http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-24 05:12:46
UTC ---
For
(insn 588 587 589 28 (set (mem:DF (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (subreg:SI
(reg/v/f:DI 182 [ b ]) 0)
(const_int 8 [0x8]))) [4 MEM[base: b_96(D), index:
D.15020_278, step
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-24 04:40:08
UTC ---
gen_reload generates wrong code for
(gdb) call debug_rtx (out)
(reg:SI 1 dx)
(gdb) call debug_rtx (in)
(plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v/f:DI 182 [ b ]) 0)
(const_int 8 [0x8]))
(gdb)
when dx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-24
03:49:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 24 03:49:03 2011
New Revision: 174101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174101
Log:
PR c++/49102
* call.c (convert_arg_to_ellip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49135
Summary: ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/920302-1.c on arm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134
Summary: ICE in g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr tests for arm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-23
23:16:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It's annoying how GCC bugzilla tends not to send mail to people when I add
> them
> to CC even if I also add a comment. Anyway, Fabien, please take a loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48106
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
22:55:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 22:55:46 2011
New Revision: 174091
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174091
Log:
PR c++/48106
* c-common.c (c_common_get_nar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
22:56:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 22:55:56 2011
New Revision: 174092
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174092
Log:
PR c++/49105
* typeck.c (build_const_cast_1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
22:56:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 22:56:04 2011
New Revision: 174093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174093
Log:
PR c++/49105
* typeck.c (cp_build_c_cast):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #22 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
22:31:59 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon May 23 22:31:55 2011
New Revision: 174090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174090
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49007
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40086
--- Comment #20 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
22:31:59 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon May 23 22:31:55 2011
New Revision: 174090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174090
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49007
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.1
Summary|[C++0x]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Aggregate-initialization|[DR 178]
|rejected for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
22:08:46 UTC ---
It's annoying how GCC bugzilla tends not to send mail to people when I add them
to CC even if I also add a comment. Anyway, Fabien, please take a look at this
bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
--- Comment #23 from Edmar Wienskoski 2011-05-23
21:58:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 24337
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24337
This patch was tested against 4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49133
Summary: [4.6 Regression] modification of aliased __m128d
miscompiles
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
--- Comment #22 from Edmar Wienskoski 2011-05-23
21:57:08 UTC ---
I completed re-testing everything.
It turns out I cannot reproduce the original error on gcc-4.4 (rev 173968)
So, I am submitting only the patch that I tested for gcc-4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot|unassigned at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49131
Summary: destructors missing DW_AT_vtable_elem_location
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
Summary: [C++0x] Aggregate-initialization rejected for class
with const data member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
Summary: discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #4 from natchouf
2011-05-23 20:36:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> A patch is posted at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01664.html
in the patch you linked to, I think there is a mistake in these lines :
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #3 from natchouf
2011-05-23 20:32:14 UTC ---
Oups, I'm sorry. -mtune should be replaced by -march everywhere in my report...
Thanks for the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-23
20:37:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 23 20:37:18 2011
New Revision: 174087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174087
Log:
PR lto/49123
* fold-const.c (constant_boole
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-23
20:38:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 23 20:38:17 2011
New Revision: 174088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174088
Log:
PR lto/49123
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr491
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-05-23 19:53:31 UTC ---
The 128-bit code for scaled erfc in Cephes is terrible. For ERFC_SCALED(1), it
gives:
0.427592...
instead of:
0.427583...
I don't see any easy way about this, someone wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2011-05-23
20:01:10 UTC ---
Hi Paul,
just two questions, for my understanding:
With your patch, what is the difference between GFC_CAN_REVERSE
and GFC_REVERSE_NOT_SET?
And why do you initialize loop.reverse c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-23
19:33:36 UTC ---
> Ok to backport this fix after testing to 4.3 and 4.4? I would also
> like to backport this fix
>
> PR rtl-optimization/42775
> * cfgrtl.c (rest_of_pass_free_cfg): Recomput
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48884
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-23
19:00:54 UTC ---
Status: I am down to about 5 testsuite failures on the patch for this. There
is a lot if interplay going on, so i will be factoring the code some as part of
the cleanup. Stay tuned.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47110
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-23 18:52:27 UTC ---
On Mon, 23 May 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > This code fails to handle the case where there already is a use.
>
> This should have been fixed in 4.5 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #2 from Anh Vo 2011-05-23 18:49:10
UTC ---
It will be fine if the fix goes into the latest snapshot.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41495
--- Comment #10 from Alasdair Lumsden 2011-05-23
18:36:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I only work on libstdc++ in my spare time and I lack the time, not the
> motivation :)
Alrighty!
> There are some others who expressed an interest in i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45345
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49120
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.1, 4.7.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48843
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49032
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-23
18:12:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 23 18:12:34 2011
New Revision: 174084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174084
Log:
PR debug/49032
* dbxout.c: Include cgraph.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49129
Summary: confusing diagnostic for missing semi-colon after
member template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhanceme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-23 17:57:38 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon May 23 17:57:35 2011
New Revision: 174080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174080
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/48826
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49120
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-23
18:03:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 23 18:03:31 2011
New Revision: 174082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174082
Log:
PR c/49120
* c-decl.c (start_decl): Convert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49032
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-23
18:07:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 23 18:07:43 2011
New Revision: 174083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174083
Log:
PR debug/49032
* dbxout.c: Include cgraph.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-23
18:00:56 UTC ---
> This code fails to handle the case where there already is a use.
This should have been fixed in 4.5 and above:
PR rtl-optimization/40086
* reorg.c (relax_delay_slo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49120
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-23
18:02:08 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 23 18:02:03 2011
New Revision: 174081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174081
Log:
PR c/49120
* c-decl.c (start_decl): Convert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48892
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49092
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #15 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
16:18:41 UTC ---
Breakpoint 15, delete_related_insns (insn=0x1ba1390) at
../../gcc/gcc/jump.c:1126
1126 int was_code_label = (LABEL_P (insn));
(gdb) p debug_rtx (insn)
(code_label 322 386 91
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-23
16:53:00 UTC ---
you haven't provided the necessary information requested at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
Specifically you need to say how your gcc was configured (because -mtune should
not affect the i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49125
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #18 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
16:57:02 UTC ---
So, the problem is here:
/* Figure out where to emit the special USE insn so we don't
later incorrectly compute register live/death info. */
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #16 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
16:40:57 UTC ---
The use is deleted because insn 434 has been retargeted from
code_label 322 to code_label 465:
(insn 434 58 366 ../../gcc/gcc/basic-block.h:194 (sequence [
(jump_insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #17 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
16:53:04 UTC ---
Jump is redirected here:
Breakpoint 17, reorg_redirect_jump (jump=0x1ba9cc0, nlabel=0x1bac660) at
../../gcc/gcc/reorg.c:1882
1882 incr_ticks_for_insn (jump);
(gdb) bt
#0 re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47315
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23
16:51:46 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 23 16:51:42 2011
New Revision: 174078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174078
Log:
Save the initial options after checking vzer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30161
--- Comment #11 from Tom Tromey 2011-05-23 16:34:27
UTC ---
See PR 33861 for another example of where an extension
would seem to be necessary.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49122
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-23
16:44:22 UTC ---
There's a note in [support.initlist] which says:
"Copying an initializer list does not copy the underlying elements."
However there was some discussion on the core reflector last mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33861
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ddavenport at walchem dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47315
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
Summary: gcc -mtune=native generates unsoported instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41495
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-23
16:22:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Would a financial incentive help? My company may be interested in funding this
> to speed up the work.
I only work on libstdc++ in my spare time and I lac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49121
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 16:07:04 UTC ---
test case:
...
#ifndef TYPE
#define TYPE char*
#endif
extern int a[];
/* Can not infer loop iteration from array -- exit test can not be replaced.
*/
void foo (int i_width,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
15:48:43 UTC ---
Ok, I'll see if I can find out why it's being deleted. In the first try,
we have the following rtl:
Breakpoint 12, mark_target_live_regs (insns=0x1b8a020, target=0x1b98f90,
res=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49044
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin 2011-05-23
15:57:49 UTC ---
This is how insn 433 is deleted:
Breakpoint 14, delete_insn (insn=0x1ba9c60) at ../../gcc/gcc/cfgrtl.c:110
110 rtx next = NEXT_INSN (insn);
(gdb) bt
#0 delete_insn (insn=0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47263
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
15:48:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 15:48:37 2011
New Revision: 174076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174076
Log:
PR c++/47263
* decl.c (use_eh_spec_block):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lenx99 at yahoo dot com.cn
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48811
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #19 from Peter Bergner 2011-05-23
15:38:11 UTC ---
I applied Janis' patch (modulo a small fixup due to upstream changes) to
current mainline and did a bootstrap and regtest. We bootstrap fine,
unfortunately the patch no longer fixes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
--- Comment #21 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
15:32:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 15:32:39 2011
New Revision: 174073
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174073
Log:
PR c++/49058
* call.c (splice_viable): Be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47544
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
15:32:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 15:32:19 2011
New Revision: 174071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174071
Log:
PR c++/47544
* pt.c (instantiate_decl): Han
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
15:32:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 15:32:29 2011
New Revision: 174072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174072
Log:
PR c++/47336
* error.c (dump_template_bindi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48617
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-23
15:32:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 23 15:32:10 2011
New Revision: 174070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174070
Log:
PR c++/48617
* pt.c (invalid_nontype_parm_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49127
Summary: -Os generates constant mov instead of instruction xor
and mov when zeroing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49121
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126
Summary: timevar_stack faild because define_label
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41320
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|XFAIL |XFAIL
|gcc.dg/tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-23 14:36:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Wonder if I'm not seeing it because my ld doesn't support plugins...
That is true.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49121
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40874
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-23
14:36:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 23 14:36:28 2011
New Revision: 174068
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174068
Log:
2011-05-23 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49125
Summary: [avr-gcc] internal compiler error: in build_unary_op,
at c-typeck.c:3786
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49122
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40874
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49121
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49124
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-23
13:56:49 UTC ---
That would be
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===
--- gcc/fold-const.c(revision 174066)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c(working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |---
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41495
--- Comment #8 from Alasdair Lumsden 2011-05-23
13:44:16 UTC ---
Hi Jonathan,
(In reply to comment #7)
> Does OpenIndiana support the new POSIX.1-2008 APIs, e.g. wctype_l and
> towupper_l?
Not at present, however Garrett D'Amore has expressed i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49124
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopt_infer_2.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
As
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo