[Bug testsuite/49512] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-24 04:41:09 UTC --- Revert this patch: diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c index 4d2caa8..2716f78 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c @@ -10246,7 +10246,7 @@ tsubst_arg_types (tree arg_types, /*

[Bug c++/49418] [4.6 regression] G++ discards cv-quals from template parameter types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-24 02:18:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 24 02:18:42 2011 New Revision: 175368 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175368 Log: PR c++/49418 * typeck2.c (build_functional_

[Bug c++/35255] [DR 115] gcc does not do partial ordering on overloaded address resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35255 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-24 02:13:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 24 02:13:41 2011 New Revision: 175367 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175367 Log: PR c++/35255 * pt.c (resolve_overloaded_uni

[Bug c++/49519] New: [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/46770] Replace .ctors/.dtors with .init_array/.fini_array on targets supporting them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770 --- Comment #66 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 23:17:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #65) > The mainline versions of both GNU ld and gold now put .ctors sections into > .init_array sections, and put .dtors sections into .fini_array sections. > .ctors/.

[Bug c/49518] New: ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:1555

--enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r175350-install --program-prefix=r175350- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110623 (experimental) (GCC) [regehr@gamow tmp032]$ [regehr@gamow tmp032]$ [regehr@gamow tmp032]$ [regehr@gamow tmp032]$ current

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 22:03:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > The testcase tests what glibc does, so IMHO it should stay as is. None of the > functions that are called with misaligned stack actually really require it to >

[Bug regression/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 --- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-06-23 21:36:05 UTC --- On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Hi, > the problem is that emultls introduces aliases later and it does not > understand > the new representati

[Bug middle-end/48770] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -O -fprofile-arcs -fPIC -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48770 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48770] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -O -fprofile-arcs -fPIC -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48770 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-06-23 21:30:23 UTC --- Author: law Date: Thu Jun 23 21:30:20 2011 New Revision: 175353 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175353 Log: PR middle-end/48770 * reload.h (reload): Ch

[Bug middle-end/49465] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-06-23 21:26:08 UTC --- Author: law Date: Thu Jun 23 21:26:04 2011 New Revision: 175352 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175352 Log: PR middle-end/49465 * tree-ssa-threadupate.

[Bug middle-end/49465] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-06-23 20:26:32 UTC --- Fixed.

[Bug middle-end/49465] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-06-23 20:26:10 UTC --- Author: law Date: Thu Jun 23 20:26:07 2011 New Revision: 175351 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175351 Log: PR middle-end/49465 * tree-ssa-threadupate.

[Bug middle-end/49465] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/49516] SRA generates memory references into its replacements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49516 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-23 19:57:05 UTC --- Fix submitted as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01816.html

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com --- Comment #15 fro

[Bug regression/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-23 19:43:09 UTC --- Created attachment 24589 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24589 proposed patch Hi, the problem is that emultls introduces aliases later and it does not understand the

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-23 19:41:30 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jun 23 19:41:26 2011 New Revision: 175350 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175350 Log: PR middle-end/49373 * g++.dg/torture/pr438

[Bug bootstrap/49502] Unable to build gcc with gmp/mpc/mpfr in its tree and flag "--enable-cxx"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49502 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48091] No warning when given function arguments mismatch earlier function definition which GCC assumes to be K&R, even with --std=c99 -pedantic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48091 Eero Tamminen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|No warning when given |No warning when given |

[Bug c++/46400] g++ Segmentation Fault on heavily templated project.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46400 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug testsuite/49512] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49512 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-23 18:51:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 23 18:51:49 2011 New Revision: 175347 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175347 Log: PR testsuite/49512 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.

[Bug bootstrap/49502] Unable to build gcc with gmp/mpc/mpfr in its tree and flag "--enable-cxx"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49502 --- Comment #4 from Franck Z 2011-06-23 18:45:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) gotcha! It's in PPL's configure script. When checking for the correct version of gmp, the line: #include is used several times and this is what choked my build

[Bug c++/46538] [4.3 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_make_fname_decl (decl.c:3690) on invalid code when using __PRETTY_FUNCTION__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/42054] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42054 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/38646] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE with invalid specialization of variadic template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38646 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/43081] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE with invalid in-class initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43081 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/38089] [4.3/4.4 Regression] g++ crash on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38089 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.5.0

[Bug c++/38089] [4.3/4.4 Regression] g++ crash on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38089 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug translation/49517] New: Translation string typo in config/rx/rx.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49517 Summary: Translation string typo in config/rx/rx.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: translation AssignedTo: un

[Bug c++/49507] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE because of defaulted template destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49507 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-23 16:53:06 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jun 23 16:53:03 2011 New Revision: 175342 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175342 Log: PR c++/49507 * decl2.c (mark_used): Don't c

[Bug regression/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-23 17:09:43 UTC --- Hi, sorry for late reply, I was not reading bugs ML very curefully on the GCC gathering... > Honza, the code here is called during expansion of functions. If called at > the > start of

[Bug c++/49395] Non-class prvalues seem to have cv-qualification with GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49395 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-23 17:09:18 UTC --- Fixed line 10.

[Bug c++/49395] Non-class prvalues seem to have cv-qualification with GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49395 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-23 16:52:44 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jun 23 16:52:41 2011 New Revision: 175339 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175339 Log: PR c++/49395 * init.c (build_zero_init_1):

[Bug c++/44625] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE after error: anonymous struct not inside named type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44625 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/44625] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE after error: anonymous struct not inside named type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44625 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-23 16:58:31 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jun 23 16:58:28 2011 New Revision: 175344 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175344 Log: /cp 2011-06-23 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/49440] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Invalid dynamic_cast for unnamed namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49440 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-23 16:52:52 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jun 23 16:52:48 2011 New Revision: 175340 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175340 Log: PR c++/49440 * class.c (set_linkage_accordi

[Bug c++/49507] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE because of defaulted template destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49507 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-23 16:56:31 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jun 23 16:56:27 2011 New Revision: 175343 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175343 Log: PR c++/49507 * decl2.c (mark_used): Don't c

[Bug c++/36435] Partial ordering of explicit specialization should include return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36435 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-23 16:52:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jun 23 16:52:32 2011 New Revision: 175338 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175338 Log: PR c++/36435 * pt.c (most_specialized_insta

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO doesn't work symbol renamed via asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-23 16:48:32 UTC --- Good to know. I was just about to ask how to reproduce it. Thanks ;)

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-23 16:45:15 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jun 23 16:45:08 2011 New Revision: 175336 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175336 Log: PR tree-optimize/49373 * tree-pass.h (all_

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO doesn't work symbol renamed via asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 16:42:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > I will look into the TLS testcases next. > They are fixed by the new linker.

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO doesn't work symbol renamed via asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-23 16:40:40 UTC --- "Fix" for strstr-asm.c posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01794.html I will look into the TLS testcases next. Honza

[Bug target/46770] Replace .ctors/.dtors with .init_array/.fini_array on targets supporting them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770 --- Comment #65 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-06-23 16:22:05 UTC --- The mainline versions of both GNU ld and gold now put .ctors sections into .init_array sections, and put .dtors sections into .fini_array sections. .ctors/.dtors sections with pri

[Bug fortran/24526] renamed variables from modules not visible in gdb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24526 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #8 from Michael Zolotukhin 2011-06-23 16:03:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Created attachment 24584 [details] > > Test showing that cleanup-* tests are not quite correct. > > Wrong test. You don't

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #7 from Michael Zolotukhin 2011-06-23 16:00:36 UTC --- Created attachment 24587 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24587 Fixed cleanup-regression.c

[Bug target/49515] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/tls/thr-init-2.c -O2 -fpic execution test failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49515 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-23 15:39:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Does !dtprello relocation need live $16 register? The relevant patterns in > alpha.md do not model that dependancy. No, DTPREL relocations are constants

[Bug fortran/24526] renamed variables from modules not visible in gdb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24526 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-01-29 17:55:51 |2011-06-21 16:00 Summary|varia

[Bug c++/49507] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE because of defaulted template destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49507 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/49088] Combine fails to properly handle zero-extension and signed int constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088 --- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-23 14:57:50 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Jun 23 14:57:45 2011 New Revision: 175335 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175335 Log: Revert the last change on force_to_mode. 2

[Bug rtl-optimization/49088] Combine fails to properly handle zero-extension and signed int constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49504] Invalid optimization for Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49504 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 14:52:40 UTC --- *** Bug 49088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/49507] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE because of defaulted template destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49507 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-23 14:28:00 UTC --- For 4.6.1 let's just revert r174159. Will you do that or shall I?

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 14:04:25 UTC --- With the latest binutils, I still got Executing on host: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/tes

[Bug bootstrap/49502] Unable to build gcc with gmp/mpc/mpfr in its tree and flag "--enable-cxx"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49502 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-23 13:58:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Namely, the gmpxx.h file was said to be missing. Along with this error > message, > came a reminder not to forget to use "--enable-cxx" flag when configur

[Bug tree-optimization/49516] SRA generates memory references into its replacements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49516 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49516] New: SRA generates memory references into its replacements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49516 Summary: SRA generates memory references into its replacements Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/35561] Promote written once local aggregates to static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35561 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 f

[Bug target/49497] Incorrect lea peephole

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49465] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 13:05:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Fix looking good. Doing a cpu2k6 int test right now. Hi Jeff, can I try your patch on my machine? Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/49513] DOM inhibits if-conversion and vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49513 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 12:45:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 24584 [details] > Test showing that cleanup-* tests are not quite correct. Wrong test. You don't know the alignment of buf. You should put an

[Bug tree-optimization/49513] PRE inhibits if-conversion and vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49513 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente 2011-06-23 12:16:59 UTC --- thanks for the fast analysis. the code in question was there also to test what the vectorized code would do for x=0 and y=0 (it is extracted from a simplified version of atan2f t

[Bug bootstrap/49502] Unable to build gcc with gmp/mpc/mpfr in its tree and flag "--enable-cxx"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49502 --- Comment #2 from Franck Z 2011-06-23 12:03:31 UTC --- Several weeks ago, with the trunk, and gmp/mpc/mpfr/ppl/cloog-ppl in the gcc source root tree, a "configure" then "make" sequence without options was stopped because one of the configuratio

[Bug target/49515] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/tls/thr-init-2.c -O2 -fpic execution test failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49515 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/49513] PRE inhibits if-conversion and vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49513 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-23 11:52:22 UTC --- IIUC that's the remaining fail being xfailed; the others are fully covered by the earlier commits.

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #5 from Michael Zolotukhin 2011-06-23 11:44:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > > > > > > As _L_mutex_lock is a function, GCC generates a pr

[Bug c++/49510] bitshift warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49510 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #4 from Michael Zolotukhin 2011-06-23 11:42:03 UTC --- Created attachment 24584 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24584 Test showing that cleanup-* tests are not quite correct.

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||xfail Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/49515] New: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/tls/thr-init-2.c -O2 -fpic execution test failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49515 Summary: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/tls/thr-init-2.c -O2 -fpic execution test failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/44625] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE after error: anonymous struct not inside named type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44625 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/49514] New: Crashes on valid use of constexpr constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49514 Summary: Crashes on valid use of constexpr constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug middle-end/35561] Promote written once local aggregates to static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35561 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-23 10:32:28 UTC --- See bug 38615 for the case when converting an object to static is not valid.

[Bug c++/49507] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE because of defaulted template destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49507 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48126] arm_output_sync_loop: misplaced memory barrier, missing clrex / dummy strex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126 --- Comment #7 from Marcus Shawcroft 2011-06-23 09:32:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Michael: > I think I agree with you on the need for the barrier in the branch out case; > gcc's info page (section 6.49 'Built-in functions for atomic mem

[Bug c++/49508] Bogus "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49508 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 Regression] Bogus |Bogus "control reaches end

[Bug c++/49508] [4.7 Regression] Bogus "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49508 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-23 08:36:33 UTC --- Status update: I have a nice stable gcc-4.1.2 with gnat that has bootstrapped itself through approx 10 generations natively on m68k-linux, and the final working patch kit is quite

[Bug testsuite/49512] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49512] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug fortran/40737] Pointer references sometimes fail to define "span" symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737 Kenneth Hoste changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenneth.hoste at elis dot

[Bug tree-optimization/27460] Does not vectorize statements with mixed type COND_EXPRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27460 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente 2011-06-23 07:00:11 UTC --- is not that the fix in PR49483 will help also in this case? Please let me know if this is considered a bug that will be eventually fixed or a feature to be added to any sort of do