[Bug lto/47410] New: Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47410 Summary: Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle mixed IR/non-IR objects Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug tree-optimization/47053] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 2 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47053 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/47053] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 2 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47053 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-22 04:09:53 UTC --- Author: law Date: Sat Jan 22 04:09:44 2011 New Revision: 169123 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169123 Log: PR tree-optimization/47053 * tree-ssa-dse.c

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-22 04:03:24 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 17:41, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 > > --- Comment #12 from DJ Delorie

[Bug c/47409] volatile struct member bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47409 --- Comment #1 from John Regehr 2011-01-22 03:57:20 UTC --- Ack, sorry, wrong testcase! This is it: struct s2 { volatile int x; }; struct s2 s; void foo (void) { s = s; }

[Bug c/47409] New: volatile struct member bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47409 Summary: volatile struct member bug Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/47401] Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47401 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot |

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-22 00:50:25 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 17:41, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 > > --- Comment #12 from DJ Delorie

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-22 00:42:52 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 17:38, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 > > --- Comment #11 from DJ Delorie

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #12 from DJ Delorie 2011-01-22 00:40:44 UTC --- Of course, one could argue that perhaps the compare should *not* have been removed? I don't know how clever the new redundant compare removal code is.

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #11 from DJ Delorie 2011-01-22 00:37:35 UTC --- I set a breakpoint on the delete of that insn; at that time, the following insn did not have the /S set on it. At the time when the /S is added, the previous insn had already been delet

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-22 00:33:26 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 15:32, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 > > DJ Delorie changed: > >

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-22 00:31:30 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 15:22, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 > > DJ Delorie changed: > >

[Bug fortran/47399] [OOP] ICE with TBP of a PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47399 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-22 00:06:43 UTC --- In Fortran 2003 the constraint was: "C1103 (R1101) An automatic object shall not appear in the specification-part (R204) of a main program." "C1106 (R1104) An automatic object shall

[Bug c++/47041] [4.6 Regression] Internal compiler error in build_data_member_initialization, add cp/semantics.c:5483

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-21 23:01:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Simple patch to avoid the ICE: The patch in comment #3 regtests without problems. However, I'm not sure if it's the best solution. Here is an alter

[Bug web/47306] Wrong name of a programming language used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47306 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-21 22:57:16 UTC --- Oh and GNU go exists already :) So using go as a programming language name it is going to be pretty much easy to find different names for different programming langauges.

[Bug web/47306] Wrong name of a programming language used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47306 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #36 from Mikael Morin 2011-01-21 22:54:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > Yep, that's what I figured eventually :) The question now is if for: > > -- > type bar > integer :: a > end type bar > type(

[Bug libfortran/46267] strerror() is not necessarily thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-01-21 22:42:26 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Fri Jan 21 22:42:17 2011 New Revision: 169110 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169110 Log: PR 46267 strerror thread safety Modified: trunk

[Bug web/47306] Wrong name of a programming language used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47306 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/47394] Internal compiler error when error count limit is reached

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47394 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47394] Internal compiler error when error count limit is reached

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47394 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-21 22:38:58 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 21 22:38:55 2011 New Revision: 169109 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169109 Log: 2011-01-21 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/47

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-21 22:35:47 UTC --- Ok, regression now fixed by reversal of the bit that exposed the failure, but the fact that it regressed implies there's something iffy with the patch for bug 47106, so I'll keep thi

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 DJ Delorie changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23014|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/47041] [4.6 Regression] Internal compiler error in build_data_member_initialization, add cp/semantics.c:5483

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-21 22:30:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 21 22:30:26 2011 New Revision: 169108 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169108 Log: PR c++/47041 * semantics.c (build_constexpr

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 DJ Delorie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dj at redhat dot com --- Comment #7 from DJ

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-21 22:11:28 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jan 21 22:11:24 2011 New Revision: 169107 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169107 Log: PR debug/47402 Temporarily revert: 2011-01-21 A

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-21 22:11:28 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jan 21 22:11:24 2011 New Revision: 169107 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169107 Log: PR debug/47402 Temporarily revert: 2011-01-21 A

[Bug web/47306] Wrong name of a programming language used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47306 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/47388] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in begin_for_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:863 with -fno-for-scope and for(;;) inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47388 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/47388] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in begin_for_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:863 with -fno-for-scope and for(;;) inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47388 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-21 21:34:29 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 21 21:34:25 2011 New Revision: 169105 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169105 Log: PR c++/47388 * semantics.c (begin_for_stmt)

[Bug lto/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/47394] Internal compiler error when error count limit is reached

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47394 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-21 20:33:15 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 21 20:33:10 2011 New Revision: 169104 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169104 Log: 2011-01-21 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/47

