http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48837
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48846
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 01:23:49 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue May 3 01:23:46 2011
New Revision: 173285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173285
Log:
2011-05-02 Steven G. Kargl
PR fort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-05-03 00:57:55 UTC ---
> in get_alias_set, at alias.c:715
Like in my bug 47870.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47870
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-03
00:52:11 UTC ---
And I think that in the FDIS we have a defect for the move assignment operator:
it is supposed to be both noexcept and constant complexity and I don't see how
those can be achieved giv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
--- Comment #7 from ssameer+gcc at gmail dot com 2011-05-03 00:01:05 UTC ---
Thanks guys ! I'll look forward to the changes in gcc 4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-02
23:50:50 UTC ---
Thanks Jon!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-02
23:50:03 UTC ---
The status table is right on trunk now, I'll update it again when move and swap
operations are added.
I should backport the updated status table to the 4.6 branch, as the C++0x
stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-02
23:46:28 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon May 2 23:46:24 2011
New Revision: 173278
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173278
Log:
2011-05-03 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
--- Comment #1 from ssameer+gcc at gmail dot com 2011-05-02 22:37:36 UTC ---
These functions are present in the standard library that comes with Visual C++
2010.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848
Summary: [C++0x] std::valarray functions missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-02
21:59:59 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 2 21:59:57 2011
New Revision: 173273
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173273
Log:
PR c++/40975
* tree-inline.c (copy_tree_r):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48834
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-02
21:59:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 2 21:59:49 2011
New Revision: 173272
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173272
Log:
PR c++/48834
* tree.c (build_vec_init_expr)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-02
22:00:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 2 22:00:07 2011
New Revision: 173274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173274
Log:
Revert:
PR c++/40975
* cp-tree.def (VE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48846
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-05-02 20:43:31
UTC ---
valgrind says:
==29628== Invalid read of size 2
==29628==at 0x641800: is_gimple_min_invariant (gimple.c:2814)
==29628==by 0x65BC5C: gimplify_compound_lval (gimplify.c:2053)
==29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48847
Summary: Wrong "unused parameter" warning with interface block
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48846
Summary: Many -O2 -flto testsuite failures with -m32 -mavx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35445
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35445
--- Comment #6 from Simon Martin 2011-05-02
20:13:13 UTC ---
Author: simartin
Date: Mon May 2 20:13:08 2011
New Revision: 173269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173269
Log:
gcc/
2011-05-02 Simon Martin
PR c/35445
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48832
marcus at jet dot franken.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-02
19:05:51 UTC ---
Yes and we are honing in on it now. I suspected the RD on negatives. Just did
not have time to check it yet. Thansk for continued examples.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-02
18:38:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon May 2 18:38:44 2011
New Revision: 173264
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173264
Log:
PR c++/48446
* decl.c (stabilize_save_expr_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-02
18:10:58 UTC ---
> This also causes the ACATS test cxg2001 to fail on i386-pc-solaris2:
This one is PR rtl-optimization/48633.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12871
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-02 18:09:39
UTC ---
But see also bug 48835
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12089
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12871
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-02 17:20:40
UTC ---
I'd rather remove that file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46500
--- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2011-05-02 17:34:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The cumulative_args_t changes should be updated and resubmitted now we are in
> 4.7 stage 1.
Before updating the cumulative_args_t changes, the log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42754
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38547
--- Comment #20 from Jason Qian 2011-05-02 17:35:23
UTC ---
Comment on attachment 16962
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16962
errors during build
Hi Rainer
I got the same message using gcc4.4.0 ob AIX 5.3
Duplicate symbol:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-02
17:31:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 24169
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24169
gcc47-pr48774.patch
Untested fix. The additional condition could be changed to just CCCmode check,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48845
Summary: [4.7 regression] All g++.dg/tree-prof and
gcc.dg/{matrix, tree-prof} executions tests fail on
Solaris 8/9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2011-05-02 17:06:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 24168
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24168
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47955
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47951
--- Comment #3 from Stuart Henderson 2011-05-02
17:01:07 UTC ---
Author: shenders
Date: Mon May 2 17:01:01 2011
New Revision: 173261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173261
Log:
2011-05-02 Stuart Henderson
PR ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47955
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-02
16:58:36 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Mon May 2 16:58:32 2011
New Revision: 173260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173260
Log:
PR target/47955
* gcc/config/m68k/m68k.c (m68k_ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48814
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-02 16:24:01 UTC ---
On Mon, 2 May 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The side-effects yes, but the read in count++ happens at either before
> or after incr is executed. At least t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844
Georg Bauhaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24166|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844
Summary: GNAT bug box, referring to gimplify.c, possibly to do
with aliasing and discriminant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46857
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48265
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-02
16:07:56 UTC ---
*** Bug 46871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46871
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48814
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-02
15:35:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Since the order of evaluation is undefined it may evaluate "count++" and
> "incr()" in any order, as it pleases.
>
> Since there is a sequence point bef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-02
15:26:23 UTC ---
> Most of them is moot if we just accept that direct calls to thunks are
> a barrier for IPA optimizations (in the case they do not have a gimple
> body). We could represent variadic t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48625
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-02 15:12:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
O, I see. The important part is in
set_default_std_flags (void)
{
gfc_option.allow_std = GFC_STD_F95_OBS | GFC_STD_F95_DEL
| GFC_STD_F2003 | GFC_STD_F2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-02
14:56:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> As discussed on IRC, the above patch is not really good idea. The consequence
> of it is that the cgraph edges and IPA references will point to thunk no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-02
14:55:38 UTC ---
Just to add, the other alternatives discussed were
I) Avoid direct calls to thunks at early optimization time.
This has problem with fact that C++ FE doesn't really tell us about t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48814
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-02
14:31:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can you elaborate on this?
> That's why I changed the mask from GFC_STD_GNU to (GFC_STD_GNU |
> GFC_STD_F2008).
First, the code is/should be also allowed fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-02
14:27:34 UTC ---
Patch:
Index: gcc/cgraph.c
===
--- gcc/cgraph.c(revision 173249)
+++ gcc/cgraph.c(working copy)
@@ -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #24 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-05-02
14:06:52 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Mon May 2 14:06:48 2011
New Revision: 173252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173252
Log:
2011-05-02 Ulrich Weigand
PR middle-en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43858
--- Comment #29 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-05-02
14:06:52 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Mon May 2 14:06:48 2011
New Revision: 173252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173252
Log:
2011-05-02 Ulrich Weigand
PR middle-en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-02
13:58:28 UTC ---
This looks like a target bug to me
in *.postreload we have:
(insn 615 177 616 32 (set (reg:CCC 17 flags)
(compare:CCC (zero_extract:DI (reg:DI 5 di [orig:129 prephitmp.8 ]
[129
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-02 14:10:22 UTC ---
Can you elaborate on this?
Previously we allowed the format with -std=gnu.
Now we want to allow it with -std=gnu or -std=f2008. So we call require_type()
only if neither of these op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24138|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-02
13:30:33 UTC ---
2011-01-03 Martin Jambor
* cgraphunit.c (verify_cgraph_node): Verify there is no direct call to
a thunk.
also "exposed" this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-02 13:47:47 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-02
> 13:23:41 UTC ---
> Yes, the noise is annoying but I can't do anything but paper over the issue
> by either re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-02
13:40:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 24162 [details]
> Proposed patch for input/output
- if (!(compile_options.allow_std & GFC_STD_GNU)
+ if (!(compile_options.allo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-02
13:23:41 UTC ---
Well, I think it is a mistake in the cgraph infrastructure and I hoped that
Honza and Martin would work on this. At least I see no way to tell
whether a function-decl is a thunk or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-02 13:24:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 24164
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24164
Revised patch including rounding down negative numbers
Sorry, my bug report should have been more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-02 13:01:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 24163
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24163
Test case for input/output of real numbers with B/O/Z editing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-02
13:11:30 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 2 13:11:27 2011
New Revision: 173250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173250
Log:
2011-05-02 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-02
13:04:30 UTC ---
Status: With some significant help from Michael, we have a front-end patch
generating a call to transfer_derived() which passes a pointer to the user
defined DTIO procedure to libgfort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-02
13:06:53 UTC ---
Thanks Thomas, thanks for support. I will have a close look and check tonight.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #34 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-02 13:05:45
UTC ---
Changeing BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT changes the ABI.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich
2011-05-02 12:58:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 24162
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24162
Proposed patch for input/output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #46 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-02
12:46:11 UTC ---
I have started on the second phase of this effort which is to get rid of the
floating point issue on -m32 machines.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47969
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-02 12:44:18 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon May 2 12:44:15 2011
New Revision: 173249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173249
Log:
/cp
2011-05-02 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47969
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #90 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-02
12:41:15 UTC ---
Per node memory usage statistics for WPA
Code Nodes
identifier_node 428715
tree_list10992455
tree_vec 5459
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48842
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-02 12:13:24 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-02 11:54:47
> UTC ---
> I've fixed identical falure happening on HP and AIX. Does it still reproduce
> for you?
I'll
ots/x86_64-linux
--with-system-zlib --disable-decimal-float
--program-prefix=mips-oe-linux-uclibc- --disable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110502 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48842
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-02 11:54:47 UTC
---
> 2011-04-22 Jan Hubicka
>
> * gengtype.c (open_base_files): Add ipa-inline.h include.
> [...]
> (true_predicate, single_cond_predicate, false_predicate,
> no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
> 2011-04-22 Jan Hubicka
>
> * gengtype.c (open_base_files): Add ipa-inline.h include.
> [...]
> (true_predicate, single_cond_predicate, false_predicate,
> not_inlined_predicate, add_condition, add_clause, and_predicates,
> or_predicates, predicates_equal_p, evau
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.6.0 |
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48836
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-02 11:37:22 UTC
---
> + /* Redirecting edges might lead to a need for vops to be recomputed.
> */
> + if (need_ssa_update_p (cfun))
>
> you can omit that check, the updater won't do anything if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #10 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-02 11:13:31 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Mon May 2 11:13:26 2011
New Revision: 173245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173245
Log:
PR testsuite/48498
* gcc.dg/vect/s
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
