[Bug tree-optimization/49513] New: introducing a product inhibit vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49513 Summary: introducing a product inhibit vectorization Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assigne

[Bug libfortran/48787] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Henlich 2011-06-23 06:13:12 UTC --- Created attachment 24583 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24583 More tests for rounding If it helps, I added some more tests for this. By removing the code lines

[Bug middle-end/49512] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49512 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64 CC|

[Bug middle-end/49512] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49512 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Summary|FAIL:

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl 2011-06-23 04:22:51 UTC --- On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:13:19PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Feel free to post to comp.lang.c about the issue. The > technical editor of F2003 routinely answers questions > about

[Bug middle-end/49512] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49512 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl 2011-06-23 04:13:49 UTC --- On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:23:26AM +, stevenj at alum dot mit.edu wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 > > --- Comment #4 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl 2011-06-23 04:02:38 UTC --- On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:01:04AM +, stevenj at alum dot mit.edu wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 > > --- Comment #3 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl 2011-06-23 04:01:49 UTC --- On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:55:20AM +, stevenj at alum dot mit.edu wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 > > --- Comment #2 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 --- Comment #4 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-06-23 03:23:06 UTC --- Section 12.4.1.2 of Fortran 2003 standard: "If the dummy argument has the VALUE attribute it becomes associated with a definable anonymous data object whose initial value i

[Bug middle-end/35561] Promote written once local aggregates to static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35561 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-23 03:17:58 UTC --- At one point this was done but it was found it violated C rules. I can find the bug report but I am being lazy right now but it comes down to if it was promoted then you have issues

[Bug middle-end/35561] Promote written once local aggregates to static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35561 Steven Fuerst changed: What|Removed |Added CC||svfuerst at gmail dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 --- Comment #2 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-06-23 02:54:50 UTC --- You're missing the point. Traditionally in Fortran, all arguments were passed *by reference*, in which case it is clearly a requirement that actual parameter match the for

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 --- Comment #3 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-06-23 03:00:47 UTC --- > Hence, the familiar old requirements of the Fortran standard are irrelevant. > The question is, what does the Fortran 2003 standard require for passing by > value, which

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra 2011-06-23 02:21:03 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Thu Jun 23 02:21:01 2011 New Revision: 175328 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175328 Log: PR bootstrap/49383 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gc

[Bug fortran/49509] cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug ada/49511] New: [4.6 Regression] acats test setup fails on HP-UX using posix shell

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49511 Summary: [4.6 Regression] acats test setup fails on HP-UX using posix shell Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49510] New: bitshift warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49510 Summary: bitshift warnings Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug web/46305] [Regression] Bugzilla: PR comment type of links: Comment links to the wrong bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46305 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-22 22:39:31 UTC --- nice, thanks!

[Bug target/49468] SH Target: inefficient integer abs code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from Kazumot

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-22 22:34:04 UTC --- Yes, that peephole doesn't catch all the patterns which could make tst #imm8,r0 use. Perhaps it would be a good idea to get numbers for the test like CSiBE test with the vanilla and

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980 --- Comment #16 from Gary Funck 2011-06-22 22:19:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) Ralf W. wrote (in part) > I'm not sure if there are other problems with parallel install, but at that > time I didn't see any others at least. Agreed. Off lis

[Bug web/46305] [Regression] Bugzilla: PR comment type of links: Comment links to the wrong bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46305 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/28854] unwinder reports sentinel frame.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28854 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/30506] not sibcalling a function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30506 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49509] New: cannot promote types for arguments passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509 Summary: cannot promote types for arguments passed by value Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedT

[Bug tree-optimization/28850] missed call -> jmp transformation; redundant unwind stuff with empty finally

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28850 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.6.1 --- Comment #5 from Pawel Sikora 20

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24333 --- Comment #7 from Pawel Sikora 2011-06-22 21:56:27 UTC --- 4.6 still affected: f: movl%edi, %edx movl%edi, %eax sarl$31, %edx idivl %edi ret

[Bug target/28854] unwinder reports sentinel frame.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28854 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2011-06

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 21:38:23 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 21:38:20 2011 New Revision: 175317 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175317 Log: PR middle-end/49373 * g++.dg/torture/pr4

