http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |bootstrap
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50042
Sri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50039
--- Comment #1 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11 05:43:21 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Aug 11 05:43:14 2011
New Revision: 177647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177647
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50039
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50042
--- Comment #1 from Sri 2011-08-11 05:39:51 UTC ---
I came across the similar issue being reported:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50042
Bug #: 50042
Summary: bootstrap step fails while compiling GCC 4.0.2 on AIX
6.1 TL-05 SP-2 using XLC 11.1.0.0 Compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49961
--- Comment #5 from quaintchewster at gmail dot com 2011-08-11 03:45:09 UTC ---
Thank all of you !!
I will use 4.6 or 4.7
2011/8/5 janus at gcc dot gnu.org :
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49961
>
> --- Comment #4 from janus at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50041
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-08-11
03:12:58 UTC ---
>#8 0x003881a7a6a9 in _int_malloc () from /lib64/libc.so.6
If you are getting a crash inside calloc, then it is hard to recover from that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #38 from Jack Howarth 2011-08-11
01:25:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> I believe this problem has been fixed. trim_filename doesn't appear twice.
Exactly what commit led you to believe this was fixed? I see nothing that
coul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49242
--- Comment #2 from Michael Richmond
2011-08-11 00:37:19 UTC ---
Yes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50018
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-11
00:20:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 24974
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24974
proposed patch
It fixes the given test case. I'll sanity check on i686.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #36 from Jack Howarth 2011-08-10
23:22:57 UTC ---
Still broken at r177628 with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-08/msg00935.html and...
../gcc-4.7-20110810/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7
--mandir=/sw/share/man
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47831
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47764
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50041
Bug #: 50041
Summary: Unreliable crash_signal leads to deadlock
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-08-10
20:06:44 UTC ---
Looks like latest testcase is a known issue. Bug29693
mvers=gnu --enable-c99
--enable-long-long --enable-target-optspace
target_alias=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c++ --disable-shared
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110810 (experimental) [trunk revision 177632] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. ~/ice.i -g
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20110810 (prerelease)
FAIL: gcc (GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #45 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-10 18:44:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> Created attachment 24973 [details]
> Patch that recognizes addresses, zero-extended with AND, v2.
>
> (In reply to comment #42)
>
> > It also caused:
> >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24967|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #43 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-10 18:19:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> > Patch that recognizes addresses, zero-extended with AND
> It seems to generate more leal for gcc.dg/torture/pr47744-2.c
No, the extra leas are due to re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50037
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50039
Bug #: 50039
Summary: Segfault in vect_operation_fits_smaller_type()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
Bug #: 50038
Summary: redundant zero extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50037
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50037
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich 2011-08-10
15:33:22 UTC ---
I wouldn't blame vectorizer here. Following loop is unrolled with unroll factor
8 even if vectorizer is disabled:
for ( count = ((*(hdrptr)) & 0x3) * 2; count > 0; count--, addr++ )
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50037
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50037
Bug #: 50037
Summary: Unroll factor exceeds max trip count
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50035
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #4 from H
t/git/gcc-x32/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-prof/tree-prof.exp ...
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C compilation, -Os -fprofile-use
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes250
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unresolved testcases1
/export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50035
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-10
13:02:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 24970
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24970
Wrong assembly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50035
Bug #: 50035
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C
execution, -Os -fprofile-use at revision 176696 on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-08-10
12:15:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 24968
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24968
WIP Patch.
A patch I'm testing but I don't very much like this given it makes this rather
com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40931
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Basov 2011-08-10
11:11:04 UTC ---
Fixed on 4.7.0 trunk.
Checked on gcc revision 177554.
gnatmake p
gcc -c p.adb
p.adb:15:07: warning: variable "A" is never read and never assigned
p.adb:22:07: warning: variable "A"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40931
--- Comment #4 from Samuel Tardieu 2011-08-10 11:02:21
UTC ---
Je suis absent jusqu'au 5 septembre sans accès à mon courrier électronique.
I am in vacation until September 5 without email access.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40931
Alexander Basov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coopht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-10
10:13:12 UTC ---
The problem comes and goes, but does seem better recently. I'll keep an eye on
it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46361
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-08-10
09:45:12 UTC ---
Is this related to PR42146, an ICE on array size of 0x8000?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48924
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48924
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29560
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50026
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50030
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-10
09:13:03 UTC ---
I think for more elaborate costs we should allow the backend to track costs
per loop by something like
void *state = targetm.start_vect_loop_cost ();
pass that state pointer to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29560
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-08-10
08:58:07 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Aug 10 08:58:03 2011
New Revision: 177616
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177616
Log:
PR target/29560
* config/avr/avr.md (*as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-10
08:50:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 10 08:50:39 2011
New Revision: 177615
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177615
Log:
2011-08-10 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-10
08:48:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 10 08:48:37 2011
New Revision: 177614
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177614
Log:
2011-08-10 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
57 matches
Mail list logo