http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-31 06:28:25 UTC ---
print "(rc,g11.1)", 2. ! 0.2E+01 expected 2.
print "(rc,g11.2)", 20. ! 0.20E+02 expected 20.
print "(rc,g11.3)", 200. ! 0.200E+03 expected 200.
print "(rc,g11.4)", 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-31 06:05:19 UTC ---
I hadn't really thought of that, but now I see what a PITA a scale factor > 0
is going to be (scale factor < 0 is simply padding with zeros and shifting
digits):
We have to ignore t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49233
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-31 04:55:41
UTC ---
The error is:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c execution test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239
Summary: Random gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c
failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
gcc version 4.7.0 20110530 (experimental) [trunk revision 174450] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. ~/ice.i -O1
/home/ryan/ice.i: In function 'foo':
/home/ryan/ice.i:27:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 61 60 62 3 (set (reg:SI 147 t)
(geu:SI (reg:SI 3 r3 [ D.1975+4 ])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190
--- Comment #18 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-31 00:03:14 UTC ---
Bootstrap restored on i686-apple-darwin9.
Dave
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10, |x86_64-apple-darwin10,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-30 21:14:04 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon May 30 21:14:01 2011
New Revision: 174455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174455
Log:
2011-05-30 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49233
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33498
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
irtual void f(Bar&) {}
};
template struct Foo;
> g++-snapshot --version
g++-snapshot (GCC) 4.7.0 20110530 (experimental)
> g++-snapshot bug.cc -c -flto
> g++-snapshot bug.o -flto
In file included from bug.cc:8:0,
from :14:
bug.cc: In member function ‘f’:
bug.cc:9:15: error: f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33498
--- Comment #17 from Bruno.THOMAS at solucom dot fr 2011-05-30 20:24:31 UTC ---
Je suis absent jusqu'au 6 juin 2011 et ne peux répondre à votre mail.
En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez joindre le 01 49 03 20 50.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 20:09:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> >
> > string = dt%getFormattedString(0, FMT)
> > 1
> > Error: 'getformattedstring' at (1) is not a m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30
20:00:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 30 20:00:11 2011
New Revision: 174451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174451
Log:
Handle misaligned TFmode load/store.
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 19:28:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Here is a reduced test case for the duplicate SAVE attribute:
The duplicate SAVE warning of comment #3 can be fixed with something like this:
Ind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190
--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2011-05-30
18:52:18 UTC ---
At r174446, lto profiled bootstrap works fine on x86_64 darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24364|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at
stor-layout.c:424 with -O
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop
-ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #12 from Eri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression]
|R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt
2011-05-30 17:12:58 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon May 30 17:12:53 2011
New Revision: 174446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174446
Log:
2011-05-30 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Summary: -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190
--- Comment #15 from Nathan Froyd 2011-05-30
16:43:01 UTC ---
I've reverted the offending commit. If somebody could confirm that the
failures are gone, this PR can be closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4910
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Froyd 2011-05-30
16:42:10 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Mon May 30 16:42:05 2011
New Revision: 174445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174445
Log:
fix PR bootstrap/4910
gcc/
PR bootstrap/49190
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190
--- Comment #14 from Nathan Froyd 2011-05-30
16:42:12 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Mon May 30 16:42:05 2011
New Revision: 174445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174445
Log:
fix PR bootstrap/4910
gcc/
PR bootstrap/49190
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49233
Summary: Please un-deprecate rvalues in memory constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49232
Summary: Pointer assignment of stride to CONTIGUOUS pointer not
diagnosed as invalid
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211
--- Comment #5 from Nils Asmussen 2011-05-30 15:22:37
UTC ---
> Again, I suggest you have a look at crtn.asm, in particular these lines:
>
> % This must be the last file on the link-line, allocating global registers
> % from the top.
>
> % Regi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.1 |4.5.1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2011-05-30
15:15:31 UTC ---
I have been using Iain's last work in progress patch and it works fine with
both gcc 4.6 branch and gcc trunk. Hopefully he can get back to polishing it or
someone else can pick up the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2011-05-30
15:16:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 24397
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24397
Iain's work in progress for LTO containerization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231
Parviz Fariborz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||parviz_fariborz at mentor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211
--- Comment #3 from Nils Asmussen 2011-05-30 14:47:40
UTC ---
Thanks for your reply!
Perhaps I miss something, but I've no idea how that should work. Regardless of
whether $254 is initialized previously or not (in my case, it's a bootloader,
so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-05-30
14:29:32 UTC ---
See gcc/config/mmix/crtn.asm, where the global registers used by the ABI are
allocated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-30
14:09:28 UTC ---
Most *-*-solaris* does not seem affected by this pr (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-05/msg03426.html or
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-05/msg03448.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40528
--- Comment #15 from Agner Fog 2011-05-30 13:13:06 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > What is the status of this issue?
>
> It is implemented on ifunc branch.
>
> > Is option 3 implemented?
>
> Yes, on ifunc bran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-30
13:12:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 30 13:12:23 2011
New Revision: 174435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174435
Log:
2011-05-30 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-30
13:04:29 UTC ---
> ok, I will wait for a fix
Meanwhile you can also configure with --enable-checking=release.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231
Summary: #pragma omp parallel for never returns
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-05-30 12:26:37 UTC ---
On 30 May, 2011, at 2:20 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
>
> --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 2011-05-30 12:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-30
12:19:45 UTC ---
This is pr49190. If you want to proceed, you need to revert revision 174286 (or
to wait for a fix).
BTW which version of Xcode are you using?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-30
12:19:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 30 12:18:59 2011
New Revision: 174433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174433
Log:
PR c++/49223
* semantics.c (finish_omp_clau
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-30
12:16:08 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 30 12:16:04 2011
New Revision: 174432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174432
Log:
PR c++/49223
* semantics.c (finish_omp_clau
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46500
--- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2011-05-30 12:11:07 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon May 30 12:11:03 2011
New Revision: 174431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174431
Log:
PR middle-end/46500
gcc/java:
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24343|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-30
11:56:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 24394
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24394
gcc46-pr49223.patch
Untested fix. The problem is that require_complete_type is just a nop if
proces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Summary: please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in
mingw32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-30
11:33:31 UTC ---
Thanks for your further investigation of these issues, Daniel. I'm not sure to
understand what you mean by "degenerate specialization", though. In my
experience, a binary trait like is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229
Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE with variadics and depending
non-type default parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-30
11:17:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 30 11:17:35 2011
New Revision: 174430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174430
Log:
2011-05-30 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-30
11:15:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 30 11:15:20 2011
New Revision: 174429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174429
Log:
2011-05-30 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-30
11:13:41 UTC ---
I think a similar case could be constructed with restrict qualified pointers.
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-30
09:35:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I see; I wonder, is this something that was added in F2008 or was it present
> in
> F2003?
If you talk about that associate-names don't inherit the alloc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49228
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-30
09:28:50 UTC ---
If you want to keep most of Xcode 3.2.6, but live dangerously with lto, you can
also do what I have done: i.e., replace
Apple Inc version cctools-795~45, GNU assembler version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-30
09:22:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Moreover, I think that this test case is in fact invalid, cf. PR 48887.
We are talking about comment 4, aren't we?
(That test case fails with ifort 12 as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49225
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-30
09:20:30 UTC ---
Thanks Daniel. Depending on how this issue is resolved - at this point I'm
pretty sure it's an actual issue - given also the inconsistency vs the
static_assert, I will actually use som
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-30
09:13:17 UTC ---
I'm going to test
@@ -3423,11 +3423,14 @@ adjust_range_with_scev (value_range_t *v
loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49228
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699
--- Comment #15 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-05-30 09:11:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
>
> Moreover, I think that this test case is in fact invalid, cf. PR 48887.
Hm.
I see; I wonder, is this something that was added in F2008 or was it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49199
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-05-30 09:02:55 UTC ---
On Fri, 27 May 2011, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-27
> 21:37:46 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-30
09:00:46 UTC ---
Triggered by r163724:
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 1 11:39:55 2010
New Revision: 163724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163724
Log:
2010-09-01 Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-30
08:53:15 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon May 30 08:53:12 2011
New Revision: 174427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174427
Log:
PR target/45263
* config/avr/libgcc.S (__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49225
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler
2011-05-30 08:46:33 UTC ---
I did some further investigation of this. The problem seems *not* to be located
in __my_and_, but it seems that the compiler expands
is_same...
for different T, U to the specializat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-30 08:44:43 UTC ---
Another issue is with DMGL_VERBOSE. nm -C does not use DMGL_VERBOSE:
libstdc++.so.6.0.16.debug
000a4e50 t bool __gnu_cxx::operator==(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator const&,
__gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49228
Summary: gcc fails to compile on darwin (with lto)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227
--- Comment #1 from dcb 2011-05-30 08:37:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 24393
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24393
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227
Summary: ice in inline_small_functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49201
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49199
--- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 07:15:35 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Mon May 30 07:15:31 2011
New Revision: 174425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174425
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49199
93 matches
Mail list logo
