http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330
Ben Bacarisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla at bsb dot me.uk
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-08 22:42:29 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 8 22:42:21 2011
New Revision: 178713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178713
Log:
2011-09-09 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-09-08
21:46:17 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Sep 8 21:46:14 2011
New Revision: 178712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178712
Log:
Fix PR c/50332
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/attr-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50338
Bug #: 50338
Summary: ICE Linking with -flto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255
--- Comment #27 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-09-08 20:55:19 UTC ---
As a follow-up, I have posted a patchlet[1] to enable this warning whenever
-Wall or -Wunused is used. This patchlet would be applied when the fix
for PR preprocessor/726
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50318
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50318
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs 2011-09-08 19:45:41
UTC ---
Author: ams
Date: Thu Sep 8 19:45:37 2011
New Revision: 178708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178708
Log:
2011-09-08 Andrew Stubbs
PR tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-08
19:22:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> But another reasonable interpretation would be to skip the parameter
> during deduction and then let normal overload resolution check for the
> conversion; i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-08
18:50:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> In fact I expected that there is some implementation freedom which allows this
> (I was thinking of 14.7.1 p6), but I still wonder: I have always understood
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44416
Quentin Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qneill at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner 2011-09-08
18:09:02 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Sep 8 18:08:53 2011
New Revision: 178703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178703
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2011-08-23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46862
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner 2011-09-08
18:09:02 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Sep 8 18:08:53 2011
New Revision: 178703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178703
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2011-08-23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-08
17:42:19 UTC ---
I think this is due to efence not implementing malloc like it should be. That
is -fno-builtin also fixes the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911
--- Comment #25 from Martin Jambor 2011-09-08
17:21:15 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Sep 8 17:20:52 2011
New Revision: 178701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178701
Log:
2011-09-08 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337
--- Comment #2 from Colin Watson 2011-09-08
17:09:45 UTC ---
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625756 reports that this
happens at least as far back as GCC 4.5, and
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=electric-fence&arch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337
--- Comment #1 from Colin Watson 2011-09-08
17:06:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 25232
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25232
test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50334
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337
Bug #: 50337
Summary: -ftree-dse performs wrong elimination on
electric-fence
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler
2011-09-08 16:57:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
In fact I expected that there is some implementation freedom which allows this
(I was thinking of 14.7.1 p6), but I still wonder: I have always understood
th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336
Bug #: 50336
Summary: LWG issue 445
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50334
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-08
16:40:19 UTC ---
Well this is kinda of expected, since you are saying all float variables are
going to be initialized with SNAN so you can detect at runtime those variables
which were left uninitialize
ge1-languages=c --disable-libstdcxx-v3
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110908 (experimental) (GCC)
CFLAGS='-Ofast -floop-flatten' ; make
(doesn't fail with -O3 -floop-flatten)
Preprocessed file attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #25 from Tobias Netzel
2011-09-08 16:27:21 UTC ---
As for me the patch does what it is expected to do; no more linker warnings
when linking objective-c code. I didn't notice anything that might be broken by
it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50334
Bug #: 50334
Summary: interaction between -Wuninitialized and
-finit-real=snan
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
trap
--enable-stage1-languages=c --disable-libstdcxx-v3
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110908 (experimental) (GCC)
CFLAGS='-O2 -ftree-vectorize' ; make
(-O3 fails too, -O2 + -ftree-vectorize seems to me the minimal failure case)
Preprocessed file attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332
Bug #: 50332
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-invalid.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16189
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50331
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50331
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-08
15:18:30 UTC ---
It is likely a duplicate of pr34721.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45331
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.maciel at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16189
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50331
Bug #: 50331
Summary: -Wuninitialized and variable passed to WRITE
statements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-08 14:58:24 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 8 14:58:21 2011
New Revision: 178694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178694
Log:
/cp
2011-09-08 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330
Bug #: 50330
Summary: Misleading error message with struct declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50329
Bug #: 50329
Summary: [PowerPC] Unnecessary stack frame set up
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
14:06:58 UTC ---
Hmm, we fail to set the vectype for the PHI - I'm somewhat lost in the
reduction code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
13:55:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 25228
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25228
preliminary patch
Patch that still ICEs its testcase. Works for testcases that first require
loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911
--- Comment #24 from Martin Jambor 2011-09-08
13:58:39 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Sep 8 13:58:30 2011
New Revision: 178693
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178693
Log:
2011-09-08 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255
--- Comment #26 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-09-08
13:54:33 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Sep 8 13:54:24 2011
New Revision: 178692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178692
Log:
PR c++/33255 - Support -Wunused-local-typedefs wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
13:40:30 UTC ---
Triggered by report http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-09/msg00052.html
OpenCC then unrolls the outer loop to get
.LBB16_double_array_mults_by_const:
# Loop body line 62, nesting dept
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
13:36:23 UTC ---
With the following untested patch we apply outer loop vectorization.
Index: gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328
Bug #: 50328
Summary: loop interchange confuses vectorizer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327
Bug #: 50327
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization generates
wrong code for BLAS's srotmg
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50304
--- Comment #4 from Tamas Fenyvesi 2011-09-08
13:16:53 UTC ---
Please find a sample code and its objdump-ed asm in the attachment.
The command line is:
arm-none-eabi-gcc -D__REDLIB__ -DDEBUG -D__USE_CMSIS -D__CODE_RED -I"../cmsis"
-I"../config"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50304
--- Comment #3 from Tamas Fenyvesi 2011-09-08
13:16:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 25226
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25226
-O1..-O3 compiled objdumped result
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50304
--- Comment #2 from Tamas Fenyvesi 2011-09-08
13:14:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 25225
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25225
some testcases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50287
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor 2011-09-08
13:09:43 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Sep 8 13:09:38 2011
New Revision: 178688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178688
Log:
2011-09-08 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
13:05:26 UTC ---
More cases handled now. What we still miss is conditional free, see
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr19831-3.c for XFAILed testcases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
13:00:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 8 13:00:23 2011
New Revision: 178687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178687
Log:
2011-09-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Bug #: 50326
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at
tree-ssa-ccp.c:456
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
12:10:13 UTC ---
That said, please pick one fail and investigate a bit. ppc-darwin doesn't
seem to be STRICT_ALIGNMENT.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-09-08 10:50:46 UTC ---
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092
>
> --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2011-09-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-08
10:49:08 UTC ---
It looks as a duplicate of pr50137 (with less failures on ppc-darwin).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
10:31:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 8 10:31:39 2011
New Revision: 178685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178685
Log:
2011-09-08 Richard Guenther
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
10:31:44 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 8 10:31:39 2011
New Revision: 178685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178685
Log:
2011-09-08 Richard Guenther
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Bug #: 50325
Summary: 76 new fails with rev. 177691
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324
Bug #: 50324
Summary: SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an
incomplete type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092
--- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-09-08 10:01:48 UTC ---
btw even in C with -Ofast
a*exp(x)*exp(y) (same for sqrt) is NOT optimized. compare
double exp0(double x, double y) {
return exp(x)*exp(y);
}
double exp1(double a, double x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
09:23:12 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 8 09:23:08 2011
New Revision: 178684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178684
Log:
2011-09-08 Richard Guenther
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
09:21:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 8 09:21:39 2011
New Revision: 178683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178683
Log:
2011-09-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50287
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-08
09:17:13 UTC ---
*** Bug 50307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50307
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50307
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus at jet dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50323
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245
--- Comment #7 from Timo Lindfors 2011-09-08
08:06:42 UTC ---
Great news! I can verify that this indeed was fixed in debian (amd64 unstable)
too:
$ gnatmake -ggdb3 -O0 gdb_bug_2
gcc-4.6 -c -ggdb3 -O0 gdb_bug_2.adb
gdb_bug_2.adb:25:07: warning: v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15558
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe 2011-09-08 07:43:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Not necessarily related to your specific problem - but a "heads up":
>
> I've just committed a change to the Darwin port that will make the compiler
> (better
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||scovich at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
93 matches
Mail list logo
