http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-30
06:52:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 23812
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23812
Detailed IRA dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Summary: Bootstrap fail due to invalid register pair being
assigned to pseudo
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352
Summary: [4.7 Regression] segfault in fortran/frontend-passes.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48351
Summary: [OOP] Realloc on assignment fails if parent component
is CLASS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
--> error
In file included from
/usr/share/tools/gcc-win-x-ppc/target/usr/h/types/vxTypesOld.h:126:0,
from
/usr/share/tools/gcc-win-x-ppc/target/usr/h/vxWorksCommon.h:225,
from
/usr/share/tools/gcc-win-x-ppc/target/usr/h/vxWorks.h:35,
from
/usr/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48310
--- Comment #3 from shushengyu 2011-03-30 04:07:33 UTC
---
I just compare the code in my project and the code in trunk ,found that the
new code in three place used "origvar":
if (really_expand)
expand_one_register_var (origvar);
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48350
Summary: make_tuple() on empty tuples does not compile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349
Summary: FLOAT_SSE_REGS typo in i386.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48348
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48348
Summary: incorrect loongson builtin pcmpgtb_u
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48265
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46870
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48265
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
02:35:48 UTC ---
*** Bug 46870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47125
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
02:27:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I think error message like followings is better.
>
> testcase.cpp:11:1: error: need 'typename' before 'enable_if::type'
> because 'enable_if' is a depen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47361
Dexuan Cui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dexuan.cui at intel dot com
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48265
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
02:16:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 02:16:37 2011
New Revision: 171715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171715
Log:
PR c++/48265
* pt.c (value_dependent_expres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48265
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
02:16:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 30 02:16:22 2011
New Revision: 171714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171714
Log:
PR c++/48265
* pt.c (value_dependent_expres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-30
02:11:11 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Mar 30 02:11:04 2011
New Revision: 171713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171713
Log:
2011-03-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48342
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-30
02:11:10 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Mar 30 02:11:04 2011
New Revision: 171713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171713
Log:
2011-03-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-30
02:11:11 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Mar 30 02:11:04 2011
New Revision: 171713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171713
Log:
2011-03-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-30
01:48:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm guessing this is the recent RA changes in r171649.
Oops, sorry; you already triaged it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48334
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48342
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-30
01:26:26 UTC ---
I've just submitted a patch for approval to solve the problem. I hope it will
be fixed soon.
Thanks for the report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-30
00:49:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks! Is
>
> PR rtl-optimization/48345
> * ira-color.c (assign_hard_reg): Skip prohibited hard registers
> for given class and mode.
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-03-30
00:28:32 UTC ---
Thanks! Is
PR rtl-optimization/48345
* ira-color.c (assign_hard_reg): Skip prohibited hard registers
for given class and mode.
OK for ChangeLog?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347
--- Comment #2 from Norman Goldstein 2011-03-30
00:16:54 UTC ---
I installed and built the source RPM mediatomb-0.12.1-5.fc14.src.rpm, using the
default compile flags, -g -O2, and this is fine, except that debugging was
difficult, so I rebuilt us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347
--- Comment #1 from Norman Goldstein 2011-03-30
00:15:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 23809
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23809
preporcessor output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47125
--- Comment #6 from Kohei Takahashi 2011-03-30 00:12:12
UTC ---
It works good now. However GCC shows following error message.
testcase.cpp: In function 'void g()':
testcase.cpp:17:10: error: no matching function for call to 'f(int)'
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347
Summary: The wrong assembler code is emitted for my
architecture
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48346
Summary: ICE when compiling a specific file with both -g and
-flto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-29
23:59:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> It seems that ira-color.c:assign_hard_reg chooses a register
> of which corresponding bit of ira_prohibited_class_mode_regs
> [FP_REGS][DFmode] is set.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-29 22:49:07
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 29 22:49:00 2011
New Revision: 171703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171703
Log:
PR bootstrap/48327
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-29
22:48:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 29 22:47:59 2011
New Revision: 171702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171702
Log:
PR debug/48253
* dwarf2out.c (struct dw_fde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-03-29
22:45:59 UTC ---
It looks that the above patch also fixes the wrong register allocation
in PR48336.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-29 22:36:52
UTC ---
I used
CC="gcc -m32" CXX="g++ -m32" CFLAGS="-O2 -g -march=i686"
/export/gnu/import/git/glibc/configure --enable-add-ons=nptl --prefix=/usr
--without-cvs --enable-multi-arch --enable-test-mu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
Summary: [4.7 Regression] [SH] Invalid float register allocated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344
Summary: powerpc ICE error: unrecognizable insn
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Summary: ICE compiling i586
linux-2.6.38/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211wep.c: in
form_sum, at reload.c:5338
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48265
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-29
20:51:18 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Mar 29 20:51:14 2011
New Revision: 171699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171699
Log:
2011-03-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48334
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-03-29
20:51:18 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Mar 29 20:51:14 2011
New Revision: 171699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171699
Log:
2011-03-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5 Regression] Wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43225
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Strange 2011-03-29
20:39:28 UTC ---
Better source:
#include
struct a1 { char l[16];} __attribute__((aligned));
struct a2 { __m128i l; } __attribute__((aligned));
void f1(struct a1 *a, struct a1 *b)
{
*a = *b;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
--- Comment #7 from Markus Elfring 2011-03-29
20:32:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 23805
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23805
valgrind log
Will this information help to resolve the reported issues?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44384
--- Comment #2 from Mark Eklund 2011-03-29 20:31:15
UTC ---
I use FORTIFY_SOURCE with a USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL of 2
and was surprised that the below code allowed
writing into fu[4][0]. I expected that at a
level of 1, but not 2.
#include
int bar (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-29
20:30:14 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 29 20:30:06 2011
New Revision: 171697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171697
Log:
PR preprocessor/48248
* c-ppoutput.c (print
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
--- Comment #6 from Markus Elfring 2011-03-29
20:26:04 UTC ---
I would like to add that the previous results come from an environment where my
self-generated GNU compiler 4.52 should be usually called.
I have hoped to circumvent the reported une
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-29
20:25:32 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 29 20:25:27 2011
New Revision: 171693
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171693
Log:
PR preprocessor/48248
* c-ppoutput.c (print
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44855
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
19:51:15 UTC ---
I should have read the code properly ... if you've suppressed implicit
instantiation in main.cpp and you want the explicit instantiation in a shared
object to be used I would expect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #28 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-29
19:49:55 UTC ---
> Friendly ping for backport?
Woops, sorry, yes. I am going to look into this really soon now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 19:12:51 UTC ---
At r171684, comment #8 works on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0. However, the
original test case (cf. comment #5) apparently still fails:
gfortran-4.7 -std=f2003 -fbounds-check -fb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44855
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
19:05:32 UTC ---
I can reproduce this on Fedora 13
using -fpic or -fPIC fixes it (as well as avoiding SELinux "permission denied"
errors when loading the shared object)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-29 18:50:47 UTC ---
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Running the testcase through g++ -g3 -save-temps, epsilon.ii reveals
>
> #define __FLT_EPSILON__ 1.192092895507812
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
18:48:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 18:47:56 2011
New Revision: 171689
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171689
Log:
PR c++/48319
* pt.c (value_dependent_expres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
18:47:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 18:47:43 2011
New Revision: 171687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171687
Log:
PR c++/48089
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
18:47:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 18:47:47 2011
New Revision: 171688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171688
Log:
PR c++/48319
* pt.c (value_dependent_expres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48342
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Failures on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at
revision 171653
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-29 18:09:05 UTC ---
Both return 0. I wonder if the fact that char is unsigned on IRIX might
have something to do with this? OTOH, compiling them with -fsigned-char
doesn't change any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
17:52:44 UTC ---
Here's a simpler test, which should return 1:
#include
int main()
{
return isspace(L' ', std::locale());
}
if that works, how about this, which should also return 1:
#includ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
17:38:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> (gdb) p str10
> $1 = {static npos = 4294967295, _M_dataplus = {> =
> {<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator> = {}, },
> _M_p = 0x1000e2f4
> L"\000\000\000s\000\000\
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
--- Comment #4 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-29 17:36:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please always attach the patch(es), I have tested the patch you mailed me, not
the one copy-pasted here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-29 17:35:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The patch has regressions, even against: GNU C 4.6.1 20110329 (prerelease)
One of many:
-PASS: gdb.base/break.exp: run until quoted breakpoint
+FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
Summary: LDBL_EPSILON is wrong on IRIX 6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #27 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 17:28:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> AFAICT this pr seems fixed by revision 171654 (pr48095).
I can confirm that comment #8 works with current trunk on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Howe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-29 17:26:17 UTC ---
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Could you post a pre-processed file here ?
Attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
Summary: Several wchar_t tests FAIL on IRIX 6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45509
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
17:24:29 UTC ---
Please provide the information requested at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45918
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36694
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #26 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 17:12:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> AFAICT this pr seems fixed by revision 171654 (pr48095).
Oh, wow. That's kind of unexpected. But nice :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42022
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-03-29 16:57:17 UTC ---
AFAICT this pr seems fixed by revision 171654 (pr48095).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47996
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
16:51:47 UTC ---
Is this still present on the 4.5 branch, or later releases?
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > You need to provide self-contained testcase, this is not self-con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45460
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
# binutils 2.21
# kernel headers 2.6.38.2
# libc headers 2.13
# gcc stage1 (c-only) 4.6.0
# libc libc_cv_forced_unwind=yes
libc_cv_c_cleanup=yes
gmp 5.0.1
mpfr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47734
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43114
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48339
Summary: Current release series version is incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48325
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
16:07:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 16:07:15 2011
New Revision: 171679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171679
Log:
PR c++/48166
* decl.c (revert_static_member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-29 15:59:11
UTC ---
It's a problem with updating the SSA graph in a relatively uncommon case.
We're failing to update a PHI argument correctly. I'm still thinking about how
best to address the problem.
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
