http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47999
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-05
23:08:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 23556
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23556
reginfo.gcda
Corresponding reginfo.gcda.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-05
23:07:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 23555
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23555
reginfo.i
./cc1 reginfo.i -quiet -O2 -fprofile-use
reproduces this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
--- Comment #3 from jerome.borme at gmail dot com 2011-03-05 22:25:23 UTC ---
Here is a more complete part of a program where I found the problem. The
following code will allocates 3 vectors fx, fy, fz with specific length, then
call a function to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
--- Comment #6 from rob.bob.301 at hotmail dot com 2011-03-05 21:28:26 UTC ---
This bug is not present in
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.4.1 [gcc-4_4-branch revision 150839]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
jerome.borme at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
Summary: -Wuninitialized warning caught a different way for
printf and ++ in loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-05
19:17:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This is suspicious. I don't see it in the ChangeLog and is probably a merge
> artifact.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/fortran/arith.c?r1=155179
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12639
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000
Summary: [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29874
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47881
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47999
Summary: [C++0x] auto type deduction works incorrectly in a
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #35 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-05 17:06:23 UTC ---
> > In testing fix for above, I see:
> >
> > ../../../gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c: In function 'strctime':
> > ../../../gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:43:20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47998
Summary: ICE of -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Reporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-05
15:40:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> What's about the following? I assume that's a 4.7 item?
>
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > 2) Fix io/read.c(read_x) in the same way to use fbuf_getc instea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47831
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2011-03-05
15:19:41 UTC ---
Got RTL before and after the 2nd if-conversion pass, anyone?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47993
--- Comment #2 from tim blechmann 2011-03-05 14:58:35
UTC ---
thanks ... didn't think of running out of memory on a 12gb machine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45980
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47681
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-05
14:28:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 5 14:28:14 2011
New Revision: 170699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170699
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47899
* cfgloopmanip.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47920
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47831
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47993
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38059
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-03-05
14:01:10 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Sat Mar 5 14:01:07 2011
New Revision: 170698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170698
Log:
PR target/47719
* arm.md (movhi_insn_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka 2011-03-05 12:45:29
UTC ---
> I don't think this is the desired behavior (nor is it documented). If it is
> then we should simply drop the always-inline attribute when merging the
> function decls (basically thro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
--- Comment #26 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-05
09:53:54 UTC ---
What's about the following? I assume that's a 4.7 item?
(In reply to comment #18)
> 2) Fix io/read.c(read_x) in the same way to use fbuf_getc instead of
> fbuf_read.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe 2011-03-05 09:08:29
UTC ---
we don't implement writable strings, but at present we place the ascii in
".const".
it seems that ld is expecting to see constant strings in .cstring (and won't
accept .const as an alter
38 matches
Mail list logo