http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-28 06:41:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 24120
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24120
Testcase for F, E, G editing
Bug also applies to E and G editing with non-zero scale factor.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48656
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dodji at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-28
05:48:23 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 28 05:48:18 2011
New Revision: 173059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173059
Log:
2011-04-28 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-28
05:48:23 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 28 05:48:18 2011
New Revision: 173059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173059
Log:
2011-04-28 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at redhat dot com |
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jvdelisle at gcc dot
|g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
--- Comment #8 from Rich Felker 2011-04-28 03:45:39
UTC ---
Thank you for the quick response. It looks like pcc supports the gcc-style
builtins (and defines __GNUC__ to be 4), whereas tinycc does not define
__GNUC__ at all. I think __GNUC__>=3 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-28
03:31:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can anyone provide me with information on the earliest GCC version to support
> the builtins for i386?
Earliest version is around 3.0.0 and most likely earl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
Rich Felker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx
--- Comment #6 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48656
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-28
03:01:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> damn trying to fix status of this.
So who's stdarg.h are you using? If not GCC's then that is the bug, GCC's
stdarg.h is the only valid and well defined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
Josef Mutzenbacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
Josef Mutzenbacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #2 from Josef M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48797
Summary: GCC does inline variadic function, crashing on i386,
when non-GNU stdarg.h is used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-28
01:53:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 28 01:53:34 2011
New Revision: 173056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173056
Log:
PR c++/40975
* cp-tree.def (VEC_INIT_EXPR):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #25 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-28
01:53:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 28 01:53:53 2011
New Revision: 173058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173058
Log:
PR libstdc++/48760
Implement list-initiali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44553
--- Comment #3 from Tony Breeds 2011-04-28
00:05:20 UTC ---
This bug affects 4.4.x, 4.5.x and 4.6.x Any chance someone can look at it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48795
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Le Cam 2011-04-27
23:42:35 UTC ---
Removing the call to p avoid the warning. Also tested by replacing p with a
call to memcpy for example, which also triggers the warning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48796
Summary: gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) while
compiling PHP
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48795
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
23:09:09 UTC ---
Sure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-27 23:07:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The issue noticed by Daniel in Comment #3 seems simple: happens only with
> checking enabled and disappears with the below (which passes testing).
>
> Jason, if y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-27
22:59:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> myInteger = -myInteger;
>
> is undefined for the integer MIN_INT?
The above is undefined for the value of MIN_INT. As there is an overflow as
-MIN_INT is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48794
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
--- Comment #2 from Chris DUrso 2011-04-27 22:36:16
UTC ---
Hi Andreas,
Are you saying that
myInteger = -myInteger;
or
if( myInteger < 0 )
is undefined for the integer MIN_INT?
Read a little closer, the overflow/underflow/abs are just
-name='s/^g++$/jasong++/' --prefix=/home/Daniel/jasongcc --enable-languages=c++
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20110427 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=c++0x' '-Wall' '-shared-libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-27 21:58:53
UTC ---
It looks like I was wrong about this showing up on IA64 Linux. I am only
seeing it on IA64 HP-UX and only in 32 bit mode. That probably means it is
related to the HP-UX pointer extens
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org, |
|jason at redhat dot c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 21:08:26 UTC ---
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree. Could you please give it a
> try?
Bug is still present in revis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-27
20:32:26 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Apr 27 20:32:21 2011
New Revision: 173048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173048
Log:
2011-04-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
20:23:25 UTC ---
Thanks Johannes. Indeed, I was still a little nervous about those bits of
losertree.h. If you can, please make sure that (even if it costs a bit of
performance):
1- After memory al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
sing...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||singler at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-27 18:36:12
UTC ---
I've been thinking about this issue now and then over the past few weeks, and
funnily enough, while I initially thought this would be a nice improvement,
I've subsequently come to th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48794
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in remap_eh_region_nr
(tree-inline.c:1194) with -Os -fopenmp -fexceptions
-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15347
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-27 18:32:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This appears to be fixed in 4.6.0. Mark as resolved?
Need to add a few testcases first.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39689
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #8 from Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #19 from M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15347
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #9 from Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40052
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #3 from Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
Summary: Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #23 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-04-27
16:28:32 UTC ---
Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02131.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-27 16:04:21
UTC ---
Hi,
I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree. Could you please give it a
try?
Thanks,
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417
--- Comment #3 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 16:03:56 UTC ---
GCJjava_main.java
Using built-in specs.
Target: mips-elf
Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure --prefix=/home/lee/gnu_src/dist
--target=mips-elf --with-new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
15:59:01 UTC ---
Thanks Jason.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-27
15:57:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 27 15:57:06 2011
New Revision: 173038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173038
Log:
PR c++/48046
* parser.c (cp_parser_diagnose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-27
15:56:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 27 15:56:46 2011
New Revision: 173036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173036
Log:
PR c++/48046
* parser.c (cp_parser_diagnose
ble-libmudflap --disable-libssp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110427 (experimental) [trunk revision 173031] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. -c -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -O2 t.ii
t.ii: In member function 'void
icu_46::ValueRecord::adjustPosition(icu_46::ValueFormat, co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 15:20:32 UTC ---
> I still can't reproduce the testcase but I guess I can make one myself just by
> forcing global constructor. Will try to have patch before lunch.
I realized last ni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-27
15:07:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Problem here is that the return array "dtype" field is uninitialized when
> > lhs is (unallocated) allocatable. Due to this ther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-27
14:59:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Gay's routines (http://www.netlib.org/fp/) can handle double, float, extended,
> quad
libquadmath initially used dtoa for __float128 [REAL(16)] I/O, but the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
14:41:15 UTC ---
#3 0x010e2203 in ipa_add_new_function (node=0x75b90940, data=0x0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ipa-prop.c:2068
2068 ipa_analyze_node (node);
(gdb) cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
14:38:01 UTC ---
DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl) is NULL for covariant return thunk to
AB::getThis()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.3
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-27 14:11:10 UTC ---
Gay's routines (http://www.netlib.org/fp/) can handle double, float, extended,
quad; rounding directions may be specified. They can output a given number of
digits (compatible to all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
13:27:50 UTC ---
Got it ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
13:09:47 UTC ---
*sigh*, 2nd commit while the 4.5 branch is frozen ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-27
13:08:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> PS: C++1x is private jargon, but well, as -std= argument, together with c++0x
> we'll need something more realistic, at some point, don't you think? ;)
At
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48790
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #13 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-04-27 12:32:09 UTC ---
I have committed those in 4.5 and the changes can be browsed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=eb9cc5c6f
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42260
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-04-27
12:07:20 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Apr 27 12:07:16 2011
New Revision: 173024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173024
Log:
Revert "Fix PR c++/42260"
gcc/cp
* cp-tree.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48790
Summary: ARM GCC divide/modulo bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #12 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-04-27 11:37:43 UTC ---
> Dodji, is there any reason not to apply this fix to 4.5 as well?
I was waiting to see how the initial fix would behave in 4.6 and it felt
below my radar. But then PR c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
Summary: missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
--- Comment #1 from Török Edwin 2011-04-27
11:10:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24114
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24114
reverse.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
--- Comment #2 from Török Edwin 2011-04-27
11:10:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 24115
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24115
test.S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
--- Comment #14 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-27 09:48:57 UTC
---
I just built a debian SID chroot and applied the diff to it's libstdc++6
(4.6.0-2), and tested your patch with the minimal.cpp from this bug report
patch -p1 < ~sehe/attachment.cgi?id=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #21 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 10:56:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Created attachment 24112 [details]
> backported patch
Thanks! I notified downstream, hopefully they will give it testing through a
bump to gcc-4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
--- Comment #3 from Török Edwin 2011-04-27
11:11:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 24116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24116
bench.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs 2011-04-27 11:08:10
UTC ---
Somewhat reduced testcase:
static void
f (unsigned int a)
{
unsigned long long __res;
if (~0ULL % (a / (a & -a)) == 0)
{
asm ("": "+&r" (__res));
}
}
int
g (unsign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
resolve_global_procedure (resolve.c:2190) on invalid
(?) fortran code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48775
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
09:50:08 UTC ---
Possibly Tru64 needs similar handling as hppa*-hpux*?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48765
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-04-27 10:25:16 UTC
---
As analyzed by Richard, the problem (btw, unrelated to Richard's patch) is that
the vectorization factor is changed after the analysis for this loop, and the
same checks that worked fine d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
10:36:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 27 10:36:35 2011
New Revision: 173019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173019
Log:
2011-04-27 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
--- Comment #3 from Michael Hope 2011-04-27
09:54:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 24111
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24111
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-27
10:04:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 24112
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24112
backported patch
Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just verified that it
pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
