http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47252
Patrick Moran changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47252
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Moran 2011-01-16
04:10:26 UTC ---
Confirmed that the code does in fact work with boost 1.42 on gcc 4.6.0. I
guess that makes this already fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in expand_ternary_op, at
optabs.c:656 with -flto -mno-sse -mxop and
__builtin_fmaf()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-01-16
01:53:25 UTC ---
dave@gsyprf11:~/gcc-4.6/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc$ less 20010124-1.res
3
20010124-1.o 3
70 e5ddcfb3 PREEMPTED_IR main_test
76 e5ddcfb3 PREEMPTED_IR g
101 e5ddcfb3 PREEMPTED_IR f
200
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #13 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-16 01:39:57
UTC ---
Created attachment 22977
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22977
reduced testcase
Doesn't need C++0x mode.
Compiler output:
$ gcc testcase2.C
testcase2.C:3:56: int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #12 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-16 01:36:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > without SSE2 vectorized lexer:
> >
> > ==2012== Invalid read of size 8
> > ==2012==at 0xB43064: search_line_acc_char (lex.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #11 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-16 01:24:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> without SSE2 vectorized lexer:
>
> ==2012== Invalid read of size 8
> ==2012==at 0xB43064: search_line_acc_char (lex.c:263)
That is probably not causing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #9 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-16 01:10:32
UTC ---
without SSE2 vectorized lexer:
==2012== Invalid read of size 8
==2012==at 0xB43064: search_line_acc_char (lex.c:263)
==2012==by 0xB434FE: _cpp_clean_line (lex.c:669)
==2012==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
--- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-16 01:09:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> without SSE2 vectorized lexer:
>
> ==2012== Invalid read of size 8
(...)
ahhh, comment for wrong PR. please ignore.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-16 01:05:20
UTC ---
without SSE2 vectorized lexer:
==2012== Invalid read of size 8
==2012==at 0xB43064: search_line_acc_char (lex.c:263)
==2012==by 0xB434FE: _cpp_clean_line (lex.c:669)
==2012==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #8 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-16 00:38:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> >
> > looks like valgrind problem with sse42 opcode:
> >
>
> Disable SSE4 code to debug this.
i've removed the HAVE_SSE4 stuff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-16 00:18:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> looks like valgrind problem with sse42 opcode:
>
Disable SSE4 code to debug this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #6 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-15 23:27:22
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > (In reply to comment #0)
> > > > current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase:
> > > >
> > > >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #5 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-15 23:20:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > (In reply to comment #0)
> > > current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase:
> > >
> > > accidentally, the --save-temps (or -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-15 23:18:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase:
> >
> > accidentally, the --save-temps (or -std=gnu++98) removes the ICE,
> > s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-15 23:16:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 22976
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22976
preprocessed source.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-15 22:55:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase:
> >
> > accidentally, the --save-temps (or -std=gnu++98) removes the ICE,
> > so how
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-15 22:53:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase:
>
> accidentally, the --save-temps (or -std=gnu++98) removes the ICE,
> so how can i produce a preprocessed sourc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
Summary: [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2011-01-15 21:56:40 UTC ---
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:55:36PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
>
> --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-15
> 17:55
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47307
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-15
21:50:05 UTC ---
> In fact, the array 'lopt' is not initialized in the code, however, the
> compiler
> does not give warning about that. I try the same code with g95, it give a
> warning messag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47310
Summary: -mint8 causes avr-g++ to SIGSEGV
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-01-15 19:31:17
UTC ---
I suppose one thing that could be done is to set opp->file and opp->file_len
regardless of whether mkstemp() succeeds or not, that is lines 1987:1093 in
unix.c, and then in open.c:ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47309
Summary: gcc-4.4.5 fails to build on darwin/ppc due to issues
in boehm-gc GC_test_and_set
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-15
18:16:33 UTC ---
Unpatched on Cygwin on Windows 7, I do not get the segfault. I also do not get
the OS error. The assign error mechanism of the test case picks up that there
is a problem. The windows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-15
17:55:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> We do not list the analogous constants for float, double,
> and long double anywhere in the Fortran manual.
Note: The PR is about libquadmath and libquadmat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #36 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-15
17:21:16 UTC ---
Hmm, the patch makes no difference, but I also see failure in its testcase
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-1.C scan-tree-dump optimized "= B::.*foo"
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-2.C scan-tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46977
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47303
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #35 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-15
16:42:06 UTC ---
I looked briefly into effectivity of the devirtualization bits and they don't
seem to work terribly well.
In GCC 4.3 -O3 copmiled libxul there are 82155 indirect calls.
In mainline -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45934
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-15
16:37:37 UTC ---
Fixed now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47307
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Summary: Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced
from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47307
Summary: be used uninitialized in this function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47276
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47306
Summary: Wrong name of a programming language used
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47276
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-15
15:45:00 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Jan 15 15:44:56 2011
New Revision: 168844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168844
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47276
* ipa.c (functi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-01-15
15:16:59 UTC ---
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
>
> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-15
> 13:35:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-01-15 14:51:00 UTC ---
> Just to be sure, I suspect it would be prudent to set opp->file to NULL and
> opp->file_len to 0 in tempfile() in case fd< 0. Or are we sure that the
> entire
> opp s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33558
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33558
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-15
14:41:12 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jan 15 14:41:09 2011
New Revision: 168843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168843
Log:
2011-01-15 Giovanni Funchal
Jonathan Wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-15
13:35:46 UTC ---
On IRC you've mentioned some TLS test issues, were they caused by this patch or
unrelated?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47059
--- Comment #2 from Rahul Kharche 2011-01-15
12:43:27 UTC ---
This issue also exists on the trunk. I am in the process of bootstrap testing
this for i686-pc-linux-gnu. I will send out this patch once it checks out.
The attached patch is Vs 4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47059
--- Comment #1 from Rahul Kharche 2011-01-15
12:32:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 22974
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22974
Patch Vs 4.5.2 Rev 167088
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47305
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-15
11:05:06 UTC ---
Another note: Seemingly, the current patch does not work, if the default access
mode is "PRIVATE" and only if one explicitly sets the privacy. (Which is a
missed optimization.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-15
11:03:13 UTC ---
Submitted patch: See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00094.html
There were additional restrictions with BIND(C) - and as Ian pointed out, there
are also issues when using the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-15
09:55:21 UTC ---
So, is this now fixed for 4.6+?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
61 matches
Mail list logo