http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-linux
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28734
Rob changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #10 from Rob 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-19
02:27:49 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 19 02:27:45 2011
New Revision: 168980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168980
Log:
2011-01-19 Graham Reed
PR libstdc++/47354
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.1.2
Summary|bitmap_allocat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #1 from Roman Kononov 2011-01-19
01:45:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 23026
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23026
this is the real test case; ignore the other one please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed with -O2
-fipa-cp-clone
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-19
01:31:12 UTC ---
Confirmed by modifying __gnu_cxx::__mutex to use
PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP to initialize the mutex:
$ lib0x ./var
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'__gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-19
00:59:41 UTC ---
Great.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43082
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to wor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23023|0 |1
is patch|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-19
00:27:45 UTC ---
Thanks for checking Jon. If we can't fix the issue very quickly, I vote for
simply removing that specific allocator, it never worked very well and the code
itself is rather ugly, IMHO.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-18
23:46:01 UTC ---
I wouldn't be surprised if that code has bit-rotted, I'll check it out now ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-18
23:31:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is it reproduceable?
I don't believe it was and I only hit it once.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47303
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2011-01-18
23:21:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23024
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23024
patch handling references
This patch would work, but for PR 47348.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-18
23:16:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 18 23:16:16 2011
New Revision: 168974
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168974
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47290
* tree-eh.c (in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 22:40:38 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jan 18 22:40:33 2011
New Revision: 168973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168973
Log:
2011-01-18 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-01-18 21:56:50
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Jan 18 21:56:46 2011
New Revision: 168970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168970
Log:
PR target/46997
* ia64.c (ia64_expand_unpack):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47354
Summary: bitmap_allocator free_list::_M_get never locks mutex
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
--- Comment #7 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
2011-01-18 21:42:50 UTC ---
Resolved alright -- but including tree-flow.h in emit-rtl.c??? :-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46894
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46894
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-18
21:29:13 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 18 21:29:11 2011
New Revision: 168968
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168968
Log:
PR middle-end/46894
* explow.c (allocat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47353
Summary: superfluous alignment after dynamic stack allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 21:18:04
UTC ---
This bug is similar to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23115
PR23115 never has been fixed correctly...
Sebastian
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352
Summary: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47351
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy 2011-01-18 21:11:23 UTC
---
Please find attached the source file g.c and the makefile.
The target "asm" causes the crash. The target "win" does a successful build.
The program is a small screen editor, it is self c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47351
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy 2011-01-18 21:08:37 UTC
---
Created attachment 23022
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23022
the makefile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
--- Comment #86 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-18 21:07:26
UTC ---
I am in the process of updating i386 psABI to specify 16byte stack
alignment.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47351
Summary: Segmentation fault in MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
--- Comment #85 from Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-01-18 21:02:43 UTC ---
Am I the only one who thinks this bug should be nominated as the first priority
GCC 4.6.0 bug?
I don't really care if the fix would be backported to 4.5.x or 4.4.x releases,
but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29832
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46215
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46168
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43567
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46970
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46970
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:54:55
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:52 2011
New Revision: 168967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168967
Log:
Add testcase for PR46970.
2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46215
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:54:50
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:46 2011
New Revision: 168966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168966
Log:
Add testcase for PR46215.
2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46168
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:54:43
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:40 2011
New Revision: 168965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168965
Log:
Add testcase for PR46168.
2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:54:38
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:34 2011
New Revision: 168964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168964
Log:
Add testcase for PR43657.
2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29832
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:54:30
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:26 2011
New Revision: 168963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168963
Log:
Add testcase for PR29832.
2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43567
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:54:23
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:18 2011
New Revision: 168962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168962
Log:
Add testcase for PR43567.
2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke
2011-01-18 20:48:34 UTC ---
Here is the debugging output. I can attach the whole back-trace if needed.
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or lat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43568
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43567
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:47:10
UTC ---
*** Bug 43568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47350
Summary: Deferred string length: ALLOCATE should allow MOLD=
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
--- Comment #4 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-01-18
20:13:59 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:13:56 2011
New Revision: 168961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168961
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47179
* config/spu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41146
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
20:06:17 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:06:13 2011
New Revision: 168960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168960
Log:
2011-01-18 Dominique d'Humieres
PR t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47065
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
--- Comment #38 from Ion Gaztañaga 2011-01-18
19:15:22 UTC ---
Thanks Richard for the detailed report. The fact is that the next standard is
trying to support relative pointers for container implementations (much like
Boost.Interprocess does), to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47349
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 19:08:00 UTC ---
Here's a first patch, not regtested yet:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-18
19:01:01 UTC ---
yes. debug mode + versioning still in progress. expect to wrap that up asap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 18:45:27
UTC ---
In this loop:
for (i=0, nops=0 ; i= 90) ? 3 : 1))
{
addrmap[i] = i - nops;
if (codestr[i] == 9)
nops++;
}
it looks like this part: i += ((codestr[i] >= 90)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47349
Summary: missing warning: Actual argument contains too few
elements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson 2011-01-18
18:20:49 UTC ---
Looks good. Ok if it passes tests.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Summary: substring with len_trim in array constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47318
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-18
17:35:34 UTC ---
debug cc1plus to see where/why it exits, not debug your application
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47347
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-18
17:32:39 UTC ---
reduced:
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-parameter"
template
struct KeyValue
{
virtual void serialize(int a) const
{
}
};
void f()
{
KeyValue values;
}
#pragma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #2 from daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de 2011-01-18 17:30:54 UTC
---
What do you mean by debug? I can't even compile it because cc1plus exists half
the way.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #33 from Mikael Morin 2011-01-18
17:21:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> Yes, but it's possible I was going up the wrong tree. My idea was to
> build the no-restrict variants of types on demand, as necessary, basically
> from gf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-18
17:20:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23020
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23020
gcc46-pr47290.patch
Like this (still untested but on this testcase)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47347
Summary: "pragma GCC diagnostic ignored" has no effect
sometimes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson 2011-01-18
16:45:09 UTC ---
Jakub, I'm fine with your second patch to detect infinite loops, with
the proviso that you break out the test into a separate function.
gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.6-20110118/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto
--enable-lan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-18
15:50:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 18 15:50:55 2011
New Revision: 168951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168951
Log:
2011-01-18 Richard Guenther
PR rtl-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #125 from Daniel Berlin 2011-01-18
15:18:25 UTC ---
>
> --- Comment #124 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-18 15:15:01
> UTC ---
>>
>> This looks suspiciously like it's not using the DFS numbers
> It seems that they are used, just we do a lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #124 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-18 15:15:01
UTC ---
>
> This looks suspiciously like it's not using the DFS numbers
It seems that they are used, just we do a lot of queries from
register_new_assert_for
according to my ^C GDB profiling.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47346
Summary: access control for nested type is ignored in class
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40901
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-18
15:11:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> access control isn't done for a nested-name-specifier
sorry, should be "... for arguments in a template-id in a
nested-name-specifier"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40901
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #3 from Jon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
--- Comment #44 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-18
14:58:04 UTC ---
and later IRA
samples %app name symbol name
2582656.8667 cc1 allocno_spill_priority_compare
6812 14.9994 cc1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #123 from Daniel Berlin 2011-01-18
14:54:33 UTC ---
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:49 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
>
> Jan Hubicka changed:
>
> What |Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
--- Comment #43 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-18
14:53:46 UTC ---
Now at -O2 the main inliner seems to degenerate ;(
168767 78.4974 cc1 cgraph_edge_badness
9426 4.3842 cc1 update_edge_key
3529 1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #122
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47345
Summary: [4.6 Regression] LTO failed to bootstrap-profiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47344
Target Milestone|4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-18
14:23:32 UTC ---
That's because even that routines operates on (aligned) word_type sized chunks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |---
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |---
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
