http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48382
Summary: ctype_noninline.h should not be installed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48333
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-03-31
06:12:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 23832
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23832
Patch that fixes the bug
It's a garbage collection issue: we're supposed to share mem_attrs involv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-31
04:55:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> If you could verify that
> change fixes the cris problems it would be greatly appreciated (that
> patch wasn't supposed to change code generation at all
-install
--program-prefix=r171761- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110330 (experimental) (GCC)
regehr@home:~/volatile/bugs/tmp008$ current-gcc -Os small.c -w
bad allocation for 78 and 61
small.c: In function ‘func_23’:
small.c:52:1: internal compiler error: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48380
Summary: ICE in postreload.c while building trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48379
Summary: -Wdouble-promotion warns for promotion by varargs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Bastiaan Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bastiaan at bjacques dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48207
Bastiaan Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bastiaan at bjacques dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-31
01:05:33 UTC ---
The problem was in a typo in ira-costs.c which in some cases results in
assigning INT_MAX to memory_cost and as consequence ALL_REGS to some allocnos.
After some optimizations th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-31
01:04:47 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Mar 31 01:04:43 2011
New Revision: 171767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171767
Log:
2011-03-30 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47109
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-03-31
00:36:17 UTC ---
I am testing a patch to remove TARGET_VERSION completely.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-31 00:07:31
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/11 17:27, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
>
> --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48378
Summary: gcc 4.6.0 fails to build from source
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48366
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-30 23:30:54 UTC ---
Attached .i and relevant rtl dumps.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-30
23:26:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 23828
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23828
Preprocessed libgcc2.i, repeat ICE for cris-elf with -fpreprocessed libgcc2.i
-march=v32 -O2
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-30
23:17:58 UTC ---
I've started to work on this. Probably it will take day or two to fix it is
hard to find a wrong code in a big program as apsi.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
Summary: [4.6 regression] miscompilation at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48376
Summary: gcc does not create an ivar for properties
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48375
Summary: ICE: in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1901
with -O -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48333
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-03-30 21:42:39 UTC ---
Test results with the patches in comment #5 and #6 posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg02627.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48373
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-30 21:21:56
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/11 13:38, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
>
> --- Comment #2 from H.J. L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48373
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-30 21:15:12
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/11 15:01, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48373
>
> Zdenek Sojka changed:
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-30 21:05:39
UTC ---
Created attachment 23825
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23825
accept testcase
OK, so now we know that connect ignores SA_RESTART, but I forgot to ask about
ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48373
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
Summary: ICE: in single_succ_edge, at basic-block.h:562 with
-fselective-scheduling2 and __builtin_unreachable()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48212
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
20:29:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 20:29:43 2011
New Revision: 171749
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171749
Log:
PR c++/48212
* semantics.c (non_const_var_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48212
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
20:29:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 20:29:13 2011
New Revision: 171748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171748
Log:
PR c++/48212
* semantics.c (non_const_var_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48373
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-30
20:27:01 UTC ---
Isn't it a duplicate of pr 48371?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-03-30 20:25:24 UTC ---
> Btw., I forgot: could you try to compile that testcase on the 4.6 branch with
> the same options used for leak_test.c, just to make sure this isn't caused
> by my dg conversi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48373
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands,
at postreload.c:403: insn does not satisfy its
constraints with -ftree-vectorize -fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48212
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48369
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48369
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
19:51:40 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 19:51:32 2011
New Revision: 171747
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171747
Log:
PR c++/48369
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48369
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
19:50:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 19:50:17 2011
New Revision: 171746
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171746
Log:
PR c++/48369
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||normvcr at telus dot net
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-30 19:38:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 23822
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23822
A testcase
[hjl@gnu-34 delta]$ /export/regression/rrs/171731/usr/bin/gcc -S -m32 -msse2
-mfpmath=sse -fpi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from H.J.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347
--- Comment #4 from Norman Goldstein 2011-03-30
19:35:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm sure that sete doesn't work with any general operand. Use proper
> constraints.
You are right. sete must operate on an 8-bit register or an 8-bit m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48372
Summary: Missed error for redundant default argument on
template.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48369
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26714
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
18:10:10 UTC ---
Bug 48370 is another reference temporary extension issue, but not a duplicate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
18:07:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 18:07:09 2011
New Revision: 171741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171741
Log:
PR c++/48281
* semantics.c (finish_compoun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
18:05:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 18:05:43 2011
New Revision: 171738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171738
Log:
PR c++/48281
* semantics.c (finish_compound
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48091
Eero Tamminen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|No warning when given |No warning when given
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
17:35:04 UTC ---
Red Hat bugzilla deals with this issue by having a "take" link next to the
Assigned To field, after the "edit" link.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz 2011-03-30 17:31:58
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Wed Mar 30 17:31:54 2011
New Revision: 171736
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171736
Log:
PR fortran/47516
* trans-expr.c (realloc_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
--- Comment #7 from Ernst Molitor 2011-03-30
17:02:26 UTC ---
With the patch gcc46-pr48343.patch applied to the gcc-4.6.0 sources and after a
"make bootstrap; make install", I have arrived at a version of gcc-4.6.0 that
both compiles the testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48370
Summary: G++ fails to extend reference temporary lifetime in
some situations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-30 16:53:11
UTC ---
It still fails at revision 171734.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-30 16:26:14
UTC ---
I used "-O3 -funroll-loops -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math" to
compile it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48368
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose 2011-03-30 16:21:28
UTC ---
the enhancement request is to add zero cost exception support.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42043
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26714
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miklcct at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48369
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in
potential_constant_expression_1, at
cp/semantics.c:7746
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
16:01:21 UTC ---
This was broken by r163893, when I changed finish_compound_literal to always
generate a TARGET_EXPR, rather than use a static variable in some cases.
I could (and probably will) parti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-30 15:57:54
UTC ---
Btw., I forgot: could you try to compile that testcase on the 4.6 branch with
the same options used for leak_test.c, just to make sure this isn't caused
by my dg conversion?
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hans.Boehm at hp dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48368
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
15:56:06 UTC ---
That states a fact - what's the bug / enhancement request?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
15:54:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > The parameter has its address taken in
> > _gfortran_transfer_integer_write (&dt_parm.0, &i, 4);
>
> True, but the value i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48368
Summary: gnat on arm-linux-gnueabi only has sjlj exception
support, not zcx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-30 15:43:53 UTC ---
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-03-30 15:16:57 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-30
15:38:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The parameter has its address taken in
> _gfortran_transfer_integer_write (&dt_parm.0, &i, 4);
True, but the value is not modified - which the ME should k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 15:36:49 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Mar 30 15:36:45 2011
New Revision: 171733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171733
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/48332
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|denin at mail dot ru|g...@integrable-solutions.ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 15:16:57 UTC ---
> Why do you think this is bogus? It's correct for IBM long double, where
> the mantissa bits can be discontiguous, and so the least value greater
> than 1 that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47551
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 15:06:50 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
> 11:29:27 UTC ---
> it will be *at least* two weeks before I have time to start that work
Don't worry about tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 15:06:04 UTC ---
> I'm planning to add isblank to std::locale (LWG 2019) which will need changes
> to all the locale models so while I'm doing that I will overhaul the ieee
> locale
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43590
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47551
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 15:02:27 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47551
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 15:00:50 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Mar 30 15:00:44 2011
New Revision: 171730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171730
Log:
gcc/
PR target/47551
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48366
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48364
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
--- Comment #8 from Markus Elfring 2011-03-30
14:55:34 UTC ---
I can also not rebuild the previously used GNU compiler software on my openSUSE
11.4 system at the moment.
"...
/bin/sh: Zeile 1: 1577 Speicherzugriffsfehler build/genmodes -m >
tm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43590
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 14:52:42 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Mar 30 14:52:38 2011
New Revision: 171729
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171729
Log:
gcc/
2011-03-30 Richard Sandiford
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48208
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU
2000 are miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48260
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110330 (experimental) [trunk revision 171715] (GCC)
Probably, has to do with change in handling of cover classes. It
is not possible to copy directly between GENERAL_REGS and FP_REGS
on PA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-30
14:11:13 UTC ---
Seems to be a combiner VTA bug.
try_combine decides to SUBST_MODE, because it has a single (non-debug) use and
single set, changes a pseudo from SImode to QImode, which magically chang
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
