[Bug c/48758] New: gcc miscompiles Emacs by incorrectly substituting memcpy for memmove

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48758 Summary: gcc miscompiles Emacs by incorrectly substituting memcpy for memmove Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug debug/48354] internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:8064

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-25 01:27:59 UTC --- On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, John David Anglin wrote: > > I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still > > reproduce for you? > > I noticed that and

[Bug debug/48354] internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:8064

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Bloc

[Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-24 23:54:11 UTC --- On 04/24/2011 02:41 PM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 > > --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich > 2011-

[Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-24 23:43:34 UTC --- Regarding comment #2. The patch completely eliminates this code. I did not feel confident that it is safe enough for all platforms. My approach is to first get the output correct, t

[Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-24 23:24:53 UTC --- On 04/24/2011 02:41 PM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 > > --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich > 2011-0

Re: [Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

On 04/24/2011 02:41 PM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-24 21:41:16 UTC --- I don't have access to a build system until Tuesday, so I couldn't test your patch. But I'm not sure I understan

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/48757] New: internal compiler error: in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2788

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757 Summary: internal compiler error: in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2788 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-24 21:51:51 UTC --- I had a quick look to this code and something really bad is going on, like, eg, memory deallocated before calling the destructor of the object constructed in it via placement new. And

[Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-24 21:41:16 UTC --- I don't have access to a build system until Tuesday, so I couldn't test your patch. But I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. I see that you added one more digit in th

[Bug ada/48756] FAIL: c940013

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48756 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-04-24 20:41:46 UTC --- Similar fail is c954023: xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found compilation terminated./home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/c9/c

[Bug ada/48756] New: FAIL: c940013

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48756 Summary: FAIL: c940013 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org Repor

[Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-24 20:33:17 UTC --- Patch submitted to gfortran list for review.

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-24 20:24:00 UTC --- > I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still > reproduce for you? I noticed that and started a couple of new builds. Should know in a coupl

[Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwa

[Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 --- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab 2011-04-24 20:04:26 UTC --- Author: schwab Date: Sun Apr 24 20:04:24 2011 New Revision: 172920 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172920 Log: Author: Richard Sandiford PR target/43804 * gc

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-24 19:43:44 UTC --- Hi, I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still reproduce for you? Honza

Re: [Bug middle-end/48752] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

Hi, I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still reproduce for you? Honza

[Bug c++/48755] ICE in instantiate_type: conditional expression of std::complex .real and .imag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48755 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Thornburg 2011-04-24 19:29:59 UTC --- Created attachment 24092 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24092 script(1) transcript giving gcc -v output, full command line to invoke gcc, full compiler output

[Bug c++/48755] ICE in instantiate_type: conditional expression of std::complex .real and .imag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48755 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/48755] New: ICE in instantiate_type: conditional expression of std::complex .real and .imag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48755 Summary: ICE in instantiate_type: conditional expression of std::complex .real and .imag Product: gcc Version: 4.2.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-24 19:13:22 UTC --- > --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini > 2011-04-24 18:27:20 UTC --- > evaulate?!? I believe it must be Czech... Dave

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-24 18:27:20 UTC --- evaulate?!?

[Bug other/48747] Darwin/MacOSX 10.5 fixincludes make check => complex.h missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48747 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-24 15:38:24 UTC --- Works for me on powerpc-apple-darwin9 bootstrapped with gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5577) ... Fixed: complex.h ... All fixinclude tests pass Configured with configu

[Bug target/48754] FAIL: gcc.dg/binop-xor(1|3).c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "]*>" *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48754 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/48754] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/binop-xor(1|3).c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "]*>" *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48754 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/binop-xor(1|3).c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "]*>" * Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/48753] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|-

[Bug middle-end/48753] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assi

[Bug target/48288] [4.7 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol "__iordi3" in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/libgcc_eh.a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48288 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2011-04-24 13:56:16 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Apr 24 13:56:13 2011 New Revision: 172917 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172917 Log: PR target/48288 * config/pa/predicate

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-24 13:49:30 UTC --- Attached .ii file. Dave

[Bug middle-end/48752] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.7 --enable-threads=posix --enable-debug=no --disable-nls --without-cloog --without-ppl --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,java,ada,obj-c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110424 (experimental) [trunk revision 172909] (GCC) Revision 172860 was ok.

[Bug c++/48749] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48749 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48749] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48749 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|internal compiler error:|[4.7 Regression] internal

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #6 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-24 12:54:15 UTC --- That _is quick response. Thank you. I'll keep an eye on this one

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||singler at kit dot edu --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.h.shorrock at gmail dot

[Bug c++/48751] Incorrect delete[] in c++/4.4/parallel/par_loop.h line 127

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48751 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48751] Incorrect delete[] in c++/4.4/parallel/par_loop.h line 127

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48751 --- Comment #1 from Tom 2011-04-24 12:05:10 UTC --- Sehe - who found the bug in response to my question submitted the bug report too, its here: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 This is a repetition of this report.

[Bug c++/48751] New: Incorrect delete[] in c++/4.4/parallel/par_loop.h line 127

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48751 Summary: Incorrect delete[] in c++/4.4/parallel/par_loop.h line 127 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #1 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-24 11:51:17 UTC --- Created attachment 24089 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24089 minimal example Compiled with g++ -g -O0 -fopenmp minimal.cpp -o minimal -save-temps

[Bug libstdc++/48750] New: for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Summary: for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[] Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug other/48748] Undocumented type traits used in libstdc++-4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48748 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/48748] Undocumented type traits used in libstdc++-4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48748 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-24 09:43:32 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Apr 24 09:43:29 2011 New Revision: 172912 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172912 Log: 2011-04-24 Paolo Carlini PR othe

[Bug other/48748] Undocumented type traits used in libstdc++-4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48748 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-24 09:42:19 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Apr 24 09:42:16 2011 New Revision: 172911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172911 Log: 2011-04-24 Paolo Carlini PR othe

[Bug c++/48748] Undocumented type traits used in libstdc++-4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48748 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48749] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48749 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/48748] New: Undocumented type traits used in libstdc++-4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48748 Summary: Undocumented type traits used in libstdc++-4.6 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: minor Priority: P3 Compone