http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47515
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29
07:16:25 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Jan 29 07:16:20 2011
New Revision: 169388
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169388
Log:
PR go/47515
runtime: If no MAP_ANON, use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47529
Summary: Visibility attributes not supported on Solaris i386
platform
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
Summary: liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal
error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
Summary: [4.6 regression] -flto -flto-partition=none broken for
arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47522
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #28 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-28
23:36:02 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Jan 28 23:35:59 2011
New Revision: 169377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169377
Log:
Fix PR c++/47311
gcc/cp/
PR c++/47311
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47526
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in is_empty_class (class.c:6800) with
-fabi-version=1 with __typeof of current class member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47490
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47525
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47522
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-28
22:35:47 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 28 22:35:43 2011
New Revision: 169375
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169375
Log:
2011-01-28 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47525
Summary: DCE fails to eliminate a dead call to a pure function
when compiled with -maltivec
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #27 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-28 22:05:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> "pluto at agmk dot net" writes:
>
> > with this patch the *current* gcc-trunk (with fixed PR47317)
> > ICEs in fixed_type_or_null.
>
> Thank you for test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-28 21:18:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm, isn't the option "-G 0" and not "-G0" ?
We have been using -G0 for years with the rtems mips BSPs and gcc happily
accepts it. The parsing of it must b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
end3er at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||end3er at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47340
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
--- Comment #4 from end3er at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 21:04:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Does -fno-tree-sink fixes the issue?
> >
> > No it doesn't. The only flags that works ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-28
21:04:40 UTC ---
I think I/O is OK - the issue is probably the same as PR 47519: Mishandling of
intrinsic operations. Though, this case looks a bit different than the other
PR.
void
concat_string (gfc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47524
--- Comment #3 from David Daney 2011-01-28 20:59:09
UTC ---
Created attachment 23160
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23160
sysinfo.go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong length in I/O |Concatenation with deferred
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47524
--- Comment #2 from David Daney 2011-01-28 20:58:38
UTC ---
Created attachment 23159
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23159
syscall_linux_mips64.go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47524
--- Comment #1 from David Daney 2011-01-28 20:58:06
UTC ---
Created attachment 23158
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23158
syscall_arch.go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47524
Summary: go1: internal compiler error: in do_get_tree, at
go/gofrontend/types.cc:1739
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523
Summary: Wrong length in I/O deferred allocatable scalar
character
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-28
20:05:08 UTC ---
Hmm, isn't the option "-G 0" and not "-G0" ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47519
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-28
20:00:31 UTC ---
Paul, do you think one should do something alike in gfc_trans_allocate and in
the intrinsic scalar/array assignment block?
gfc_conv_intrinsic_len has:
default:
/* Anybody s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47507
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47507
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-28
19:49:28 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jan 28 19:49:25 2011
New Revision: 169372
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169372
Log:
2011-01-28 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
ges=c,c++,fortran
--disable-multilib --enable-plugins --enable-cloog-backend=isl
--with-ppl=/data03/vondele/gnu/ppl-0.11/install
--with-cloog=/data03/vondele/gnu/cloog-0.16.1/install/
--with-libelf=/data03/vondele/gnu/libelf-0.8.13/install --enable-gold
--enable-checking=release
Thread model: posix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression]|[4.5 Regression] Invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #21 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com 2011-01-28 19:37:17 UTC ---
I shall be out of the office until Monday 28 February; I will not have email
access during most of that time, so I will read your message when I return.
For manageria
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-28
19:36:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 28 19:36:44 2011
New Revision: 169370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169370
Log:
PR target/42894
* varasm.c (force_const_me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47515
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-28 18:43:27
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/28/11 11:28, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
>
> --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47519
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|ICE on allo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-28
18:28:11 UTC ---
Backporting r162726 to 4.5.2 and 4.4.5 prevents the ICE there too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235
--- Comment #4 from Tony Poppleton 2011-01-28
18:08:15 UTC ---
As a quick test, I commented out the block with the following comment in
fold-const.c:
/* If this is an EQ or NE comparison with zero and ARG0 is
(1 << foo) & bar, conv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
Tony Poppleton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.3.5
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521
Summary: Unnecessary usage of edx register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235
--- Comment #3 from Tony Poppleton 2011-01-28
17:02:50 UTC ---
Actually what I said above isn't correct - had it compiled down to "bt $4, %al"
then it would make sense to do that special case, but as it used "testb" it is
inconclusive.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-28 16:56:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > Hints or tiny patch appreciated.
>
> You need to find out whether/how this works for the C compiler.
What do you mean? It dictates the maximum size of o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235
--- Comment #2 from Tony Poppleton 2011-01-28
16:55:48 UTC ---
Based on Richard's comment, I tried a modified version of the code replacing
the (1 << x) with just (16).
This shows that GCC (4.6 & 4.5.2) does perform an optimization similar to ll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
--- Comment #4 from Brendan 2011-01-28
16:52:12 UTC ---
Was using the MinGW bundled with PythonXY
Now upgraded to version 4.5.2 and it works fine
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-28
16:13:07 UTC ---
Patch posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02118.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
jur.pauw at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.2.2 |4.4.5
--- Comment #5 from jur.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
--- Comment #4 from jur.pauw at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 15:54:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 23156
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23156
preprocessed output that triggers va_arg segmentation fault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-28
15:48:08 UTC ---
I don't have binaries anymore but it was built from SVN rev. 167488. So using
a gcc 4.6 with that revision as host compiler should reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47520
Summary: [trans-mem] ICE Segmentation fault at 01
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-28
15:39:50 UTC ---
Also note that gcc 4.2 is no longer maintained, so even if there is a bug in
that version it won't get fixed. Please try a newer release.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-28
15:35:05 UTC ---
Another follow up:
Bug 47517 - the example from c.l.f linked to from comment 0 fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-28
15:35:02 UTC ---
TODO:
- Function result variables which are character(len=:), pointer
(according to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00264.html item (v))
- Deferred-length string ARRAYS ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-01-28 15:32:50 UTC ---
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, davek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
>
> --- Comment #15 from Dave Korn 2011-01-28 15:28:33
> UTC --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47519
Summary: ICE on allocation of with deferred-length string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #15 from Dave Korn 2011-01-28 15:28:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> The test is invalid on i[345]86-*-* without also enabling -msse.
Does the same apply to libcpp/lex.c? i.e. Is that code invalid unless
compiled with -msse2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
--- Comment #1 from jur.pauw at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 15:26:41 UTC ---
If gcc version 3.4.4 is used then the program executes correctly.
Version information:
Reading specs from
/sysmnt/cadappl_linuxi386_nsvr1/gcc/3.4.4/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47518
Summary: va_arg causes segmentation fault in case of variable
length argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-28
15:19:23 UTC ---
The test is invalid on i[345]86-*-* without also enabling -msse. A fix is to
add
/* { dg-options "-msse" { target i[345]86-*-* } } */
probably also for x86_64 with -m32. Or sim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517
Summary: Rallocate on assignment: Segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-28 15:15:37 UTC ---
Is this going to be fixed for 4.6.0 or should we XFAIL the test? This
PR has been open for 5 months now.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
--- Comment #1 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 15:14:24 UTC ---
gcc version 4.5.0 20100604??? version is marked as 4.6.0
Paul
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-28
14:59:03 UTC ---
Close as FIXED (for the 4.6 trunk).
Left overs:
- ICE mentioned in comment 12 - now PR 47516
- Assignment to polymorphic LHS, PR 43366
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
Summary: ICE with reallocate on assignment w/
--disable-bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47350
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-eabi|arm-eabi,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47513
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47454
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-28
14:29:30 UTC ---
> Ok for mainline (I'll post to gcc-patches anyway)?
Sure, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Marlier
2011-01-28 14:18:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23153
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23153
testcase with O0
With this testcase and -O0:
$ gcc -fgnu-tm -O0 -S pr46567-2.i -o testcase.s
pr46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47350
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas 2011-01-28 13:53:25
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 28 13:53:19 2011
New Revision: 169356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169356
Log:
2011-01-28 Paul Thomas
Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas 2011-01-28 13:53:25
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 28 13:53:19 2011
New Revision: 169356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169356
Log:
2011-01-28 Paul Thomas
Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2011-01-28 13:53:25
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 28 13:53:19 2011
New Revision: 169356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169356
Log:
2011-01-28 Paul Thomas
Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47515
Summary: Issues porting libgo to IRIX 6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-28 13:46:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Please specify the linker you are using and compile-flags you are using to
> build SPEC - you should know the information you gave is not enough to
> reproduce the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
Brendan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||Windows XP - SP3 - Intel -
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-01-28 13:33:41 UTC ---
could be windows specific, since both testcases run fine here
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu), with 4.3, 4.5 and 4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-28 13:04:36 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-28
> 12:45:43 UTC ---
>> You're right: I somehow misread the PR and though the test had already
>> been introduced in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47514
Summary: Source file over a certain size compiles but will not
run
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47279
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner 2011-01-28
12:48:34 UTC ---
I assume the binutils 2.11 and 2.10 versions are typos and you meant 2.21 and
2.20? I'll fire off a build using your configure options and report back.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression] can't |[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47513
Summary: [C++0x] [SFINAE] compiler rejects valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47400
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-26 15:33:03 UTC ---
From my reading of libiconv 1.13.1 libcharset/tools/{irix-6.5,
osf1-5.1}, it seems that there isn't any such locale. If this cannot be
helped, it seems that we sho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-28 12:40:52 UTC ---
> --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-28
> 12:36:54 UTC ---
>> Between 20110121 and 20110127, the new gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c test started
>> failing again
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47512
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Jaap van der Heijden 2011-01-28 12:38:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 23151
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23151
natString.s
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