[Bug fortran/47399] ICE with TBP of a PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47399 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-21 20:31:30 UTC --- The ICE is due to an overly eager ASSERT check and can be removed with the following patch. TODO: A proper check with an error message for the invalid case. --- a/gcc/fortran/primar

[Bug ada/35998] debug info invalid x86_64 DW_AT_byte_size 0xffffffff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998 Douglas B Rupp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rupp at gnat dot com --- Comment #7 from

[Bug middle-end/45422] [4.6 Regression] compile time increases 3x.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45422 --- Comment #31 from davidxl 2011-01-21 20:08:11 UTC --- Comparing this timing with 4.6 results (164s), looks like many other passes become slower other than ivopt (e.g IRA increases from 3.5s to 11s etc -- ivopt only account for a small part of

[Bug c++/47041] [4.6 Regression] Internal compiler error in build_data_member_initialization, add cp/semantics.c:5483

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/47408] Several of the Altivec tests fail if run with a compiler built with --with-cpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47408 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/47408] Several of the Altivec tests fail if run with a compiler built with --with-cpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47408 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2011-01-21 20:00:09 UTC --- Created attachment 23072 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23072 Patch that adds -mno-vsx to altivec tests

[Bug middle-end/45422] [4.6 Regression] compile time increases 3x.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45422 --- Comment #30 from davidxl 2011-01-21 19:58:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > (In reply to comment #28) > > David, any progress with this? > > The cost function fix to make sure solution set does not become too big will > be > probably v

[Bug target/47408] New: Several of the Altivec tests fail if run with a compiler built with --with-cpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47408 Summary: Several of the Altivec tests fail if run with a compiler built with --with-cpu=power7 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug middle-end/45566] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in convert_to_eh_region_ranges, at except.c:2446 with -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fnon-call-exceptions -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45566 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress

[Bug rtl-optimization/47366] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note in the end of bb 3 with -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/45566] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in convert_to_eh_region_ranges, at except.c:2446 with -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fnon-call-exceptions -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45566 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-21 19:35:45 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 21 19:35:42 2011 New Revision: 169101 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169101 Log: PR middle-end/45566 * except.c (convert_to_

[Bug rtl-optimization/47366] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note in the end of bb 3 with -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-21 19:34:08 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 21 19:34:03 2011 New Revision: 169100 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169100 Log: PR rtl-optimization/47366 * fwprop.c (forwa

[Bug c++/46807] [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error: in synthesized_method_walk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/47317] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in fixed_type_or_null.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47317 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46552] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on pointer to member variable with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46552 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46977] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in htab_find_slot_with_hash (hashtab.c:650)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46977 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46552] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on pointer to member variable with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46552 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-21 18:59:48 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 21 18:59:40 2011 New Revision: 169099 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169099 Log: PR c++/46552 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_consta

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #12 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-21 18:41:50 UTC --- On Friday, January 21, 2011 04:32:23 pm you wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 > > Kai Tietz changed: > >What|Removed |Ad

[Bug tree-optimization/47053] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 2 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47053 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com AssignedTo

[Bug target/47403] [x32] TLS doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47403 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-21 18:05:59 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Jan 21 18:05:55 2011 New Revision: 169097 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169097 Log: Call convert_to_mode on legitimize_tls_addre

[Bug tree-optimization/47407] New: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407 Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/47406] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-modf-1.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47406 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-21 17:45:22 UTC --- Created attachment 23070 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23070 assembler output

[Bug middle-end/47406] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-modf-1.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47406 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-21 17:44:45 UTC --- Created attachment 23069 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23069 preprocessed input

[Bug middle-end/47406] New: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-modf-1.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47406 Summary: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-modf-1.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assigne

[Bug c++/46977] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in htab_find_slot_with_hash (hashtab.c:650)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46977 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-21 17:38:06 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 21 17:38:02 2011 New Revision: 169096 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169096 Log: PR c++/46977 * semantics.c (potential_const

[Bug middle-end/47405] New: gcc.dg/torture/20090618-1.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405 Summary: gcc.dg/torture/20090618-1.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/47404] gcc.dg/pr46909.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47404 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-21 17:30:55 UTC --- Created attachment 23068 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23068 ifcombine dump

[Bug tree-optimization/47404] New: gcc.dg/pr46909.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47404 Summary: gcc.dg/pr46909.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: una

[Bug middle-end/47401] Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47401 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23066|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libfortran/46267] strerror() is not necessarily thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug target/47403] New: [x32] TLS doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47403 Summary: [x32] TLS doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/47401] Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47401 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23064|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/47388] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in begin_for_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:863 with -fno-for-scope and for(;;) inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47388 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-21 17:15:52 UTC --- Created attachment 23065 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23065 gcc46-pr47388.patch Untested fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/37273] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] IRA does not re-materializes addresses (loads from the TOC)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-21 17:13:35 UTC --- SPEC 2k6 testing on x86-64 is a wash for integer codes. Small improvement for 403.gcc 462.libquantum and small regressions for 456.hmmr and 471.omnetpp are evident. There's a couple

[Bug rtl-optimization/41619] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in insert_save (caller-save.c) for SPEC CPU2000's 252.eon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41619 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/41619] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in insert_save (caller-save.c) for SPEC CPU2000's 252.eon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41619 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-21 16:49:34 UTC --- Author: law Date: Fri Jan 21 16:49:31 2011 New Revision: 169095 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169095 Log: PR rtl-optimization/41619 * caller-save.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/41619] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in insert_save (caller-save.c) for SPEC CPU2000's 252.eon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41619 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-21 16:45:36 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01424.html After some brief discussion with rth (concerns about global_regs) in IRC, rth approved the patch.

[Bug bootstrap/47402] New: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/47401] Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47401 --- Comment #1 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-01-21 16:33:43 UTC --- Created attachment 23064 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23064 Proposed fix Patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01406.html

[Bug middle-end/47401] New: Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47401 Summary: Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug middle-end/45422] [4.6 Regression] compile time increases 3x.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45422 --- Comment #29 from davidxl 2011-01-21 16:27:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) > David, any progress with this? The cost function fix to make sure solution set does not become too big will be probably very involved and won't be availlable in

[Bug c++/47388] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in begin_for_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:863 with -fno-for-scope and for(;;) inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47388 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is not optimal in AVX mode due to use of TARGET_MEM_REFs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-21 16:21:55 UTC --- You can play with a cleanup patch I have lying around, queued for 4.7: Index: emit-rtl.c === *** emit-rtl.c (revis

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is not optimal in AVX mode due to use of TARGET_MEM_REFs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-21 16:03:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Note that this shouldn't be an issue for AVX/SSE as unaligned moves are > as fast as aligned ones if they are really aligned (at least I hope > this is true for

[Bug tree-optimization/47355] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed with -O2 -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is not optimal in AVX mode due to use of TARGET_MEM_REFs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-21 15:37:33 UTC --- And before you start fiddling with set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos, most alignment related pieces in it should simply re-use get_object_alignment (a cleanup I didn't finish in time

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is not optimal in AVX mode due to use of TARGET_MEM_REFs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-21 15:35:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Thus, the real reason is that we lack alignment information on > > MEM_REFs/TARGET_MEM_REFs but only have pointer alignment i

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/44606] Wrong SPE floating point during computation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44606 --- Comment #12 from David Kühling 2011-01-21 15:17:34 UTC --- Ok, looks like the change to reload1.c introduced by GCC revision 168347 (author froydnj): http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/reload1.c?r1=168347&r2=168346&pathrev=168347 fixes th

[Bug tree-optimization/47355] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed with -O2 -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-21 15:15:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 21 15:15:40 2011 New Revision: 169094 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169094 Log: PR tree-optimization/47355 * tree-eh.c (cle

[Bug c/47400] New: Several UCN tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B and IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47400 Summary: Several UCN tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B and IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/47399] New: ICE with TBP of a PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47399 Summary: ICE with TBP of a PARAMETER Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/47398] [4.5/4.6 Regression] tree check: accessed elt 10 of tree_vec with 9 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:10500

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47398 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net --- Comment #2 from

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-21 14:57:36 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jan 21 14:57:33 2011 New Revision: 169093 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169093 Log: PR debug/47106 * cfgexpand.c (account_used_vars_

[Bug c++/47398] [4.5/4.6 Regression] tree check: accessed elt 10 of tree_vec with 9 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:10500

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47398 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is not optimal in AVX mode due to use of TARGET_MEM_REFs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-21 14:45:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thus, the real reason is that we lack alignment information on > MEM_REFs/TARGET_MEM_REFs but only have pointer alignment information for now. I know it won't sol

[Bug c++/47398] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] tree check: accessed elt 10 of tree_vec with 9 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:10500

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47398 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] tree check: accessed elt 10 of tree_vec with 9 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:10500 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/47398] [4.5/4.6 Regression] tree check: accessed elt 10 of tree_vec with 9 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:10500

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47398 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is not optimal in AVX mode due to use of TARGET_MEM_REFs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-21 14:22:40 UTC --- Thus, the real reason is that we lack alignment information on MEM_REFs/TARGET_MEM_REFs but only have pointer alignment information for now.

[Bug other/47395] the tree code WIDEN_MULT_MINUS_EXPR has a mismatching name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47395 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is not optimal in AVX mode due to use of TARGET_MEM_REFs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/47397] Alignment of array element is incorrect in AVX mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47397 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-21 14:15:49 UTC --- Investigating.

  1   2   >