http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521
--- Comment #3 from Tomohiro Kashiwada 2011-09-27
04:15:19 UTC ---
Other test case (gcc generates wrong code):
volatile union {
// add volatiles tenaciously, but...
volatile unsigned int all;
volatile struct {
volatile unsign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50529
--- Comment #5 from Jordan DeLong 2011-09-27 02:56:14
UTC ---
Nice. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50529
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50529
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-27 02:39:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:39:34 2011
New Revision: 179234
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179234
Log:
2011-09-26 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45012
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:19:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:18:56 2011
New Revision: 179231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179231
Log:
PR c++/50508
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_logica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:19:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:19:05 2011
New Revision: 179232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179232
Log:
PR c++/46105
* typeck.c (structural_compty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:12:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:12:51 2011
New Revision: 179229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179229
Log:
PR c++/46105
* typeck.c (structural_comptyp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45102
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:13:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:13:00 2011
New Revision: 179230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179230
Log:
PR c++/45102
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:12:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:12:42 2011
New Revision: 179228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179228
Log:
PR c++/50508
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_logica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45487
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45487
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-27 01:56:22 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 27 01:56:17 2011
New Revision: 179226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179226
Log:
/cp
2011-09-26 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50529
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-27
00:45:12 UTC ---
deque too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50529
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50529
Bug #: 50529
Summary: std::vector::erase invokes undefined behavior with
empty range
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48698
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-09-27
00:03:00 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Sep 27 00:02:54 2011
New Revision: 179221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179221
Log:
2011-09-26 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247
--- Comment #24 from Cary Coutant 2011-09-26
23:32:17 UTC ---
Author: ccoutant
Date: Mon Sep 26 23:32:13 2011
New Revision: 179220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179220
Log:
PR lto/47247
* plugin-api.h (enum ld_plu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35927
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46587
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45487
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50515
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-26 20:05:58 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Sep 26 20:05:43 2011
New Revision: 179213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179213
Log:
2011-09-26 Janus Weil
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50515
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-26 20:05:57 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Sep 26 20:05:43 2011
New Revision: 179213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179213
Log:
2011-09-26 Janus Weil
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.6.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
--- Comment #14 from Cary Coutant 2011-09-26
18:29:52 UTC ---
Author: ccoutant
Date: Mon Sep 26 18:29:46 2011
New Revision: 179209
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179209
Log:
include/ChangeLog:
PR 40831
* demangle.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45012
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||potswa at mac dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
18:24:36 UTC ---
It looks the same to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-26
18:16:33 UTC ---
Looks like overflow in the fixed point scalling code. Will look into that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42288
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45487
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
18:12:01 UTC ---
I'm open to this change.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
17:55:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 26 17:55:04 2011
New Revision: 179208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179208
Log:
PR c++/50512
* call.c (compare_ics): Only c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-26 17:24:47
UTC ---
The problem is the wrong alignment for e->v in method.
The initial RTL has
(insn 17 16 18 4 (set (mem/s/j:V2DI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 66 [ e ])
(const_int 40 [0x28])) [0 MEM[
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phresnel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50524
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528
Bug #: 50528
Summary: [4.7 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with
LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
15:47:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 26 15:47:17 2011
New Revision: 179203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179203
Log:
PR c++/50523
* call.c (implicit_conversion)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49804
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21057
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenther at suse dot de|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-26
15:00:49 UTC ---
Hm, I suppose we should then make all replacement decls have BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT
rather than min (BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT, object-size). Or alternatively
(given we re-compute alignment tog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-26 14:47:22 UTC ---
Just double-checked and a bisection with my testcase also leads
to revision 178789:
98d1b25faaa16abc483251c9acf3cb1ef79cc941 is the first bad commit
commit 98d1b25faaa16abc48325
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
Bug #: 50527
Summary: inconsistent vla align
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-26
14:09:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 26 14:08:53 2011
New Revision: 179200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179200
Log:
2011-09-26 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-26 13:52:04 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 26 13:51:52 2011
New Revision: 179198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179198
Log:
2011-09-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-09-26 13:22:58 UTC ---
Not easily, because I don't have an installed version with GNU ld
around, and haven't figured out all the options necessary to compile and
link with an uninstalled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-26
12:59:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 26 12:58:35 2011
New Revision: 179196
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179196
Log:
2011-09-26 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50465
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-26
12:14:13 UTC ---
This testcase fails with all of 4.6, r178788 and r178789, so I doubt it is the
right testcase for this bug.
I'm running delta using a test if r178788 -fpermissive compiles it without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-26 12:07:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 25366
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25366
testcase
Reduced to ~560 lines.
% g++ testcase.cpp -Wfatal-errors
testcase.cpp: In instantia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50465
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-26
11:53:55 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Sep 26 11:53:40 2011
New Revision: 179191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179191
Log:
PR target/50465
* config/avr/avr-protos.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521
--- Comment #2 from Tomohiro Kashiwada 2011-09-26
11:42:37 UTC ---
Variable 'bitfield' declared as volatile, so all bitfield's members are
volatile.
Even if declare 'bits' as volatile, gcc dumps same code.
However, adding option -fno-strict-volat
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: baldr...@gcc.gnu.org
$ gcc-4.7 -S p.ads
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.7.0 20110926 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
sinfo.adb:717
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-26
10:48:15 UTC ---
I don't think volatile union bitfield constitutes a "volatile bitfield" as
per what GCC implements.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-26
10:46:06 UTC ---
*** Bug 50474 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50522
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50525
Bug #: 50525
Summary: gfortran should not allow early reference to entry
dummy argument (r178939)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50524
Bug #: 50524
Summary: *** glibc detected *** invalid free() pointer on
illegal code (r178939)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-26
09:38:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The behaviour seems to be related to the code line
> if(r != !!r)
This is clearly a dup of PR50380.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
Bug #: 50523
Summary: C++ FE apparently incorrectly rejects tramp3d
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-26
09:08:36 UTC ---
#define strcpy(x,y) __builtin___strcpy_chk (x, y, __builtin_object_size (x, 1))
int
f1 (void)
{
struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[4]; } a;
strcpy (a.buf1 + 9, "a");
return 0;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #2 from Steffen Schmidt
2011-09-26 09:04:33 UTC ---
I'm very sorry for the inconvenience, but this bug is not directly related to
any CodeSourcery built GCC toolchain. It was a pure coincedence using such a
toolchain.
I am able to re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-26 09:01:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Could you explain why you assume that this is invalid? I would say it is valid
> at least in F95, see Fortran 95 standard, chapter 4.4.2, "Determina
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-26 08:45:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Could you explain why you assume that this is invalid? I would say it is valid
> at least in F95, see Fortran 95 standard, chapter 4.4.2, "Determina
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50522
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-26
08:23:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25365
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25365
gcc47-pr50522-hack.patch
The perhaps safer hack, which handles only pointers initialized from
casted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-26 08:09:09 UTC ---
Unfortunately, gfortran also does not reject it if the types actually differ:
program main
type t
integer :: i
end type
type u
real :: r
end type
type(u),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #51 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-09-26 08:04:37 UTC ---
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, rearnsha at arm dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
>
> --- Comment #48 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-09-12
> 15:31:51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50522
Bug #: 50522
Summary: C++ std::valarray vectorization missed optimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50515
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50493
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
98 matches
Mail list logo
