http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37191
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-27 06:17:05 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Oct 27 06:17:00 2011
New Revision: 180560
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180560
Log:
PR target/37191
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50879
Bug #: 50879
Summary: ICE in sf_fabs.c while bootstrap on PowerPC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50840
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #8 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-27
02:31:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 25622 [details]
> asmcons and ira pass log for the reload failure of "z" insn constraint
The original insn 13 was
(insn 13 12 14 3 (se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
--- Comment #18 from nightstrike 2011-10-27
02:00:37 UTC ---
We have a patch. What else is missing?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50850
--- Comment #2 from Max DeLiso 2011-10-27 00:48:15
UTC ---
no problems with gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20111026 (experimental)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
23:35:30 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 26 23:35:26 2011
New Revision: 180549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180549
Log:
PR libstdc++/50862
* include/std/conditio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-26 23:07:08 UTC
---
Created attachment 25622
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25622
asmcons and ira pass log for the reload failure of "z" insn constraint
(In reply to comment #5)
> It see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2011-10-26 22:52:50
UTC ---
Following (untested) patch fixes the failure for me:
Index: sse.md
===
--- sse.md(revision 180528)
+++ sse.md(wor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-26 22:36:31 UTC
---
Created attachment 25621
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25621
Experimental not working patch for mov.b with displacement addressing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50842
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-10-26 22:36:15 UTC ---
On 26-Oct-11, at 5:26 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> gnatmake needs to be linked against /usr/lib/libiconv.dylib.
>
> Which Makefile variable contains the -lic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-10-26
22:31:34 UTC ---
Caused by...
r180517 | rguenth | 2011-10-26 05:30:29 -0400 (Wed, 26 Oct 2011) | 9 lines
2011-10-26 Richard Guenther
PR lto/41844
* Makefile.in (lto-wrapper): Depen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
Michael Hope changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
--- Comment #1 from Mich
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
Bug #: 50878
Summary: ARM bootstrap failure on insn-preds.c with error:
dominator of 12 should be 6, not 5
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-26
21:26:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Do we know what patch broke this?
>From the look of things, it is most likely the LTO options change from Richard
Guenter which caused it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50842
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876
--- Comment #2 from Mike Stump 2011-10-26
21:12:58 UTC ---
Do we know what patch broke this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50877
Bug #: 50877
Summary: link.h not found when I add --enable-objc-gc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #54 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-26
20:15:43 UTC ---
> well, no reply to my radar yet -
> - so, shall I apply the proposed patch as "sticking plaster" until we decide
> the Right Way forward ?
OK, let's go ahead.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code generation for |[4.4/4.5/4.6
|array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #53 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-26 19:57:25
UTC ---
well, no reply to my radar yet -
- so, shall I apply the proposed patch as "sticking plaster" until we decide
the Right Way forward ?
(I believe it's generally been approved, just a qu
with: ../gcc-4.7-20111026/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-ppl
bjdir/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/i386/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/i386/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-20111026/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-10-26 19:36:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 25620
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25620
Testcase
Still fails with this testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-10-26 19:30:50 UTC ---
Disappeared in trunk between rr. 178135 and 178749.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-10-26 19:21:11 UTC ---
Works with recent trunk. Fixed in r179424 (PR 47247)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #5 from Joly Aarons 2011-10-26 17:35:29
UTC ---
Excellent, just for completeness, I can confirm that on my machines :
gfortran -O3 -mavx
does reproduce the problem identically and that :
gfortran -O3 -mno-avx -march=native
compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48173
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 17:59:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 26 17:59:36 2011
New Revision: 180531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180531
Log:
2011-10-26 Paolo Carlini
* typec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #4 from Joly Aarons 2011-10-26 17:30:32
UTC ---
Excellent, just for completeness, I can confirm that :
gfortran -O3 -mavx
does reproduce the problem identically and that :
(In reply to comment #3)
> The issue is related with "-mav
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50078
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50275
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45402
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48666
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47435
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48437
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25614|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #3 from xunxun 2011-10-26 16:35:38
UTC ---
The issue is related with "-mavx"
I use "gfortran -O3 -mavx" to reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #2 from Joly Aarons 2011-10-26 16:08:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Your gcc -v information?
> And your cpu model? (I think it's related with cpu instruction set)
>
> I use i686-w64-mingw32 gfortran 4.6.2 to run the test well
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
xunxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-26 15:52:07 UTC ---
> I made the patch against 4.6.1, and have run bootstrap and testing on AIX 5.3
> TL4. I was able to apply it unchanged against trunk r180430, but have not yet
> g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
Bug #: 50875
Summary: O3 and -march=native lead to internal compiler error:
in find_reloads
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #5 from Graham Reed 2011-10-26 15:39:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Sorry, forgot to add:
I made the patch against 4.6.1, and have run bootstrap and testing on AIX 5.3
TL4. I was able to apply it unchanged against trunk r18043
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #4 from Graham Reed 2011-10-26 15:36:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 25617
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25617
KLUDGE/workaround for ICE
I worked around the ICE on AIX with this patch. THIS IS A WORKAROUND ONLY--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50874
Bug #: 50874
Summary: loc_t in tree-diagnostics.c conflicts with system
header on AIX
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
14:06:12 UTC ---
Yes, thanks for spotting it. Ideally we'd define this_thread::yield() anyway,
but until then the test should use the dg-require
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26
13:55:25 UTC ---
Shouldn't the testcase contain:
// { dg-require-sched-yield "" }
? I'm getting a failure because this_thread::yield is not defined, and
30_threads/this_thread/2.cc contains this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26
13:47:56 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:47:48 2011
New Revision: 180525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180525
Log:
PR debug/50826
* var-tracking.c (rtx_debug_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
13:46:45 UTC ---
Yes they are. Not doing that would be a good idea
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo