http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-25
06:31:31 UTC ---
No objection I think. Alternatively there could be a switch to control this
warning.
=/data/vondele/gcc_bench/libs/
--with-mpfr=/data/vondele/gcc_bench/libs/
--with-mpc=/data/vondele/gcc_bench/libs/
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110524 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-march=native' '-shared-libgcc'
/data/vondele/gcc_benc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48502
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48502
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25
05:57:57 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed May 25 05:57:54 2011
New Revision: 174167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174167
Log:
PR go/48502
libgo/os: Fix test to run on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49143
Pierre Habouzit changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44311
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45080
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-31 10:14:4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48322
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48292
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49144
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-05-25
02:16:00 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed May 25 02:15:58 2011
New Revision: 174165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174165
Log:
2011-05-24 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-25
01:41:00 UTC ---
Are you sure it's fixed in the branch too?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49066
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48106
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47544
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-25
01:34:19 UTC ---
I will be doing some things with this, maybe not exactly as suggested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
01:08:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 01:08:24 2011
New Revision: 174160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174160
Log:
PR c++/47336
* error.c (dump_template_bindi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47263
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48617
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48647
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48945
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48617
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
01:08:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 01:08:07 2011
New Revision: 174158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174158
Log:
PR c++/48617
* pt.c (invalid_nontype_parm_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48884
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49042
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49042
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
01:08:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 01:08:53 2011
New Revision: 174164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174164
Log:
PR c++/49042
* pt.c (get_mostly_instantiate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
01:08:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 01:08:38 2011
New Revision: 174162
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174162
Log:
PR c++/49105
* typeck.c (build_const_cast_1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48884
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
01:08:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 01:08:46 2011
New Revision: 174163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174163
Log:
PR c++/48884
* pt.c (fn_type_unification):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47263
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
01:08:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 01:08:31 2011
New Revision: 174161
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174161
Log:
PR c++/47263
* decl.c (use_eh_spec_block):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47544
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
01:08:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 01:08:16 2011
New Revision: 174159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174159
Log:
PR c++/47544
* pt.c (instantiate_decl): Han
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24244|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49153
dizzy at roedu dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154
Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc:
ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49042
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-24
23:45:05 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 24 23:44:59 2011
New Revision: 174151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174151
Log:
PR c++/49042
* pt.c (get_mostly_instantiate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49153
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-24
23:51:38 UTC ---
Not having looked into your code in any serious detail, I suspect something is
wronf with it: current Intel, Comeau and SunStudio compilers all error out in
the same way as recent GCCs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49151
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-24 23:29:23 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue May 24 23:29:19 2011
New Revision: 174150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174150
Log:
2011-05-24 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49151
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-24 23:17:02
UTC ---
Bad reload:
Reloads for insn # 588
Reload 0: reload_in (DI) = (reg/v/f:DI 182 [ b ])
GENERAL_REGS, RELOAD_FOR_OPERAND_ADDRESS (opnum = 0)
reload_in_reg: (reg/v/f:DI 182 [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49153
Summary: Compile error with template metafunctions (starting
with 4.5.x)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
Component|t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49144
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48187
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2011-05-24 21:29:38
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue May 24 21:29:35 2011
New Revision: 174142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174142
Log:
In gcc/:
2011-05-24 Nicola Pero
PR objc/4818
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
--- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero 2011-05-24 21:39:29
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue May 24 21:39:24 2011
New Revision: 174143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174143
Log:
In libobjc/:
2011-05-24 Nicola Pero
PR libob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
--- Comment #6 from Nicola Pero 2011-05-24 21:43:47
UTC ---
I applied the fix. Waiting for approval to apply it for the 4.6 branch as well
so that it gets into 4.6.1. :-)
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--- Comment #1 from karg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49151
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
--- Comment #5 from John Peyton 2011-05-24 21:26:49
UTC ---
> Maybe you are getting subnormals which causes a huge performance decrease.
It looks like that might indeed be the case. It didn't seem to happen with ICC
though. Is it possible that o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48845
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
John Peyton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49151
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Summary: Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49151
Summary: [C++0x] chrono::duration has incorrect non-member
operator semantics
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49042
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49136
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48884
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-24
20:26:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 24 20:26:47 2011
New Revision: 174139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174139
Log:
PR c++/48884
* class.c (pushclass): Accept
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-05-24
20:27:39 UTC ---
Maybe you are getting subnormals which causes a huge performance decrease.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49150
Summary: Preprocessing fortran code with the `-M` flag to
automatically resolve dependencies and produce
makefile rules rendered useless by requiring .mod
files be present
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351
--- Comment #24 from Florian Weimer 2011-05-24 19:54:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Florian, your patch seems to have gone unreviewed, could you ping it?
Jason reviewed it and Ian, too (off-list). I haven't yet gotten around to
incorpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49149
Summary: Dependency autogeneration with `-M` rendered useless
by requiring .mod files
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
--- Comment #3 from John Peyton 2011-05-24 19:16:51
UTC ---
Created attachment 24351
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24351
Finally, this is a preprocessed version of the minimal case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49143
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
--- Comment #2 from John Peyton 2011-05-24 19:16:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 24350
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24350
This is a minimal example of an expression that takes longer to evaluate than
it should. Run the slight
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-24 18:53:14 UTC
---
> Honza, can you try this on mozilla?
Can try, but only after returning from Bertinoro. All connections I found here
filters VPN.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
John Peyton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Joh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
Summary: Certain expressions take an extremely long time for no
apparent reason
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42775
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin 2011-05-24
18:47:17 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Tue May 24 18:47:14 2011
New Revision: 174133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174133
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-09-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #23 from John David Anglin 2011-05-24
18:44:38 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Tue May 24 18:44:35 2011
New Revision: 174132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174132
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49007
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720
Zaak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Zaak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40086
--- Comment #21 from John David Anglin 2011-05-24
18:44:38 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Tue May 24 18:44:35 2011
New Revision: 174132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174132
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49007
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49133
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-24 18:41:33 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue May 24 18:41:31 2011
New Revision: 174131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174131
Log:
PR target/49133
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147
Summary: graphite branch ICEs with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep
Product: gcc
Version: lno
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2011-05-24
18:06:04 UTC ---
Above is first of a series of patches. It handles converting __builtin_powi to
a sequence of multiplies in the cse_sincos gimple pass. More to come.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2011-05-24
18:02:27 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue May 24 18:02:22 2011
New Revision: 174129
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174129
Log:
2011-05-24 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth 2011-05-24 17:51:54
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue May 24 17:51:51 2011
New Revision: 174128
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174128
Log:
PR target/3746
* config.gcc (alpha*-dec-osf5.1*)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48437
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
Summary|LTO crashes with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-24
17:41:54 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue May 24 17:41:51 2011
New Revision: 174127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174127
Log:
Always add -mno-XXX for -march=native.
2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48187
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-05-24 17:45:59
UTC ---
I have a patch ready to fix this --
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01735.html
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-24
17:38:38 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue May 24 17:38:34 2011
New Revision: 174126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174126
Log:
Always add -mno-XXX for -march=native.
2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49146
--- Comment #2 from Ariel Burton 2011-05-24
17:31:22 UTC ---
f and f_ms_abi are identical with the exception that f_ms_abi
is annoted with __attribute__((ms_abi)). This causes the compiler
to emit code to save registers not otherwise saved. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49146
Summary: segv from libgcc_s when raising an exception, or
unwinding stack with backtrace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49144
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49146
--- Comment #1 from Ariel Burton 2011-05-24
17:18:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 24347
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24347
preprocessed file for t_repro.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49136
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49144
Summary: [4.6/4.7 regression] miscompiled reverse_iterator?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
ong --enable-target-optspace
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110524 (experimental) [trunk revision 174114] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. ~/ice.i -O1
/home/ryan/ice.i: In function 'func3':
/home/ryan/ice.i:30:1: internal compiler error: in
simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48633
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-05-24
16:28:42 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue May 24 16:28:38 2011
New Revision: 174124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174124
Log:
2011-05-24 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126
--- Comment #4 from Michael K. Edwards
2011-05-24 16:38:41 UTC ---
OK, that's a clear explanation of why the DMB is necessary in the case where
both the compare and the store succeed (neither branch is taken; at a higher
semantic level, a lock is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49138
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-24 16:19:25 UTC ---
On Tue, 24 May 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49138
>
> --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-24
> 14:54:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-05-24
16:14:56 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue May 24 16:14:51 2011
New Revision: 174123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174123
Log:
2011-05-13 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo