http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-18
07:45:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 18 07:45:12 2011
New Revision: 168944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168944
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47299
* expr.c (expand_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174
--- Comment #28 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-18
07:10:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> I'm seeing the same problem with gcc 4.6 trunk (r168937) for building a cross
> compiler with target arm-unknown-eabi configured with newlib in tree. Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47337
Summary: memory unsafety bug leading to wrong code generation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #5 from DJ Delorie 2011-01-18 01:46:00 UTC
---
Created attachment 23014
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23014
alternate patch
Alternate patch. The v850.md patch tests frame_related, which is set for REGS
only to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-18 01:36:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 23011
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23011
20010124-1.c.000i.cgraph
--- Comment #10 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-18 01:36:53 UTC ---
Attached .cgraph files.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174
--- Comment #27 from John Tytgat 2011-01-18
01:17:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 23009
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23009
Build log and full copy of zlib and 32/zlib subdirectories in build directory
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174
John Tytgat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||John.Tytgat at aaug dot net
--- Comment #26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-18 00:21:42 UTC ---
Here is abs-1.c.000i.cgraph:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-18 00:10:55 UTC ---
This is it!
Dave
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44513
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44513
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44513
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose 2011-01-17 23:05:35
UTC ---
a biarch build for yesterday's trunk on i686 with the proposed patch applied
succeeds and doesn't show any regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46822
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-17
22:53:24 UTC ---
I wonder if this was a bug in glibc. I have:
apinski@apinskidesktop:~$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.7, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Softw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46822
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47067
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-17
22:34:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 17 22:34:35 2011
New Revision: 168937
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168937
Log:
PR c++/47067
* semantics.c (base_field_cons
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in |[4.5 Regression] ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
22:26:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 17 22:26:42 2011
New Revision: 168935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168935
Log:
PR fortran/47331
* gfortran.h (struct gfc_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-17 22:17:50
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Mon Jan 17 22:17:47 2011
New Revision: 168934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168934
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2011-01-17 Nicola Pero
PR objc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-17 21:56:13
UTC ---
Patch posted with reversal of java patch and fix in i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01071.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
--- Comment #3 from Lars Schmidt-Thieme
2011-01-17 21:52:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 23006
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23006
file producing the ICE
sorry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336
Summary: ICE: "Error reporting routines re-entered"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #23 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
21:16:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 23005
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23005
optimized for gcc.dg/autopar/outer-2.c at -m32 with patch from comment 14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
21:15:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 23004
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23004
optimized for gcc.dg/autopar/outer-2.c at -m32 with r168907
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
21:14:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 23003
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23003
parloops for gcc.dg/autopar/outer-2.c at -m32 with patch from comment 14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
21:14:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 23002
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23002
parloops for gcc.dg/autopar/outer-2.c at -m32 with r168907
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
21:13:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 23001
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23001
assembly for gcc.dg/autopar/outer-2.c at -m32 with patch from comment 14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
21:12:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 23000
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23000
assembly for gcc.dg/autopar/outer-2.c at -m32 with r168907
/Users/howarth/work/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/how
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Summary: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45129
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27436
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28397
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
20:02:43 UTC ---
No, it was removed because it was very badly designed warning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #19 from Andi Kleen 2011-01-17
19:59:23 UTC ---
Sounds like a valgrind bug to me. It should know that the string instruction
does not examine the values after the terminator character and the length.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32415
Matt Fago changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fago at earthlink dot net
--- Comment #10 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
19:58:43 UTC ---
Also, is there a convention in FSF gcc coding for how empty bodies are supposed
to be handled? Should we have the extra space or explicit braces that the old
patch requested for empty b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-17
19:56:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It was removed on purpose, see PR36478 and discussions about it on
> gcc-patches.
So it was removed because of the absence of an appropriate algorithm to
im
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #18 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-17 19:37:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> If there's some easy way we can add a valgrind exception for these
> functions to the gcc source tree, I'd be open to do so. But I also don't
> want to fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47327
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47327
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-17
19:16:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 17 19:16:27 2011
New Revision: 168932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168932
Log:
2011-01-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-17
19:03:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 17 19:03:28 2011
New Revision: 168930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168930
Log:
2011-01-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson 2011-01-17
18:40:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> ==5267== Invalid read of size 8
> ==5267==at 0x11E4E24: search_line_sse42(unsigned char const*, unsigned
It's fine. (1) Note that we've already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #13 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-17 18:39:14 UTC ---
Last graph.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-17 18:32:22 UTC ---
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> It seems that we get wrong already when streaming abs-1-lib.o file. Would be
> possible to attach cgraph dump from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-17
18:12:53 UTC ---
THe ICE happens because refs_may_alias_p_1 gets an ao_ref initialized
from a MEM_REF of an ADDR_EXPR of a component_ref.
get_ref_base_and_extent then removes the MEM_REF but the base i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #16 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-17 18:05:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > But it never checks the buffer end. It looks bogus to me.
>
> Read the comment at the beginning of the section. This is an a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
Ryan S. Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
Summary: g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C -O2 -flto FAILs without
visibility
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Summary: [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris
2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
17:49:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 22997
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22997
gcc46-pr47331.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46603
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
17:49:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 17:49:25 2011
New Revision: 168918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168918
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-22 Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46603
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
17:48:41 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 17:48:36 2011
New Revision: 168917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168917
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-22 Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #16 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
Summary: g++ compiler should check for empty while or for
bodies
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, openmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-17 16:25:25
UTC ---
Those who ignore libtool are forced to reimplement it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
--- Comment #2 from Ryan S. Arnold 2011-01-17 16:16:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> You are not supposed to override CFLAGS in sub-makes.
What's the recommended procedure for making sure fPIC/fpic is used properly,
once again relying on th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
16:15:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> The GNU linker made
>
> extern int abs_called;
>
> prevailing (it's a common, probably works with -fno-common?) instead of
>
> int abs_called = 0;
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
16:14:21 UTC ---
The GNU linker made
extern int abs_called;
prevailing (it's a common, probably works with -fno-common?) instead of
int abs_called = 0;
thus I think this is a bug in the GNU lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Summary: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1133
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-17 16:13:37
UTC ---
You are not supposed to override CFLAGS in sub-makes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17
16:10:54 UTC ---
Is hpux an ELF target? GNU LD plugin implementation contains some hackery to
chose proper PREEMPTED/RESOLVED/etc values.
Perhaps it is broken on non-elfs.
In any case I will prepare pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17 16:08:05 UTC
---
> thus, memcpy is also missing but at least main_test is correctly
> used from 20010124-1.o.
memcpy is missing due to hack eliminating all builtins from being output. We
discussed
this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17 16:05:56 UTC
---
> Note that the assert probably should do &&, not ||. Or it doesn't
> make sense at all. Asserting that the prevailing_node is analyzed
> should be enough.
No, the assert basically tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17 16:03:37 UTC
---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
>
> --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-01-17
> 15:42:26 UTC ---
> Resolution file is:
>
> 3
> abs-1.o 3
> 70 262910e5 PREE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #15 from Richard Henderson 2011-01-17
16:03:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> But it never checks the buffer end. It looks bogus to me.
Read the comment at the beginning of the section. This is an aligned
read before END, and t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
Summary: libdecnumber/Makefile.in overrides CFLAGS set by sub
make invocation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47329
Summary: cc1plus segfaults when using variadic function
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-01-17
15:42:26 UTC ---
Resolution file is:
3
abs-1.o 3
70 262910e5 PREEMPTED_IR main_test
84 262910e5 PREEMPTED_IR abs
88 262910e5 PREEMPTED_IR abs_called
abs-1-lib.o 3
70 b13b015b PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
15:21:36 UTC ---
Small correction, the empty infinite loop is not split because of preheader
creation, but because of force_single_succ_latches - the condition there causes
edge split even when latch h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-17 15:12:38 UTC ---
> I suppose you are using GNU ld, right?
Yes (gold has not been ported).
> On trunk x86_64 with stock binutils 2.21 I get
>
> > cat 20010124-1.res
> 3
> 20010124-1.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
14:49:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 22995
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22995
gcc46-pr47290.patch
Ugh, cddce pass for empty loop:
:
:
goto ;
creates a preheader:
:
:
:
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47313
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
14:48:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 17 14:48:35 2011
New Revision: 168907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168907
Log:
2011-01-17 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47313
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45934
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45696
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzi...@trash-mail.com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47328
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47306
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47328
Summary: preprocessor handles backslash at the end of a line
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47318
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-17
13:54:46 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 17 13:54:43 2011
New Revision: 168904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168904
Log:
Correct mask operand for AVX mask load/store
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47309
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-apple-darwin9
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #29 from Michael Matz 2011-01-17 13:52:20
UTC ---
> It is, btw, a sign of bad Fortran language design
I don't see that. The frontend merely needs to emit correctly typed
expressions. And that the type of 'a%b%ptr%d' depends on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
13:49:47 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this with the testcase from comment #3 on x86_64-linux
with either gold or GNU ld from stock binutils 2.21 nor without using
the linker plugin.
The only call to l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo