http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-26
05:28:50 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Tue Jul 26 05:28:45 2011
New Revision: 176782
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176782
Log:
2011-07-25 Andrew Pinski
PR tree-opt/4967
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49347
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-26
05:07:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Jason, will there be restrict support in C++ 2011?
No.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49799
--- Comment #8 from Carrot 2011-07-26 02:51:39 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> No, you miss the point.
>
> Internally we must not generate (ashift (reg) (const_int)) where the const is
> negative.
>
> Note that your testcasegenerates a reg s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Lacombe 2011-07-26
01:31:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 24834
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24834
reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
Summary: False positive warning triggered by
-Wmaybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #44 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-26
00:29:22 UTC ---
Please.. ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #43 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-26
00:26:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> Seems like we should add BUILT_IN_ISINF and its variants to
> builtin_valid_in_constant_expr_p.
Actually, we seem to ignore the arguments when a function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #42 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-26
00:10:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (we *do* have PRs about constexpr vs diagnostics)
Notably 45923, which I have just closed as fixed by my June 29 patch.
The comment 8 testcase results in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25
22:53:29 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Jul 25 22:53:25 2011
New Revision: 176773
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176773
Log:
PR debug/49841
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 21:49:53
UTC ---
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02209.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Summary: m68k gcj-4.6 NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 ==
NULL)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47509
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-25
20:14:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. git clone git://github.com/ethersex/ethersex.git
> 2. cd ethersex/
> 3. make menuconfig
> -> Make sure that "UDP support" is act
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 20:13:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Another problem:
> >
> > [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/bar.c
> > typedef unsigned int Elf32_Addr;
> > extern void _start (void);
> > i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 20:10:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Another problem:
>
> [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/bar.c
> typedef unsigned int Elf32_Addr;
> extern void _start (void);
> int
> dl_main ( Elf32_Addr *user_entry)
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 20:00:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > (In reply to comment #14)
> > > Another problem:
> >
> > > /tmp/bar.c:10:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> > > (insn 6 5 7 3 (set (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 19:59:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Another problem:
>
> > /tmp/bar.c:10:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> > (insn 6 5 7 3 (set (reg:SI 67)
> > (symbol_ref:SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #41 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-25
19:58:52 UTC ---
The testcase in Comment #30 has the types wrong, the below is a corrected
version (the substance of the issue doesn't change at all). I'm also thinking
of checking in the library bits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #15 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 19:51:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Another problem:
> /tmp/bar.c:10:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 6 5 7 3 (set (reg:SI 67)
> (symbol_ref:SI ("_start") [flags 0x41] _start>))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 19:39:27
UTC ---
Another problem:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/bar.c
typedef unsigned int Elf32_Addr;
extern void _start (void);
int
dl_main ( Elf32_Addr *user_entry)
{
if (*user_entry == (Elf32_Addr) _star
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #13 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47089
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grosser at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 18:29:08
UTC ---
Working x32 GCC generates:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat foo.s
.file"foo.c"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globldl_main
.typedl_main, @function
dl_main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_start
dl_main, .-dl_main
.hidden_start
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20110725 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47128
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 18:11:47
UTC ---
I will close this PR when the patches from Tobias will go on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01892.html
This patch-set removes support for CLooG-Parma.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 18:03:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 24831 [details]
> A testcase
>
> elf/rtld.c in glibc is miscompiled by
>
> -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -fPIC
GCC generates many relocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 17:50:19 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jul 25 17:50:13 2011
New Revision: 176765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176765
Log:
2011-07-25 Paolo Carlini
PR boot
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
CC: ja...@redhat.com
Target: x86_64-fedora16-linux-gnu
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110725 (experim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47593
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 17:46:29
UTC ---
Second attempt to fix this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02061.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24821|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2011-07-25 17:27:26
UTC ---
The patch allows me to get past the failure. The current solution seems good
enough for me. Someone else can implement the alternative when it's needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49845
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #89 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-25
17:14:13 UTC ---
Ok, thanks. I'm afraid Jon will not be able to contribute much over the next
few weeks, in the meanwhile I'll try to find the time to go through that old
message of yours to the mailin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49836
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49836
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 17:08:53 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jul 25 17:08:48 2011
New Revision: 176761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176761
Log:
2011-07-25 Paolo Carlini
Nath
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #88 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-25 17:02:45 UTC ---
> --- Comment #87 from Paolo Carlini
> 2011-07-22 21:49:49 UTC ---
> Now the pragma issue is solved. Good. I don't know Rainer if that means we can
> do something
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 16:58:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Working ld.so sets EDX properly with:
Sorry, I need a testcase to debug this...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 16:41:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > X32 dynamic linker is miscompiled:
>
> BTW: These two functions look the same to me.
>
> "lea(%rsi,%rdx,1),%edx" is the same as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-25
16:39:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 24832
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24832
possible fix
The ICE caught exactly what it was supposed to -- a difference in
unwind info acros
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 16:24:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> X32 dynamic linker is miscompiled:
BTW: These two functions look the same to me.
