http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48747
Summary: Darwin/MacOSX 10.5 fixincludes make check => complex.h
missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-23
23:33:42 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Apr 23 23:33:39 2011
New Revision: 172904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172904
Log:
PR preprocessor/48740
* lex.c (lex_raw_str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-23
23:32:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Apr 23 23:32:09 2011
New Revision: 172903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172903
Log:
PR preprocessor/48740
* lex.c (lex_raw_str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
Summary: Matmul with allocate on assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-23 21:54:03 UTC ---
I could produce the following more detailed output via "-v -save-temps":
[..]\cygwin\home\Daniel\jasongcc\bin\jasong++ -v -save-temps -std=c++0x -Wall
main.cpp
Using built-in specs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-23 21:51:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 24087
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24087
Preprocessed version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-23 21:50:54 UTC ---
On 04/23/2011 02:27 PM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
--- snip ---
>
> Unpatched gfortran and ifort give:
I meant patched gfortran and ifort give:
>
> 123456789012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
Summary: [C++0x] Segmentation fault with list-initialization,
void initializers and variadics
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48744
Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with list-initialization
and void initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-23
21:27:22 UTC ---
lets expand the test case just a little:
print "(a)", "12345678901234567890"
print "(g15.3e5)", 0.1d0
print "(g15.3e5)", 0.1d1
print "(g15.3e5)", 0.1d2
print "(g15.3e5)", 0.1d3
print
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #2 from Joe Stroller
2011-04-23 21:14:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 24086
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24086
Raw output from Todd Allen's cpuid utility
Raw output also attached.
I think the AMD document "AMD P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #1 from Joe Stroller
2011-04-23 21:12:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24085
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24085
Output from Todd Allen's cpuid utility
Todd Allen's cpuid utility detects this CPU correctly.
http://
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
Summary: -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon -
compiled C fails with "illegal instruction"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-23
20:26:47 UTC ---
I'm following with interest the numerical analysis side of the discussion, but
I have to add that, *as a libstc++-v3 proper* issue, as mentioned by Richard,
the issue is moot, because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
Summary: Internal error in glimplify_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-23
17:51:34 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Apr 23 17:51:31 2011
New Revision: 172901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172901
Log:
2011-04-23 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24081|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jvdelisle at gcc dot
|g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48741
--- Comment #3 from vjeux 2011-04-23 16:30:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is a C99 feature and a GNU extension in C++. Use -std=gnu++0x.
Thanks, I did not know about this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48741
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-23
16:24:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Integer exponent powers are computed using
> >
> > TYPE
> > NAME (TYPE x, int m)
> > {
> > unsigned int n = m < 0 ? -m : m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #13 from Kay Hayen 2011-04-23 15:10:32 UTC
---
Oh, it occured to me something that I could test:
[~]> g++-4.6 -c --std=c++0x testcase.cpp -Wall -Werror
testcase.cpp:3:17: error: unterminated raw string
testcase.cpp:3:15: error: expec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
--- Comment #2 from Paulo A. P. Pires 2011-04-23
13:55:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Integer exponent powers are computed using
>
> TYPE
> NAME (TYPE x, int m)
> {
> unsigned int n = m < 0 ? -m : m;
> TYPE y = n % 2 ? x : 1;
> whil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-23 13:19:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 24081
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24081
Revised test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |preprocessor
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #43 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-23 11:44:45 UTC ---
It seems the required changes would fit in nicely in output_float():
We can treat FMT_G like FMT_E. After the rounding step, i.e. when the final
value of the variable e in output_fl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-23
11:36:03 UTC ---
I get no error with gcc version 4.6.0 20110419 (Red Hat 4.6.0-5)
(I can't test vanilla 4.6 until I finish reinstalling my pc)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #9 from Kay Hayen 2011-04-23 11:24:54 UTC
---
On 4.6 it exists though, I pasted your code to a new file:
-
[~]> g++-4.6 -c --std=c++0x testcase.cpp -Wall -Werror
testcase.cpp:3:17: error: unterminated raw string
testcase.cpp:3:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-23 11:14:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 24079 [details]
> Sorry for the typo, that's what you get for extracting test case. This one is
> better.
I cannot reproduce this warnin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-23 11:06:28 UTC ---
The second branch (let printf do rounding) should only be choosen if the
requested rounding mode is the same as printf uses (nearest/compatible?) and
either
- the format is ES or
- th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #7 from Kay Hayen 2011-04-23 11:05:52 UTC
---
Created attachment 24079
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24079
Sorry for the typo, that's what you get for extracting test case. This one is
better.
With this one I ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-23
11:05:18 UTC ---
Oops! thanks, Jakub!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-23 10:58:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> "raw(foo%sbar%sfred%sbob?)raw" is not a raw string literal,
> R"raw(foo%sbar%sfred%sbob?)raw" is, and that one doesn't warn or error and
> is handle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48741
vjeux changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|c |c++0x ##__VA_ARGS__ no
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48741
Summary: c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #40 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-23
10:26:41 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Apr 23 10:26:38 2011
New Revision: 172897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172897
Log:
2011-04-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-23
10:18:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Apr 23 10:18:54 2011
New Revision: 172896
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172896
Log:
PR c/48685
* fold-const.c (fold_convert_loc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-23
10:18:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Apr 23 10:18:03 2011
New Revision: 172895
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172895
Log:
PR c/48685
* fold-const.c (fold_convert_loc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-23
09:20:46 UTC ---
Integer exponent powers are computed using
TYPE
NAME (TYPE x, int m)
{
unsigned int n = m < 0 ? -m : m;
TYPE y = n % 2 ? x : 1;
while (n >>= 1)
{
x = x * x;
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #1 from Kay Hayen 2011-04-23 09:17:04 UTC
---
Just to note: I found this bug with 4.5.2 originally. I then used 4.6 only to
check that it wasn't solved in the mean time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48733
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Summary: Raw C++0x strings and trigraphs mix badly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48732
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48731
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48730
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43872
--- Comment #6 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com 2011-04-23 08:37:21 UTC ---
I shall be out of the office until Tuesday 3rd May and will not have email
access during most of that time, so I will read your message when I return.
For urgent manag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43872
Chung-Lin Tang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-23 07:49:33 UTC ---
I think I found the problematic code in write_float:
if (f->format == FMT_F || f->format == FMT_EN || f->format == FMT_G
|| ((f->format == FMT_D || f->format == FMT_E)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-23 07:43:54 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Apr 23 07:43:50 2011
New Revision: 172894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172894
Log:
Revert:
2011-04-22 Uros Bizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-23 07:41:48 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Apr 23 07:41:43 2011
New Revision: 172893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172893
Log:
Revert:
2011-04-22 Uros Bizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2011-04-23 07:38:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > This test fails again after the fix for PR target/48723 [1,2].
>
> Sure, stack checking is totally broken:
>
> Running /home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gna
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739
Summary: ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use() with
"-ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
Summary: pow() fails to produce (some) subnormalized numbers
with integer exponents
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
61 matches
Mail list logo
