http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2011-05-21
04:51:10 UTC ---
Could this have been fixed by PR 42775 which does not change reorg but rather
free_cfg?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24314|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49066
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-21
03:57:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat May 21 03:57:12 2011
New Revision: 173993
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173993
Log:
PR c++/49066
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-05-21
03:59:49 UTC ---
Comparing reorg.c from 4.3 versus 4.4, it seems like the problem
may be latent in more recent versions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49076
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Baldwin 2011-05-21
03:16:20 UTC ---
I'm not sure if this is directly related or not, but the following program
produces the same output as the original (with the same problem):
subroutine print_int (i)
in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095
Summary: Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with
test
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37144
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28457
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24312|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-21 00:45:30
UTC ---
With the latest x32 kernel, I got
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcspn.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39543-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr43766.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48945
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49045
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49066
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094
Summary: ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49076
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-20
21:50:25 UTC ---
If one places a break point in gfc_conv_array_parameter - which is called
during gfc_conv_procedure_call, one finds that "foo" is of type "AS_DEFERRED"
and not "AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE"; at t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
21:29:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 21:29:14 2011
New Revision: 173984
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173984
Log:
DR 1073
PR c++/49082
* typeck.c (comp_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-20 21:31:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Patch:
... regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072
--- Comment #3 from Jose 2011-05-20 21:22:03
UTC ---
Another error encountered on a second try:
xgcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)
Thank you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-20
21:22:02 UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 20:59:43
UTC ---
Created attachment 24312
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24312
A patch
I am testing this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
20:40:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 20:39:59 2011
New Revision: 173981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173981
Log:
DR 1073
PR c++/49082
* typeck.c (comp_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
20:01:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 20:01:19 2011
New Revision: 173978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173978
Log:
PR c++/48873
* tree.c (stabilize_expr): Don
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 20:12:10
UTC ---
The problem is
Breakpoint 3, force_to_mode (x=0x70acbde0, mode=DImode, mask=4294967295,
just_select=0) at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gcc/combine.c:8325
8325 op1 = forc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
20:01:45 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 20:01:42 2011
New Revision: 173979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173979
Log:
PR c++/48873
* tree.c (stabilize_expr): Don
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
--- Comment #14 from Tristan Wibberley
2011-05-20 19:30:15 UTC ---
Ed,
It depends on the rest of your program that you cut out. As given, no it's
not supposed to work.
see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ for how to report your problem if you have a
go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
--- Comment #6 from Roger Jeurninck 2011-05-20
19:44:04 UTC ---
Thanks for the swift reponse.
Let me explain this a bit. In our build process we compile thousands of files
and the outcome should be stable.
If we do adapt a file we try to minimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-20 19:32:33 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri May 20 19:32:30 2011
New Revision: 173976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173976
Log:
2011-05-20 Tom de Vries
PR target/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2011-05-20
19:19:35 UTC ---
This loop in cleanup_tree_cfg_1 is miscompiled:
/* Start by iterating over all basic blocks. We cannot use FOR_EACH_BB,
since the basic blocks may get removed. */
n = l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49080
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
19:01:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 19:01:53 2011
New Revision: 173970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173970
Log:
PR c++/48873
* tree.c (stabilize_expr): Don
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48948
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
19:02:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 19:02:42 2011
New Revision: 173975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173975
Log:
PR c++/48948
* class.c (finalize_literal_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24163
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 19:01:14
UTC ---
This patch works:
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index 8af86f2..60c6e13 100644
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -10184,6 +10184,7 @@ simplify_shift_const_1 (enum rtx_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48736
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
19:02:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 19:02:08 2011
New Revision: 173971
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173971
Log:
PR c++/48736
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
19:02:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 19:02:17 2011
New Revision: 173972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173972
Log:
PR c++/48745
* pt.c (value_dependent_expr_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
Jason Vas Dias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
18:53:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 18:53:27 2011
New Revision: 173969
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173969
Log:
PR c++/48873
* tree.c (stabilize_expr): Don
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093
Summary: ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with
volatile inside peeled loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-20
18:22:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 20 18:22:49 2011
New Revision: 173967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173967
Log:
PR bootstrap/49086
* gimple-fold.c (and_com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-20
18:23:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 20 18:23:36 2011
New Revision: 173968
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173968
Log:
PR bootstrap/49086
* gimple-fold.c (and_com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48873
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
18:30:16 UTC ---
The new32.C testcase worked in 3.3, but breaks in 3.4 and later.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49092
Summary: ice in tree_add_const_value_attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 18:27:51
UTC ---
(gdb) bt
#0 force_to_mode (x=0x70acbdf8, mode=DImode, mask=4294967294,
just_select=0) at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gcc/combine.c:8154
#1 0x01121405 in simplify_and_co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49089
--- Comment #1 from Changpeng Fang 2011-05-20
18:01:29 UTC ---
Apparently, this default option setting should only apply to systems that
splitting loads is bebeficial:
config/i386/i386.c(ix86_option_override_internal):
if (!(target_flags_explic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49067
asalina at snet dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c
Version|4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49091
Summary: ice in evaluate_conditions_for_known_args
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48706
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-20 18:05:29 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri May 20 18:05:26 2011
New Revision: 173966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173966
Log:
2011-05-20 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090
Summary: provide a way to recognize defaulted template
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24163
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
18:01:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 18:01:22 2011
New Revision: 173965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173965
Log:
PR c++/24163
PR c++/29131
gcc/cp/
* pt.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48706
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-20
18:01:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri May 20 18:01:22 2011
New Revision: 173965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173965
Log:
PR c++/24163
PR c++/29131
gcc/cp/
* pt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #17 from David Fang 2011-05-20
17:56:25 UTC ---
I usually catch these with -Wshadow -Werror.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49089
Summary: Regression on CFP2006 on Bulldozer From Splitting AVX
32-byte Unaligned Loads
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Bloc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41495
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-20
17:27:45 UTC ---
Does OpenIndiana support the new POSIX.1-2008 APIs, e.g. wctype_l and
towupper_l?
If noone else does it I hope to get time to work on fixing the problems in the
current code, but it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 17:19:26
UTC ---
We have
#10 0x01121405 in simplify_and_const_int_1 (mode=DImode,
varop=0x70acbdf8, constop=4294967294)
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gcc/combine.c:9413
9413 va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48361
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49088
Summary: Combine fails to properly handle zero-extension and
signed int constant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49080
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-20 16:30:51 UTC ---
It should be safe to copy the GCC copy of longlong.h into glibc; I tried
to ensure that the GCC copy is suitable for use in both places.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49087
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-05-20
16:55:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 24307
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24307
slightly more reduced testcase
Slightly more reduced test case than original.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49087
Summary: crash in vect_is_slp_reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-20
16:49:58 UTC ---
Backtrace
(gdb) run -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../work/libgomp
-I../../../work/libgomp/config/bsd -I../../../work/libgomp/config/posix
-I../../../work/libgomp -Wall -Werror -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
Summary: [4.7 Regression] libgomp/task.c:79:1: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085
Summary: Crash with SIGSEGV during compilation.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@boost-consulting.com
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41495
Alasdair Lumsden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alasdairrr at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Summary: Bootstrap failure with bug box of Program_Error
EXCEPTION_ACCESS _VIOLATION / Error detected at
system.ads:175:5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49083
Summary: g++ should error when a variable declared in a
condition is hidden by a variable in the immediately
contained block
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-20 16:03:50 UTC ---
I don't see any explanation of what you think the compiler is doing wrong.
For example, "when this source file is compiled with the following
options, the program ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49080
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-20 16:01:04
UTC ---
FWIW, the copy of longlong.h in glibc is slightly out of date, it lacks support
for zarch, which uses a different definition of smul_ppmm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
Summary: Incorrect counter used for compilation of string
literals.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #95 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-20
15:31:28 UTC ---
... and
7,456,601,134 < /gcc/gimple.c:gimple_type_eq (18852945x) [//lto1]
1,384,102,312 < /gcc/gimple.c:gimple_type_hash (3452343x) [//lto1]
936,822,402 * ???:_obstack_begin [/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #94 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-20
15:30:38 UTC ---
Callgrinding htab_find_slot_with_hash leads to:
2,535,276,742 < /libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_find_slot'2 (27545437x) [//lto1]
84,947,655,239 < /libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_find_slot (5291
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49078
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
Summary: [C++0x] Issues with noexcept propagation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
15:02:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 20 15:02:49 2011
New Revision: 173954
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173954
Log:
2011-05-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
