[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 --- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-06-09 06:54:33 UTC --- two more datapoints (depth=30 is still running): max-vartrack-expr-depth=22: var-tracking emit :5459.44 (99%) usr max-vartrack-expr-depth=25: var-tracking emit :42078.07

[Bug middle-end/45819] [4.5 Regression] unexpected unaligned access to volatile int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45819 Khem Raj changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from

[Bug tree-optimization/49318] [4.7 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/49336] ATAN2 values differ from those specified in documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49336 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation CC|

[Bug bootstrap/49072] Error building the compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/48660] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 Michael Hope changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.hope at linaro dot

[Bug libfortran/49336] ATAN2 values differ from those specified in documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49336 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/49154] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-09 02:34:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Will post that patch momentarily. Done:

[Bug rtl-optimization/49154] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-09 01:54:41 UTC --- Created attachment 24471 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24471 Repeat mentioned SEGV at patched r174780 with "cc1 -fpreprocessed -O2 libgcc2.i -march=v10"

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 momchil at xaxo dot eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||momchil at xaxo dot eu --- Commen

[Bug target/49030] ICE in get_arm_condition_code, at config/arm/arm.c:17180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030 Michael Hope changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.hope at linaro dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/49154] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-09 01:31:26 UTC --- Created attachment 24470 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24470 A patch to the CRIS port to go with the documentation update. Unfortunately when this patch by

[Bug gcov-profile/49333] [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in gcc/gcc/gcov-io.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49333 --- Comment #4 from Martin Ettl 2011-06-09 00:41:41 UTC --- Thanks, i already filed a bug at cppchecks bugtracker about this issue: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2830 Many thanks for your help and best regards Martin 2011/6/

[Bug ada/49337] New: Improve Gnatmake to work without static libraries.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49337 Summary: Improve Gnatmake to work without static libraries. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: ada Assigned

[Bug libfortran/49336] New: ATAN2 values differ from those specified in documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49336 Summary: ATAN2 values differ from those specified in documentation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/49305] SH Target: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49305] SH Target: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305 --- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-08 23:13:30 UTC --- Author: kkojima Date: Wed Jun 8 23:13:27 2011 New Revision: 174824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174824 Log: PR target/49305 * config/sh/predicates.

[Bug gcov-profile/49333] [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in gcc/gcc/gcov-io.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49333 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-08 22:47:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Oh the second hunk of the patch is very bad as it closes a file descriptor > that > has an associated FILE to it. I should say the FILE is still open and u

[Bug target/49335] ARM: Invalid assembler generated while compiling C++ code from 'codeblocks'

languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto --with-mode=thumb --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a9 --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=neon Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110608 (experimental) [trunk revision 174795] (GCC) michaelh@ursa2:~/linaro/bugs$ as -v GNU assembler version 2.20.5

[Bug gcov-profile/49333] [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in gcc/gcc/gcov-io.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49333 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-08 22:25:35 UTC --- Oh the second hunk of the patch is very bad as it closes a file descriptor that has an associated FILE to it.

[Bug target/49335] New: ARM: Invalid assembler generated while compiling C++ code from 'codeblocks'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49335 Summary: ARM: Invalid assembler generated while compiling C++ code from 'codeblocks' Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug gcov-profile/49333] [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in gcc/gcc/gcov-io.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49333 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/49334] New: [cppcheck] possible index out of bounds in gcc/ada/adaint.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49334 Summary: [cppcheck] possible index out of bounds in gcc/ada/adaint.c Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug gcov-profile/49333] New: [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in gcc/gcc/gcov-io.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49333 Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in gcc/gcc/gcov-io.c Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug fortran/49324] iso_varying_string and reshape fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/44175] [C++0x] decltype sometimes cannot recurse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44175 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49259] template/incomplete6.C ICE in build_target_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49259 Janis Johnson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49259] template/incomplete6.C ICE in build_target_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49259 Janis Johnson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49332] [C++0x] noexcept ignored on function pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49332 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49332] [C++0x] noexcept ignored on function pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49332 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-08 21:47:04 UTC --- Or rather in C++98 it was observable through diagnostics, but couldn't change the behavior of a well-defined program.

[Bug c++/49332] New: [C++0x] noexcept ignored on function pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49332 Summary: [C++0x] noexcept ignored on function pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48468] [C++0x][SFINAE] noexcept operator does not handle function templates well

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48468 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-08 21:39:50 UTC --- Note that the fix I just checked in for 49107 delays substitution into noexcept-specifications, so they are no longer usable for SFINAE.

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x][4.7 Regression] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-08 21:35:05 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 8 21:35:02 2011 New Revision: 174820 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174820 Log: PR c++/49107 * cp-tree.def (DEFERRED_NOEXC

[Bug c++/49329] Static method with std::string parameter gets messed up with non-static method with bool parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49329 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-08 21:29:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I want a static and a non-static method with the same name you might want to rethink that cc::xx is a qualified name lookup, so can find both overloads o

[Bug c++/12255] exception-specification ignored on pointer to function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12255 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug fortran/49331] New: Accepts invalid specification expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49331 Summary: Accepts invalid specification expressions Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/49330] Integer arithmetic on addresses optimised with pointer arithmetic rules

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330 --- Comment #1 from Harald van Dijk 2011-06-08 20:42:04 UTC --- A similar example, but one which does not convert the integer back to a pointer: #include #include int a; int main() { unsigned long b = (unsigned long) &a - 134518548; volati

[Bug c++/49329] Static method with std::string parameter gets messed up with non-static method with bool parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49329 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-08 20:25:50 UTC --- I think GCC is correct here. EDG gives a similar error.

[Bug fortran/49328] Internal compiler error due to explicit array bounds in contained routine argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49328 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-08 20:22:40 UTC --- > Confirmed on gcc4.5.2 and 4.5.3, but AFAICT this has been fixed on gcc4.6 and > 4.7 (trunk) between revisions 17 and 170140. Sorry I did not read the tests correctly, the

[Bug c/49330] New: Integer arithmetic on addresses optimised with pointer arithmetic rules

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330 Summary: Integer arithmetic on addresses optimised with pointer arithmetic rules Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49329] New: Static method with std::string parameter gets messed up with non-static method with bool parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49329 Summary: Static method with std::string parameter gets messed up with non-static method with bool parameter Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug fortran/49328] Internal compiler error due to explicit array bounds in contained routine argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49328 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-08 20:11:38 UTC --- Confirmed on gcc4.5.2 and 4.5.3, but AFAICT this has been fixed on gcc4.6 and 4.7 (trunk) between revisions 17 and 170140.

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 --- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-08 20:07:04 UTC --- Checking for a warning using check_no_compiler_messages seems as easy or easier then checking the return code so I did that. I have submitted a patch to gcc-patches. http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug fortran/49328] New: Internal compiler error due to explicit array bounds in contained routine argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49328 Summary: Internal compiler error due to explicit array bounds in contained routine argument Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 --- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-08 18:12:40 UTC --- How about compiling this with -Wcast-align and looking for a warning message: char *y; typedef char __attribute__ ((__aligned__(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__))) c; c *z; void foo(void) {

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 --- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-06-08 17:59:18 UTC --- > Perhaps something like: > union { int i; char c[8]; } u; > int > main () > { > int *p; > asm volatile ("" : "=r" (p) : "0" (&u.c[1])); > *p++; > return 0; > }

[Bug middle-end/49308] [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug testsuite/49323] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/integer-typedef.C scan-assembler-times *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-08 17:48:11 UTC --- I meant (*p)++; instead of *p++; sorry.

[Bug c++/49326] Lambda arguments should not have a default value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49326 Ruben Van Boxem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/28220] Segfault with pch and trying to do IMA with C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28220 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-08 17:41:07 UTC --- Andrew, does it make sense to have this PR still open?

[Bug testsuite/49323] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/integer-typedef.C scan-assembler-times *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49323 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-08 17:36:15 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 8 17:36:12 2011 New Revision: 174813 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174813 Log: PR testsuite/49323 * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/in

[Bug middle-end/49191] gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp.com --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/49327] Parse error involving "templated method inside templated class"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49327 --- Comment #2 from robinei at gmail dot com 2011-06-08 17:35:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > You want: > > DelegateType::template from_method(object_ptr); Doh! thanks

[Bug c++/49327] Parse error involving "templated method inside templated class"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49327 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49327] New: Parse error involving "templated method inside templated class"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49327 Summary: Parse error involving "templated method inside templated class" Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-08 17:07:42 UTC --- Proposed fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00661.html

[Bug c++/49326] Lambda arguments should not have a default value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49326 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-08 17:05:06 UTC --- No, that's not how it works, read the manual for -std and -pedantic.

[Bug c++/49326] Lambda arguments should not have a default value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49326 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem 2011-06-08 16:54:34 UTC --- I compiled with -std=c++0x, so GCC extensions should be turned off.

[Bug other/49325] Incorrect target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug c++/49326] Lambda arguments should not have a default value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49326 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-08 16:50:42 UTC --- If you get a warning with -pedantic that usually means it's a G++ extension. If you don't want the extension use -pedantic-errors so it is rejected

[Bug c++/49326] New: Lambda arguments should not have a default value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49326 Summary: Lambda arguments should not have a default value Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: un

[Bug other/49325] New: Incorrect target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49325 Summary: Incorrect target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY check Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig

[Bug fortran/49324] iso_varying_string and reshape fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324 --- Comment #2 from Joshua Cogliati 2011-06-08 16:30:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Not an analysis, just some observations ... > > I get different results with different compilers: > gfortran 4.7: > array2d second2

[Bug fortran/49324] iso_varying_string and reshape fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/46003] cond5.C fails for ARM EABI tests.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003 --- Comment #7 from Janis Johnson 2011-06-08 15:49:02 UTC --- Test g++.dg/template/cond5.C starts passing for arm-none-linux-gnueabi with r174682, the fix for PR49134 mentioned in comment 6.

[Bug fortran/49324] New: iso_varying_string and reshape fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324 Summary: iso_varying_string and reshape fail Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #64 from PcX 2011-06-08 14:26:05 UTC --- I found that the shared or static gcc edition made a great difference of the wx unicode release mono dll size. - At first, I build the gcc 4.6 with "--enable-static

[Bug target/49305] SH Target: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305 --- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-08 14:03:02 UTC --- It's my fault after all. The patch r174586 should check the mode parameter too. Without checking mode, insn-recog routines are confused and the combine pass makes insns with wrong

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 --- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-08 13:51:34 UTC --- Hm, this isn't going to work for all cases. When I reproduce the problem on powerpc64-linux without forcing a hardware square root, I see: spawn /home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-mai

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #31 from Kris 2011-06-08 13:49:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > > Will this fix be applied to 4.6 or 4.5? > However, if your life depends on it, we could maybe consider having an > exception from tha

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #30 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-08 13:39:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > Will this fix be applied to 4.6 or 4.5? Usually we only backport regression fixes, and since this is technically not a regression, the default pr

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-08 13:38:51 UTC --- Or alternatively make it more dynamic, like if in one function the maximum level is reached or almost reached (so it could be checked only in vt_expand_loc_callback) more than some par

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-08 13:34:42 UTC --- 10 was the minimal value to get reasonable debug info in some cases (e.g. gcc.dg/guality/), so perhaps 20 is too much and we should go down to the default of 12-15.

[Bug c++/49321] Incorrect Optimization O2 and O3 on Shift Operation for 64 bit Integers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321 Yu Simin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||silver24k at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 --- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-06-08 13:23:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Using -g -O2 -fbounds-check instead of -g -O1 -fbounds-check cures it, > or e.g. -g -O1 -fbounds-check --param max-vartrack-expr-depth=5 > speeds it up.

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #29 from Kris 2011-06-08 13:12:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > r174416 fixes all the test cases in this PR (except comment #11, which is > invalid). I'm glad we finally nailed this one. > > Closing as fixed. Thanks for reporti

[Bug target/47739] gcc 4.4.5 with target powerpc-wrs-vxworks fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47739 Jan Smets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co

[Bug c++/49322] [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c++/49322] [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-08 12:31:20 UTC --- I have forgotten to say that I see the failure with -m64 only.

[Bug testsuite/49323] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/integer-typedef.C scan-assembler-times *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49323 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-08 12:19:17 UTC --- > Created attachment 24466 [details] > gcc47-pr49323.patch > > Does this work for you? On x86_64-apple-darwin10, yes it does (I cannot test powerpc-apple-darwin9 right now), th

[Bug c++/44175] [C++0x] decltype sometimes cannot recurse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44175 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-08 12:16:49 UTC --- Additionally, if the only deep recursion problem is during GC, perhaps: --- gcc/cp/cp-tree.h 2011-05-27 21:13:30.946483346 +0200 +++ gcc/cp/cp-tree.h 2011-06-08 14:15:06.7433894

[Bug testsuite/49323] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/integer-typedef.C scan-assembler-times *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/21953] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21953 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW URL|

[Bug c/48825] libiberty "psignal" lacks const modifier, failing to compile when HAVE_PSIGNAL is undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48825 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/49322] [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-08 11:47:36 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10 at revision 174779 I only see FAIL: 20_util/is_move_assignable/value.cc (test for excess errors) WARNING: 20_util/is_move_assignable/value.cc compilati

[Bug middle-end/21953] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21953 --- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-08 11:39:16 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Wed Jun 8 11:39:14 2011 New Revision: 174804 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174804 Log: PR middle-end/21953 * gcc.dg/compat/struct-layo

[Bug testsuite/49323] New: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/integer-typedef.C scan-assembler-times *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49323 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/integer-typedef.C scan-assembler-times * Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46003] cond5.C fails for ARM EABI tests.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 --- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-08 10:31:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > It would need @plt for flag_pic, and somehow ensure that the %ebx is > initialized, plus whatever else is needed for calls on e.g. darwin etc. We can probab

[Bug c++/49311] Missing static const symbol with -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-08 10:27:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Does the way I use an rvalue change it's definition? I don't understand the question, I don't know what you mean by the definition of an rvalue. > So

[Bug rtl-optimization/49303] ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49303] ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov 2011-06-08 09:59:26 UTC --- Author: amonakov Date: Wed Jun 8 09:59:23 2011 New Revision: 174801 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174801 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49303 * sel-sche

[Bug c++/49311] Missing static const symbol with -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311 --- Comment #7 from Hartmut Schirmer 2011-06-08 09:57:58 UTC --- > > class A > > { > > public: > > static const unsigned first = 1; > > enum { second = 2 }; > > }; > > > > should behave similar in all cases address of first isn't taken. > >

[Bug tree-optimization/49320] gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c FAILs with random flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49320 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-06-08 09:54:08 UTC --- Yes, sorry, I had testsuite results with preprocessed sources from an older revision, and when looking at the testcase sources, I was checking current trunk - where it is already fixed.

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug testsuite/49239] Random gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #6 from I

[Bug tree-optimization/49320] gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c FAILs with random flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49320 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

  1   2   >