http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
Summary: Multiple initialization with DATA: Warning and
initialization order
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergey.v.maslov at intel
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49585
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49585
Summary: need a warning about new/malloc returning
unsufficiently aligned memory
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48384
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38752
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49216
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
22:28:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 22:28:15 2011
New Revision: 175674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175674
Log:
PR c++/49216
* init.c (build_new_1): Pass {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49003
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
22:20:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 24642
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24642
patch for 4.6
I've been pretty free about applying non-regression fix patches to the 4.6
branch, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49003
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Ridge 2011-06-29
21:50:06 UTC ---
Thanks Jason! Is there any chance of getting this into 4.6.2?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49003
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49003
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
21:19:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 21:19:31 2011
New Revision: 175671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175671
Log:
DR 1207
PR c++/49003
* cp-tree.h (struc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2011-06-29 21:18:09
UTC ---
Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg02283.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Gray 2011-06-29 21:17:31
UTC ---
The problem appears to be in the "fixed" version of string.h
before:
#ifndef NULL
#ifdef __GNUG__
#define NULL__null
#else
#define NULL((void *)0)
#endif
#endif
after:
#i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-29
21:14:55 UTC ---
> ISTM that DOM considering those two accesses equivalent, even though they had
> different types is arguably incorrect behaviour.
The accesses themselves have the same type, since th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49460
--- Comment #4 from Roger Jarrett 2011-06-29
21:13:49 UTC ---
Confirmed -fno-tree-pre worked around the issue using the initial source
--Roger
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Gray 2011-06-29 21:01:45
UTC ---
There is some problem with the gcc headers it would seem, placing #include
at the start of lto-plugin.c the correct definition of NULL gets
picked up. I am still trying to figure ou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49415
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49421
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #29 from David Fang 2011-06-29
20:21:52 UTC ---
re-ping for backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48109
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23655|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
--- Comment #4 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
19:59:57 UTC ---
Aren't 1 and 2 the same thing?
I'm not sure what 3 is, but it's about a Hello World example using AM and PCH.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-29
19:52:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is stage 1 though.
Hmm, strange.
> > I'll try a new bootstrap with r175603 reverted.
>
> How do you build the stage 1 compiler? With optimizatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49575
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-29
19:49:47 UTC ---
With firstprivate of course you get a copy of the variable, but it is still a
variable. The *.omp_fn* function which is created from the #omp parallel
region will load it from paramet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49575
--- Comment #2 from Duncan 2011-06-29 19:38:00
UTC ---
I am new to OpenMP so I do not know the details, but as far as I know, variable
k is defined as firstprivate, so each thread will have an independent local
copy. Why does it need defining con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
--- Comment #8 from gee 2011-06-29 19:37:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24640
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24640
preprocessed source and generated code
verbose log
i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -O4 -mfpmath=sse -march=native -mtune=n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
19:35:52 UTC ---
It's not about being smart enough, most gcc devs have plenty of things to work
on so if you want to convince someone yours is worth implementing you should
spend a few minutes descri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
--- Comment #8 from Bryan Hundven 2011-06-29
19:30:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 24639
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24639
libjava-version_script-consistency.diff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
--- Comment #7 from Bryan Hundven 2011-06-29
19:30:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > I had a discussion with Yann E. Morin, and it sounds like this option was
> > ported forward from the legacy options in Dan Kegel's crosstool.
> >
> > The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49003
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36884
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
Summary: [4.4.7 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux:
segfault compiling _muldi3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #8 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
19:01:53 UTC ---
/usr/include was just an example and not the main point of this feature
request.
I expect GCC devs to be smart enough to pick the best implementation of a
certain request themselve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-06-29 18:44:55
UTC ---
Patch set containing the work around and the fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg02261.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
18:41:33 UTC ---
And how do I do that?
It would be better to do it for system dirs, not /usr/include, which would also
work for cross compilers where the sysroot is not under /usr
(this is what I m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #6 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
18:31:52 UTC ---
> why should they be excluded because they're not under /usr/include?
Because unless you tell GCC, GCC won't know they're good candidates.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
18:26:01 UTC ---
My company installs libraries under /foo/third-party and /foo/releases, those
files don't change, why should they be excluded because they're not under
/usr/include?
If you want a n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #14 from Pat Haugen 2011-06-29
18:21:23 UTC ---
Working fine now, thx.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49583
Summary: Reloading stack operands in the wrong order, so needs
to insert fxch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #4 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
18:12:24 UTC ---
Suppose your app has 10557 include directives. What do you add to your PCH?
Why /usr/include? Because these headers are unlikely to change, so they're a
good candidate for PCH.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
--- Comment #6 from gee 2011-06-29 18:08:34 UTC ---
> $ gcc -v
i'm sorry to attach invalid gcc -v. this is proper one.
$ i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=i686-pc-mingw32-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-ming
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
--- Comment #4 from gee 2011-06-29 18:03:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 24637
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24637
generated asm with i686-pc-mingw32-gcc testsetjmp.c -S -s
> I compiled program with 4.6.0 gcc using mingw-w64 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #15 from David Fang 2011-06-29
18:02:48 UTC ---
This bug can probably be closed. --with-dwarf2 has been working for quite a
while.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg02820.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
--- Comment #1 from David Fang 2011-06-29
17:57:34 UTC ---
My 32b-only powerpc arch is a G4, which really should have multilib disabled
for most components. I couldn't find an option to
--disable-libquadmath-multilib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49272
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2011-06-25 00:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49272
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
17:38:58 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 17:38:53 2011
New Revision: 175659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175659
Log:
PR c++/49272
* g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rfg10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
17:34:11 UTC ---
If your program has:
#include "everything.h"
#include
and you have a PCH for everything.h.gch then something.h should be added to
everything.h
Isn't that easy enough?
I don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #2 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
17:32:02 UTC ---
So why exactly can't this be done?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
Summary: configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49364
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-29
17:28:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 24636
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24636
gcc47-pr49364.patch
Ugh, broken vendor tools.
Anyway, does the following patch fix it? There is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-29
17:25:32 UTC ---
I don't think this can be done really. Because of the way PCH works and the
way you are supposed to use PCH. That is you are supposed to have a header
file which just includes many o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
17:15:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 17:15:16 2011
New Revision: 175658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175658
Log:
PR c++/49520
* semantics.c (constexpr_fn_re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
17:15:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 17:15:06 2011
New Revision: 175657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175657
Log:
PR c++/49554
* semantics.c (lambda_proxy_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
--- Comment #2 from gee 2011-06-29 17:08:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 24635
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24635
testcase
i hope it would be helpful
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3.50.20110610-cvs
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49379
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-06-29 17:07:50 UTC ---
See also bug 48127.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
16:39:50 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:39:45 2011
New Revision: 175654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175654
Log:
Promote argument before checking non-legiti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #13 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29
16:24:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 24633 [details]
> A patch to restore bootstrap
Huh, sorry for the duplicate patch ... I hadn't seen yours.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #12 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29
16:19:14 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:19:08 2011
New Revision: 175652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175652
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49114
* reload.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 16:17:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Trunk now fails to build on PPC with the following:
>
> /home/gccbuild/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/gcc/reload.c: In function ‘push_reload’:
> /home/gccbuild/gcc_trunk_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 16:17:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 24633
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24633
A patch to restore bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-29
16:04:51 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:04:47 2011
New Revision: 175651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175651
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49539
* tree-ssa-f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-29
16:03:00 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:02:56 2011
New Revision: 175650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175650
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49539
* tree-ssa-f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581
Summary: [trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in
nested txns is missing
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49580
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48385
Martin Decky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.6.1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Decky 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
--- Comment #2 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
14:46:00 UTC ---
I kinda agree, but:
Automake (and CMake) devs say they don't know how to properly support PCHs. So
maybe GCC devs could help them and ensure end users can use this feature of
GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-29
14:39:28 UTC ---
I think this should be an automake bug rather than a GCC one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49580
Summary: SPEC2006 GCC benchmark build failure when run with
autopar
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
Summary: Document how to use PCH with Automake
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: pch
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
14:35:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 14:34:58 2011
New Revision: 175646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175646
Log:
PR c++/45923
* class.c (explain_non_litera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-29 13:39:32 UTC ---
> This caused:
>
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 13:37:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Author: ro
> Date: Wed Jun 29 07:31:05 2011
> New Revision: 175618
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175618
> Log:
> PR libffi/46660
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49578
Summary: Profiling: call graph table overflows on Solaris.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #6 from Siarhei Siamashka
2011-06-29 13:35:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 24630
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24630
test.c
Attached a slightly updated testcase, which can demonstrate unnecessary spills
to stack e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48155
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
13:34:25 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:34:20 2011
New Revision: 175638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175638
Log:
Add *lea_0_x32 to support addresses with com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
13:33:25 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:33:23 2011
New Revision: 175637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175637
Log:
Remove SUBREG_LOC member from struct replace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
13:32:42 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:32:40 2011
New Revision: 175636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175636
Log:
Don't handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (r
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