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-06-22 21:35:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Seems fixed. If so, please close. If not, please summarize remaining issues. The patches in comments #8 and #10 are essentially unfixed, IIRC. #10 ne

[Bug bootstrap/49247] libiberty configure assumes newlib does not supply psignal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49247 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 21:30:25 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 21:30:19 2011 New Revision: 175316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175316 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug bootstrap/23656] Cross-compilation with newlib fails in libiberty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23656 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 21:30:24 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 21:30:19 2011 New Revision: 175316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175316 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug regression/47836] Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or target-zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836 --- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 21:30:24 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 21:30:19 2011 New Revision: 175316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175316 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug c/48825] libiberty "psignal" lacks const modifier, failing to compile when HAVE_PSIGNAL is undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48825 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 21:30:25 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 21:30:19 2011 New Revision: 175316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175316 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug other/47733] psignal (int, const? char*) in libiberty/strsignal.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47733 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 21:30:25 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 21:30:19 2011 New Revision: 175316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175316 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug c++/49508] New: [4.7 Regression] Bogus "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49508 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bogus "control reaches end of non-void function" warning Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49507] New: ICE because of defaulted template destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49507 Summary: ICE because of defaulted template destructor Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig

[Bug c++/49440] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Invalid dynamic_cast for unnamed namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49440 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/49470] optional diagnostic not given for invalid mem-initializer in uninstantiated template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49470 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/49506] reusing a file stream object will always get eof after openning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49506 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgomp/49490] suboptimal load balancing in loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49490 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-22 20:39:27 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 22 20:39:25 2011 New Revision: 175315 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175315 Log: PR libgomp/49490 * omp-low.c (expand_omp_fo

[Bug debug/49496] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49496 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-22 20:37:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 22 20:37:54 2011 New Revision: 175314 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175314 Log: PR debug/49496 * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect

[Bug c++/49395] Non-class prvalues seem to have cv-qualification with GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49395 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46278] avr-gcc 4.5.1 doing suboptimal reloads using X

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-22 20:35:30 UTC --- Created attachment 24582 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24582 snake.c Yet another source file to test. Compile with, e.g. -Os -mmcu=atmega128 -std=gnu99 Compi

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/49506] New: reusing a file stream object will always get eof after openning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49506 Summary: reusing a file stream object will always get eof after openning Product: gcc Version: 3.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug other/47733] psignal (int, const? char*) in libiberty/strsignal.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47733 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 20:18:00 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 20:17:47 2011 New Revision: 175307 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175307 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug bootstrap/49247] libiberty configure assumes newlib does not supply psignal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49247 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 20:17:58 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 20:17:47 2011 New Revision: 175307 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175307 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug bootstrap/23656] Cross-compilation with newlib fails in libiberty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23656 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 20:17:58 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 20:17:47 2011 New Revision: 175307 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175307 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug regression/47836] Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or target-zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836 --- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-22 20:17:55 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Wed Jun 22 20:17:47 2011 New Revision: 175307 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175307 Log: PR regression/47836 PR bootstrap/23656

[Bug c++/49505] [DR 214] wrong partial ordering for explicit instantiation with unused template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49505 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49505] New: [DR 214] wrong partial ordering for explicit instantiation with unused template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49505 Summary: [DR 214] wrong partial ordering for explicit instantiation with unused template parameter Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug c++/35255] [DR 115] gcc does not do partial ordering on overloaded address resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35255 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/49504] Invalid optimization for Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49504 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-22 19:59:59 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jun 22 19:59:52 2011 New Revision: 175306 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175306 Log: Properly handle pointer addition/subtraction

[Bug rtl-optimization/49504] Invalid optimization for Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49504 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug fortran/49416] wrong -fbounds-check with 2 dimensional arrays reshape

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49416 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/48126] arm_output_sync_loop: misplaced memory barrier, missing clrex / dummy strex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126 --- Comment #6 from Michael K. Edwards 2011-06-22 19:00:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > If I understand correctly however most cases wouldn't need it - I think most > cases are use the compare&swap to take some form of lock, and then once

[Bug c++/36435] Partial ordering of explicit specialization should include return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36435 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-22 18:34:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > > > > As _L_mutex_lock is a function, GCC generates a prologue and epilogue for > > > it - > > > in p

[Bug middle-end/49504] Invalid optimization for Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49504 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/49493] ICE: in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2637 with -O -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49493 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/49493] ICE: in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2637 with -O -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49493 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-22 18:02:09 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 22 18:02:06 2011 New Revision: 175300 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175300 Log: 2011-06-22 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug libgcj/49451] FileHandleGcTest FAILS on IRIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49451 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 --- Comment #2 from Michael Zolotukhin 2011-06-22 17:50:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > > > As _L_mutex_lock is a function, GCC generates a prologue and epilogue for > > it - > > in prologue stack alignment is

[Bug fortran/49501] support ATTRIBUTES ALIGN in gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49501 --- Comment #1 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-06-22 17:38:25 UTC --- Actually, it looks like there is a way to allocate aligned memory, albeit a bit ugly, thanks to Fortran 2003's C interoperability. Declare a bind(C) interface to e.g. pos

[Bug c++/22596] Impossible to explicitly instantiate particular overloaded function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22596 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49504] New: Invalid optimization for Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49504 Summary: Invalid optimization for Pmode != ptr_mode Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: un

[Bug testsuite/49503] Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48126] arm_output_sync_loop: misplaced memory barrier, missing clrex / dummy strex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126 Dr. David Alan Gilbert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.gilbert at linaro dot

[Bug c++/22596] Impossible to explicitly instantiate particular overloaded function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22596 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug c++/49260] cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C fails execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-22 15:55:59 UTC --- Should be fixed on trunk now.

[Bug c++/49260] cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C fails execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-22 15:55:25 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 22 15:55:22 2011 New Revision: 175296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175296 Log: PR c++/49260 * call.c (build_call_a): Set c

[Bug target/49497] Incorrect lea peephole

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-22 15:29:48 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jun 22 15:29:43 2011 New Revision: 175295 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175295 Log: Check TARGET_PARTIAL_REG_STALL in imul to le

[Bug testsuite/49503] New: Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503 Summary: Incorrect stack alignment, produced by inline assembler in tests gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c and gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 S

[Bug c++/49260] cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C fails execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 Michael K. Edwards changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.k.edwards at gmail dot

[Bug middle-end/41378] -fipa-pta -O3 leads to ICE : in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2601

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41378 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgomp/49490] suboptimal load balancing in loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49490 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49454] [4.7 Regression] /usr/include/libio.h:336:3: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/49429] [4.7 Regression] dse.c change (r175063) causes execution failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49365] 436.cactusADM performance regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49365 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug regression/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49422] [arm] unable to find a register to spill in class 'VFP_LO_REGS'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49422 philb at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49502] Unable to build gcc with gmp/mpc/mpfr in its tree and flag "--enable-cxx"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49502 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/49502] New: Unable to build gcc with gmp/mpc/mpfr in its tree and flag "--enable-cxx"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49502 Summary: Unable to build gcc with gmp/mpc/mpfr in its tree and flag "--enable-cxx" Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/49072] Error building the compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug bootstrap/49072] Error building the compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072 --- Comment #8 from Franck Z 2011-06-22 11:07:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Failure. But with a tag passed to libtool. My Cygwin version of libtool is 2.4-1. Took place in objdir/gmp/mpn. With the command: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compil

[Bug debug/47858] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] IPA-SRA decreases quality of debug info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-22 10:42:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 22 10:41:58 2011 New Revision: 175288 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175288 Log: PR debug/47858 * gimple.h (enum gimple_debu

[Bug regression/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug debug/49496] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49496 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-22 09:32:08 UTC --- Created attachment 24579 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24579 gcc47-pr49496.patch Untested fix.

[Bug debug/49496] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/49072] Error building the compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072 --- Comment #7 from Franck Z 2011-06-22 09:21:41 UTC --- In reply to comment #6) > > Hope this piece of information is useful. :-) > Not really, if you don't say which versions of GCC and GMP/MFPR/MPC you're > using, and your exact configure comm

[Bug tree-optimization/49493] ICE: in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2637 with -O -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49493 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49494] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in remap_predicate at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1876 with -findirect-inlining -finline-small-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49494 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mi

[Bug tree-optimization/49496] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49496 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

  1   2   >