[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-14 06:10:09 UTC --- We also need to scratch the section of http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html under Darwin/Mac OS X which says... LTO-support. Darwin has benefited from ongoing work on LTO; support

[Bug c++/47200] [C++0x] ICE: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:5821 with missing definition of constexpr function

2011-03-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47200 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted

2011-03-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47125] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE occurs in combination with partial specialization and invalid template function.

2011-03-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47125 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/48030] Implement read_x using fbuf_getc

2011-03-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48030 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-03-13 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #2 from Mike Stump 2011-03-14 03:13:27 UTC --- Another fix might be to have pure elf .o files... ld I think will read elf .o files... [s] Don't tell anyone I said that. If not, we might be able to get Apple to do that. This

[Bug lto/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-03-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-14 03:10:24 UTC --- Note that LTO was disabled for gcc 4.6.0 due to the inability of end-users to obtain an appropriate Xcode 3.2.5 now that the broken Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 have been released.

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #20 from Mike Stump 2011-03-14 03:09:08 UTC --- I'm ambivalent. If people developing or following would like one, feel free to create one. Depending on how safe it is, we could put it in sooner, and by that time, we'd need one.

[Bug lto/48108] New: lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-03-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 Summary: lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-14 02:57:50 UTC --- Should I create a new PR for following the progress of the re-implementation of LTO on darwin?

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-14 02:47:53 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Mar 14 02:47:49 2011 New Revision: 170929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170929 Log: 2011-03-13 Jack Howarth PR lto/

[Bug bootstrap/42566] Bootstrap fails in stage3 building the libstdc++ PCH

2011-03-13 Thread 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42566 --- Comment #12 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-03-14 02:18:20 UTC --- I tried to test this but I can't get to it because now I'm stuck with a bootstrap compare bug. Actually, if the object file comparison happens after the

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-13 22:45:57 UTC --- Actually the situation with Xcode 3.2.5 is pretty grim as well. Currently only Xcode 3.2.2 is available for download from connect.apple.com. So people needing to do new installs are tr

[Bug c++/48107] New: [C++0x] no explicit conversion from scoped enumeration type to bool

2011-03-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48107 Summary: [C++0x] no explicit conversion from scoped enumeration type to bool Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-13 21:54:17 UTC --- FYI, it it comes down to having a dependency on libelf or heavily lobbying Apple to fix the broke change made to the assembler in Xcode 4.0.1 and 4.1, I would go with the second option

[Bug c++/48106] New: [C++0x] ICE with scoped enum with fixed underlying type

2011-03-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48106 Summary: [C++0x] ICE with scoped enum with fixed underlying type Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] global register variables defect

2011-03-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

2011-03-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

2011-03-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig 2011-03-13 20:57:53 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Mar 13 20:57:49 2011 New Revision: 170924 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170924 Log: 2011-03-13 Thomas Koenig PR libfortran/4

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-13 20:54:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Alright, multiple segments will not work. Or even if they do, it is another > solution that may or may not work in the future depending on the whims of > App

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher 2011-03-13 20:41:12 UTC --- Alright, multiple segments will not work. Or even if they do, it is another solution that may or may not work in the future depending on the whims of Apple. So, a rewrite it will h

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

2011-03-13 Thread arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 --- Comment #9 from arnaud patard 2011-03-13 20:40:27 UTC --- I confirm that backporting r159644 and r159683 make things work. From comment 8, I guess that the bug is still there and that one can still hit it sooner or later, right ? (btw, amazi

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-13 20:32:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > The easiest way to fix this is maybe to just have more than one GNU_LTO > > segment. AFAIU the limit of 255 sections is a limit

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-13 20:19:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > The easiest way to fix this is maybe to just have more than one GNU_LTO > segment. AFAIU the limit of 255 sections is a limit per segment. It is not > diffic

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher 2011-03-13 19:48:41 UTC --- The easiest way to fix this is maybe to just have more than one GNU_LTO segment. AFAIU the limit of 255 sections is a limit per segment. It is not difficult to have multiple GNU_LTO

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

2011-03-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kazu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/48102] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: error: macro "build_cloog_prog" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given

2011-03-13 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48102 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug bootstrap/48102] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: error: macro "build_cloog_prog" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given

2011-03-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48102 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/48102] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: error: macro "build_cloog_prog" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given

2011-03-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48102 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/48102] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: error: macro "build_cloog_prog" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given

2011-03-13 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48102 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 | Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/47348] wrong string length with array constructor

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47348] wrong string length with array constructor

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 17:37:47 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 13 17:37:43 2011 New Revision: 170923 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170923 Log: 2011-03-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/47348

[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned

2011-03-13 Thread mahatma at eu dot by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838 --- Comment #87 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2011-03-13 16:56:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #85) > Am I the only one who thinks this bug should be nominated as the first > priority > GCC 4.6.0 bug? Some lazy people ;) may use global mstackrealign

[Bug fortran/41650] [Cleanup] Use gfc_expr_attr in resolve_allocate_expr/resolve_deallocate_expr

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41650 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48104] aaaaaa

2011-03-13 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48104 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/41603] [-fwhole-file] Add diagnostic for assumed-length character function

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41603 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/48104] New: aaaaaa

2011-03-13 Thread bobby2 at bobmail dot info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48104 Summary: aa Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: bo

[Bug fortran/41107] [F03] Proc-pointer components: Fix calling DECL for f2c

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41107 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug fortran/41083] Implicit typing: Save implicit type for external procedures

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41083 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/41023] Inconsistent error locations for wrong interfaces with overloaded operators

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41023 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48090] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

2011-03-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/39988] F2008: Default initialization, structure constructors, and allocatable components

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39988 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48103] Lambda function incorrect syntax leads to internal compiler error and segfault

2011-03-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48103 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/35913] INTRINISIC vs. host-associated procedures (check conformance)

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35913 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug c++/48103] New: Lambda function incorrect syntax leads to internal compiler error and segfault

2011-03-13 Thread vlad at lazarenko dot me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48103 Summary: Lambda function incorrect syntax leads to internal compiler error and segfault Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P

[Bug fortran/46896] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code with transpose(a) passed to subroutine

2011-03-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896 --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 14:16:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Tobias, > > You shame me - I undertook to do something with this one and did not. > I do not know that the fix is compatible even with 4.5 - I think not. >

[Bug libstdc++/26458] Passing a NULL char* into output stream now breaks the output stream

2011-03-13 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26458 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-13 13:11:38 UTC --- Ian, I see you are returning to this old issue. Really, today I don't have a strong opinion, if you are willing to post to the mailing list a patchlet (I think both std/ostream and bi

[Bug middle-end/45273] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] The compiler depends on the host double (-fprofile-corection only)

2011-03-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45273 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23643|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/48101] obscure error message with std::set

2011-03-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-13 12:24:13 UTC --- Do you have a suggestion for a better error? We could use a static_assert in std::allocator to reject const T As far as I can see, the reason the code is invalid is exactly the rea

[Bug bootstrap/48102] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure for powerpc-apple-darwin9: error: macro "build_cloog_prog" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given

2011-03-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48102 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-13 12:23:47 UTC --- I am now at stage 2 with the following patch: --- ../_gcc_clean/gcc/graphite-cloog-compat.h2010-10-01 14:21:41.0 +0200+++ ../gcc-4.6-work/gcc/graphite-cloog-compat.

[Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

2011-03-13 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-13 12:13:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (a) the first is because LTO has produced two image_info instances with > different mangled names ... > > e.g. L_OBJC_ImageInfo.2044 / L_OBJC_ImageInfo.2

[Bug target/41894] wrong code with -fno-split-wide-types

2011-03-13 Thread avr at gjlay dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41894 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avr at gjlay dot de --- Comment #10 fr

[Bug bootstrap/48102] New: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure for powerpc-apple-darwin9: error: macro "build_cloog_prog" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given

2011-03-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48102 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure for powerpc-apple-darwin9: error: macro "build_cloog_prog" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug middle-end/45273] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] The compiler depends on the host double (-fprofile-corection only)

2011-03-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45273 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug libstdc++/48101] New: obscure error message with std::set

2011-03-13 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 Summary: obscure error message with std::set Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig.

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-13 10:07:50 UTC --- my +1 generally to comment #8, We are (re)-discussing with the Apple developer for ld (obviously that can't be in this forum). IMO, 'as' is trying to check "if someone tries to write a

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-13 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot