[Bug tree-optimization/49413] over-optimization that causes valid code to segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413 --- Comment #9 from Matt Gattis 2011-08-04 04:21:20 UTC --- > However, on most archs I'm pretty sure the optimizer already checks alignment > in order to do things like SIMD instructions. So this is probably a valid > FEATURE REQUEST... that the

[Bug go/49889] Calling a function whose name is obscured by a local variable does not produce an error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49889 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/49889] Calling a function whose name is obscured by a local variable does not produce an error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49889 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 04:08:35 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Thu Aug 4 04:08:29 2011 New Revision: 177310 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177310 Log: PR go/49889 gccgo : Fixed bug 49889.

[Bug tree-optimization/49413] over-optimization that causes valid code to segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49413 Gabriel M. Beddingfield changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabriel at teuton dot org --- C

[Bug middle-end/49971] Missing "uninitialized" warning; may involve "return" statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49971 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c/49971] New: Missing "uninitialized" warning; may involve "return" statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49971 Summary: Missing "uninitialized" warning; may involve "return" statements Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-04 00:18:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 24911 [details] > full patch > > Your patch misses several patterns. > > This bootstraps, but I don't have an avx cpu locally. It works: htt

[Bug libgomp/48841] [regression] lot more libgomp testsuite failures compared to 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841 Hin-Tak Leung changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.5, 4.6.1 Known to fail|

[Bug target/34888] Stack patterns for AVR not optimal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34888 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #6 from Richard H

[Bug target/34888] Stack patterns for AVR not optimal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34888 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-03 22:57:25 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Wed Aug 3 22:57:22 2011 New Revision: 177300 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177300 Log: PR target/34888 * config/avr/avr.md: New

[Bug libgomp/48841] [regression] lot more libgomp testsuite failures compared to 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841 --- Comment #6 from Hin-Tak Leung 2011-08-03 22:26:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Please follow the directions I gave in that PR. Start with a standard > configure; make setup, no bootstrap-lean4, no relative paths to the > source dir.

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #106 from Marc Glisse 2011-08-03 21:51:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #96) > I could trace this to g++ defining __STRICT_ANSI__ for > -std=c++98/c++0x. defines _STRICT_STDC in this > case, which hides the !_REENTRANT && !_LP64 && !_

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 21:46:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 24911 [details] > full patch > > Your patch misses several patterns. > > This bootstraps, but I don't have an avx cpu locally. I am testing i

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24910|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug middle-end/49968] ICE in calls.c:3141 / assert after emit_stack_restore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968 --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-08-03 21:21:32 UTC --- The patch did indeed fix the testcase, thanks! Running a full regression now ...

[Bug c/49923] __attirubte__((packed)) on ARM is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923 --- Comment #6 from Søren Holm 2011-08-03 21:00:06 UTC --- As far as my isolated test-case goes the patch works. :D I will report back after a test on the target tomorrow.

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 20:51:22 UTC --- Created attachment 24910 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24910 A patch I am testing this.

[Bug tree-optimization/49963] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in abs_hwi, at hwint.c:108

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-03 20:29:51 UTC --- Created attachment 24909 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24909 Draft patch I'm attaching a patch which tries to implement what Joseph suggests (thanks!). Essential

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #105 from Andrew Paprocki 2011-08-03 20:26:17 UTC --- $ uname -a SunOS sun 5.10 Generic_137111-08 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5240 Solaris $ CC -V CC: Sun C++ 5.10 SunOS_sparc 128228-10 2010/08/18 $ g++ -dumpversion 4.5.2 $ cat > foo.cpp #includ

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03 20:17:49 UTC --- I wonder whether the right thing to do would be to add a general expression comparison routine like the one below (just a rough sketch so far). a) Do we have something like t

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 Andrew Paprocki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew at ishiboo dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-03 20:11:16 UTC --- It seems that I never submitted the patch. It is posted now. Honza

[Bug tree-optimization/49735] [4.7 Regression] mips64-elf libgcc build fails with apparently infinite recursion.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug tree-optimization/49735] [4.7 Regression] mips64-elf libgcc build fails with apparently infinite recursion.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-03 20:00:22 UTC --- Hmm, it looks like recursive_inlining_p predicate broke with presence of aliases. I will take a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/49772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in ipa_pta_execute, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6790 with -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-08-03 19:57:06 UTC --- Hmm, we should never make the cgrpah point to inline variant in this case, so rest of compilation should go smoothly after the error is output. I don't think it is what is confusing ipa-

