http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure with ada
since r171622
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-29
06:26:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> call set1 (get (h))
> subroutine set1 (a)
> integer, intent(inout) :: a
If one changes the (invalid) INOUT to IN, it compiles.
* * *
Additionall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
Summary: Target attribute leaks from function pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-29 04:06:02
UTC ---
Another testcase:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/eoshift_large_1.f90
-Os -pedantic-errors -S -mx32
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-29
03:15:32 UTC ---
FYI, this problem also exists under linux so it isn't darwin specific.
Opened...
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9571
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48325
Summary: internal compiler error: in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:396 with
neon optimized code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
00:04:57 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 00:04:54 2011
New Revision: 171643
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171643
Log:
PR c++/48313
* pt.c (maybe_adjust_types_for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324
Summary: [C++0x] constexpr evaluation should respect lifetime
rules
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-28
23:55:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 28 23:55:47 2011
New Revision: 171642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171642
Log:
PR debug/48253
* dwarf2out.c (struct dw_fde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48203
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-28
23:53:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 28 23:53:46 2011
New Revision: 171640
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171640
Log:
PR debug/48203
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #27 from David Fang 2011-03-28
23:42:54 UTC ---
Friendly ping for backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-28
22:57:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 23793
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23793
reduced^2 test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48323
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-28
22:25:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> Sorry for being pedantic, but would you care to explain how your observation
> renders this report invalid? I am afraid I do not u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48323
--- Comment #4 from Jan van Dijk 2011-03-28 22:17:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Sorry for being pedantic, but would you care to explain how your observation
renders this report invalid? I am afraid I do not understand this resolution.
Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306
--- Comment #2 from karl at freefriends dot org 2011-03-28 21:51:03 UTC ---
For both gcc 4.5.2 and 4.6.0, I configured it from the original source on
ftp.gnu.org, using --prefix=/usr/local/gnu --enable-languages=c,c++, no other
arguments. "make in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 20:55:13 UTC ---
Also the following variant is not rejected (seems to be a module problem):
module m
implicit none
type :: rectangle
real :: width, height
procedure(get_area),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 20:39:53 UTC ---
Reduced/modified test case:
interface get
procedure get1
end interface
integer :: h
call set1 (get (h))
contains
subroutine set1 (a)
integer, intent(ino
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2011-03-28 12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48323
Summary: Lifetime of local variables: global versus member
function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37017
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11412
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48322
Summary: [C++0x] Plural parameter packs are not expanded well
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48321
Summary: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr46845.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5: ICE in
commit_one_edge_insertion, at cfgrtl.c:1566
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28
18:38:37 UTC ---
reduced
template Tp declval() noexcept;
template
class __is_constructible_helper
{
typedef char __one;
typedef struct { char __arr[2]; } __two;
temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28
18:35:56 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Mar 28 18:35:53 2011
New Revision: 171623
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171623
Log:
PR go/48312
Fix fd_select.go for changes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48320
Summary: [C++0x] cannot expand template parameter pack in
Default template arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-28
18:26:52 UTC ---
The patch in comment #3 fixes the ICE, but the test still fails:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP VECTORIZED" 1
Compiling with -Ofast -ftree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48288
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
Summary: Segmentation fault in instantiation of
std::is_constructible
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
--- Comment #4 from Mike Stump 2011-03-28
17:41:36 UTC ---
If there is an easy work around in gcc to avoid the problem, we could entertain
that, but, generally, I'd be more interested in clang failures going forward.
llvm-gcc is old and getting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2011-03-28
17:18:25 UTC ---
Jakub, please do not forget about this one for stage1 GCC 4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #25 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 17:09:34
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Mar 28 17:09:27 2011
New Revision: 171617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171617
Log:
libgfortran:
backport from mainline:
2011-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gordon.magnusson at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48309
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 16:46:33 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:46:27 2011
New Revision: 171616
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171616
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2011-03-23 Rainer Orth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48238
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48238
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 16:39:44 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:39:35 2011
New Revision: 171615
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171615
Log:
2011-03-26 Dominique d'Humieres
PR testsuite/482
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48292
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-28
16:27:43 UTC ---
CC-ing Jason about this one too. By the way, isn't the first time this sorry
message surfaces, eg, Comment #4 in PR44167.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48294
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-28
16:15:52 UTC ---
Ah, I can reproduce with those lines.
Apparently caused by my PR41445 fix.
To fix this, I think we should remember not just src_line, but also filename
in print variable in c-ppoutput
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
Markus Elfring changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #1 from Markus Elfring
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
Summary: Memory access error by "build/genhooks"?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48195
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48289
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-28
15:06:32 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 28 15:06:28 2011
New Revision: 171607
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171607
Log:
Revert:
PR c++/48289
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48317
Summary: SCCVN does not handle vector constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28
14:26:35 UTC ---
slightly further reduced:
template
inline void
bind(Functor&& f, ArgTypes&& a) { }
template
void func( T )
{}
int main( int, char** )
{
bind( func, 0 );
}
this is ce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48316
Summary: missed CSE / reassoc with array offsets
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
--- Comment #3 from joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de 2011-03-28 13:51:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can't reproduce this, neither with g++ 4.5, nor trunk.
Did you delete the empty lines?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
Summary: ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:13899
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-28
13:21:30 UTC ---
==1823== Invalid read of size 1
==1823==at 0x4C32E7: gfc_check_vardef_context (expr.c:4377)
==1823==by 0x4CBC25: compare_actual_formal (interface.c:2291)
==1823==by 0x4CD48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28
13:14:56 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Mar 28 13:14:47 2011
New Revision: 171604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171604
Log:
Add -fno-pic to gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-28
12:52:43 UTC ---
> Please try
>
> ...
> -/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-pic" } */
> ...
It does fix the failure, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28
12:43:12 UTC ---
It's not the _Bind constructor, it's the bind() call itself, this demonstrates
the problem:
template
inline
void
bind(_Functor&& __f, _ArgTypes&&... __args) { }
templat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 12:40:06 UTC ---
> I don't think thread_leak_test.c was tested before.
In that case, please try to compile it with the same flags used for one
of the other tests (e.g, leak_test.c)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Heift
2011-03-28 12:34:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 23791
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23791
generated assembler
On line 114, the generates assembler code refers to .LPIC4, which does not
exist
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-28 12:31:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Could you please check if this test worked before my patch? It may have
> been that the failure simply went unnoticed.
>
I don't think thread_leak_test.c was te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28
12:24:23 UTC ---
The example can be modified to work by passing a pointer, so the template
argument isn't deduced as a function type:
std::bind( &func, 0 );
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12742
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jepler at unpythonic dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42098
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||37954
--- Comment #17 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48314
Summary: Make the new symbols weak symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libobjc
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48309
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-03-28 11:35:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Gordon Magnusson wrote:
> C:\bugreport>ld -v
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21.51.20110326
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
Summary: std::bind with template function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|DW_TAG_type_unit has no |4.5.x should produce
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:21:20 UTC ---
>> supposed to test? pr46940_0.c fails because "only weak aliases are supported"
>> on darwin and the other tests pass even without plugin support.
>
> They are va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48310
--- Comment #2 from shushengyu 2011-03-28 11:20:03 UTC
---
Oh,sorry!I am not know the rule well.
Can you introduce someone who would like to give me some help to me?
At 2011-03-28 17:47:06，"rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28
11:18:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> > AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
> > given that Mike has approved,
> > if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:11:09 UTC ---
> --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC ---
>> AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
>> given that Mike
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 11:07:02
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Mar 28 11:06:58 2011
New Revision: 171598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171598
Log:
PR target/48245
* config/darwin.h (LINK_COMMAND
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48305
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-28
10:55:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23790
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23790
gcc47-pr48305.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-28 10:50:44 UTC ---
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Btw, your testcase would be kindof invalid as you are not using the
> documented standard way of accessing fen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47553
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28
10:38:27 UTC ---
Thanks Ira.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312
Summary: [4.7 regression] http, rpc, websocket tests hang on
Solaris 2/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47553
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-28 10:32:12 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Mar 28 10:32:09 2011
New Revision: 171597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171597
Log:
gcc/
PR target/47553
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-03-28 10:30:55 UTC
---
I am going to test this patch. It checks that if we have a phi in outer loop in
the basic block after the inner loop, then this phi is really inner loop's exit
phi, i.e., its operand is de
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
