http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2011-02-28
07:49:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 23487
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23487
proposed fix
Not thoroughly tested, but it seems to pass comp1.cc and comp2.cc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47894
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-28
06:55:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 28 06:55:08 2011
New Revision: 170556
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170556
Log:
PR c++/47906
* g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing1.C: Sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
--- Comment #9 from Ibaidul Sahib 2011-02-28
06:53:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> do you think you could make the example more confusing? maybe if you named
> every namespace, class and member function the same, instead of only doing
> th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #14 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-02-28 06:47:38 UTC ---
Dear Mikael,
It needs the backporting that Thomas suggested. I have been away from
home for a bit and so have not had access to a 4.5 tree. I'll be back
in 04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
--- Comment #8 from Ibaidul Sahib 2011-02-28
06:39:39 UTC ---
Confirmed that this testcase runs fine with gcc 4.4.5/4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47874 still fails on gcc
4.4.5/4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47874
--- Comment #4 from Ibaidul Sahib 2011-02-28
06:31:01 UTC ---
Here are some additional test results on gcc 4.4.5/4.5.2:
g++-4.4.5
=
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/ibaidul/BugReport/Build/BugReport
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-28
04:17:32 UTC ---
Yes the g++.dg/abi/mangle39.C and g++.dg/abi/mangle45.C now pass but it appears
we also need to do the same fix for these two failures as well...
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing1.C scan-as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure with custom flags
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |unassigned at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47685
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
--- Comment #7 from Artem S. Tashkinov 2011-02-27
23:26:52 UTC ---
> That should work. The error is a sanity check that profile information
> is sane.
I don't get you :( It seems like you say two opposite things.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-02-27
23:24:01 UTC ---
Bug summary adjusted.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47918
Summary: [4.6 regression] noreturn discovery broke non local
gotos on m68k
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-27
23:13:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks for the explanation!
>
> I'm not sure if it's worth opening a new bug report, but GCC crashes when I
> try
> to use -fprofile-generate/-fprofile-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-none-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47562
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
Wolfgang Bangerth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bangerth at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47535
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-27
22:31:48 UTC ---
> have libstdc++-v3, too.
Then you cannot use the C++ compiler really. So why compile it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
--- Comment #5 from Artem S. Tashkinov 2011-02-27
21:06:04 UTC ---
Thanks for the explanation!
I'm not sure if it's worth opening a new bug report, but GCC crashes when I try
to use -fprofile-generate/-fprofile-use together with -flto:
g++ -o u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-27
21:03:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> My bad!
>
> export LDFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -mtune=generic -flto
>
> has solved the problem.
Yeah, I guess it will be one of the more common mistakes ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
Artem S. Tashkinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47917
Summary: snprintf(..., "const string") should be optimized into
memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47778
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-27
20:10:30 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk. I will leave this PR open until I get the back ports done. I
want to give this change a few days on trunk first.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47778
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-27
20:08:47 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 27 20:08:44 2011
New Revision: 170549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170549
Log:
2011-02-27 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47778
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-27
20:06:13 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 27 20:06:10 2011
New Revision: 170548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170548
Log:
2011-02-27 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-02-27 19:57:01 UTC ---
A null pointer check (... && ! &p->i) is not eliminated, notwithstanding the
fact that the pointer has been dereferenced. If it is not null, bar is not
called; otherwise, there is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-02-27 19:56:55 UTC ---
Still fails with GCC version 4.6.0 20110226.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47871
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-02-27 19:54:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23484
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23484
Backtrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-02-27 19:54:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 23485
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23485
Backtrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47903
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression]|[4.5 Regression]
|var-t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47903
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-27
19:37:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Feb 27 19:37:35 2011
New Revision: 170547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170547
Log:
PR middle-end/47903
* real.c (real_arithmet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
Artem S. Tashkinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47916
Summary: Using -flto leads to halved performance of unrar
unarchiver
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2011-02-27
19:12:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Looks like there is a pretty simple (eg, no continued fractions & co) way to
> do
> this:
The continued fraction thing for ratio_less may actually be easier:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
17:11:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 17:11:19 2011
New Revision: 170544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170544
Log:
PR c++/47904
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal) [PARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47915
Summary: Type declaration: Recursive specification expression
not detected.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47886
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47896
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47404
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-02-27
15:01:25 UTC ---
Duplicate of PR47835?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
14:39:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 14:39:15 2011
New Revision: 170543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170543
Log:
PR c++/47906
* g++.dg/abi/mangle39.C: Speci
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47886
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-27
14:36:56 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Feb 27 14:36:53 2011
New Revision: 170542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170542
Log:
2011-01-27 Tobias Burnus
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47886
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-27
14:30:04 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Feb 27 14:29:59 2011
New Revision: 170541
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170541
Log:
2011-01-27 Tobias Burnus
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47846
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47914
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47846
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-27
14:12:35 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Feb 27 14:12:31 2011
New Revision: 170539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170539
Log:
2011-02-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47914
Summary: __builtin_isunordered(Inf, NaN) doesn't work on
linux-m68k/aranym
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46466
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46466
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-27 13:20:59 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Feb 27 13:20:55 2011
New Revision: 170538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170538
Log:
2011-02-27 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
Summary: [C++0x] improve ratio_add to overflow less often
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46466
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
--- Comment #16 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-27 12:23:22 UTC ---
Author: denisc
Date: Sun Feb 27 12:23:14 2011
New Revision: 170536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170536
Log:
2011-02-23 Georg-Johann Lay
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47886
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-27
12:05:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Feb 27 12:05:36 2011
New Revision: 170535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170535
Log:
PR fortran/47886
* gfortran.dg/gomp/task-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47912
Summary: translatable string typo: params.def:869: "paritition"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: translation
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47911
Summary: gettext string typo: params.def:861: parition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: translation
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46466
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47909
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47909
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-02-27
09:33:02 UTC ---
Fixed by the still unapplied patch for PR43804:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20541
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #8 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-27 09:23:44 UTC ---
Exactly this is the current problem, there is neither a working switch like
--disable-target-zlib nor a working --disable-target-libiberty.
(sorry if confusing you by using o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #20 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-27 08:36:58 UTC ---
Author: denisc
Date: Sun Feb 27 08:36:55 2011
New Revision: 170534
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170534
Log:
2011-02-22 Georg-Johann Lay
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
08:13:32 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 08:13:28 2011
New Revision: 170533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170533
Log:
PR c++/47904
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47897
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
08:13:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 08:13:16 2011
New Revision: 170532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170532
Log:
PR c++/47897
* semantics.c (non_const_var_e
85 matches
Mail list logo