http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688
--- Comment #21 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-06 06:29:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-08/msg00052.html
Works ok on native alpha [1].
There are two remaining problems, an assert in "as", as reported in [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48993
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:38:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:38:32 2011
New Revision: 177503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177503
Log:
PR c++/48993
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49988
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:38:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:38:08 2011
New Revision: 177500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177500
Log:
PR c++/49988
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_array_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:38:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:38:16 2011
New Revision: 177501
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177501
Log:
PR c++/49669
* init.c (perform_member_init)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49921
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:38:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:38:24 2011
New Revision: 177502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177502
Log:
PR c++/49921
* semantics.c (finish_decltype
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49921
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:34:40 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:34:37 2011
New Revision: 177498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177498
Log:
PR c++/49921
* semantics.c (finish_decltype
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:34:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:34:29 2011
New Revision: 177497
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177497
Log:
PR c++/49669
* init.c (perform_member_init)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48993
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:34:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:34:45 2011
New Revision: 177499
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177499
Log:
PR c++/48993
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49988
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-06
04:34:25 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 6 04:34:21 2011
New Revision: 177496
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177496
Log:
PR c++/49988
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_array_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Douglas Mencken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Summary: 50k get!!! GCC is great!
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: spam
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Summary: [4.5/graphite] ICE in graphite_loop_normal_form, at
graphite-sese-to-poly.c:2850
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-08-05
23:21:36 UTC ---
Confirmed on x86_64-apple-darwiin11 that the lto-bootstrap failure due to
duplicate symbols in introduced at...
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Aug 4 11:30:45 2011
New Revision: 177358
URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37221
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33037
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37211
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37211
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-05
23:06:22 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 5 23:06:18 2011
New Revision: 177491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177491
Log:
2011-08-05 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37211
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-05
22:59:15 UTC ---
The commit seems to have gone to "[Bug middle-end/37221] Missed early
loop-unroll optimization - causes 40% degradation on SPU".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47369
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
22:37:35 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Aug 5 22:37:32 2011
New Revision: 177490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177490
Log:
Add a testcase for PR target/47369.
2011-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49995
Douglas Mencken changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dougmencken at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49998
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|crtstuff.c:64:28: fatal |[4.7 Regression]
|e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49998
Summary: crtstuff.c:64:28: fatal error: unwind-dw2-fde.h: No
such file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #15 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
22:05:45 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Aug 5 22:05:43 2011
New Revision: 177487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177487
Log:
Add a testcase for PR middle-end/47364.
20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #27 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-05 22:01:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00642.html
>
> It failed gcc.dg/torture/pr47744-2.c the same way as comment 8.
Expected, please see the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48993
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-05 21:58:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> New revision of patch at [1].
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00642.html
It failed gcc.dg/torture/pr47744-2.c the same way as comment 8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49997
Summary: ICE in inline_small_functions with
-fnon-call-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37221
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-05
21:52:03 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 5 21:51:59 2011
New Revision: 177486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177486
Log:
2011-08-05 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/3722
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996
Summary: Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing
struct in new-initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49921
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49995
Summary: "operand missing mode" warning on sparc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2234 with -Os -fsched2-use-superblocks
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49494
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-05
20:56:08 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Aug 5 20:56:05 2011
New Revision: 177484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177484
Log:
+ PR middle-end/49494
+ * ipa-inline-analys
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-05
20:52:06 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Aug 5 20:52:03 2011
New Revision: 177483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177483
Log:
PR middle-end/49500
* tree-emultls.c (new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin11 |x86_64-apple-darwin{10,11}
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-05
20:20:11 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Aug 5 20:20:07 2011
New Revision: 177482
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177482
Log:
PR middle-end/49735
* gcc.c-tortur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49988
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49812
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49983
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47453
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49983
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47453
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-05
19:15:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 5 19:15:25 2011
New Revision: 177480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177480
Log:
PR c++/47453
* typeck.c (build_x_compound_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49812
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-05
19:12:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 5 19:12:24 2011
New Revision: 177479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177479
Log:
PR c++/49812
* typeck.c (cp_build_unary_op)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49983
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-05
19:12:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 5 19:12:16 2011
New Revision: 177478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177478
Log:
PR c++/49983
* parser.c (cp_parser_range_fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688
--- Comment #20 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
19:04:20 UTC ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-08/msg00052.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #25 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-05 19:01:44
UTC ---
New revision of patch at [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00642.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2011-08-05
18:52:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Created attachment 24397 [details]
> > Iain's work in progress for LTO containerization
>
> Sorry that I can't commit any tim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-08-05
18:22:39 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Aug 5 18:22:36 2011
New Revision: 177475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177475
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49900
* sched-ebb.c (a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688
--- Comment #19 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
17:44:43 UTC ---
Err, it's slightly more complicated than that.
We're emitting *both* a frame from .ent/.end *and* a frame from .cfi.
The later has the personality info, and the former does not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688
--- Comment #18 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
17:33:05 UTC ---
Argh. The problem is that if we emit both
.ent / .frame / .mask / .end
notes and .cfi directives, the .cfi directives get ignored.
Thus the .cfi_personality directive did n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49993
Summary: arrays declared as parameter are not allocated in
read-only memory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-08-05 17:17:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 24924
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24924
BT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-08-05
17:12:16 UTC ---
$ ../gcc-4.7-20110805/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-20110805/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/sw/src/fink.build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05 17:03:54 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Aug 5 17:03:50 2011
New Revision: 177468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177468
Log:
2011-08-05 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-08-05 16:57:11 UTC ---
r173763 -ok, r174012 - fail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991
Summary: gimple check: expected gimple_phi(error_mark), have
gimple_assign(max_expr) in gimple_phi_arg
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
Summary: Regression: Bootstrap failure for x86_64-*-mingw32 in
libfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: baldr...@gcc.gnu.org
$ gcc-4.7 -c p.adb
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.7.0 20110805 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
sinfo.adb:638|
| Error detected at p.adb:7:9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282
--- Comment #16 from Alan Modra 2011-08-05 16:29:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 24923
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24923
minimal rs6000.c fix
This fix just ensures we have a stack tie at the ABI_V4 stack reset. Note that
o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra 2011-08-05 16:23:04
UTC ---
Created attachment 24922
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24922
belt and braces fix for rs6000.c
This fix goes overboard to guard against possible future compiler cha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
16:18:57 UTC ---
Fixed? Dave, if this works for you on pa, please close.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
16:17:54 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:17:46 2011
New Revision: 177466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177466
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49977
* dwarf2cfi.c (scan_insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
16:17:20 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:17:13 2011
New Revision: 177465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177465
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49977
* dwarf2cfi.c (scan_insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
16:12:22 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:12:16 2011
New Revision: 177464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177464
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49982
* expr.c (fixup_args_siz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-05 15:39:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I don't see those at my setup. Will check. Is that with the plugin?
Yes.
ld --version
GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.21.52.0.2.20110610
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49494
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-05
15:25:34 UTC ---
Problem here is that more_ok is compiled into function having 4 parameters
(where first parameter is return value) and it is called with 3 parameters.
My fortran fu is not on par to tel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-05
15:15:47 UTC ---
Ah, thank you reload for silly intermediate states. But at least
it gets cleaned up afterward. So, yes, your fix is correct.
But I'd prefer a slight variation:
diff --git a/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24884|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-05 14:50:55
UTC ---
I don't see those at my setup. Will check. Is that with the plugin?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49812
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-05
14:42:00 UTC ---
operator++ isn't returning void. The problem is that GCC is treating it as a
volatile prvalue, which can't bind to either const volatile int& or const int&.
But int prvalues shouldn'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49812
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49983
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49988
--- Comment #1 from Faisal Vali 2011-08-05 13:59:55
UTC ---
Also, changing the parameter to a pointer to an array makes the code work
correctly:
struct A {
char data[3];
template
constexpr
// NOTE: now it is a pointer to an arr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45282
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-05
13:53:35 UTC ---
...is a prvalue if the LHS is a prvalue. decltype now returns int&&, which is
closer but still not right.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #110 from Martin Jambor 2011-08-05
13:47:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #107)
>
> Martin, you mentioned similar problem earlier, perhaps you already have
> solution?
I went for adding the includes. I wasn't looking into dependenci
Daca nu ti-ai gasit inca jumatatea, este pentru ca nu ai cautat-o unde trebuie.
Ea te asteapta pe http://www.Amandoi.net
ATENTIE :In conformitate cu legea 365/2002 cu modificarile aduse prin legea
121/2006 privind comertul elect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2011-08-05
13:39:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> works for me on Darwin9 & Darwin10.
> Don't have access to Darwin11 as yet - but if someone could check it there.
Works fine on x86_64-apple-darwin11
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49985
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49988
Summary: constexpr on ctor invokes improper initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2011-08-05 12:22:16 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Aug 5 12:22:10 2011
New Revision: 177428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177428
Log:
PR libgomp/49965
* testsuite/libgomp.c++/task-8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987
Summary: [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails
on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-08-05 10:50:27 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The loop that remains after fixing PR49957 in 410.bwaves is the following,
> which loop SLP does not handle (well, I'm not exactly sure) because
>
> t.f:18: not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49984
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49984
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-05
10:16:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 5 10:16:48 2011
New Revision: 177425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177425
Log:
2011-08-05 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to |Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49983
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49979
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
