[Bug middle-end/49308] New: [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308 Summary: [4.7 Regression] segfault in rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at gcc/gcc/dce.c:518 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #31 from Thomas Henlich 2011-06-07 06:56:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > Created attachment 24454 [details] > Patch for scale factor. PUBLIC DOMAIN A had a go at this. Feel free to improve.

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #30 from Thomas Henlich 2011-06-07 06:56:13 UTC --- Created attachment 24454 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24454 Patch for scale factor. PUBLIC DOMAIN

[Bug target/48542] mmix code which calls setjmp/longjmp may not work.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-07 05:46:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Your patch looks likely Something along those lines might be sufficient and contained for release branches, but I think it should be differently at lea

[Bug target/49307] New: ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307 Summary: ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug c++/49290] [4.6/4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:6795

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug bootstrap/49306] 4.6.0 fails to build on Solaris 11 (i386)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49306 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/49302] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug bootstrap/49306] New: 4.6.0 fails to build on Solaris 11 (i386)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49306 Summary: 4.6.0 fails to build on Solaris 11 (i386) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unas

[Bug target/49305] New: SH Target: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

local/libexec/gcc/sh-elf/4.7.0/lto-wrapper Target: sh-elf Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --target=sh-elf --prefix=/usr/local --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib --disable-libssp --without-headers --disable-nls --disable-werror --enable-lto --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-

[Bug objc/49301] Forward declaration of classes broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug objc++/48275] getter=namespace failing with .mm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48275 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-06 22:

[Bug objc++/48275] getter=namespace failing with .mm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48275 --- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-06-06 22:09:51 UTC --- Author: nicola Date: Mon Jun 6 22:09:47 2011 New Revision: 174726 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174726 Log: In gcc/cp/: 2011-06-06 Nicola Pero , PR obj-c

[Bug target/47672] math-68881.h does not support C99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Riviere 2011-06-06 21:20:46 UTC --- > What specific instructions are missing from -ffast-math? I don't know myself, but I have been told it was the case. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-02/msg00186.html

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24451|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/49298] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected ast of kind field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49298 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49283] pointless warning with -Wstrict-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49283 --- Comment #3 from bruno at clisp dot org 2011-06-06 20:33:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > [GCC] optimizes [...] > moving the + 3 from the LHS and combining it with the constant offset > on the RHS. That is only valid if p + 3 does not get

[Bug c/49304] New: ICE: code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6573 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49304 Summary: ICE: code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6573 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/49303] ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303 --- Comment #1 from Paul H. Hargrove 2011-06-06 20:07:44 UTC --- Due to a "rogue $PATH" the failing gcc-4.7.0 in the report was built with a non-standard gcc. To rule out that as a possible contributing factor, I have confirmed (below) that when

[Bug c++/49298] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected ast of kind field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49298 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-06 20:07:29 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 6 20:07:26 2011 New Revision: 174722 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174722 Log: PR c++/49298 * semantics.c (potential_const

[Bug target/47672] math-68881.h does not support C99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-06 19:54:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > However, someone reported that all the functionnality of > math-68881.h was not reported to -ffast-math: some instructions are missing. ... > 2) Move the

[Bug c++/49298] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected ast of kind field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49298 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-06 19:42:40 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 6 19:42:38 2011 New Revision: 174721 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174721 Log: PR c++/49298 * semantics.c (potential_const

[Bug c++/49298] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected ast of kind field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49298 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/47672] math-68881.h does not support C99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Riviere 2011-06-06 19:06:07 UTC --- Normal math implementation should always reside inside libm, to fully support exceptions, error handling, etc. When better speed is required, and strict standard compliance is not

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-06 19:01:53 UTC --- Looks good to me.

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24413|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/48893] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48893 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49268] Invalid code generated for assumed-size Cray pointee

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49268 --- Comment #3 from Asher Langton 2011-06-06 18:17:28 UTC --- Author: langton Date: Mon Jun 6 18:17:26 2011 New Revision: 174719 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174719 Log: PR fortran/49268 * trans-decl.c (gfc_tran

[Bug rtl-optimization/49145] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1322

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49145 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-06 18:16:21 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Mon Jun 6 18:16:18 2011 New Revision: 174718 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174718 Log: gcc/ PR rtl-optimization/49145

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/49262] 3-yr-old infinite loop in dwarf2out.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49264] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/49214] [4.7 Regression] Broken pipe in backtrace for x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug other/49303] New: ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303 Summary: ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on ia64 in r174558 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06 17:46:50 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 6 17:46:47 2011 New Revision: 174716 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174716 Log: PR testsuite/49288 * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cd

[Bug debug/49262] 3-yr-old infinite loop in dwarf2out.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06 17:46:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 6 17:46:00 2011 New Revision: 174715 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174715 Log: PR debug/49262 * dwarf2out.c (native_encode

[Bug lto/49302] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/49264] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06 17:16:37 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 6 17:16:35 2011 New Revision: 174713 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174713 Log: PR c++/49264 * gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt_1)

[Bug c++/49264] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06 17:14:33 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 6 17:14:31 2011 New Revision: 174712 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174712 Log: PR c++/49264 * gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt_1)

[Bug c++/49264] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06 17:12:29 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 6 17:12:25 2011 New Revision: 174711 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174711 Log: PR c++/49264 * gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt_1)

[Bug c++/48818] Wrong copy constructor used when using std::pair in .so and app.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818 --- Comment #4 from Melanie Cappelaere 2011-06-06 16:27:22 UTC --- I don't think it does, but it also doesn't matter for this bug report; symbols are not hidden while they should be.

[Bug debug/49262] 3-yr-old infinite loop in dwarf2out.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug objc/49301] Forward declaration of classes broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug target/49257] -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257 --- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-06 15:49:06 UTC --- Uros, the code you generate has a double-rounding error. You can generate code inline if you have access to SSE2, by converting the pieces to DFmode and then truncating to SFmode

[Bug c++/48771] [C++0x] is_literal_type incorrect for references to non-literal types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48771 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/49277] [4.7 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Richard Gu

[Bug objc/49301] Forward declaration of classes broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301 --- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-06-06 15:14:24 UTC --- > @class is used to tell the compiler the class exists, but that its not (yet) > available. Eg: class B uses class A, but class A uses class B too, creating a > recursive import, and th

[Bug tree-optimization/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1

[Bug objc/49301] Forward declaration of classes broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301 jos at kuijpersvof dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug objc/49301] New: Forward declaration of classes broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301 Summary: Forward declaration of classes broken Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: objc AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #11 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-06 14:27:44 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Jun 6 14:27:41 2011 New Revision: 174701 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174701 Log: 2011-06-06 Bill Schmidt PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/48764] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06 14:06:06 UTC --- The same issue in a more complicated form hits trunk in PR49279.

[Bug c++/49279] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06 14:03:27 UTC --- # PT = nonlocal escaped D.7613_101 = MEM[(struct ei_matrix_storage *)this_30(D)]; # PT = nonlocal escaped D.7616_104 = D.7613_101 + D.7582_90; # PT = nonlocal escaped { D.

[Bug fortran/49280] Misinterpretation of -static-libgfortran switch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49280 --- Comment #4 from Filip Hroch 2011-06-06 13:49:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Steve makes a good point. I have found that some distributions do not install > the static libraries unless one specifically installs them. An example is > F

[Bug other/49116] GCC fails to bootstrap with -O3 ("may be used uninitialized" errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49116 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Ol

[Bug bootstrap/49209] unresolved references to fatal() while linking xgcc and cpp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49209 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-06 13:30:11 UTC --- These programs should only be calling fatal_error from diagnostic.c, not a function named "fatal".

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O3" failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-06-06 13:24:41 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Mon Jun 6 13:24:39 2011 New Revision: 174697 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174697 Log: PR bootstrap/49270 * ipa-inline-analysis.c (rea

[Bug testsuite/49273] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C scan-assembler-times [^\n\r]*DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name: 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49273 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-06 13:22:45 UTC --- > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06 > 13:00:20 UTC --- > Created attachment 24448 > --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24448 > gcc47-p

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06 13:09:59 UTC --- > ... Can you please test this on darwin ... It works on x86_64-apple-darwin10 and powerpc-apple-darwin9. Thanks.

[Bug c++/49279] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||48764 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guen

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49154] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target|cris-axis-elf, |cris-axis-elf |spa

[Bug rtl-optimization/49154] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #29 from Thomas Henlich 2011-06-06 12:47:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > > > > print "(-2pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.002E+01 > > print "(-1pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.020E+00 > > print "(0pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-06 12:42:14 UTC --- With Sun as, the testcase fails, with GNU as, it passes. On IRIX 6.5, it fails even with GNU as, haven't yet checked why. Rainer

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #28 from Thomas Henlich 2011-06-06 12:41:55 UTC --- I had a look at the code and what I think we should do is the following: If G editing and a scale factor p != 0 is in effect, split the rounding step into 2 steps: First, check if

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06 12:36:49 UTC --- Rainer, What is the difference between ... [trunk revision 174614] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg00642.html (for

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06 12:37:07 UTC --- No, the test just should use -fno-merge-debug-strings in dg-options and make sure it matches only DW_AT_(MIPS_|)linkage_name in .debug_info and not in .debug_abbrev. The test will fai

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #27 from jvdelisle at charter dot net 2011-06-06 12:36:21 UTC --- > > print "(-2pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.002E+01 > print "(-1pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.020E+00 > print "(0pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 > print "(1pg1

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Henlich 2011-06-06 12:27:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > My confusion seems to be when scale factor is to be ignored and when not, I > will give the standard another read. As it happens, you're not the only o

[Bug testsuite/49288] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06 12:25:45 UTC --- --- /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C2011-05-31 14:24:18.0 +0200 +++ /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C2011-06-0

[Bug libfortran/49296] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong END OF FILE error for list-directed I/O with strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-06-06 12:20:48 UTC --- I will leave this to Janne. (I am very short on time.) If the fix is not obvious, I will be happy to review the patch. It took a while for this to surface.

[Bug driver/49178] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Space between linker option and library in gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug libfortran/49296] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong END OF FILE error for list-directed I/O with strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran --- Comment #6 from Dom

[Bug fortran/49296] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong END OF FILE error for list-directed I/O with strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06 12:10:14 UTC --- > > Revision 166252 is within the range, but I fail to see the connection: > > My impression - looking at the diff - is that it is a different patch. You are right!-) Revision

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at charter dot net 2011-06-06 12:09:48 UTC --- On 06/06/2011 01:38 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: > For a scale factor 0, we are done. Good work, thank you! > > A scale factor != 0 does not work yet,

Re: [Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

On 06/06/2011 01:38 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: For a scale factor 0, we are done. Good work, thank you! A scale factor != 0 does not work yet, you wrote you are still working on it, is that correct? I am now. ;) print "(-2pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.002E+01

[Bug middle-end/49282] malloc corruption in large lto1-wpa run during inline edge heap resize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-06 11:49:48 UTC --- > I suppose we keep pointers to inline summaries live across the growth. Well, we should not. It is resized in inline_summary_alloc () and that function is called always before we get a

[Bug tree-optimization/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06 11:46:16 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 6 11:46:14 2011 New Revision: 174696 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174696 Log: 2011-06-06 Mikael Pettersson PR tree-o

[Bug tree-optimization/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06 11:43:34 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 6 11:43:31 2011 New Revision: 174695 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174695 Log: 2011-06-06 Mikael Pettersson PR tree-o

[Bug preprocessor/48532] Wrong location of namespaced pragma involving macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48532 --- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-06-06 11:33:45 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Mon Jun 6 11:33:42 2011 New Revision: 174694 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174694 Log: PR preprocessor/48532 libcpp/ * directives.c

[Bug c++/49260] cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C fails execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug lto/48978] excessive hash table allocation for large lto build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48978 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gcov-profile/49299] ICE in gimple_ic on profile feedback build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug other/49284] -fdump-ipa-cgraph leads to ICE in generate_canonical_option, at opts-common.c:303

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06 10:44:43 UTC --- Can you provide source for "random" object files?

[Bug libstdc++/49293] 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-[12].cc fail with glibc 2.14

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49280] Misinterpretation of -static-libgfortran switch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49280 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49296] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong END OF FILE error for list-directed I/O with strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from

[Bug middle-end/49282] malloc corruption in large lto1-wpa run during inline edge heap resize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06 10:42:23 UTC --- I suppose we keep pointers to inline summaries live across the growth.

[Bug libstdc++/49293] 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-[12].cc fail with glibc 2.14

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-06 10:41:48 UTC --- Created attachment 24446 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24446 Draft patch

[Bug other/49284] -fdump-ipa-cgraph leads to ICE in generate_canonical_option, at opts-common.c:303

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284 --- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-06 10:39:32 UTC --- If you use my command line and just supply any random object files for the ones specified it should reproduce I think. If not i'll upload my builddir, but it's large.

[Bug middle-end/49283] pointless warning with -Wstrict-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49283 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06 10:38:33 UTC --- 1) Line 2026 contains the expression (p < buff + sizeof buff - 1) GCC only looks at local tuple stmts when emitting the warning, so I suppose it sees sth like p = &buff[...];

[Bug fortran/49296] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong END OF FILE error for list-directed I/O with strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06 10:36:33 UTC --- Revision 166252 is within the range, but I fail to see the connection: 2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/43899 * runtime/error.c (generate_warning): New funct

[Bug other/49284] -fdump-ipa-cgraph leads to ICE in generate_canonical_option, at opts-common.c:303

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >