http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50313
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope at linaro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50373
Bug #: 50373
Summary: Incorrect Code generated for function with two
possible return values (Seg Fault)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50372
Bug #: 50372
Summary: c++11: pointers to static functions should be valid
template parameters
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50371
Bug #: 50371
Summary: [C++0x] std::nullptr_t rejected as non-type
template-parameter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50370
Bug #: 50370
Summary: [C++0x] Multiple declarations with default template
arguments accepted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48372
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48320
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-09-12
21:03:35 UTC ---
Candidate patch posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg00744.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50363
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-09-12 20:56:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 25252
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25252
reduced testcase
This testcase needs more flags to reproduce though:
$ gcc -O2 -fno-tree-ch -fno-tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50369
Bug #: 50369
Summary: Support 256bit vector permutation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2011-09-12
20:15:59 UTC ---
Previous comment is incorrect. The statement:
# err2.395_571 = PHI
is the close_phi for the outer loop, while:
# err2.395_561 = PHI
is the close_phi for the inner loop.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
--- Comment #5 from Jordan DeLong 2011-09-12 19:38:22
UTC ---
Ah, thanks Paolo. That simplification also gave me enough hints for a
work-around for now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-12
19:29:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 12 19:29:31 2011
New Revision: 178795
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178795
Log:
PR bootstrap/50010
* dwarf2cfi.c (add_cfis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183
--- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2011-09-12
19:18:07 UTC ---
Slogging through the code, it appears to me that the code added in block 45 to
define err2.395_571:
D.6815_562 = Commutative_Associative_Reduction.822[0];
err2.395_571 = D.68
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50358
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25241|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50368
Bug #: 50368
Summary: Implicit, precision losing cast in objc/objc-api.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010
--- Comment #16 from Gary Funck 2011-09-12 18:39:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Created attachment 25246 [details]
> gcc47-pr50010.patch
Bootstraps on i686 CentOS release 5.6 with installed packages.
Jakub, thanks for tracking this down
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #50 from Steven Bosscher 2011-09-12
18:24:58 UTC ---
Perhaps someone can comment on, and test, Joern's patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00461.html
@Richard E: That would be a middle-end fix, if it's correct, so perhap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50367
Bug #: 50367
Summary: -flto and -Wl,--as-needed combination removes some
needed libraries
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50212
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50212
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-12
17:55:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 12 17:55:36 2011
New Revision: 178785
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178785
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/50212
* bb-reorder.c (f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50290
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|lto |
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-09
/
--with-cloog --with-ppl --with-cloog-include=/usr/include/cloog-ppl/
--disable-ppl-version-check
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110912 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gcc -O2 -flto -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-vrp -funroll-all-loops
testcase.c
In file included from testcase.c:14:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50366
--- Comment #1 from Krisztian Kocsis
2011-09-12 16:39:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 25249
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25249
Verbose linker output.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50366
Bug #: 50366
Summary: Still got failed assertion in lto_varpool_replace_node
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50299
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-12
15:49:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 12 15:49:38 2011
New Revision: 178784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178784
Log:
PR debug/50299
* calls.c (load_register_par
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #49 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-09-12 15:33:56
UTC ---
On 09/12/2011 09:31 AM, rearnsha at arm dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
>
> --- Comment #48 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-09-12
> 15:31:51 UTC ---
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #48 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-09-12
15:31:51 UTC ---
On 12/09/11 16:18, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> A much simpler way to fix this is to emit a barrier just prior to
> mucking around with stack pointer in the epilogue. That's h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #47 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-09-12 15:18:44
UTC ---
On 09/12/2011 02:42 AM, sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
>
> --- Comment #46 from Sebastian Huber
> 2011-09-12 08:42:59
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50338
--- Comment #6 from James McKelvey
2011-09-12 14:58:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > All the source in my project's library is built with -flto.
> >
> > This same basic code worked with LTO before, shortly after LTO
> > first came out. Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50352
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-12
14:44:20 UTC ---
further reduced
struct String {
String(const char* s, int len);
bool test();
};
struct XplorVars { const char* aner; };
struct XplorSimulation {
XplorSimulation();
Xplor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-12
14:26:33 UTC ---
reduced
template
class CDSString {
public:
CDSString(const CHAR* s="",
int len=-1,
const int blockSize=8);
CDSString(const CDSString&);
bool matches(const CHAR* str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-12
13:47:18 UTC ---
-fpermissive is not a catch-all "behave like previous versions" switch, but in
any case, surely the problem here is that the code is valid, it nothing to do
with -fpermissive
script
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-09-12
13:32:16 UTC ---
Bzip2 compressed preprocessed source file for common/xplorSimulation.cc
attached to reproduce the failure with...
[MacPro:~/xplor-nih-2.27/common/bin.Darwin_11_x86_64] howarth% g++-fsf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
Bug #: 50365
Summary: invalid use of non-static data member not suppressed
by -fpermissive
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351
PcX changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-*-mingw* |*-*-mingw32
Host|*-*-mingw*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351
--- Comment #4 from PcX 2011-09-12 13:00:37 UTC
---
So I think that will affect all x86 target LTO build.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351
--- Comment #3 from PcX 2011-09-12 12:55:55 UTC
---
Using Eric Botcazou's test case, it also has the problem.
gcc lex.c
has no problem
gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin lex.c
it shows
In file included from lex.c:15:0,
from :0:
lex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351
--- Comment #2 from PcX 2011-09-12 12:52:11 UTC
---
Created attachment 25247
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25247
Eric Botcazou's testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010
--- Comment #15 from Gerald Pfeifer 2011-09-12
12:16:04 UTC ---
This patch fixes bootstrap on i386-unknown-freebsd9.0 and test results
(cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-09/msg01121.html ) appear
to be in the normal range.
Thanks, J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++0x] [4.7 Regression]|[C++0x] [4.7 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc 4.6 ICE probably|[C++0x] ICE probably
|r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43746
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43746
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-12
10:06:52 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Sep 12 10:06:46 2011
New Revision: 178779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178779
Log:
gcc/
PR target/43746
* config/avr/avr.c (A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50352
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-12
09:33:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 12 09:33:36 2011
New Revision: 178778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178778
Log:
PR bootstrap/50352
* config/arm/arm.md (*pu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50106
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-rtemseabi4.11 |arm-eabi-gcc
--- Comment #5 from Sebast
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-rtemseabi4.11 |arm-eabi-gcc
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50364
Bug #: 50364
Summary: Volatile miscompilation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50352
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #46 from Sebastian Huber
2011-09-12 08:42:59 UTC ---
I guess the local patch will look like this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00459.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
31 16:44:56
EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> rpm -qa "glibc*" | grep -e 'glibc-[0-9]' | sort -u
glibc-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686
glibc-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.x86_64
> g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/app2/gcc/4.7.0-20110912-svn178775
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50362
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-12
07:47:28 UTC ---
seems to be fixed on the 4.6 branch, but 4.7 gives a different ICE:
gcc_test/test.cpp:69:64: internal compiler error: in count_type_elements, at
expr.c:5310
60 matches
Mail list logo
