http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
--- Comment #13 from John Engelhart
2011-03-19 04:06:28 UTC ---
I'm the original reporter.
At this point, I no longer have any specific examples that demonstrate this
problem (this was filed quite some time ago).
m...@gcc.gnu.org:
> So, I'm so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
--- Comment #12 from Mike Stump 2011-03-19
03:58:25 UTC ---
Any warnings generated that are invalid are bugs. These bugs should be filed,
and we'll fix them. Please attach an example file that generate warnings.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48201
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48201
Summary: ndefined reference to `__builtin_stdarg_start' when
compiling util-vserver-0.30.216 on gentoo
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
--- Comment #11 from Nicola Pero 2011-03-19
01:24:47 UTC ---
Having looked at some of the warnings generated in GNUstep if you compile
with -fstrict-aliasing, they seem to be C warnings with little relevance
to Objective-C (they mostly seem to be
et.o names-cache.o params.o caps.o sysfs.o proc.o i386-ports.o -lz
-lresolv
Then: objdump -T libpci.so.3.1.7 | grep pci_fill_info
No such symbol.
gcc (Gentoo SVN) 4.6.0-pre9999 20110318 (prerelease) rev. 171169
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48187
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 23:45:07
UTC ---
Andrey,
I was just looking at PR 48191, a bug submitted against GCC 4.5.2. It looks
like it is caused by the same problem that this patch fixes. Can you back port
this fix to the 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 23:40:43
UTC ---
It looks like this is the same problem as PR 43603 (but with a different error
result). I can reproduce it on the trunk at r167587, but it is fixed at
r167588.
To fix it in the 4.5 br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48192
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23711|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48192
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23718|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
AssignedTo|meissner at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48199
--- Comment #1 from Deny 2011-03-18 22:43:34 UTC
---
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=GREE7D1X
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48199
Summary: unable to emulate 'TF'. Patch for mips64el r5900
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #6 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:23:32
UTC ---
Bleh... nevermind the longer test, it carries along my misunderstanding of the
sign extension. Anyway, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
--- Comment #18 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-18
20:20:45 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Mar 18 20:20:35 2011
New Revision: 171165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171165
Log:
PR bootstrap/45381
* lex.c [ALTIVEC] (search_lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-18
20:20:01 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Mar 18 20:19:45 2011
New Revision: 171164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171164
Log:
PR bootstrap/45381
* lex.c [ALTIVEC] (search_lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #5 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:14:51
UTC ---
Here's a test case:
int printf(const char *format, ...);
int main (void)
{
int y = 0x8000;
int x1 = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)y);
int x2 = (long)0 > ((unsigned i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #4 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:12:31
UTC ---
Thanks Jakub, I was just about to send the same example!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Target|x86_64-pc-m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-18
20:09:18 UTC ---
That's true, the step from the 3rd to 4th line is wrong.
But that doesn't mean that on LP64 targets it should print 1.
On:
extern void abort (void);
static int y = 0x8000;
int
main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #2 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:04:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>x = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)0x8000);
>x = (long)0 > ((unsigned)0 ^ (unsigned)0x8000);
> I think you missed something here (unsigned)(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-18
19:56:42 UTC ---
x = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)0x8000);
x = (long)0 > ((unsigned)0 ^ (unsigned)0x8000);
I think you missed something here (unsigned)(signed short) still sign exte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48198
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: no
immediate_use list with -fopenmp --param
partial-inlining-entry-probability=101
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
St
--program-prefix=r171139- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110318 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48196
--- Comment #1 from gcchelp.5.adept at 0sg dot net 2011-03-18 19:35:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23716
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23716
does not exhibit the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48196
Summary: ICE (segmentation fault) on inclusion of ,
C++0x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 19:31:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 23714
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23714
shorter test case
Shorter test case. Reproducible on IA64 HP-UX as well with -mlp64 (and -O3
-fPIC).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48195
Summary: ICE: vector VEC(ipa_node_params_t,base) index domain
error, in ipa_analyze_node at ipa-prop.c:1525 with
-flto --param partial-inlining-entry-probability=101
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48194
Summary: gcc -std=c99 fails to link when calling inline
function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48193
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: type mismatch
between an SSA_NAME and its symbol with -flto --param
partial-inlining-entry-probability=101
Product: gcc
Versi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #10 from Perry Smith 2011-03-18 18:57:07
UTC ---
IZ81343 (or one of its sister APARs) fixes the original issue. But, it leaves
a new issue. The new error looks like:
ld: 0711-596 SEVERE ERROR: Object expand.o
An RLD for sec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Richard G. 2011-03-18
18:05:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It appears that this not a "gcc" bug but an AIX bug.
The error was precipitated by an AIX system update, but at the same time, it
can be said that the A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48118
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-18
17:28:19 UTC ---
The response to Comments 5 through 7 from the darwin linker developer is...
-
Unfortunately, the _sigtramp functi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48185
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-18
17:27:43 UTC ---
G++ is right
a declaration in a selection-statement (if or switch) must be of the form:
if ( type-specifier id = initializer )
or in C++0x:
if ( type-specifier id { init } )
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48170
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-18 17:21:42 UTC ---
> --- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-17
> 02:58:56 UTC ---
> Thanks. It looks like the Solaris connect call does not honor SA_RESTART for
> some reas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48192
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-18
17:20:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 23711
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23711
Patch to make conditional macros not 'defined'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48185
--- Comment #2 from Lisp2D 2011-03-18 17:15:23 UTC
---
Code
{ struct passwd*pwd(getpwuid(...));
if(pwd)return true;}
is still compiled.
Code
if(struct passwd*pwd=getpwuid(...))return;
compiled too.
But
if(struct passwd*pwd(getpwuid(...)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48170
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Kuvyrkov 2011-03-18
17:12:24 UTC ---
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Fri Mar 18 17:12:19 2011
New Revision: 171155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171155
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48170
* gcse.c (ho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #8 from Perry Smith 2011-03-18 17:10:32
UTC ---
It appears that this not a "gcc" bug but an AIX bug. There is one change but
more changes are needed. I'll try to update when I know more. Expect it to be
a week or so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48192
Summary: Conditional macros should not pass #ifdef
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-03-18 16:39:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We ICE because we again issue more than issue_rate insns. And this happens
> because we hit an insn which does not modify the DFA state at all, thus we do
> n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
Summary: internal compiler error: in issue_nops_and_insn, at
config/ia64/ia64.c:8258
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48190
Summary: [regression?] Huge memory use while compiling
qemu-0.4.0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-03-18 16:24:25
UTC ---
I like the patch from comment 6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48176
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-18
16:22:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 18 16:22:01 2011
New Revision: 171151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171151
Log:
PR debug/48176
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189
Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGFPE (division
by zero) in in predict_loops () at predict.c:991 with
--param max-predicted-iterations=0
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48176
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-18
16:18:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 18 16:18:05 2011
New Revision: 171150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171150
Log:
PR debug/48176
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48188
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in remove_unnecessary_regions
(ira-build.c:1855) with --param ira-max-loops-num=0 on
basic code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48174
--- Comment #4 from Bill Long 2011-03-18 16:08:37 UTC
---
Additional comment from originator of the bug at Cray:
The DIE tag DW_TAG_unspecified_parameters indicates that a variable argument
list starts. Try a simple C program for contrast. Just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48185
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48187
Summary: infinite errors with misplaced [ in @interface
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
Anh Vo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |ada
--- Comment #5 from Anh Vo 2011-03-18 15:58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
Summary: ICE: SIGFPE (division by zero) in
maybe_hot_frequency_p at predict.c:129 with --param
hot-bb-frequency-fraction=0 on basic code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48185
Summary: if(struct ...)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48184
Summary: ICE: SIGFPE (division by zero) in compute_alignments
() at final.c:731 with --param align-threshold=0 on
basic code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48183
Summary: ICE [arm] immed_double_const at emit-rtl.c (-mfpu=neon
-g -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thenlich at users dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47965
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48182
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in try_crossjump_to_edge
(cfgcleanup.c:1703) with --param min-crossjump-insns=0
on basic code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
as of rev 171126, an Ada
bootstrap still fails, but this seems to be a different error.
The failure can be reproduced with
$ gnat1 -quiet -O2 -fPIC -g g-debpoo.adb
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.7.0 20110318 (experimental) [trunk revision 171126] (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48118
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-18
15:07:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 18 15:07:04 2011
New Revision: 171147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171147
Log:
PR c++/48118
* call.c (build_over_call): Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-18
15:07:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 18 15:07:13 2011
New Revision: 171148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171148
Log:
PR c++/48162
* semantics.c (finish_call_exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23372
--- Comment #43 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-18
15:06:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 18 15:06:51 2011
New Revision: 171146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171146
Log:
PR c++/23372
* gimplify.c (gimplify_arg):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35315
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-18
15:06:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 18 15:06:41 2011
New Revision: 171145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171145
Log:
PR c++/35315
* c-common.c (handle_transpare
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
--- Comment #2 from rfm at gnu dot org 2011-03-18 14:58:10 UTC ---
The problem showed up with argframe information in base ... which presumably
means that something in base is getting that wrong :-(
I wonder, could we have a runtime function to ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48180
--- Comment #5 from henry0312 at gmail dot com 2011-03-18 14:50:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > > LTO is not enabled by default on x86_64-apple-darwin1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48180
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-18
14:40:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > LTO is not enabled by default on x86_64-apple-darwin10 and the apple
> > > linker
> > > does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code with -O -fgcse
--param ira-max-conflict-table-size=0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48180
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-18
14:38:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > LTO is not enabled by default on x86_64-apple-darwin10 and the apple linker
> > does not support a linker plugin compatible w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48180
henry0312 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |lto
--- Comment #2 from henry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-18 14:18:04 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Mar 18 14:17:58 2011
New Revision: 171142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171142
Log:
PR middle-end/47405
* gcc.dg/torture/20090618-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47790
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48180
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-18
14:14:15 UTC ---
Another option is:
--- gcc/combine-stack-adj.c2010-12-02 11:51:32.0 +0100
+++ gcc/combine-stack-adj.c2011-03-18 15:12:09.497674812 +0100
@@ -551,7 +551,16 @@ gate_hand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-18 14:13:37 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Mar 18 14:13:32 2011
New Revision: 171141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171141
Log:
PR middle-end/47405
* gcc.dg/torture/20090618-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-18 14:10:41 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Mar 18 14:10:35 2011
New Revision: 171140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171140
Log:
PR middle-end/47405
* gcc.dg/torture/20090618-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47790
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47790
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-18 14:01:47
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Mar 18 14:01:41 2011
New Revision: 171139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171139
Log:
PR middle-end/47790
* expr.c (optimize_bitfi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48180
Summary: '-fuse-linker-plugin' doesn't work.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
