[Bug c++/50929] New: [C++0x] Wrong function selected for overload with template and rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50929 Bug #: 50929 Summary: [C++0x] Wrong function selected for overload with template and rvalue reference Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/50888] Bootstrap failure in libjava against latest git glibc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888 --- Comment #4 from Christian Joensson 2011-10-31 05:29:38 UTC --- Recent bootstrap/build on i686/linux libtool: link: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./gcc/gcj -B/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/i686-redhat-linux/libjava/ -B/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49682] [alpha] gcc-4.6.1: ICE at -O2 and -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49682 Matt Turner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/46328] [OOP] type-bound operator call with non-trivial polymorphic operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328 --- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson 2011-10-31 02:06:36 UTC --- Thanks for the update. The same error occurs when a defined assignment is added: $ cat abstract_field_expression.F90 module field_module implicit none type ,abstract :: field

[Bug bootstrap/50878] [4.7 Regression] ARM bootstrap failure on insn-preds.c with error: dominator of 12 should be 6, not 5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-linux-gnueabi |arm-linux-gnueabi |

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-30 23:36:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I wonder whether there might be something in the target code that suggests the > early optimizers to do that? I've tried playing with the TARGET_ADDRESS_C

[Bug rtl-optimization/39351] compute_init_costs uses unemitted insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39351 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50753] dshiftl/dshiftr: Rejects valid BOZ, accepts double BOZ

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50753 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 22:09:50 UTC --- Dang. I transposed numbers in the PR in the ChangeLog. Here's the commit message with the correct PR number. Author: kargl Date: Sun Oct 30 21:59:24 2011 New Revision: 1806

[Bug other/50573] configure lists --with-gnu-ld twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50573 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/50753] dshiftl/dshiftr: Rejects valid BOZ, accepts double BOZ

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50753 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/50573] configure lists --with-gnu-ld twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50573 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 21:59:27 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Oct 30 21:59:24 2011 New Revision: 180686 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180686 Log: 2011-10-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fort

[Bug fortran/50923] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] No warning if function return value is not set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50923 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7

[Bug fortran/50924] Attempt to allocate negative amount of memory. Possible integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/50928] ICE building RTEMS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 21:09:56 UTC --- Created attachment 25670 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25670 Preprocessed source code

[Bug c/50928] New: ICE building RTEMS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928 Bug #: 50928 Summary: ICE building RTEMS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug bootstrap/50927] lm32 ICE seg fauit compiling libgcc2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 21:02:27 UTC --- Created attachment 25669 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25669 Preprocessed source code

[Bug bootstrap/50927] New: lm32 ICE seg fauit compiling libgcc2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927 Bug #: 50927 Summary: lm32 ICE seg fauit compiling libgcc2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50926] Output to 'fort.6" file instead of console

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50926 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/26567] ICE in c_lex_with_flags, at c-lex.c:472 with cc1 -C (without -E)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26567 Serge Belyshev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug middle-end/50708] Infinite loop between rshift_double and lshift_double if count is LONG_MIN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-30 20:35:03 UTC --- The regression started with r158372: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-04/msg00478.html Here's what seems to have happened: 1. Anatoly Sokolov suggested to add a bunch of double_

[Bug fortran/50926] New: Output to 'fort.6" file instead of console

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50926 Bug #: 50926 Summary: Output to 'fort.6" file instead of console Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2011-10-30 19:59:27 UTC --- Created attachment 25668 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25668 vrp dumps

[Bug c/50925] avr ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 19:43:24 UTC --- Created attachment 25667 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25667 Preprocessed output Preprocessed code.

[Bug c/50925] avr ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 19:42:50 UTC --- gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20111029 (experimental) Newlib up to date at same time Cut and pasted from log with multiple jobs in parallel. The actual command line for hash.c was. /home2/joel/b

[Bug c/50922] infinite loop when optimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/50925] New: avr ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 Bug #: 50925 Summary: avr ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/50924] Attempt to allocate negative amount of memory. Possible integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/50924] Attempt to allocate negative amount of memory. Possible integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924 fwi at inducks dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fwi at inducks dot org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/50924] New: Attempt to allocate negative amount of memory. Possible integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50924 Bug #: 50924 Summary: Attempt to allocate negative amount of memory. Possible integer overflow Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONF

[Bug fortran/50923] New: [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] No warning if function return value is not set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50923 Bug #: 50923 Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] No warning if function return value is not set Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNC

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c/50922] infinite loop when optimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-30 17:03:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > int main(void) > { > long x=0; > unsigned long c; > for(c=0;c<2147483648UL;c++) >{ > lcdSendData(x++); > } You're causing a signed over

[Bug c/50922] infinite loop when optimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922 xunxun changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug lto/49677] GCC 4.6.0 LTO files not compatible with GCC 4.6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49677 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot

[Bug c/49934] gcc 4.6.1 messes up code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49934 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 --- Comment #9 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-30 15:53:10 UTC --- Sorry made a mistake and i supplied the wrong command line With this gcc47 -O2 -m32-freg-struct-return io_apic.i -flto -c gcc47 -O2 -flto io_apic.o the test case ICEs hwith any pat

[Bug c/50922] New: infinite loop when optimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922 Bug #: 50922 Summary: infinite loop when optimized Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/50913] ICE: compiling libgfortran for i686-w64-mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem 2011-10-30 15:20:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > What was the ICE? Sorry about that: /home/ruben/mingw-w64/toolchain/src/gcc/libgfortran/generated/spread_i1.c: In function 'spread_i1': /home/ruben/mingw-

[Bug tree-optimization/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/50921] GCC cannot find dependent conversion-function-id even if there's a using declaration for it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50921 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub 2011-10-30 13:54:21 UTC --- Someone notified me that you can substantially reduce this to the following template struct Base { operator int(); }; template struct Derived : Base { using Base::operator int;

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-30 13:53:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > GCC makes usual mem accesses into those with post_inc/pre_dec at > auto_inc_dec pass. I guess that auto_inc_dec pass can't find > post_inc insns well in that ca

[Bug c++/50921] New: GCC cannot find dependent conversion-function-id even if there's a using declaration for it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50921 Bug #: 50921 Summary: GCC cannot find dependent conversion-function-id even if there's a using declaration for it Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug target/50694] SH Target: SH2A little endian does not actually work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-30 12:45:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > This problem doesn't require the theoretical/mathematical > completeness. There are many inappropriate combinations > of options w

[Bug middle-end/50823] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-30 12:41:34 UTC --- I get the same ICE when compiling the polyhedron test aermod.f90: [macbook] lin/test% gfc aermod.f90 -O3 --param max-inline-insns-auto=198 aermod.f90:39103:0: internal compiler

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-30 12:36:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I'm a bit curious to see what happens if they are changed > to non-zero for SI/DImode. ..not much actually. I've tried defining both as TARGET_SH1 and compar

[Bug c++/50920] New: add a -std=c++11 option to the driver

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50920 Bug #: 50920 Summary: add a -std=c++11 option to the driver Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/50917] [4.7 Regression] Mozilla build fails because of C++11 user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-10-30 12:22:30 UTC --- The problem in comment 2 is fixed by: replacing: #define SECMOD_MAKE_NSS_FLAGS(fips,slot) \ "Flags=internal,critical"fips" slotparams=("#slot"={"SECMOD_SLOT_FLAGS"})" with: #def

[Bug fortran/46328] [OOP] type-bound operator call with non-trivial polymorphic operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/50875] O3 and -mavx lead to internal compiler error: in find_reloads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] Induct benchmark of polyhedron slows down when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-30 11:34:15 UTC --- Created attachment 25666 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25666 Further reduced test for induct.f90 The reduced test contains a single et of nested loops in

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] Induct benchmark of polyhedron slows down when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-30 11:24:57 UTC --- > It would be nice if somebody could reduce this to a more managable testcase. I have posted a reduced test in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265#c34 (pr34265).

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail

[Bug other/50916] -Os, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE breaks strcpy & others if inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net --- Comment #4 from

[Bug other/50916] -Os, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE breaks strcpy & others if inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ar...@pld-linux.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/50875] O3 and -mavx lead to internal compiler error: in find_reloads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875 --- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 10:30:11 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sun Oct 30 10:30:06 2011 New Revision: 180676 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180676 Log: PR target/50875 * config/i386/sse.md

[Bug c++/50848] [4.7 Regression] ICE in derived template class missing using for member of template base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50848 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-30 10:30:35 UTC --- With -fpermissive ICEs for me, however: 50848.C: In member function ‘void B::f()’: 50848.C:2:53: warning: there are no arguments to ‘u’ that depend on a template parameter, so a decla

[Bug other/50916] -Os, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE breaks strcpy & others if inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net --- Comment

[Bug c++/50917] [4.7 Regression] Mozilla build fails because of C++11 user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-10-30 10:20:42 UTC --- Another example (happened later in Mozilla build, after putting a space between "libxul"MOZ_DLL_SUFFIX): struct SECMODModule *nssMod = SECMOD_CreateModule(__null, "NSS Internal

[Bug c++/50881] ICE Segfault on compare this pointer with reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug c++/50881] ICE Segfault on compare this pointer with reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/50919] New: [OOP] Don't use vtable for NON_OVERRIDABLE TBP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50919 Bug #: 50919 Summary: [OOP] Don't use vtable for NON_OVERRIDABLE TBP Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/50902] [4.7 Regression] intVar/dinternal.cc ICEs at -O2 -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50902 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Target Milestone|-

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] Induct benchmark of polyhedron slows down when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] Induct benchmark of polyhedron slows down when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-30 09:40:38 UTC --- I don't see why RTL invariant motion should move the one variant but not the other. Of course this also shows that we should, after loop unrolling on the tree level, also perform l

[Bug tree-optimization/50908] [4.7 Regression] building emacs-23.3; gives msg: indent.c:1140:1: internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1041

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50908 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug c++/50917] [4.7 Regression] Mozilla build fails because of C++11 user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippel

[Bug tree-optimization/50908] [4.7 Regression] building emacs-23.3; gives msg: indent.c:1140:1: internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1041

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50908 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug target/50911] [4.7 regression] assertion failure in expand_vec_perm_interleave2 with -msse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50911 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50912] [4.7 regression] gimple assertion failure at gimple.h:1940 with -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50912 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug libstdc++/50915] gcc fails at run time due to undefined libintl_textdomain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50915 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/50916] -Os, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE breaks strcpy & others if inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50917] [4.7 Regression] Mozilla build fails because of C++11 user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/50918] New: Unoptimal code for vec-shift by scalar for integer (byte, short, long long) operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50918 Bug #: 50918 Summary: Unoptimal code for vec-shift by scalar for integer (byte, short, long long) operands Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

[Bug bootstrap/50878] [4.7 Regression] ARM bootstrap failure on insn-preds.c with error: dominator of 12 should be 6, not 5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 08:21:52 UTC --- Posted fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02782.html

[Bug c++/50917] New: [4.7 Regression] Mozilla build fails because of C++11 user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50917 Bug #: 50917 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Mozilla build fails because of C++11 user-defined literals Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNC

[Bug rtl-optimization/50764] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2243 with -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -ftree-tail-merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30 07:39:36 UTC --- Tentative patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02767.html