

[Bug target/51122] New: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122 Bug #: 51122 Summary: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2001 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug bootstrap/51112] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51112 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka 2011-11-14 17:02:22 UTC --- thank you! What kind of weakref issues you see? Honza

[Bug c++/34383] ICE on Usage of default function template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34383 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 16:56:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 14 16:55:56 2011 New Revision: 181355 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181355 Log: PR bootstrap/51094 PR middle-end/51116

[Bug bootstrap/51094] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181279 on non-ELF targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14 16:56:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 14 16:55:56 2011 New Revision: 181355 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181355 Log: PR bootstrap/51094 PR middle-end/51116

[Bug tree-optimization/50744] [4.7 Regression] ice in good_cloning_opportunity_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot |

[Bug bootstrap/51036] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-14 16:30:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > coud you please verify that the attached patch solves the problem? (applied, together with c#15 PR51094) full regstrap incl. Ada and Java, i686-darwin9 r

[Bug c++/51121] std::make_pair and std::multimap result in duplicate std::pair destructors in assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51121 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44473] iterators already defined for std::vector when using std::decimal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44473 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||db4 at mm dot st --- Comment #20 from Pao

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-14 16:14:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test This test should be disabled on darwin (and probably everywhere except GNU/Linux)

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-11-14 16:04:57 UTC --- > coud you please verify that the attached patch solves the problem? On x86_64-apple-darwin10, I have only done an update with the patch at revision 181350 (but I have rebuilt

[Bug bootstrap/51086] [4.7 regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:3437

GNAT BUG DETECTED======+ | 4.7.0 2014 (experimental) [trunk revision 181350] (sparc-sun-solaris2.11) GCC error:| | in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:3437 | | Error detected around /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/ada/opt.adb:347:8 | Rainer

[Bug bootstrap/51036] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036 --- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-11-14 15:21:50 UTC --- Interesting. In any case, I hardly find this issue related to my patch, like what H.J.'s bissecting (thanks for that H.J. by the way!) is suggesting. So a memory manageme

[Bug bootstrap/51068] [4.7 Regression] ARM bootstrap failure due to ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info_1 at cfgrtl.c:2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51068 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.hope at linaro dot

[Bug bootstrap/51068] [4.7 Regression] ARM bootstrap failure due to ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info_1 at cfgrtl.c:2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51068 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/51121] Duplicate destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51121 --- Comment #1 from David Bustos 2011-11-14 14:34:54 UTC --- Created attachment 25817 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25817 .ii file of problematic code

[Bug c++/51121] New: Duplicate destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51121 Bug #: 51121 Summary: Duplicate destructors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug bootstrap/51036] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 14:32:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hmm, it looks like I can't reproduce this anymore with r181280 on trunk. > > Are you still seeing it? No, due to [1]. But - isn't this patch just papering ov

  1   2   >