http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48176
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47016
--- Comment #1 from Denis Excoffier
2011-03-18 06:36:05 UTC ---
The same occurs with GCC 4.6.0 RC 20110314.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39044
p4bgtech at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p4bgtech at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48176
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-18
06:17:20 UTC ---
Hmm, maybe because the section would be empty, see PR 42288.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
Summary: incorrect registration of typed selectors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libobjc
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48176
Summary: .debug_aranges is no longer emitted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48174
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-18
04:59:58 UTC ---
I think this was already fixed in 4.6.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-18
04:02:30 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Mar 18 04:02:25 2011
New Revision: 171125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171125
Log:
Revert the last change on cant_combine_insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48175
Summary: [x32] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-18
00:45:08 UTC ---
The darwin linker developer says
This is not a tools bug. It worked by luck with Xcode3 tools. The is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-18
00:29:18 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Mar 18 00:29:15 2011
New Revision: 171124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171124
Log:
Check zero/sign extended hard registers.
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-17
23:41:29 UTC ---
The darwin linker developer says...
The issue is in the __eh_frame, the reloc for second FDE's pointer to it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-17
23:37:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 23704
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23704
object file for gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE,
compiled under Xcode 4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-17
23:36:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23703
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23703
assembly file for gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE,
compiled under Xcode 4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #14 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-17 23:14:22
UTC ---
I ran the GCC testsuite on the compilers I built with the patch and did not
have any regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18832
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48174
Summary: DWARF for subroutine with no args indicates 'varargs'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48173
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48173
Summary: [4.6 regression] bootstrap error on arm-linux-gnueabi
(defaulting to armv4t)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17
22:00:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 17 22:00:47 2011
New Revision: 171116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171116
Log:
PR c++/47504
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_consta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #25 from Matthias Klose 2011-03-17
22:00:16 UTC ---
builds on a non-networked machine succeed
Nick Clifton writes:
>> + /* Even zero-sized arguments occupy one byte. */
>> + if (size == 0)
>> +size = 1;
>
> That fixes it!
Great! Thanks for confirming.
> Will you apply this patch yourself, or should I submit the patch and the
> test case as a separate email to gcc-patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Denis.Excoffier at airbus
How are you? I am Haykanush! I am beautiful, funny, caring lady! I am dream to
date with good man! Please answer me on my private email: yantr...@yahoo.com.
With hope Haykanush!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48091
--- Comment #2 from Eero Tamminen 2011-03-17 21:08:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> That's how K&R works. The function definition isn't a prototype.
Why that would be a valid excuse not to give a warning when function call
either doesn't m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
20:41:02 UTC ---
I hope both issues should be fixed now, can you please retest on cris-elf?
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
20:35:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 20:34:59 2011
New Revision: 171114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171114
Log:
PR debug/48163
* var-tracking.c (prepare_ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
20:34:00 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 20:33:54 2011
New Revision: 171113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171113
Log:
PR debug/48163
* function.c (assign_parms):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
20:30:19 UTC ---
Confirmed. Apparently DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN is still NULL at the point where
Richard changed it and DECL_EXTERNAL is being set. It is set during:
#0 tree_function_versioning (old_de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307
rfm at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17020|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-17
20:12:35 UTC ---
Opened radar Problem ID: 9149679, Xcode 4.0 regresses Throw_2.exe libjava
testcase. I wonder if this might just be a new permutation of the existing eh
epilogue issues on darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172
Summary: incorrect vectorization of loop in GCC 4.5.* with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #13 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-17 20:10:06
UTC ---
I got good builds on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. I haven't
done a full test run yet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-17
20:08:06 UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Mar 17 20:08:01 2011
New Revision: 17
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=17
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/37273
* ira-costs.c (s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
joe at mcknight dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48160
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48160
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-17
19:51:06 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 17 19:51:03 2011
New Revision: 171108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171108
Log:
Check SUBREG in prepare_call_arguments.
201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48171
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-17
19:23:37 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 17 19:23:34 2011
New Revision: 171107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171107
Log:
Add Save to -mavx and -mfma.
2011-03-17 H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-17 18:37:51 UTC ---
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Untested fix. The reason it uses gen_rtx_PLUS directly is to make sure it
> doesn't generate code in that case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126
--- Comment #2 from Michael K. Edwards
2011-03-17 18:14:11 UTC ---
Please insert the text of your citations, since the ARM ARM is not a public
document.
I think I'm persuaded that the CLREX isn't necessary -- although I'm going to
keep it in my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48171
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48171
Summary: Missing "Save" on -mavx and -mfma
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48170
Summary: ICE: in hoist_code, at gcse.c:4524 with -fgcse --param
max-hoist-depth={0,1}
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-17 16:59:13 UTC ---
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
>
> --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-17 16:56:13
> UTC ---
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 16:58:31 UTC ---
>> That's part your fault and part ours: while install.texi states `MPC
>> Library version 0.8.1 (or later)', later versions are rarely tested and
>> often break,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-17 16:56:13 UTC
---
Richard, this patch of yours fails on IRIX 5 and 6. I suppose this is a target
bug, since it does pass on other platforms (Tru64 UNIX, Solaris 2/SPARC and
x86) that don't have mempcpy i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|Denis.Excoffier at airbus |
|dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #11 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-17
16:41:24 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Mar 17 16:41:05 2011
New Revision: 171105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171105
Log:
PR debug/47510
gcc/
PR debug/47510
* dw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
16:19:07 UTC ---
See the link in comment 5, or this one:
http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#dep_lookup_bases
or this one:
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq/templates.html#faq-35.19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #7 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
16:18:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > In a template unqualified names are not looked up in dependent base classes
>
> Aegypt?!
>
> Then explain to me, why it works for all the other classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 16:17:47 UTC ---
>> Btw., what's your reason to still be running Solaris 8? I'm the Solaris
>> GCC maintainer and seriously consider to deprecate it for GCC 4.7.
> Here we still h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
Jeffrey Yasskin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126
Marcus Shawcroft changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus.shawcroft at arm dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #6 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
16:14:27 UTC ---
> In a template unqualified names are not looked up in dependent base classes
Aegypt?!
Then explain to me, why it works for all the other classes and including other
methods inside
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
16:08:32 UTC ---
http://womble.decadent.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#base-lookup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17
16:02:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 17 16:02:08 2011
New Revision: 171103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171103
Log:
PR c++/48166
* decl.c (revert_static_member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-17 16:01:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 23700
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23700
A testcase
[hjl@gnu-18 delta]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/usr/bin/gcc -O2 -ffast-math
-S testcase-min
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41998
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Depends on|17843, 20070
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 15:57:55 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-03-17
> 15:21:03 UTC ---
> Duplicate of PR middle-end/48152?
Might be, but the testcase from Comment #5 doesn't fail for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #14 from Denis Excoffier
2011-03-17 15:48:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I see, but on the other hand this will be a fairly uncommon undertaking.
You must know that the process is highly automatized, and, most importantly,
tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #3 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
15:47:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23698
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23698
output of "uname -a"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #2 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
15:46:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 23697
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23697
gzipped compiler log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #1 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
15:45:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23696
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23696
command to call the compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
Summary: compiler is confused about scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-17 15:41:10
UTC ---
Created attachment 23694
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23694
Andy's frame-pointerless mcount patch
This is Andy's frame-pointerless mcount patch. There was a t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||46542
--- Comment #9 from Manuel Ló
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-17
15:37:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Ah, it isn't any difference between --enable-checking=release and
> --enable-checking=yes behavior of cc1, but instead just that haifa-sched.i is
> diffe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-17 15:35:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 23693
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23693
Minor improvement to register allocation
Was showing good results for x86; however, was regressing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:22:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 15:22:20 2011
New Revision: 171102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171102
Log:
PR bootstrap/48153
* dwarf2out.c (mem_loc_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:21:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 15:21:39 2011
New Revision: 171101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171101
Log:
PR middle-end/48152
* var-tracking.c (prepa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-03-17
15:21:03 UTC ---
Duplicate of PR middle-end/48152?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 15:12:12 UTC ---
> --- Comment #12 from Denis Excoffier
> 2011-03-17 14:43:35 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #11)
>> I don't really understand Denis' reluctance to build a newer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:12:19 UTC ---
Ah, it isn't any difference between --enable-checking=release and
--enable-checking=yes behavior of cc1, but instead just that haifa-sched.i is
different.
We are expanding
D.2070_29 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:00:56 UTC ---
Reduced testcase for -O2:
typedef struct T *R;
typedef union P { int i; } S;
struct T { union { S f[1]; } u; };
struct G { int l; int t; int r; };
typedef struct G H;
typedef struct {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-17
14:59:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 17 14:59:00 2011
New Revision: 171098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171098
Log:
2011-03-17 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
Summary: [4.7 regression] Solaris 2/SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE
in sparc_function_arg_1, at config/sparc/sparc.c:5721
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #12 from Denis Excoffier
2011-03-17 14:43:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I don't really understand Denis' reluctance to build a newer perl as a
> prerequisite
No problem with perl itself, i've a working perl-5.13.10 compiled o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34758
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrapping revision 171075 fails
on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
14:33:19 UTC ---
I can reproduce it, but even with --enable-checking=yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-17 14:25:36 UTC ---
/home2/dave/gcc-4.6/objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home2/dave/gcc-4.6/objdir/./prev-g
cc/ -B/home2/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/hppa-linux/bin/
-B/home2/dave/opt/gnu/gc
c/gcc-4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
