[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/51119] New: MATMUL slow for large matrices

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 Bug #: 51119 Summary: MATMUL slow for large matrices Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/51112] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51112 --- Comment #1 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-14 06:41:13 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Mon Nov 14 06:41:09 2011 New Revision: 181347 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181347 Log: PR bootstrap/51112 * tree-v

[Bug middle-end/50335] ICE in psct_dynamic_dim, at graphite-poly.h:659

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335 --- Comment #5 from Gregory Maxwell 2011-11-14 06:19:44 UTC --- Still failing with r181345

[Bug c++/51107] [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107 --- Comment #4 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-14 05:03:05 UTC --- Created attachment 25813 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25813 Patch in typeck.c and enhaced testcase. gcc/testsuite/ 2011-11-14 Ed

[Bug c++/51107] [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107 --- Comment #3 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-14 03:42:45 UTC --- DECL_USE_TEMPLATE (decl) == 0 for template specializations. So DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (current_function_decl) is false. In fact current_function_de

[Bug c/51101] i386-rtems fails to compile dwarf2asm.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51101 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-11-14 03:06:18 UTC --- Was not present ... i386-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 2008 (experimental) [trunk revision 181159]

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7 from

[Bug target/47563] m32r does not have synchronization primitives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47563 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/47563] m32r does not have synchronization primitives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47563 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC|law at redhat dot com | --- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2011-11-14 01:26:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Asserting that the bug is not a flaw in avr backend, I set the component to > "other". The bug is somewhere in the caller-saves/IRA/reload triangle like > P

[Bug bootstrap/51118] New: ICE when bootstrapping on Ubuntu 11.10/amd64 with stage1 checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118 Bug #: 51118 Summary: ICE when bootstrapping on Ubuntu 11.10/amd64 with stage1 checking enabled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug target/50694] SH Target: SH2A little endian does not actually work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694 --- Comment #10 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-11-13 23:00:15 UTC --- Author: kkojima Date: Sun Nov 13 23:00:10 2011 New Revision: 181340 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181340 Log: PR target/50694 * config/sh/sh.h (IS_L

[Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe 20

[Bug other/19563] Makefiles don't handle configure --program-suffix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19563 --- Comment #4 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-11-13 18:17:20 UTC --- It has worked for me for the last couple of years as well, so whatever caused it is fixed

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-13 17:13:34 UTC --- On 13-Nov-11, at 12:27 AM, jimis at gmx dot net wrote: > Does the following simple patch solve it? This undoes an > optimisation, and > there is an ongoing discussion ab

[Bug c++/45385] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missing -Wconversion for method calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-13 16:33:10 UTC --- On 13-Nov-11, at 12:27 AM, jimis at gmx dot net wrote: > I'm curious though: in pa64-hpux.h I can see that this part is in the > GAS-specific part. Why are we emmiting HP-

[Bug c++/51108] g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51108 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/36993] g++ crashes with segfault upon wrong placement of case label

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36993 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rec-for-bugzilla at yandex

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-13 13:58:47 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Sun Nov 13 13:58:43 2011 New Revision: 181336 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181336 Log: gcc: PR target/48108 Backport from mainlin

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #17 from jh at suse dot de 2011-11-13 13:08:12 UTC --- > Is this a missing dependency in the make? Makefiles generally do not track changes in your compiler. You need to fully rebuild then. I am travelling today, but should have patc

[Bug gcov-profile/51113] [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-11-13 13:07:15 UTC --- Please note that this happens with the gold linker. When I use ld.bfd the build fails much later (during libxul linking).

[Bug c++/50431] [C++0x] bug in def array size with a lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431 --- Comment #6 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-11-13 12:59:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I guess we can close this as fixed in 4.7.0. Yes, I think so.

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-11-13 12:54:11 UTC --- I have found that reverting the change for gcc/cgraphunit.c in revision 179429 and doing a simple update is not enough to fix the libstdc++-v3 failures. In top of that the lib

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-13 12:51:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Hi, > I finally debugged this. Great! :-) > It is an ordering issue - emutls adds new variables but > remove_unreachable_functions expects that visibility p

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2011-11-13 12:41:03 UTC --- Hi, I finally debugged this. It is an ordering issue - emutls adds new variables but remove_unreachable_functions expects that visibility pass has been run and externally_visible flag c

[Bug c/51111] Optimization bug with array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 vova7890 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51117] New: [4.7 regression] rev.181172 causes glibc build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117 Bug #: 51117 Summary: [4.7 regression] rev.181172 causes glibc build failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/51113] [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-11-13 10:29:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > hm, at a wild guess it looks like -fvisibility-inlines-hidden is not being > taken into consideration in my patch. If you build without that option,

[Bug gcov-profile/51113] [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1