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03 19:41:17 UTC --- The simple constant-length example in comment #0 can be rejected by extending the resolve.c part of the patch in comment #3 into: Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c ==

[Bug middle-end/21018] Initializing string literal data improperly marked frame-relative?, should be readonly static const.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21018 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority

[Bug target/43746] -fmerge-constants and -fmerge-all-constants don't work at AVR target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43746 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schlie at comcast dot net --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/49970] "make prefix=... install" doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970 --- Comment #5 from jimis 2011-08-03 19:32:09 UTC --- DESTDIR is supported just fine, but it is not prefix, it serves different purposes. In particular it installs in /$DESTDIR/$prefix but installed package would search libraries in /$prefix. jo

[Bug c++/47453] [DR 1214] Various non-conforming behaviors with braced-init-list initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47453 --- Comment #7 from Johannes Schaub 2011-08-03 19:17:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > > > You can define it as follows to make it work in both cases > > > > #define PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER {} > > I cannot define/redefine this valu

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 --- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-03 19:11:48 UTC --- It's a bug in the i386 backend: (call_insn 28 27 136 2 (parallel [ (parallel [ (call (mem:QI (mem/f:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 73 [ __ec$_M_cat_2->_vptr

[Bug libfortran/49970] "make prefix=... install" doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl 2011-08-03 19:09:22 UTC --- On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:01:55PM +, jimis at gmx dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970 > > --- Comment #2 from jimis 2011-08-03 19:01:51 UTC --- > I

[Bug libfortran/49970] "make prefix=... install" doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-03 19:03:24 UTC --- This is a bug in libtool. See bug 46607. It will need to be fixed in upstream libtool (see bug 46607 comment 10 for what might be the simplest approach).

[Bug libfortran/49970] "make prefix=... install" doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970 --- Comment #2 from jimis 2011-08-03 19:01:51 UTC --- I use it casually for packages that use autotools to configure the build, it always works fine. And for gcc it has worked for me plenty of times for i386 C-frontend only builds, and till not I'

[Bug tree-optimization/49963] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in abs_hwi, at hwint.c:108

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-03 18:59:33 UTC --- I think this is a case for a function absu_hwi or similar that returns an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT value. (Actually it's a case for operating properly on the INTEGER_CS

[Bug tree-optimization/49948] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops: "address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49948 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-03 18:56:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 3 18:56:02 2011 New Revision: 177292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177292 Log: PR tree-optimization/49948 * gimple.c (walk

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03 18:53:17 UTC --- I think in general we may also have to reject differing non-constant string lengths (at least that's what ifort does), as in: module world implicit none type :: world_1

[Bug c++/47453] [DR 1214] Various non-conforming behaviors with braced-init-list initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47453 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49948] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops: "address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49948 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-03 18:49:43 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 3 18:49:40 2011 New Revision: 177291 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177291 Log: PR tree-optimization/49948 * gimple.c (walk

[Bug libfortran/49970] "make prefix=... install" doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03 18:36:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > A check for different ranks can be added like this: This will reject the following variant of the original test case, which is accepted up to now:

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug middle-end/49968] ICE in calls.c:3141 / assert after emit_stack_restore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/49968] ICE in calls.c:3141 / assert after emit_stack_restore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-03 18:00:21 UTC --- Created attachment 24908 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24908 proposed patch I believe this will solve the problem.

[Bug libfortran/49970] New: "make prefix=... install" doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970 Summary: "make prefix=... install" doesn't work Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unas

[Bug c/49923] __attirubte__((packed)) on ARM is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-08-03 17:39:05 UTC --- Søren, can you please verify this patch fixes the problem for you? It's based on trunk but should apply well to the 4.6 branch too. Thanks. Index: src/gcc/tree-sra.c =

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49969] New: not vectorized: data ref analysis failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49969 Summary: not vectorized: data ref analysis failed Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug middle-end/49968] ICE in calls.c:3141 / assert after emit_stack_restore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49968] New: ICE in calls.c:3141 / assert after emit_stack_restore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968 Summary: ICE in calls.c:3141 / assert after emit_stack_restore Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Ass

[Bug web/49935] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 3.6.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/49965] libgomp.c++/reduction-4.C and libgomp.c++/task-8.C FAIL on Solaris 11/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-03 16:50:27 UTC --- > --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-03 > 16:37:36 UTC --- > So what values it printed? Did it print -2.0 and 9.0 in some iterations? Here's the complete

[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 16:49:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > > This additional patch prevents zero_extend when we deal with > > wider-than-word-size moves. These moves need offsetable_oper

[Bug c++/49967] New: The -static-libstdc++ does not work on HP-UX (IA64 B.11.23, probably others)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967 Summary: The -static-libstdc++ does not work on HP-UX (IA64 B.11.23, probably others) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 16:47:09 UTC --- Created attachment 24907 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24907 A testcase [hjl@gnu-33 delta]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32-test/release/usr/gcc-4.7.0-x32/bin/gcc -mx32 -

[Bug libgomp/49965] libgomp.c++/reduction-4.C and libgomp.c++/task-8.C FAIL on Solaris 11/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-03 16:37:36 UTC --- So what values it printed? Did it print -2.0 and 9.0 in some iterations? The final merging is done in a critical section between GOMP_atomic_start and GOMP_atomic_end, perhaps you can

[Bug c++/49949] wrong sign for product of complex and double with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49949 --- Comment #5 from Ilker R Capoglu 2011-08-03 16:34:31 UTC --- Created attachment 24906 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24906 The preprocessed file with the STL and blitz++ headers. (bzip2'd)

[Bug c++/49949] wrong sign for product of complex and double with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49949 --- Comment #4 from Ilker R Capoglu 2011-08-03 16:32:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction is useful > > if you can't reduce it then using gzip or bzip2 might make it small enough to > attach

[Bug target/49950] GOT relocation for -fPIE is excessive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49950 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/49949] wrong sign for product of complex and double with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49949 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-03 16:27:23 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction is useful if you can't reduce it then using gzip or bzip2 might make it small enough to attach

[Bug libgomp/49965] libgomp.c++/reduction-4.C and libgomp.c++/task-8.C FAIL on Solaris 11/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-03 16:26:45 UTC --- > --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-03 > 15:10:13 UTC --- > for task-8.C, error is a function on linux, so please replace it by errval > or err_atomic or

[Bug c++/49949] wrong sign for product of complex and double with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49949 --- Comment #2 from Ilker R Capoglu 2011-08-03 16:20:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > An attachment is missing. Please try to create a small self-contained > testcase using . Sorry, I think it didn't get uploaded because it was above 1000k

[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 16:18:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > > This additional patch prevents zero_extend when we deal with > wider-than-word-size moves. These moves need offsetable_operand, which > zero_extend (...) isn

[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-03 16:08:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > gcc.dg/torture/pr47744-2.c compiled with > > -mx32 -O3 -std=gnu99 -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops > > generates codes like > > leal(%rax,%r9), %

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #103 from Marc Glisse 2011-08-03 15:52:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #102) > What would help enormously for this would be a complete justification > for the individual fixes: Of course. I tried to keep the fixincludes to the minimum

[Bug tree-optimization/49963] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in abs_hwi, at hwint.c:108

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-03 15:45:06 UTC --- Eh, my way of fixing it would be removing the assert ;) Seriously, too bad, I can try to look a bit into it but help is welcome of course, I don't think the project wants to rely on my

[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 15:44:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > This additional patch prevents zero_extend when we deal with > wider-than-word-size moves. These moves need offsetable_operand, which > zero_extend (...) isn't.

[Bug libgcj/40947] Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after -_SYSTYPE_SVR4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947 --- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-03 15:42:46 UTC --- >> > Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after >> > -_SYSTYPE_SVR4 > >> What I do see is that if you add some -W option to ld, you get exactly

[Bug libgcj/40947] Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after -_SYSTYPE_SVR4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947 Hin-Tak Leung changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.1 --- Comment #16 from Hin-Tak Leung

[Bug c/49966] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts

ith... /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/gcc/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-20110803/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c -w -O2 -lm -m32 -o /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc/pr45034

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 Hin-Tak Leung changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.1 --- Comment #13 from Hin-Tak Leung

[Bug c/49966] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts

ith... /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/gcc/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-20110803/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c -w -O2 -lm -m32 -o /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #12 from Hin-Tak Leung 2011-08-03 15:29:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Did you use an absolute path for the source dir? There have been > problems with relative paths in the past. Tried absolute path with 4.6.1, and compilat

[Bug c/49966] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49966 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: una

[Bug tree-optimization/49963] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in abs_hwi, at hwint.c:108

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-03 15:27:36 UTC --- Probably fails on any 32bit HWI platform.

[Bug tree-optimization/49963] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in abs_hwi, at hwint.c:108

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49946] Thread jumps confuse loop unrolling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49946 --- Comment #1 from Igor Zamyatin 2011-08-03 15:26:57 UTC --- Used compiler: Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110802 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/49962] "internal compiler error" when using type-bounded function returning vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/49961] type bounded function can not return a pointer of a array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49961 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/49957] Fails to SLP in 410.bwaves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49957 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/49955] Fails to do partial basic-block SLP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #102 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-03 15:12:29 UTC --- > --- Comment #101 from Paolo Carlini > 2011-08-03 10:02:44 UTC --- > Thanks Marc. Thus, it seems to me that Rainer should have a look to the > fixincludes, doub

[Bug libgomp/49965] libgomp.c++/reduction-4.C and libgomp.c++/task-8.C FAIL on Solaris 11/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-03 15:10:13 UTC --- for task-8.C, error is a function on linux, so please replace it by errval or err_atomic or similar instead if err doesn't work on Solaris. Fur reduction-4.C, perhaps Solaris long dou

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gc

[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-03 15:01:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > > Created attachment 24899 [details] > > > Proposed patch that exploits addr32. > > > > > > H.J., can you please test this pa

[Bug libgomp/49965] New: libgomp.c++/reduction-4.C and libgomp.c++/task-8.C FAIL on Solaris 11/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965 Summary: libgomp.c++/reduction-4.C and libgomp.c++/task-8.C FAIL on Solaris 11/SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/49740] [4.7 Regression] powerpc native bootstrap with -O3 produces "Bootstrap comparison failure!"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49740 --- Comment #2 from Douglas Mencken 2011-08-03 14:56:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Did it recover? What shall I try? gcc-4.7-20110730? svn checkout? Some patch? (Nothing has been attached or reported.)

[Bug libgomp/49965] libgomp.c++/reduction-4.C and libgomp.c++/task-8.C FAIL on Solaris 11/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/49900] [4.7 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-ebb.c:691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Andreas Sch

[Bug middle-end/49721] convert_memory_address_addr_space may generate invalid new insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 14:48:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > H.J., I agree with what you write in comment 16. But unless we are sure that > the problematic composition will never be generated (e.g. by ivopts), we > canno

[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 --- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-03 14:45:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Created attachment 24899 [details] > > Proposed patch that exploits addr32. > > > > H.J., can you please test this patch on mx32. > > > > The patch bootst

[Bug middle-end/47383] [x32] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #17 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03 14:44:59 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Aug 3 14:44:54 2011 New Revision: 177277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177277 Log: Add a testcase for PR middle-end/47383. 20

[Bug tree-optimization/49957] Fails to SLP in 410.bwaves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49957 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-03 14:41:49 UTC --- The patch now makes us vectorize shell_lam.f:303: note: LOOP VECTORIZED. shell_lam.f:262: note: LOOP VECTORIZED. shell_lam.f:205: note: LOOP VECTORIZED. compared to just shell_la

[Bug bootstrap/49964] Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 --- Comment #1 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-08-03 14:28:55 UTC --- Started from here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-08/msg00051.html

[Bug bootstrap/49964] New: Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964 Summary: Bootstrap failed with AVX turned on Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...

[Bug tree-optimization/49963] New: ICE: in abs_hwi, at hwint.c:108

--disable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-dwarf2 --disable-lto Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20110803 (experimental) (GCC) GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.0 20110803 (experimental) (avr) compiled by GNU C version 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291], GMP version 5.0.1, MPFR versio

[Bug fortran/49962] "internal compiler error" when using type-bounded function returning vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 --- Comment #2 from wangmianzhi 2011-08-03 14:24:19 UTC --- On 2011年08月03日 10:23, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 > > --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres > 2011-08-03 14:22:47 UTC --- >

[Bug fortran/49962] "internal compiler error" when using type-bounded function returning vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-03 14:22:47 UTC --- With gfortran 4.6.1 and trunk, the code compiles and gives at run time 1 2 3 but I get the ICE with 4.5.3. So the bug has been fixed, but not ba

[Bug fortran/49962] New: "internal compiler error" when using type-bounded function returning vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49962 Summary: "internal compiler error" when using type-bounded function returning vector Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

  1   2   >