http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48719
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722
Summary: ICE in df_refs_verify() with -mno-push-args
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #21 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-22 00:30:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > !@$#%^%^
> >
> > I tried to do a build with svn release and it failed for me. Same problem.
> >
> > xgcc says
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #20 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-22 00:28:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> !@$#%^%^
>
> I tried to do a build with svn release and it failed for me. Same problem.
>
> xgcc says it is 4.3.0.
>
> What did I do wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #19 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-22 00:07:00 UTC ---
!@$#%^%^
I tried to do a build with svn release and it failed for me. Same problem.
xgcc says it is 4.3.0.
What did I do wrong???
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed:
missing barrier after block 6 with
-foptimize-sibling-calls -fsched2-use-superblocks
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-21
22:55:33 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 I get the segmentation fault with 4.6 r169227 and
170921, but not with trunk r172845 nor with 4.5.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
--- Comment #1 from Cezary Sliwa 2011-04-21
22:33:36 UTC ---
Sorry, I almost forgot:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/4.6.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
Summary: quad precision literals do not work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48719
Summary: quad precision intrinsics are missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
Summary: gfortran crash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Re
-install/gcc-r172845-install
--program-prefix=r172845- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110421 (experimental) (GCC)
[regehr@gamow tmp012]$ cat small.c
unsigned short safe_52 (unsigned short ui1, unsigned short ui2)
{
return ui1 + ui2;
}
extern int printf (const char
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48714
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.5, 4.5.1
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48708
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-21 20:23:58 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Apr 21 20:23:55 2011
New Revision: 172843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172843
Log:
PR target/48708
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48716
Summary: gcc OpenMP static variable declared in scope inside
construct is predetermined shared
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-21
19:23:36 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Apr 21 19:23:34 2011
New Revision: 172838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172838
Log:
2011-04-21 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/48405
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713
--- Comment #3 from Ian Chivers
2011-04-21 19:11:29 UTC ---
It was not clear to me which one I should have downloaded and installed.
I'm trying to finish a book for springer
and need most of the development stuff, including
oop
openmp
mpi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #42 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-21
19:09:24 UTC ---
Yes, I agree. My intuition was telling me our approach was wrong. I will try
to come up with a patch in the next few days. No rush please with Easter
coming up.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48715
Summary: CASE_VALUES_THRESHOLD should be settable with --param
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48714
Summary: gcc -O hangs gobbling memory, while gcc -O
-fno-tree-fre finishes quickly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-21
18:02:54 UTC ---
OK, I've been wrong on many accounts above but at least I know what is
going on now. The segfault happens while materializing cones, not
while inlining. And we're materializing a cl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #41 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-21 16:36:14 UTC ---
Actually it may be even simpler than that:
We already know how many significant digits (d) we want in the output string,
and at what digit to round. So we can write the digits of th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #12 from davidxl 2011-04-21 16:22:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have a patch that makes it fail on trunk as well. IVOPTs generates
>
> for (p = &a; p != &a - 3; --p)
> *(p + 3) = ...
>
> and alias analysis doesn't l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677
--- Comment #12 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-21 16:18:17 UTC ---
ok it works ! but damn this is strange i had to encase the path to the sysroot
directory in quotes and use the windows path instead of the posix path variant.
../src/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707
--- Comment #1 from Roman Kononov 2011-04-21
15:57:12 UTC ---
It is caused by -r170488.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48712
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48712
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
15:51:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 21 15:51:39 2011
New Revision: 172833
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172833
Log:
2011-04-21 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
15:51:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 21 15:51:39 2011
New Revision: 172833
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172833
Log:
2011-04-21 Richard Guenther
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-21
15:50:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> If someone wants to post svn commands to see the difference between the
> m68k.md
> file between 122895 & 122896 ... that would be cool (ya know ... so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-04-21 15:48:10 UTC ---
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
>
> --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #17 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-21
15:46:44 UTC ---
svn diff -r 122895:122896 m68k.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677
--- Comment #11 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-21 15:45:13 UTC ---
ok it seems to be related to sysroots i tried compiling without --with-sysroot
and cpp.exe works then.
question would then be if its an error on my part ? i use sysint
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713
--- Comment #1 from Ian Chivers
2011-04-21 15:44:07 UTC ---
I have just downloaded and installed the latest development version on this
system and still get the same message.
d:\document\fortran\newbook\examples\ch28\gfortran>gfortran -v
Using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-21 15:43:27 UTC ---
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > If gcc has forgotten the underlying type, and only looks at the bitfield
> > size
> > and offset, gcc will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-21 15:36:26 UTC ---
The C front end should not depend on fold creating NON_LVALUE_EXPRs
anywhere, but I don't know if C++ has such dependencies. Where does the
NON_LVALUE_EXPR come from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42288
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #16 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-21 15:30:29 UTC ---
If someone wants to post svn commands to see the difference between the m68k.md
file between 122895 & 122896 ... that would be cool (ya know ... so I don't
have to beat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713
Summary: Error: invalid instruction suffix for push
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44384
--- Comment #4 from Mark Eklund 2011-04-21 15:17:37
UTC ---
Although "subobject" isn't well defined in the documentation,
the below comments from tree-object-size.c revision r171388
lines 63-68 would indicate that subobject is the innermost arra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48640
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48638
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
14:40:57 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 21 14:40:53 2011
New Revision: 172831
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172831
Log:
2011-04-21 Richard Guenther
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46787
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48703
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
14:35:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 21 14:35:43 2011
New Revision: 172830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172830
Log:
2011-04-21 Richard Guenther
PR lto/487
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48710
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich 2011-04-21
14:36:12 UTC ---
This is rev. 172660
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48703
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48712
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23551
Matthew Fortune changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mfortune at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #63 from Vadim Zeitlin 2011-04-21
14:04:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #61)
> (In reply to comment #59)
>
> > I review the patch, and found that we can add "-fno-keep-inline-dllexport"
> > to
> > the compiler option, and then, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #11 from rakdver at kam dot mff.cuni.cz 2011-04-21 13:34:29 UTC ---
> > > I am somewhat sympathetic to treating indirect (TARGET_)MEM_REFs as
> > > opaque,
> > > only looking at the final pointer that is dereferenced, not at the
> > >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-21
13:16:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Hmm, I am not sure I follow here. So the bug seems to be that
> 1) ipa-cp produces a clone
> 2) somehow after WPA we inline the original function, not the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48712
Summary: [4.5 Regression] ICE in dfs_enumerate_from, at
cfganal.c:1207, with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Summary: value not in range of type "Interfaces.C.unsigned" in
g-socthi.adb
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-04-21 13:05:54 UTC ---
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, rakdver at kam dot mff.cuni.cz wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
>
> --- Comment #9 from rakdver at kam dot mff.cuni.cz mff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48710
Summary: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous
memory access) in g-catiio.adb
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #9 from rakdver at kam dot mff.cuni.cz 2011-04-21 12:56:20 UTC ---
> ivtmp.25_24 = (long unsigned int) &array;
> array.26_26 = (long unsigned int) &array;
> D.2769_27 = array.26_26 + 0x0fff0;
>
> :
> # ans_21 = PHI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48613
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48709
Summary: java/net/natVMInetAddress.cc:42:52: error: declaration
of C function 'int gethostname(char*, int)' conflicts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #40 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-21
12:44:54 UTC ---
Reply to comment #37
Using volatile does not fix the behavior for the "if" condition. I have tried
several volatile permutations on it as well. Using "volatile" rather than the
"asm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
12:39:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> IVOPTs generates
>
> ivtmp.25_24 = (long unsigned int) &array;
> array.26_26 = (long unsigned int) &array;
> D.2769_27 = array.26_26 + 0x0f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
12:32:04 UTC ---
IVOPTs generates
ivtmp.25_24 = (long unsigned int) &array;
array.26_26 = (long unsigned int) &array;
D.2769_27 = array.26_26 + 0x0fff0;
:
# ans_21 = PHI
# i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48703
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48708
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-21 11:55:50 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Apr 21 11:55:45 2011
New Revision: 172821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172821
Log:
PR target/48708
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Dvorak 2011-04-21
11:49:36 UTC ---
I think we rely on the assumption that pointer arithmetics satisfies the
restrictions of C standard (i.e., that the pointer is within a single memory
object) on more places than just t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-21
11:34:32 UTC ---
This was my fault. I have in mind that my breakage happened between 4.2 and
4.3. (And you write that 4.2.4 is ok, right?)
Unfortunately we can not update/downgrade to this revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-21
11:07:03 UTC ---
Hmm, I am not sure I follow here. So the bug seems to be that
1) ipa-cp produces a clone
2) somehow after WPA we inline the original function, not the clone
right?
How this can lead t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
11:05:09 UTC ---
Before the patch:
movq%rsp, %rdx
leaq-16(%rsp), %rcx
movl$0, %eax
.L5:
addl%eax, %eax
addl12(%rdx), %eax
subq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
--- Comment #4 from belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-21 10:53:26 UTC ---
Sorry for the delay: this is my gcc -v:
arm-eabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=.../trunk/2011-04-20/install-a9softfpneon/bin/../libexec/gcc/arm-eabi/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-21
10:48:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24066
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24066
patch
Patch I am testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35073
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46329
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-21 09:39:06 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Apr 21 09:39:03 2011
New Revision: 172815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172815
Log:
gcc/
PR target/46329
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48683
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48571
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48708
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48708
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-04-21 08:36:14 UTC ---
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
>
> --- Comment #17 from Easwaran Raman 2011-04-21
> 00:20:51 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #39 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-21
08:29:45 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 21 08:29:41 2011
New Revision: 172812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172812
Log:
2011-04-21 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48708
Summary: Invalid V2DI vector set insn generated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...
89 matches
Mail list logo