"lea(%rsi,%rdx,1),%edx" is the same as "add%esi,%edx".
Can you plea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 16:15:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> A shot-in-the-dark change:
>
> (define_insn "*add_1"
> [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,rm,r,r")
> (plus:SWI48
> (match_operand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 16:15:10
UTC ---
Created attachment 24831
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24831
A testcase
elf/rtld.c in glibc is miscompiled by
-std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -fPIC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49842
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mexas at bristol dot ac.uk
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39386
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844
Summary: Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1
"-flto -fuse-linker-plugin" results in many linker
stage errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49347
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49347
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-25 15:56:31 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:56:27 2011
New Revision: 176758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176758
Log:
PR c++/49347
* inclhack.def (solaris_posix_spawn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49404
--- Comment #2 from Akos PASZTORY 2011-07-25
15:51:06 UTC ---
Does that also apply to _Unwind_Backtrace? Unfortunately the specification I
found [1] doesn't elaborate on the return values. Would anything bad happen if
it just returned the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39386
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-25
15:45:51 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:45:47 2011
New Revision: 176757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176757
Log:
PR target/39386
Backport from mainline r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067
--- Comment #42 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-25
15:39:54 UTC ---
With gas_dyn changed to use MINLOC (DTEMP, 1) we now inline the intrinsic
(but not with MINLOC (DTEMP), even though we know it'll be a single-element
array result ...).
We complet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39386
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-25
15:42:00 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:41:55 2011
New Revision: 176756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176756
Log:
PR target/39386
* config/avr/avr.c (out_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-25 15:39:58
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:39:52 2011
New Revision: 176755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176755
Log:
PR libgomp/45351
* config/osf/sem.h: New file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843
Summary: 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libmudflap
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49842
--- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht 2011-07-25
15:33:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 24830
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24830
/usr/ports/lang/gcc47/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freebsd9.0/libgcc/config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49842
Summary: sparc64-portbld-freebsd9.0 internal compiler error:
in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c:2632
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49838
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49838
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 15:29:16 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:29:13 2011
New Revision: 176754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176754
Log:
/cp
2011-07-25 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-25 15:28:30
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:28:27 2011
New Revision: 176753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176753
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR testsuite/49753
* g++.dg/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49753
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-25 15:28:30 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:28:27 2011
New Revision: 176753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176753
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR testsuite/49753
* g++.dg/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49753
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-25 15:25:37 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:25:32 2011
New Revision: 176752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176752
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR testsuite/49753
* g++.dg/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-25 15:25:37
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 25 15:25:32 2011
New Revision: 176752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176752
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR testsuite/49753
* g++.dg/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41849
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41849
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-25
15:21:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 24829
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24829
Test case from attachment 24828 as compiled with avr-gcc 4.4.2
For compiler options, see the atta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49347
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 15:20:42
UTC ---
A shot-in-the-dark change:
(define_insn "*add_1"
[(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,rm,r,r")
(plus:SWI48
(match_operand:SWI48 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41849
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-25
15:19:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 24828
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24828
C test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47124
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47124
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-25 14:58:22 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 25 14:58:18 2011
New Revision: 176751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176751
Log:
PR target/47124
* config.gcc: Reject *-*-solaris
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49809
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49809
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-25 14:51:50 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jul 25 14:51:47 2011
New Revision: 176750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176750
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/4980
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-25 14:52:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The miscompiled function is
Er, not a testcase ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49404
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 14:36:23
UTC ---
The miscompiled function is
auto inline void
__attribute ((always_inline))
elf_machine_rela_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
void *const relo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49840
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 14:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255
--- Comment #23 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-07-25 14:29:15 UTC ---
> --- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini
> 2011-07-24 22:49:32 UTC ---
> Just as a note, wanted also to add that if I understand correctly the
> (temporary?!?) small issue w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49840
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-25
14:27:50 UTC ---
Does
Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c (revision 176745)
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c (working copy)
@@ -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47947
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
--- Comment #12 from Agner Fog 2011-07-25 14:21:52 UTC
---
No the behavior is not predictable when it sometimes warns about ignoring
overflow, and sometimes not. Please add a warning when it optimizes away an
overflow check after the abs function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc d
...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: d...@gcc.gnu.org
/tmp/20110725/./gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/20110725/./gcc/
-B/farm/dje/install/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0-20110725/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/bin/
-B/farm/dje/install/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0-20110725/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/lib/
-isystem
/farm/dje/install/powerpc-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49840
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49822
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-25
14:15:06 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 25 14:15:02 2011
New Revision: 176745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176745
Log:
2011-07-25 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49840
Summary: [4.7 Regression] New test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-25 13:59:10
UTC ---
X32 dynamic linker is miscompiled:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00114821 in elf_machine_rela_relative (reloc_addr_arg=,
l_addr=1114112, reloc=)
at ../sysd
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
