http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48055
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c
compilation, -O2 -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48054
Summary: Documentation for LOG intrinsic function is ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Marlier
2011-03-10 04:31:30 UTC ---
This issue has been filled here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48021
There is also a reduced testcase. (If I remember well the namespace std
matters).
Patrick.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
--- Comment #14 from Wolfgang Bangerth 2011-03-10
04:27:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Once you know A's T, you have a desired type int (*)(T, T) from which to
> determine which specialization of the template to use.
Hm, I agree that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48018
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-10
02:48:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I'm confused why this would be an overload set. cmp1 is a template so I
> can't see how this code would even begin to be valid without specifying
> the tem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48020
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48020
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-10
00:51:18 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Mar 10 00:51:14 2011
New Revision: 170842
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170842
Log:
PR go/48020
gotest: Pass -v to nm to avo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-09
23:36:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
> >
> > Mikael Pettersson changed:
> >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48048
--- Comment #3 from Walter Spector 2011-03-09
23:17:20 UTC ---
I updated my copy of the trunk, and rebuilt 4.6. Non-derived type
allocatable/pointer variables seem to be ok. However allocatable/pointer
derived type components are not supported.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48045
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard 2011-03-09 23:04:09
UTC ---
The previous patch is wrong, it should depend on either a .loc or a .line
output. I had misunderstood when the DW_AT_stmt_list was really necessary. Also
there was some debate on wheth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-09
23:01:38 UTC ---
The remaining problem in the full glob2 test is
src/Unit.o: In function `transaction clone for Unit::~Unit()':
Unit.cpp:(.text._ZGTtN4UnitD2Ev[transaction clone for Unit::~Unit(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48053
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48053
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48018
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09 22:17:44
UTC ---
Thanks for the correction.
I just committed a patch which should fix this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
Wolfgang Bangerth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bangerth at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #58 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-09 21:45:10 UTC ---
> How do you do this with "make -f client.mk profiledbuild"?
To answer my own question:
Just edit ./configure and ./js/src/configure and add
"-flto=4 -fwhole-program" (or whate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-09
21:43:02 UTC ---
OK, the problem here is as follows:
when we first declare the myvectypes and mytype3, vector has not been
instantiated, so we mark the array, and the pointer to the array, for
structu
ith-mpfr=/opt/gcc-nightly/gcc-host-libs
--with-mpc=/opt/gcc-nightly/gcc-host-libs --enable-languages=c
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110309 (experimental) [trunk revision 170818] (GCC)
Breakpoint 1, build_int_cst_wide (type=0xfffb0f011b8, low=18446744073709551615,
hi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-09
21:14:51 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Mar 9 21:14:45 2011
New Revision: 170836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170836
Log:
PR 47952
include/
* demangle.h (enum gnu_v3_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression]|[4.5 Regression]
|gcc.d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-09
20:49:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:00 2011
New Revision: 170834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170834
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47866
* expr.c (store_f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |debug
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-09 20:27:27 UTC ---
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
> 2011-03-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48048
--- Comment #2 from Walter Spector 2011-03-09
20:25:18 UTC ---
>--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-09
>18:50:28 UTC ---
>Report comes too late - it's fixed since 2011-01-26 :-)
>
>Cf. PR 47339 and PR 43062.
>
>I case something is not wor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2011-03-09 20:12:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Joern, after discussion with Mark and Richi my advice at this point on the
> GFDL
> issue is that you should prepare a concrete patch that moves al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #57 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-09 19:49:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> > Turned out that GNU ld doesn't like "--as-needed";
> > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--no-keep-memory" works fine.
> > (although GNU ld uses wa
Hello folks!
When I compile the following OPT.CPP with gcc 4.5.2 (mingw) under
Windows-32...
===
int test(int x)
{
x = x ^ (x >> 1);
int x1=x;
x = x >> 2;
x = x ^ x1;
return x;
}
===
...a call to
gpp -O3 -S OPT.CPP
produces this OPT.s:
===
.file "OPT.CPP"
.te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-09
19:34:58 UTC ---
bb 2 op 19 insn 30 MO_VAL_SET (concat/u:SF (value/u:SI 12:5945
@0x243ae38/0x2445870)
(reg:SF 17 %f2))
Either we should SUBREG this to the VALUE's mode, or allow different modes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09 19:30:54
UTC ---
Thanks, so it sounds like SA_RESTART should be defined when compiling libgo.
The relevant file is libgo/runtime/go-go.c.
The Solaris man page that I found on the web suggests that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44707
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner 2011-03-09
19:20:47 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Mar 9 19:20:42 2011
New Revision: 170829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170829
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2010-07-02 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #56 from Jan Hubicka 2011-03-09 19:19:53
UTC ---
> Turned out that GNU ld doesn't like "--as-needed";
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--no-keep-memory" works fine.
> (although GNU ld uses way more memory than gold.)
Hmm, seems li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #55 from Jan Hubicka 2011-03-09 19:17:26
UTC ---
> Just a warning: Building a -fprofile-generate libxul uses
> ~13GB of memory. (I have 8GB on my build-system and lto1
> got killed several times by the OOM killer, until I added
> enou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48048
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052
Summary: loop not vectorized if index is "unsigned int"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-09
18:39:23 UTC ---
Gosh, not really at the moment, quite a bit of time ago. Looks like, the whole
point of my changes was avoiding duplicate error messages, thus, worst case we
can re-instantiate the old
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #30 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-09 18:30:16 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 9 18:30:11 2011
New Revision: 170827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170827
Log:
2011-03-09 Paolo Carlini
* test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-09 18:30:12 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09
> 18:21:44 UTC ---
> Come to think of it, the code sets SA_RESTART when it calls sigaction. Is
> SA_RESTART def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48049
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09 18:21:44
UTC ---
Come to think of it, the code sets SA_RESTART when it calls sigaction. Is
SA_RESTART defined on Solaris? Do I have to #define any special macros to get
it to be defined?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48051
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48051
Summary: sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-09
17:57:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 9 17:57:51 2011
New Revision: 170826
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170826
Log:
PR c++/44629
* pt.c (unify): An unresolved
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-09
17:57:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 9 17:57:46 2011
New Revision: 170824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170824
Log:
PR c++/44629
* pt.c (unify): An unresolved
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-09 17:26:44
UTC ---
I tried the patch in comment #2 and verified that it fixes vector-2.c on IA64
HP-UX and Linux and caused no regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor 2011-03-09
16:59:59 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Mar 9 16:59:55 2011
New Revision: 170822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170822
Log:
2011-03-09 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44045
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denis.campredon at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48050
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23605|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|GC |
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48036
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cck0011 at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #6 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48050
Summary: [c++] ice with c++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23598|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux |powerpc64-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
Summary|ICE in
: 4
<3e> DW_AT_type: <0x45>
<42> DW_AT_data_member_location: 0
<43> DW_AT_accessibility: 3 (private)
but:
FAIL: g++ (GCC) 4.6.0 20110309 (experimental)
(gdb) ptype C
type = class C {
public:
^^^
int private_;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48020
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-09 16:09:42 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09
> 07:09:58 UTC ---
> I think that the problem is that the functions are not being run in the order
> they appear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48048
Summary: [F2003] Remove constraint on namelist group objects
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #29 from Chris Jefferson 2011-03-09
16:07:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 23604
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23604
Changelog for stable sort change
Changelog
I've put Jonathan in here, because part of the test c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #28 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-03-09 16:01:33 UTC ---
The use case was "sloppy" coders (we have hundreds of them, a real resource to
find bugs!)
I personally have no problem with "const &".
Still I remember many tutorials and code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #27 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-09
16:00:52 UTC ---
No problem Chris with the trivial formatting, but please spend a minute on the
ChangeLog, if you can. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #26 from Chris Jefferson 2011-03-09
15:58:24 UTC ---
But, the first line of the method (of all the methods) is:
VERIFY(rh.ok);
So, we know it's true. That might still look more consistent/clear.
Very sorry about the formatting. If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #25 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-09
15:55:38 UTC ---
Jon, I'm doing that here, while reformatting a bit the testcases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48018
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-09 15:55:06 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09
> 06:24:43 UTC ---
> I'm not sure it matters to the syslog writer that Solaris syslog uses
> STREAMS.
> I thin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-09
15:53:43 UTC ---
Chris, thanks for dealing with this so quickly.
A small nit, in the new testcase I think the move-assignment operator should
use
ok = rh.ok;
instead of
ok = true;
to preserv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047
Summary: Incorrect output rounding of double precision numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-09
15:33:33 UTC ---
Vincenzo no hurry, thankfully Chris has a patch essentially ready (apparently)
and most likely we can fix the problem over the next hours. But in general I'm
unconvinced that it makes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-09
15:28:55 UTC ---
Great. While I test it locally, can you please prepare a ChangeLog entry? For
sure it's much easier for you to write down which are the new functions, the
renames, etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #21 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-03-09 15:27:49 UTC ---
On 9 Mar, 2011, at 1:46 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
>
> --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini
> 2011-03-09 12:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
Chris Jefferson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23599|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-09 15:11:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I have the exact same glibc and kernel versions on FC14, and I don't see it.
>
> Can you attach your executable and your core dump?
I think it may have somethi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
--- Comment #6 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-03-09 15:02:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 23601
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23601
stripped down libQt3Support.a
Here's a stripped down version of libQt3Support.a -- linking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16427
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-09
14:56:26 UTC ---
Related to this is
struct X { int i; int j; int k; };
void foo (void)
{
struct X a, b;
__builtin_memcpy (&a, &b, 4);
}
where we are unable to DCE the memcpy call.
Both issues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] Expected diagnostic "reference to
'type' is ambiguous" not given for function-local
static declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #54 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-09 14:40:25 UTC ---
Turned out that GNU ld doesn't like "--as-needed";
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--no-keep-memory" works fine.
(although GNU ld uses way more memory than gold.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-09
14:40:48 UTC ---
I can confirm the ICE with r170818.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-09
14:14:08 UTC ---
that was reduced using the most recent snapshot not HEAD of trunk, so apologies
if it doesn't fail with an up-to-date build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09 14:11:36
UTC ---
I have the exact same glibc and kernel versions on FC14, and I don't see it.
Can you attach your executable and your core dump?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-09
14:05:35 UTC ---
template
struct typeprops {
typedef T complex;
typedef T real;
};
namespace good {
template
inline typename typeprops::real abs (T const & x)
{ retur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48045
Summary: dwarf2out emits CU with DW_AT_stmt_list to empty line
table
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo